RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Balloon-assisted kyphoplasty (BAK) is a minimally invasive procedure to treat vertebral compression fractures (VCF). BAK not only restores vertebral height and corrects kyphotic deformity by cement augmentation, but it also may alter spinal biomechanics, leading to subsequent adjacent level VCFs. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate the timing, location, and incidence of new VCFs following BAK and identify the risk factors associated with their occurrence. STUDY DESIGN: Single-institution observational study. METHODS: A prospectively collected cohort of 1,318 patients who underwent BAK by a single-surgeon from 2001 through 2022 was analyzed. The patients had pain that was unresponsive to nonsurgical management and a VCF secondary to osteoporosis, trauma, or neoplasm. The time between the index and subsequent fracture, fracture level, number of initial fractures, age, body mass index (BMI), tobacco use, and chronic corticosteroid use were recorded. RESULTS: Of 1,318 patients, 204 (15.5%) patients underwent a second BAK procedure an average of 373 days following BAK (range: 2-3,235 days). Third, fourth, and fifth procedures were less common (45, 12, and 6 patients, respectively). A total of 142 patients (69.6%) developed a subsequent fracture adjacent to the index level; adjacent and remote level fractures developed at different times (mean: 282 vs 581 days, P = 0.001). Patients treated for multiple VCFs in a single surgery were more likely to develop subsequent VCFs (P = 0.024) and at adjacent levels (P = 0.007). Subsequent VCFs were associated with older age (P < 0.001), women (P = 0.045), osteoporosis (P < 0.001), and chronic corticosteroid use (P < 0.001). A subgroup analysis of 812 (61.6%) patients who underwent BAK for degenerative indications revealed that osteoporosis (b = 0.09; 95% CI, 0.03-0.16; P = 0.005) and chronic corticosteroid use (b = 0.06; 95% CI, 0-0.11; P = 0.055) were associated with adjacent level fracture. For the entire cohort, almost every patient treated for both a thoracic and lumbar fracture (92.3%) developed an adjacent level second fracture (P = 0.005). LIMITATIONS: The true incidence of post-BAK fractures may be underestimated as surveillance is not routine in asymptomatic or osteoporotic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic post-BAK VCFs are infrequent and may occur long after the initial procedure. Nearly two-thirds of subsequent fractures in our study occurred adjacent to the initially treated level; almost every patient who suffered thoracic and lumbar fractures at the same time developed an adjacent level second fracture. Additionally, osteoporosis and chronic corticosteroid use were associated with adjacent level fractures in patients who underwent surgery for degenerative indications.

Asunto(s)

Fracturas por Compresión , Cifoplastia , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Fracturas por Compresión/cirugía , Cifoplastia/efectos adversos , Cifoplastia/métodos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/epidemiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Adulto

