Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Lipids Health Dis ; 19(1): 111, 2020 May 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32460779

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several studies have investigated the association between non-statin lipid-lowering therapy and regression of atherosclerosis. However, these studies were mostly small and their results were not always robust. The objectives were: (1) to define if a dual lipid-lowering therapy (statin + non-statin drugs) is associated with coronary atherosclerosis regression, estimated by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS); (2) to assess the association between dual lipid-lowering-induced changes in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) levels and atherosclerosis regression. METHODS: A meta-analysis including trials of non-statin lipid-lowering therapy, reporting LDL-C, non-HDL-C and total atheroma volume (TAV) with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up was performed. The primary endpoint was defined as the change in TAV measured from baseline to follow-up, comparing groups of subjects on statins alone versus combination of statin and non-statin drugs. The random-effects model and meta-regression were performed. RESULTS: Eight eligible trials of non-statin lipid-lowering drugs (1759 patients) were included. Overall, the dual lipid-lowering therapy was associated with a significant reduction in TAV [- 4.0 mm3 (CI 95% -5.4 to - 2.6)]; I2 = 0%]. The findings were similar in the stratified analysis according to the lipid-lowering drug class (ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors). In the meta-regression, a 10% decrease in LDL-C or non-HDL-C levels, was associated, respectively, with 1.0 mm3 and 1.1 mm3 regressions in TAV. CONCLUSION: These data suggests the addition of ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors to statin therapy results in a significant regression of TAV. Reduction of coronary atherosclerosis observed with non-statin lipid-lowering therapy is associated to the degree of LDL-C and non-HDL-C lowering. Therefore, it seems reasonable to achieve lipid goals according to cardiovascular risk and regardless of the lipid-lowering strategy used (statin monotherapy or dual treatment).


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Ezetimiba/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Hipercolesterolemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/farmacología , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/sangre , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/etiología , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Hipercolesterolemia/complicaciones , Inhibidores de PCSK9 , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía
3.
J Clin Lipidol ; 10(1): 192-8.e1, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26892136

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2013, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) jointly released new guidelines for cardiovascular risk assessment and cholesterol management that substantially modified the previous recommendations proposed by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) in 2001. The relative impact of these new guidelines on potential statin use has not been estimated in Latin American populations. OBJECTIVE: To estimate and compare eligibility for statin therapy based on ACC/AHA and NCEP guidelines in adult Chilean population. METHODS: Using data from the last National Health Survey (2009-2010 NHS), we conducted a cross-sectional analysis in a ​representative sample of the Chilean adult population and calculated the proportion of individuals that would receive statins under each set of guidelines. RESULTS: According to ACC/AHA guidelines, the population eligible for statin treatment increased from 21.7% (NCEP guidelines) to 33.2% (overall 53% increase). This effect was more pronounced among women (29.6% under ACC/AHA vs 15.6% under NCEP) and with those of advanced age (75% of the subjects >60 years of age compared with 46% under NCEP). The newly eligible group included more women and older subjects and individuals with lower LDL cholesterol levels. CONCLUSION: Compared with NCEP recommendations, the new ACC/AHA guidelines significantly increased the number of Chilean adults eligible for statin therapy. Full implementation of the new recommendations may have important public health implications in Chile and other Latin American countries, as more women and older subjects without cardiovascular disease would qualify for statin treatment.


Asunto(s)
American Heart Association , Cardiología , Colesterol/metabolismo , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Selección de Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/metabolismo , Chile , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA