RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Temporary stoma formation is common in Crohn's disease (CD), while stoma reversal is associated with postoperative morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of split stoma reversal, SSR (i.e., exteriorization of proximal and distal ends of the stoma through a small common opening) and end stoma closure, ESC (i.e., the proximal stump externalized, and distal end localized abdominally. METHODS: Patients with CD who underwent stoma reversal surgeries between January 2017 and December 2021 were included. Demographic, clinical, and postoperative data were collected and analyzed to evaluate outcomes of reversal surgery. RESULTS: A total of 255 patients who underwent stoma reversal surgeries met the inclusion criteria. SSR was superior to ESC in terms of operative time (80.0 vs. 120.0, p = 0.0004), intraoperative blood loss volume (20.0 vs. 100.0, p = 0.0002), incision length (3.0 vs. 15.0, p < 0.0001), surgical wound classification (0 vs. 8.3%, p = 0.04), postoperative hospital stay (7.0 vs. 9.0, p = 0.0007), hospital expense (45.6 vs. 54.2, p = 0.0003), and postoperative complications (23.8% vs. 44.3%, p = 0.0040). Although patients in the ESC group experienced more surgical recurrence than those in the SSR group (8.3% vs. 3.2%) during the follow-up, the Kaplan-Meier curve analysis revealed no statistical difference (p = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: The split stoma can be recommended when stoma construction is indicated in patients with Crohn's disease.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Reoperación , Estomas Quirúrgicos , Humanos , Enfermedad de Crohn/cirugía , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estomas Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tempo Operativo , Ileostomía/efectos adversos , Ileostomía/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been described in the early post-operative phase after stoma reversal. This systematic review aimed to describe the incidence of CDI after stoma reversal and to identify pre-operative variables correlated with an increased risk of infection. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines in March 2024. Manuscripts were included if reported at least one patient with CDI-associated diarrhoea following stoma reversal (colostomy/ileostomy). The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of CDI; the secondary outcome was the comparison of clinical variables (age, sex, time to stoma reversal, neo-adjuvant and adjuvant therapies after index colorectal procedure) in CDI-positive versus CDI-negative patients. A meta-analysis was performed when at least three studies reported on those variables. RESULTS: Out of 43 eligible manuscripts, 1 randomized controlled trial and 10 retrospective studies were selected, including 17,857 patients (2.1% CDI). Overall, the mean age was 64.3 ± 11.6 years in the CDI group and 61.5 ± 12.6 years in the CDI-negative group (p = 0.51), with no significant difference in sex (p = 0.34). Univariable analyses documented that the mean time to stoma reversal was 53.9 ± 19.1 weeks in CDI patients and 39.8 ± 15.0 weeks in CDI-negative patients (p = 0.40) and a correlation between neo-adjuvant and adjuvant treatments with CDI (p < 0.001). A meta-analysis was performed for time to stoma reversal, age, sex, and neo-adjuvant therapies disclosing no significant differences for CDI (stoma delay, MD 11.59; 95%CI 24.32-1.13; age, MD 0.97; 95%CI 2.08-4.03; sex, OR1.11; 95%CI 0.88-1.41; neo-adjuvant, OR0.81; 95%CI 0.49-1.35). Meta-analysis including patients who underwent adjuvant therapy evidenced a higher risk of CDI (OR 2.88; 95%CI 1.01-8.17, p = 0.11). CONCLUSION: CDI occurs in approximately 2.1% of patients after stoma reversal. Although a trend of increased delay in stoma reversal and a correlation with chemotherapy were documented in CDI patients, the use of adjuvant therapy was the only possible risk factor documented on meta-analysis. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023484704.
Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium , Estomas Quirúrgicos , Humanos , Infecciones por Clostridium/etiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/microbiología , Estomas Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Estomas Quirúrgicos/microbiología , Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Incidencia , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano , Ileostomía/efectos adversos , Colostomía/efectos adversosRESUMEN
AIM: Temporary stoma formation remains a common part of modern-day colorectal surgical operations. At the time of reversal, a second procedure is required when the bowel is anastomosed and the musculature is closed. The rate of incisional hernia at these sites is 30%-35% with conventional suture closure. Mesh placement at this site is therefore an attractive option to reduce hernia risk, particularly as new mesh types, such as biosynthetic meshes, are available. The aim of this work was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the use of mesh for prophylaxis of incisional hernia at stoma closure and to explore the outcome measures used by each of the included studies to establish whether they are genuinely patient-centred. METHOD: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the published literature regarding the use of mesh at stoma site closure operations. Comprehensive literature searches of major electronic databases were performed by an information specialist. Screening of search results was undertaken using standard systematic review principles. Data from selected studies were input into an Excel file. Meta-analysis of the results of included studies was conducted using RevMan software (v.5.4). Randomized controlled trial (RCT) and non-RCT data were analysed separately. RESULTS: Eleven studies with a total of 2008 patients were selected for inclusion, with various mesh types used. Of the included studies, one was a RCT, seven were nonrandomized comparative studies and three were case series. The meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies shows that the rate of incisional hernia was lower in the mesh reinforcement group compared with the suture closure group (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.12-0.37) while rates of infection and haematoma/seroma were similar between groups (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.41-1.21 and OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.63-1.80, respectively). The results of the RCT were in line with those of the nonrandomized studies. CONCLUSION: Current evidence indicates that mesh is safe and reduces incisional hernia. However, this is not commonly adopted into current clinical practice and the literature has minimal patient-reported outcome measures. Future work should explore the reasons for such slow adoption as well as the preferences of patients in terms of outcome measures that matter most to them.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Incisional , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Estomas Quirúrgicos , Humanos , Hernia Incisional/prevención & control , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Estomas Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
TECHNIQUE: (1) A four-pointed star-shaped incision was made to separate the skin around the stoma intestine. (2) The stoma intestine was resected, and side-to-side or end-to-side anastomosis was performed to restore the continuity of the intestine. (3) The peritoneum and rectus sheath should be closed using continuous full-thickness sutures. (4) The subcutaneous fat layer and dermis layer should be sutured using purse-string sutures. Two holes should be made in the center of the sutured area. (5) The cross should be sutured intermittently on all four sides using 1-2 stitches. (6) A rubber strip should be placed in the center of the small hole. RESULTS: The presence of a small hole in the center of the incision and the use of a rubber strip for drainage facilitate early fluid drainage. The design of a cross-stitched skin incision helps reduce local tension. CONCLUSION: The modified cross-suture technique may reduce postoperative incision infections and associated pain, which is a suitable incision treatment method for loop stoma reversal.
Asunto(s)
Pared Abdominal , Estomas Quirúrgicos , Humanos , Goma , Técnicas de Sutura , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , SuturasRESUMEN
Surgery is the only treatment for parastomal hernia (PH). When possible, stoma closure is the best way to manage this type of hernia, however, whether to perform it in a single approach with abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) is still debatable. A 58-year-old woman with a type IV PH with loss of domain was submitted to preoperative optimization [botulinum toxin type A and progressive pneumoperitoneum (PPP)], followed by simultaneous stoma closure and AWR. Hospital discharge was on the eighth day with no complications. Six months later, no clinical evidence of recurrence or other complication was observed. Large PHs are technically challenging. Stoma closure and simultaneous AWR increase surgical risk. Preoperative optimization with a combination of adjuvants (including PPP) is feasible in PH and may overcome technical complexity, even though patient selection remains the key when choosing a PH repair with synchronous stoma closure.
RESUMEN
Low anterior resection for rectal cancer often includes a diverting loop-ileostomy to avoid the severe consequences of anastomotic leakage. Reversal of the stoma is often delayed, which can incur health-care costs on different levels. The aim is to, on population basis, determine stoma-related costs, and to investigate habitual and socioeconomic factors associated to the level of cost. Multi-register design with data from the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry, the National Prescribed Drug Register, Statistics Sweden and cost-administrative data from the National Board of Health and Welfare. Data was gathered for 3564 patients with rectal cancer surgery 2007 to 2013, for 3 years following the surgery. Factors influencing the cost of inpatient care and stoma-related consumables were assessed with linear regression analyses. All monthly costs were higher for females (consumables P < .001 and in-patient care P = .031). Post-secondary education (P = .003) and younger age (P = .020) was associated with a higher cost for consumables while suffering a surgical complication was associated with increased cost for inpatient care (P < .001). Patients who had their stoma longer had lower monthly costs (consumables P < .001 and in-patient care P < .001). Female gender, longer duration of stoma, young age, and higher education are associated with higher costs for the care of a diverting stoma after rectal cancer surgery. This study does not allow for analyses of causality but the results together with deepened analyses of underlying reasons form a proper basis for decisions in health care planning and allocation of resources. These findings may have implications on the debate of equal care for all.
Asunto(s)
Ileostomía , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Femenino , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Recto/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aims to identify which risk factors are associated with the appearance of an incisional hernia in a stoma site after its closure. This in the sake of identifying which patients would benefit from a preventative intervention and thus start implementing a cost-effective protocol for prophylactic mesh placement in high-risk patients. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane library, and ScienceDirect was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting incidence, risk factors, and follow-up time for appearance of incisional hernia after stoma site closure were included. A fixed-effects and random effects models were used to calculate odds ratios' estimates and standardized mean values with their respective grouped 95% confidence interval. This to evaluate the association between possible risk factors and the appearance of incisional hernia after stoma site closure. RESULTS: Seventeen studies totaling 2899 patients were included. Incidence proportion between included studies was of 16.76% (CI95% 12.82; 21.62). Out of the evaluated factors higher BMI (p = 0.0001), presence of parastomal hernia (p = 0.0023), colostomy (p = 0,001), and end stoma (p = 0.0405) were associated with the appearance of incisional hernia in stoma site after stoma closure, while malignant disease (p = 0.0084) and rectum anterior resection (p = 0.0011) were found to be protective factors. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic mesh placement should be considered as an effective preventative intervention in high-risk patients (obese patients, patients with parastomal hernia, colostomy, and end stoma patients) with the goal of reducing incisional hernia rates in stoma site after closure while remaining cost-effective.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Incisional , Estomas Quirúrgicos , Humanos , Hernia Incisional/epidemiología , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Hernia Incisional/prevención & control , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Estomas Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Colostomía/efectos adversos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing stoma reversal may experience surgical site infections and poor scarring. A purse-string closure approach may lower the incidence of surgical site infections due to its inherent ability to drain wound exudates. This study compared the frequency of surgical site infections and the cosmetic outlook of the scar among patients undergoing stoma reversal with linear and purse-string skin closure techniques. SETTING AND DURATION: Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Child Health Sciences Lahore with a duration of one year (June 2021 to June 2022). METHODS: This randomized controlled trial (TCTR20210417001) was conducted with IRB approval. A total of 124 patients undergoing stoma reversal were randomly assigned to two groups (62 in each): Group A received conventional linear skin closure, while Group B received purse-string wound closure. The study evaluated surgical site infection, cosmetic outcome, and length of stay. RESULTS: Both groups had similar age, gender ratio, indication for surgery, and length of stay. The purse-string group had a significantly lower incidence of SSI (38.7 % vs. 14.5 %; p = 0.002) and better scar quality (Manchester scar scale showed 'good' scar quality in 63 % of patients vs. 22.6 % in the linear closure group, p-value <0.0001). CONCLUSION: The purse-string technique for skin closure resulted in fewer surgical site infections and improved scar appearance.