RESUMEN

Objective: Screening questionnaires are one option for identification of at-risk substance use and substance use disorder (SUD) during pregnancy. We report the experience of a single institution following universal implementation of a brief screening tool for self-reported substance use at the first prenatal encounter. Study Design: This is a prospective implementation study evaluating screening for substance use in pregnancy in a large safety net healthcare system. Universal screening with the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) Quick Screen V1.0 was integrated into the electronic medical record (EMR) and administered at the first point of contact with the healthcare system. SUD was identified initially with diagnosis within the EMR by a healthcare provider and was confirmed with toxicology (maternal or neonatal) results corroborating a pattern of substance use and maternal and neonatal ICD-10 codes for SUD. Patients identified with SUD were then classified as moderate or severe SUD based on criteria established by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition. We measured rates of NIDA implementation across different healthcare settings, evaluated NIDA concordance with ascertainment of SUD, and compared adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with moderate and severe SUD. Results: From July 28, 2021, through June 25, 2022, 14,634 unique pregnant individuals accessed care at ambulatory and acute care sites. Universal implementation of the NIDA Quick Screen identified at-risk substance use in 2146 (14.7%) of those who accessed our system, or 17.1% of 12,550 screened across the system, with greater screen completion in ambulatory over acute care settings. SUD was identified in 256 (1.7%) of 14,634 individuals and moderate or severe SUD was identified in 184 (1.3%). Among those with moderate or severe SUD, 90 (48.9%) were NIDA positive, 22 (12.0%) NIDA negative, and 72 (39.1%) unscreened. Of 94 individuals with NIDA discordance or who were unscreened 76 (81%) accessed initial care through an acute care setting. Of 96 individuals with opioid use disorder, 68 (70.8%) were treated with medication-assisted therapy, and 56 (58.3%) were screened with the NIDA Quick Screen. Among delivered individuals with available outcomes, those with moderate or severe SUD were less likely to seek prenatal care (71 (76%) vs 9852 (98%), <0.001)) and more likely to deliver before 37 weeks, (18 (20%) vs 909 (9%), RR (95% CI) 2.13 (1.40, 3.24)) compared to individuals without SUD. Neonates exposed to moderate or severe SUD were more likely to have birth weight <10th centile for gestational age (20 (22%) vs 1147 (12%), RR (95% CI) 1.92 (1.29, 2.85)) and require admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (19 (21%) vs 964 (10%), RR (95%) 1.95 (1.30, 2.93)). Conclusion: Universal screening was implemented across a large public healthcare system at a high rate, with higher rates of implementation in ambulatory settings. NIDA successfully identified at-risk substance use in 17% of the SUD cohort but failed to identify more than 50% of patients with moderate or severe SUD. Patients with moderate and severe SUD accessed care primarily through the emergency department and experienced higher rates of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Future efforts to identify, engage, and retain this highest-risk group are needed.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To analyze adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) among mothers of newborns referred to a hospital's child protection team (CPT) for suspected substance exposure. Researchers hypothesized that a higher prevalence of these mothers have ≥ 4 ACEs than female counterparts in the general population. The study team also explored whether associations existed between type of maternal ACEs and substance use in pregnancy. METHODS: Retrospective review of infant referrals to the CPT in the 3 years after adding an ACEs questionnaire to the consultation process. Bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression models examined associations between prenatal substance use and maternal ACEs prevalence, controlling for demographics. RESULTS: Data from 222 infants (four sets of twins) and 218 mothers were analyzed. Half (50.0%) the infants had withdrawal symptoms. Most (67.0%) women had positive toxicology screens, while 85.0% reported prenatal substance use. Half (50.9%) the mothers reported ≥ 4 ACEs and these individuals had significantly higher odds of cannabinoid use [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 3.7; 95%CI 2.0, 6.9, p < 0.001) than those with < 4 ACEs. A significant association was found between substance use and ACEs in the household challenges category (p = 0.03), especially parental separation/divorce (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: As hypothesized, a higher prevalence of mothers referred to the CPT had ≥ 4 ACEs than women in the general population (50.9% vs. 15.2%), and a large proportion had used substances while pregnant. Routine prenatal ACEs screening and universal, nonpunitive toxicology testing of infants and mothers at birth may provide opportunities for intervention while reducing the transgenerational impact of ACEs.

It is known that Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) put people at risk of poor health choices and outcomes later in life. Pregnant people who have experienced ACEs­especially those with ≥ 4 events ­are at risk for prenatal substance use, exposing their infants in utero. The high prevalence of people in this study with ≥ 4 ACEs whose infants tested positive for substance exposure provides further evidence of the association between ACEs and substance use in pregnancy. Prenatal screening for childhood adversity may identify people at risk and provide opportunities for intervention, thus reducing the transgenerational impact of ACEs.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Toxicology testing is frequently used as a means of gathering objective data about substance use in pregnancy, but little is known about the clinical utility of testing in the peripartum setting. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize the utility of obtaining maternal-neonatal dyad toxicology testing at the time of delivery. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective chart review of all deliveries in a single healthcare system in Massachusetts between 2016 and 2020, and identified deliveries with either maternal or neonatal toxicology testing at delivery. An unexpected result was defined as a positive test for a nonprescribed substance that was not known on the basis of clinical history, self-report, or previous toxicology testing within a week of delivery, excluding results for cannabis. We evaluated the characteristics of maternal-infant dyads with unexpected positive results, unexpected positive results by rationale for testing, changes in clinical management after an unexpected positive test, and maternal outcomes in the year after delivery using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of the 2036 maternal-infant dyads with toxicology tests performed during the study period, there were 80 (3.9%) with an unexpected positive result. Diagnosis of substance use disorder with active use in the last 2 years was the clinical rationale for testing that yielded the greatest number of unexpected positive results (10.7% of total tests ordered for this rationale). Inadequate prenatal care (5.8%), maternal use of medication for opioid use disorder (3.8%), maternal medical indications such as hypertension or placental abruption (2.3%), history of substance use disorder in remission (1.7%), or maternal cannabis use (1.6%) yielded lower rates of unexpected results compared with a recent substance use disorder (within the last 2 years). Solely on the basis of findings from unexpected test results, 42% of dyads were referred to child protective services, 30% of dyads had no documentation of maternal counseling during delivery hospitalization, and 31% did not receive breastfeeding counseling after an unexpected test; 22.8% had monitoring for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. Postpartum, 26 (32.5%) were referred to substance use disorder treatment, 31 (38.8%) attended a postpartum mental health visit, and only 26 (32.5%) attended a postpartum visit. Fifteen individuals (18.8%) were readmitted in the year after delivery, all for substance-related medical complications. CONCLUSION: Unexpected positive toxicology results at delivery were uncommon, particularly when tests were sent for frequently used clinical rationales for testing, suggesting a need to revisit guidelines surrounding appropriateness of indications for toxicology testing. The poor maternal outcomes in this cohort highlight a missed opportunity for maternal connection to counseling and treatment in the peripartum period.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Generations of colonialism, abuse, racism, and systemic trauma have contributed to Indigenous women in Canada bearing the greatest burden of substance use in pregnancy. Stigma associated with substance use in pregnancy translates into multiple barriers to women engaging in care. Care providers have key interactions that can act as a bridge or a barrier to care. METHODS: Patient journey maps were created for women living with substance use (n = 3) and semi-structured interviews (n = 20) were performed to understand perceptions of maternity-care providers around women with substance use in pregnancy at a regional hospital in northern British Columbia. RESULTS: Patient journey maps showed overall emotions of hurt, loss, judgment, and anger at their interface with health care during pregnancy. Providers described gaps in knowledge of substance use in pregnancy and harm reduction. Although care providers overall perceived themselves to be providing compassionate care without bias, the patient journey maps suggested profound judgment on behalf of providers. CONCLUSION: Ongoing cultural humility and trauma-informed care training along the continuum of care is critical to impacting discrepancies between perceived lack of bias and harm in patient interactions. Acknowledgment of systemic racism's impact on provision of maternity care is critical for health system change.