RESUMEN

Background: A recent study has reported that the radiographic measurement of posterior tibial slope (PTS) is larger in male pediatric patients with tibial spine fractures (TSF) than in controls. However, they found no difference in PTS between female patients and controls. Purpose: (1) To identify whether PTS is larger in female pediatric patients with TSF than in female controls and (2) to validate the relationship between PTS and pediatric TSF in male patients. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: After an a priori power analysis, 84 pediatric patients with TSF (50 female patients and 34 male patients) and 84 age- and sex-matched controls were enrolled in this study. Demographic information, including sex, age, and race, was recorded. Skeletal maturity was determined based on the stage of epiphyseal union on knee radiographs. PTS was defined as the angle between a line perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the tibia and the posterior inclination of the medial tibial plateau on standard knee lateral radiographs. Results: The mean age when the TSF occurred was 11.2 ± 2.7 years for female patients and 12.9 ± 2.5 years for male patients. There was no significant difference in skeletal maturity between female patients and female controls or between male patients and male controls. The mean PTS was not significantly different between female patients (8.8°± 2.8°) and female controls (8.3°± 3.1°) (P = .366) or between male patients (9.0°± 2.8°) and male controls (9.3°± 2.6°) (P = .675). Those with a PTS >1 SD (2.9°) above the mean (8.8°) had no greater odds (1.0 [95% CI, 0.4-2.5]; P≥ .999) of having a TSF than others. Conclusion: PTS was not found to be a risk factor for pediatric TSF in female or male patients in this study.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Spine fixation surgery for traumatic vertebral fractures is associated with severe pain and is often difficult to control. Traditionally systemic opioids have been the mainstay of analgesia for these procedures, which can lead to hyperalgesia, nausea, ileus, sedation, cognitive impairment, dependence, etc., limiting usage of opioids. The Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel ultrasound-guided procedure with easily identifiable sonoanatomy. We hypothesized that a multimodal approach involving ESPB to a conventional analgesic regimen with local infiltration for patients undergoing major traumatic spine surgeries might provide better perioperative analgesia and reduce the need for postoperative opioid requirements. Material and Methods: A randomized control prospective trial was conducted on 34 ASA grade I -II patients aged 18 to 65 years who were scheduled to undergo elective posterior spine fixation surgery with ASIA B to E after traumatic spine fracture under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized to Group A which included patients who received general anesthesia with ESPB, and Group B, or the control group, included patients who received general anesthesia with systemic analgesics and postoperative local infiltration without ESPB. Intraoperative total fentanyl consumption, VAS score at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours, time to activate patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump, total morphine consumption, and opioid-related side effects were monitored and compared in both groups. Results: Postoperative PCA morphine consumption was significantly lower in group A patients who received ESPB than those in the control group (17.06 ± 9.59 vs 37.82 ± 9.88 P value = <0.0001). VAS scores at rest and movement at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 hours were significantly lower (P value = 0.05) in the ESPB group compared with the control group at all time points. Conclusion: Bilateral ultrasound-guided Erector spinae plane block, when administered in traumatic spine patients undergoing spine fixation surgery, provides better analgesia with statistically decreased VAS scores and less postoperative opioid requirement.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Thoracolumbar fractures (TLF) requiring surgical intervention can be treated with either open or percutaneous stabilization, each with some distinct risks and benefits. There is insufficient evidence available to support one approach as superior. METHODS: Patients who underwent spinal fixation for TLF between 2008 and 2020 were reviewed. Patients with one or two levels of fracture treated with either open or percutaneous stabilization were included. Exclusion criteria were more than two levels of fracture, patients requiring corpectomy, stabilization constructs that crossed the cervicothoracic or lumbosacral junction, history of previous thoracolumbar fusion at the same level, spinal neoplasm, anterior or lateral fixation, and spinal infection. Demographic, operative, and clinical data were collected for all patients. RESULTS: 691 patients (377 open, 314 percutaneous) met the inclusion criteria. Patients in the percutaneous cohort sustained lower estimated blood loss (73 vs 334 ml; p< 0.001) and shorter length of surgery (114 vs. 151 minutes; p< 0.001). No differences were observed in the length of hospital stay or overall reoperation rates. Asymptomatic (7.0% vs 0.8%) and symptomatic (3.5% vs 0.5%) hardware removal was more common with the percutaneous cohort, while the incidence of revision surgery due to hardware failure requiring the extension of the construct (1.9% vs 5.8%) and infection (1.9% vs 6.4%) was greater in the open group. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous stabilization for TLF was associated with shorter operative time, less blood loss, lower infection rate, higher rates of elective hardware removal, and lower rates of hardware failure requiring extension of the construct compared to open stabilization.

RESUMEN

Thoracic spine fracture-dislocation injuries result from significant forces that cause significant morbidity and mortality. In rare instances, there have been cases of associated esophageal injury from bony laceration. Here we report a case esophageal entrapment in a high thoracic distraction injury following a motor vehicle accident.

RESUMEN

Objective: This study aims to compare the utilization of 3D-CT reconstruction in measuring pedicle outer width (POW) between younger/middle-aged patients (<60 years) and older patients (≥60 years) with thoracolumbar spine fractures (TSF). Methods: We conducted a retrospective study from January 2021 to December 2022, involving a total of 108 patients with TSF. The study population consisted of 62 patients aged ≥60 years (observation group) and 46 patients aged <60 years (control group). We compared the POW on both the right and left sides of the thoracolumbar spine between the two groups. Additionally, we analyzed the POW by gender within each group and calculated the incidence of patients falling below the critical values for arch root puncture (5 mm) and arch root nailing (7 mm) in both groups. Results: There were no statistically significant differences observed in the POW between the two groups on both the left and right sides of each corresponding vertebra (P > 0.05). In the observation group, both male and female patients had significantly smaller POW compared to the control group (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference in POW was observed between the same-sex groups in the L4 to L5 vertebrae (P > 0.05). In the observation group, the POW was less than 5 mm in 9.33% (81/868) of cases and less than 7 mm in 49.88% (433/868) of cases, primarily observed from T11 to L3. In the control group, 4.81% (31/644) of cases had a POW of less than 5 mm, and 13.81% (88/644) had a POW of less than 7 mm. Conclusion: Utilizing preoperative 3D-CT reconstruction to measure POW in patients with TSF not only facilitates the assessment of surgical feasibility but also aids in surgical pathway planning, thus potentially reducing the incidence of postoperative complications.