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Closure of temporary diverting ostomies is commonly preceded by an endoscopic study of the colonic mucosa and anastomosis, despite lacking evidence of its relevance and impact on subsequent operative management. AIM: We sought to determine the incidence of pathological findings and therefore evaluate the clinical benefit of routine pre-operative endoscopy in asymptomatic patients, hypothesizing sole evaluation of the anastomotic integrity to be sufficient in these cases. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all adult patients with ostomy installations who were followed up for potential reversal surgery between 2002 and 2020 at the University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland. Main outcome measures were the incidence of endoscopically identified pathological findings in the asymptomatic case cohort and their impact on the subsequent course of treatment. RESULTS: Pre-procedural endoscopic data of 187 cases evaluated for ostomy closure were evaluated. Relevant mucosal findings in the asymptomatic cohort were documented in 26.3% and findings at the anastomotic site detected in 8.7%. A change in subsequent surgical management was noted in 10 patients of the entire cohort (5.3%) and in 9 (5.1%) of all asymptomatic cases. Upon multivariate analyses, the age range of 51 to 60 years old was found to be significantly linked to the presence of endoscopic findings entailing a change in patient management. CONCLUSION: Our findings strongly suggest ostomy closure surgery without previous assessment of the bowel mucosa by means of endoscopy to be acceptable in asymptomatic patients. However, we found it to be indicated in all patients meeting the screening criteria for colorectal carcinoma.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of Clostridium Difficile infection (CDI) after stoma reversal in patients who underwent transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (TaTME) and to evaluate variables correlated with this post-operative infection. METHODS: Patients who underwent stoma reversal surgery following TaTME for rectal cancer between 2015 and 2023 at a high-volume Institution, were retrospectively reviewed for the post-operative occurrence of diarrhea and in-hospital CDI (positive toxin in the stools). Patients were divided into the following subgroups according to the post-operative course: Group A-no clinical symptoms; Group B-mild diarrhea (< 10 evacuations/day); Group C-severe watery diarrhea (> 10 evacuations/day) with CDI negative; and Group D-severe watery diarrhea (> 10 evacuations/day) CDI positive. Clinical and laboratory data were analyzed for their correlation with CDI. A machine learning approach was used to determine predictors of diarrhea following stoma reversal. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were selected, of whom 79 were assessed as Group A, 16 Group B, 25 Group C and 6 (4.8%) Group D. Univariable analysis documented that delayed stoma reversal correlated with CDI (Group A mean interval 44.6 weeks vs. Group D 68.4 weeks, p 0.01). The machine learning analysis confirmed the delay in stoma closure as a probability factor of presenting diarrhea; also, diarrhea probability was 80.5% in males, 77.8% in patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy, and 63.9% in patients who underwent adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Stoma reversal surgery can result in moderate rate of in-hospital CDI. Time-to stoma reversal is a crucial variable significantly related with this adverse outcome.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Clostridium , Neoplasias del Recto , Estomas Quirúrgicos , Masculino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estomas Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Diarrea/epidemiología , Diarrea/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine oncologic outcome in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (aEOC) receiving an intestinal stoma (IS) at the time of cytoreductive surgery (CRS), probability of stoma reversal (SR) and variables affecting odds of SR. METHODS: This population-based cohort study included all women diagnosed with aEOC between 2009 and 2018 in the Stockholm/Gotland Region of Sweden. The association between IS formation at CRS and survival was analyzed with proportional hazards regression yielding hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for predefined confounders. Cumulative incidence functions, with death or recurrence as competing risk, were used to estimate chance of SR. The association between clinical factors and SR was analyzed with logistic regression yielding odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI. RESULTS: The final analysis included 888 women undergoing CRS for aEOC. Of these, 129 (14,5%) received an IS of which 74% (n = 95) were defunctioning and 26% (n = 34) permanent. IS was associated with an increased hazard of death (HR 1.30, CI 95%, 1.05-1.61; p = 0.02) in the univariate analysis, however not in the adjusted analysis. The probability of SR of defunctioning IS within 2 years was 48% (95% CI, 38-58). Median time to SR was 10 months. High surgical complexity score (SCS) was associated with increased odds of reversal (OR 3.43, 95% CI, 1.06-11.05; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: IS formation does not seem to affect prognosis in women with aEOC. We could not identify any factor, known at time of CRS, that may predict the odds of SR except a high SCS.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Estudios de Cohortes , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSI) are common complications after surgery, which cause other complications and increase medical costs. However, the effect of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for the prevention of SSI at stoma reversal remains inconclusive, with controversial results. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of NPWT following stoma reversal in colorectal surgery to prevent SSI and other wound complications. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for articles published up to July 2022 and identified relevant studies reporting the NPWT administration following stoma reversal in colorectal surgery compared with non-pressure dressing. The primary outcome was the incidence of SSI, and the secondary outcomes were hematoma, seroma, and length of hospital stay (LOS). RESULTS: Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, with 825 patients with (n = 310) or without (n = 515) NPWT. Pooled SSI rate was lower in the NPWT group than in the non-pressure dressing group (OR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.84; P = 0.01). There was no significant effect on hematoma (OR = 0.21; 95% CI: 0.03, 1.27; P = 0.09), seroma (OR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.05, 1.28; P = 0.1) and LOS (MD = -0.16, 95% CI: -0.83, 0.51; P = 0.64). CONCLUSION: The use of NPWT following stoma reversal in colorectal surgery reduced the incidence of SSI. However, this conclusion needs to be interpreted with caution, and further studies should be conducted to confirm in higher-quality RCTs.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Colorrectal , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Humanos , Hematoma , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/efectos adversos , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/métodos , Seroma , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & controlRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of primary versus secondary closure of stoma reversal skin wound in terms of wound infection. Methods: The study was conducted at Surgical B Unit of Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan, from January 1 to December 31, 2020, and comprised adult patients of either gender undergoing stoma reversal. The patients were randomised into primary closure group A and secondary closure group B. Surgical procedure was similar in both the groups except the skin closure technique. In group A, skin was closed with interrupted polypropylene sutures, while in group B, wound was dressed with saline-soaked gauze daily using aseptic technique and was allowed to heal by secondary intention or delayed primary closure later on. Postoperatively, the wound was assessed for infection till 30th postoperative day or complete wound healing. Data was analysed using SPSS 16. RESULTS: Of the 50 patients, 35(70%) were males and 15(30%) were females. The overall mean age was 28±1.65years. There were 25(50%) patients in each of the two groups. There were 19(76%) males and 6(24%) females in group A with a mean age of 32±2.8years. There were 16(64%) males and 9(36%) females in group B with a mean age of 23±3.5years. Overall, 10(20%) patients had wound-site infections; 9(36%) in group A versus 1(4%) in group B (p=0.005). Frequency of wound infection with respect to gender, type of stoma and length of hospital stay was not significant (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Secondary skin closure was found to be associated with significantly reduced wound infection rate after stoma reversal. CClinical Trial Number: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04785404.
Asunto(s)
Estomas Quirúrgicos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Masculino , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Ileostomía , Técnicas de Cierre de Heridas , ColostomíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Anal cancer is a rare form of gastrointestinal malignancy, and treatment is often confined to specialist centres. It has a high cure rate with non-surgical approach resulting in organ preservation. The current accepted schedule is chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin with radiotherapy doses between 50.4 and 53.2 Gray in 28 fractions. METHODS: This study included patients who had histological confirmation of squamous cell carcinoma and had completed the full CRT course for anal cancer between 2008 and 2018 in our centre. Data was collected retrospectively assessing demographics, staging, surgery, relapse, latest follow-up, date of death, CRT regimen and TNM stage. Outcome data and stoma reversal rate were analysed. RESULTS: Overall, 87 patients were included in the study. At diagnosis 94.3% of patients had T2-T4 disease, and 44.8% had involvement of positive loco-regional lymph nodes. Overall survival (OS) probability at 1, 3 and 5 years were 98.8%, 87.4% and 83.7%, respectively. Results also revealed a statistically significant effect of time from diagnosis to the start of radiotherapy on OS (p = 0.039). Sixty-nine (79.3%) patients achieved complete remission at last follow-up. Twenty-one patients (24%) underwent surgery for a de-functioning stoma, and only five of these patients subsequently received stoma reversal surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our data reflects the efficacy of CRT as the primary modality of treatment in the management of anal squamous cell carcinoma with effective organ preservation and disease control. Early stoma reversal may also enhance quality of life.