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The public health crisis of pregnant women being exposed to drugs of abuse and of its impact on their unborn children continues to grow at an alarming rate globally. The state of pregnancy is unique, with physiological changes that can lead to changes in the way drugs are handled by the body in both pharmacokinetics and response. These changes place the pregnant woman, fetus, and newborn infant at risk, as many of these drugs can cross the placenta and into breast milk. The substances most commonly linked to harmful effects include alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, stimulants, and opioids. The pharmacological and toxicological changes caused by in utero exposure or breastfeeding exposure are difficult to study, and the full extent of the mechanisms involved are not fully understood. However, these changes can significantly affect the risks of substance abuse and influence optimal treatment of pregnant women with a substance use disorder. In addition, newborns who were exposed to drugs of abuse in utero can experience withdrawal syndromes. Pharmacological management in infants is used to guide and treat withdrawal symptoms, with the goal being to improve the infant's sleep, eating, and comfort. Several barriers may prevent pregnant women from seeking help for substance use, including stigma and interactions with the legal system. Understanding changes in pharmacology, including pharmacokinetic changes that happen during pregnancy, is essential for anticipating the extent of maternal exposure and neonatal adverse effects.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Indigenous women are overrepresented among people who use (PWU) methamphetamine (MA) due to colonialism and intergenerational trauma. Prenatal methamphetamine exposure (PME) is increasing as the number of PWUMA of childbearing age grows. Yet impacts of MA in pregnancy and effective interventions are not yet well understood. OBJECTIVE: We conducted an environmental scan of published and grey literature (2010-2020) to determine effects of MA use in pregnancy for mothers and their offspring, effective interventions and implications for Indigenous women. SEARCH STRATEGY: A strategic search of Ovid Medline, Embase, ProQuest-Public Health and CINAHL databases identified academic literature, while Google and ProQuest-Public Health identified grey literature. SELECTION CRITERIA: Article selection was based on titles, abstracts and keywords. The time frame captured recent MA composition and excluded literature impacted by coronavirus disease 2019. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data extracted from 80 articles identified 463 results related to 210 outcomes, and seven interventions. Analysis focused on six categories: maternal, neonatal/infant, cognitive, behavioral, neurological, and interventions. MAIN RESULTS: Maternal outcomes were more congruent than child outcomes. The most prevalent outcomes were general neonatal/infant outcomes. CONCLUSION: A lack of Indigenous-specific research on PME and interventions highlights a need for future research that incorporates relevant historical and sociocultural contexts.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Compared with opioid use disorder, methamphetamine use is a public health crisis that has limited evidence-based pharmacologic interventions for long-term treatment. The prevalence of methamphetamine use during pregnancy is growing and contributes to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Because of widespread stigma and social complexities associated with methamphetamine use during pregnancy, these patients often experience limited prenatal care, further contributing to poor outcomes. In public health circles, harm reduction describes a framework for conceptualizing substance use by championing health promotion and the safest use of substances, as opposed to the unachievable goal of abstinence. There is limited evidence supporting the application of harm reduction in this population. We call for action and research to investigate how the progressive concept of harm reduction might be applied to mitigate adverse outcomes for obstetrical patients who use methamphetamine.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Each year in the United States, approximately half a million reproductive-aged women are afflicted with major depression. Pregnant and postpartum women can be reluctant to openly disclose their suffering related to depression and other stigmatizing illnesses (eg, mood and anxiety disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder, and substance use disorders) and subsequently remain symptomatic with no relief. Maternal mortality related to these conditions is significant, with maternal suicide and overdose-related death peaking between 7 and 12 months postpartum. Geographic challenges in accessing perinatal mental health experts can be overcome through the use of telepsychiatry services using a secure video platform (telemedicine).