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Ano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia , Neoplasias del Ano/terapia , Neoplasias del Ano/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cisplatino/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: Up to a third of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of appendiceal or colorectal origin receive a stoma during primary surgery. Stoma reversal provides an opportunity for second-look surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) or high-grade appendiceal cancer (AC) from 2006 to 2021 from our database. A total of 34 consecutive stoma closure patients with no evidence of preoperative disease recurrence (tumor markers and CT scans) were compared with 141 consecutive re-do CRS/HIPEC patients with known recurrence. RESULTS: Eleven patients (32.4%) were identified to have peritoneal recurrence at stoma closure. Time between first and second CRS was 12 months (4 to 64.2) in the stoma closure group vs. 24.6 months (5.8 to 119.8) in the re-do group, while median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 4 (3 to 6) vs. 8 (1 to 39), respectively (p=0.0143). CONCLUSION: Second-look laparotomy during stoma closure identified unexpected PC in 32.4% of our patients with significantly lower PCI than planned re-do operations.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Apéndice , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias Peritoneales , Neoplasias del Apéndice/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Apéndice/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Terapia Combinada , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/efectos adversos , Humanos , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Segunda Cirugía , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess the incidence of incisional hernia (IH) across various type of incisions in colorectal surgery (CS) creating a map of evidence to define research trends, gaps and areas of future interest. METHODS: Systematic review of PubMed and Scopus from 2010 onwards. Studies included both open (OS) and laparoscopic (LS). The primary outcome was incidence of IH 12 months after index procedure, secondary outcomes were the study features and their influence on reported proportion of IH. Random effects models were used to calculate pooled proportions. Meta-regression models were performed to explore heterogeneity. RESULTS: Ninetyone studies were included reporting 6473 IH. The pooled proportions of IH for OS were 0.35 (95% CI 0.27-0.44) I2 0% in midline laparotomies and 0.02 (95% CI 0.00-0.07), I2 52% for off-midline. In case of LS the pooled proportion of IH for midline extraction sites were 0.10 (95% CI 0.07-0.16), I2 58% and 0.04 (95% CI 0.03-0.06), I2 86% in case of off-midline. In Port-site IH was 0.02 (95% CI 0.01-0.04), I2 82%, and for single incision surgery (SILS) of 0.06-95% CI 0.02-0.15, I2 81%. In case of stoma reversal sites was 0.20 (95% CI 0.16-0.24). CONCLUSION: Midline laparotomies and stoma reversal sites are at high risk for IH and should be considered in research of preventive strategies of closure. After laparoscopic approach IH happens mainly by extraction sites incisions specially midline and also represent an important area of analysis.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Colorrectal , Hernia Incisional , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Cirugía Colorrectal/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Humanos , Hernia Incisional/epidemiología , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Hernia Incisional/prevención & control , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are an estimated 100,000 cases of abdominal injury (ABI) in the USA, annually resulting in over $12 billion in direct medical cost and $18 billion in lost productivity. This study assesses the timeliness, safety, and efficacy of the surgical management of abdominal injuries (ABIs), hollow viscus injuries (HVIs), and colonic injuries (CIs) for patients residing in New York State (NYS). METHODS: Using data from NYS's Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS), we identified all trauma patients with ABI admitted between 2006 and 2015. We subdivided ABI into HVI and CI using diagnosis and procedure codes and examined processes of care and outcomes adjusting for patient characteristics, injury severity score, structural, and process indicators. RESULTS: We identified 31,043 hospitalized patients with ABI, 71% were incurred from blunt forces. Most patients with ABI (72%) were treated at a Level I/II trauma center (TC) and 7% patients were transferred to Level I/II TC. Failure to be treated at Level I/II TC was associated with 16% increased hazard of death. HVI was diagnosed in 23% of ABI patients (n = 7294); 18% experienced delayed hollow viscus repair (dHVR); dHVR was associated with a 76% increased hazard of death. CI was diagnosed in 9% of ABI patients (n = 2921) and 18% experienced dHVR. Seventy-five percent of CI were repaired primarily (n = 1354). Less than 37% of stomas were reversed by 4 years of index trauma. CONCLUSION: Most abdominal trauma in NYS was caused by motor vehicle accidents, falls, and assault. dHVR and not being treated at Level I/II TC were associated with worse outcomes. More research is needed to reduce under-triage and delays in the operative treatment of blunt abdominal trauma.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Heridas no Penetrantes , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , New York/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: Formation of stoma during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is often performed to reduce the risk of anastomotic leak. Subsequent stoma reversal provides a unique opportunity for second-look surgery to detect early peritoneal recurrence. Current surveillance methods often fail to detect disease early, including imaging and biochemical markers. In our study, we examined the safety and efficacy of second-look surgery for detection and treatment of disease recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 35 patients undergoing stoma reversal from 2015 to 2019 with negative pre-operative imaging. RESULTS: A total of 37% of cases had disease recurrence, with a median peritoneal cancer index of 4. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in all patients. The majority of patients (77%) suffered minor complications only. Median length of hospital stay was 12 days. CONCLUSION: Second-look surgery detects early disease recurrence and is a safe alternative to conventional screening methods post primary CRS/HIPEC for PC. Long-term, routine second-look surgery can improve survival.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Segunda Cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma/epidemiología , Carcinoma/patología , Carcinoma/terapia , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Neoplasias Peritoneales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Segunda Cirugía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Carga TumoralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To reduce the surgical site infections (SSI), the purse-string closure technique has been widely performed and has also been recommended in adult stoma reversal. However, for children, some debate still exists. This study aims to compare the SSI rates in children between the purse-string and the linear for the skin closure of stoma reversal. METHODS: The data were collected from pediatric patients, who had undergone either purse-string or linear closure for elective surgery of stoma reversal from two university hospitals between January 2016 and December 2019. RESULTS: The purse-string and linear closure had been performed on 31 and 45 patients, respectively. At 30 days after surgery, three patients in the purse-string closure group had developed SSI compared to 14 patients in the linear closure group (9.7 vs. 31.1%, p = 0.028). Furthermore, there had been no significant difference in the overall post-operative complications. In multivariate analysis, the SSI had been significantly lower in patients with purse-string closure (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05-0.86, p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: By employing the purse-string closure technique for skin closure of stoma reversal, there had been a significantly lower SSI rate compared to linear closure with no difference in the length of hospital stay.
Asunto(s)
Estomas Quirúrgicos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Adulto , Niño , Colostomía , Humanos , Ileostomía , Tiempo de Internación , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Técnicas de SuturaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Stoma site incisional hernias after ileostomy closure are complex hernias that can be associated with abdominal pain, discomfort, and a diminished quality of life. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of incisional hernia (IH) following temporary ileostomy reversal in patients undergoing colorectal surgery, and the risk factors associated with its development. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-centre, cohort study of patients undergoing ileostomy reversal between January 2010 and December 2016. Comorbidities, operative characteristics, comparison between early and late ileostomy closure and postoperative complications were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 202 consecutive patients were prospectively evaluated (median follow-up 46 months; range: 12-109). Stoma site incisional hernia occurred in 23% of patients (n = 47), diagnosed by physical examination or imaging tests. The reasons for the primary surgery were colorectal cancer (n = 141, 69.8%), inflammatory bowel disease (n = 14, 6.9%), emergency surgery (n = 35, 17.3%), and other conditions (n = 12, 5.9%). Secondary outcomes: a statistically significant risk factors for developing an IH was obesity (higher BMI) (OR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05-1.26) p = .003). CONCLUSIONS: 23% of patients developed surgical site IH, a higher BMI being the only risk factor found to be statistically significant in the development of an incisional hernia.