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In the United States, the historical condemnation and punitive legal consequences of substance use during pregnancy-ranging from incarceration to termination of parental custody of a newborn-render pregnant women in state of biosocial precarity. Yet pregnant women who use illicit substances who desire to parent must generate a legible narrative for bureaucratic groups, such as Child Protective Services, through engagement with biomedical care in order to demonstrate parental capacity. Based on longitudinal interviews with pregnant women who were actively using illicit substances and attempting to parent after delivery, we posit that the relationship between biosocial precarity and biomedical care is a procedural interaction that is rooted in the potential to parent, described as the ability to have a "take-home baby." In order to achieve this goal, the need for engagement in biomedical care and the creation of a biomedical narrative, described as a "résumé for the baby" is required. The relationship between care and biosocial precarity is a unique, underdeveloped concept within medical anthropology and has important consequences not only for the ethical turn within anthropology, but also how applied researchers consider engagement with this highly marginalized, vulnerable population.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) are primary prevention tools to reduce substance use disorders (SUD) and sequelae. Evidence regarding perceptions of PDMPs from different primary care providers, which may impact PDMP utilization for women, is unavailable. OBJECTIVE: To examine perceived PDMP effectiveness among obstetrician-gynecologists (OB/GYNs) compared to primary care physicians (PCPs). METHODS: Independent surveys of PDMP users in Florida, Kentucky, and California were evaluated based on a Likert-type item to assess perception of PDMP effectiveness in reducing prescription drug abuse and diversion. Response distributions of OB/GYNs versus PCPs were compared using chi-square tests. RESULTS: In Florida, there were 41 OB/GYN and 511 PCP respondents; Kentucky, 46 OB/GYNs and 265 PCPs; and California, 41 OB/GYNs and 162 PCPs. In each state OB/GYNs viewed PDMPs as less effective, positive, or useful compared to PCPs (p ≤ 0.01, all states): Florida: 64.1% OB/GYN vs. 83.7% PCP "agree positive impact"; Kentucky: 45.0% OB/GYN vs. 68.5% PCP "effective". California: 73.2% OB/GYN vs. 86.4% PCP "useful". CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest OB/GYNs view their state's PDMP as less effective than do PCPs, which may present barriers to PDMP utilization and decrease opportunities for SUD interventions. Engagement of all healthcare team members is needed to inform future strategies and policies to increase PDMP effectiveness.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is a collection of symptoms that occurs primarily due to antenatal opioid exposure. National data on incidence, hospital resource utilization, and demographic features of NAS have not been previously described for Canada. METHODS: Secondary analysis was performed with data from hospitals in all Canadian provinces and territories, excluding Quebec. Infants with NAS were identified by searching for ICD-10-CA code P96.1 in the Canadian Institute for Health Information's discharge abstract database. We examined incidence, hospital beds occupied per day, length of stay (fiscal 2003-2014), hospital costs, and demographic features (due to data availability, limited to fiscal 2010-2014). RESULTS: The incidence of NAS in Canada tripled between 2003 and 2014 (1.8-5.4 per 1000 live births), with an average annual increase of 0.33 cases per 1000 live births (95% CI 0.31, 0.34). Provincial incidence in 2014 ranged from 2.7 (Alberta) to 9.7 (New Brunswick) per 1000 live births. Between 2010 and 2014 total and mean per-patient costs rose from $15.7 to $26.9 million CAD and $14,629 to $17,367 CAD, respectively, with substantial inter-provincial variation in expenditure. Mean length of stay was 14.4 days in 2003 and 14.8 days in 2014, and beds occupied per day rose from 19.7 in 2003 to 69.4 in 2014. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of NAS is increasing in Canada with associated rise in healthcare resource utilization. Inter-provincial variability in incidence and resource utilization underscores the need to further explore best practices for cost-effective prevention and management of NAS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In spite of the growing knowledge and understanding of addiction as a chronic relapsing medical condition, individuals with substance use disorders (SUD) continue to experience stigmatization. Pregnant women who use substances suffer additional stigma as their use has the potential to cause fetal harm, calling into question their maternal fitness and often leading to punitive responses. Punishing pregnant women denies the integral interconnectedness of the maternal-fetal dyad. Linking substance use with maternal unfitness is not supported by the balance of the scientific evidence regarding the actual harms associated with substance use during pregnancy. Such linkage adversely impacts maternal, child, and family health by deterring pregnant women from seeking both obstetrical care and SUD treatment. Pregnant women who use substances deserve compassion and care, not pariah-status and punishment.