RESUMEN

Background/Objectives: Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) significantly impair quality of life. This study evaluates the impact of STIR sequence MR imaging on clinical decision-making for treating OVFs, mainly focusing on how MRI findings influence treatment modifications compared to those based solely on CT scans. Methods: This retrospective analysis reviewed cases from the Manninger Jeno National Traumatology Institute over ten years, where patients with suspected OVFs underwent CT and STIR sequence MR imaging. The study examined changes in treatment plans initiated by MRI findings. The diagnostic effectiveness of MRI was compared against CT in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and the ability to influence clinical treatment paths. Results: MRI detected 1.65 times more fractures than CT scans. MRI influenced treatment adjustments in 67% of cases, leading to significant changes from conservative-conservative, conservative-surgery, and surgery-surgery based on fracture characterizations provided by MRI. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that integrating STIR sequence MR imaging into the diagnostic pathway for OVFs significantly enhances the accuracy of fracture detection and profoundly impacts treatment decisions. The ability of MRI to reveal specific fracture features that are not detectable by CT scans supports its importance in the clinical evaluation of OVFs, suggesting that MRI should be incorporated more into diagnostic protocols to improve patient management and outcomes. The findings advocate for further research to establish STIR MRI as a standard osteoporosis management tool and explore its long-term benefits in preventing secondary fractures.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the outcomes of conservative management in patients with thoracolumbar fractures classified with a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS) score of 4 or 5, and to analyze initial imaging findings and clinical risk factors associated with treatment failure. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, patients with thoracolumbar fractures and a TLICS score of 4 or 5, determined through MRI from January 2017 to December 2020, were included. Patients undergoing conservative treatment were categorized into two groups: Group 1 (treatment success) and Group 2 (treatment failure), based on initial and 6-month follow-up outcomes. Clinical data were compared between the two groups. Initial radiological assessments included three kyphosis measurements (Cobb angle, Gardner angle, and sagittal index [SI]), anterior and posterior wall height, and central canal compromise (CC). Additionally, risk factors contributing to treatment failure were analyzed. RESULTS: The conservative treatment group comprised 84 patients (mean age, 60.25 ± 15.53; range 22-85; 42 men), with 57 in Group 1 and 27 in Group 2. Group 2 exhibited a higher proportion of women, older age, and lower bone mass density (p = 0.001-0.005). Initial imaging findings in Group 2 revealed significantly greater values for Cobb angle, SI, and CC (p = 0.001-0.045 or < 0.001; with cutoff values of 18.2, 12.8, and 7.8%, respectively), and lower anterior wall height (p = 0.001), demonstrating good to excellent interobserver agreement (0.72-0.99, p < 0.001). Furthermore, osteoporosis was identified as a significant risk factor (odds ratio = 5.64, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Among patients with TLICS scores of 4 or 5, those experiencing conservative treatment failure exhibited unfavorable initial radiological findings, a higher proportion of women, advanced age, and osteoporosis. Additionally, osteoporosis emerged as a significant risk factor for treatment failure.

Asunto(s)

Tratamiento Conservador , Vértebras Lumbares , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Vértebras Torácicas , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Torácicas/lesiones , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/lesiones , Adulto , Anciano , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto Joven , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Clinical implications of screening for blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) after low-energy mechanisms of injury (LEMI) remain unclear. We assessed BCVI incidence and outcomes in LEMI versus high-energy mechanisms of injury (HEMI) patients. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, blunt trauma adults admitted between July 2015 and June 2021 with cervical spine fractures, excluding single spinous process, osteophyte, and chronic fractures were included. Demographics, comorbidities, injuries, screening and treatment data, iatrogenic complications, and mortality were collected. Our primary end point was to compare BCVI rates between LEMI and HEMI patients. RESULTS: Eight hundred sixty patients (78%) were screened for BCVI; 120 were positive for BCVI. LEMI and HEMI groups presented similar BCVI rates (12.6% versus 14.4%; P = 0.640). Compared to HEMI patients (n = 95), LEMI patients (n = 25) were significantly older (79 ± 14.9 versus 54.3 ± 17.4, P < 0.001), more likely to be on anticoagulants before admission (64% versus 23.2%, P < 0.001), and less severely injured (LEMI injury severity score 10.9 ± 6.6 versus HEMI injury severity score 18.7 ± 11.4, P = 0.001). All but one LEMI and 90.5% of the HEMI patients had vertebral artery injuries with no significant difference in BCVI grades. One HEMI patient developed acute kidney injury because of BCVI screening. Eleven HEMI patients developed BCVI-related stroke with two related mortalities. One LEMI patient died of a BCVI-related stroke. CONCLUSIONS: BCVI rates were similar between HEMI and LEMI groups when screening based on cervical spine fractures. The LEMI group exhibited no screening or treatment complications, suggesting that benefits may outweigh the risks of screening and potential bleeding complications from treatment.

Asunto(s)

Traumatismos Cerebrovasculares , Vértebras Cervicales , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Vértebras Cervicales/lesiones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/epidemiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Anciano , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Heridas no Penetrantes/mortalidad , Heridas no Penetrantes/epidemiología , Adulto , Traumatismos Cerebrovasculares/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Cerebrovasculares/complicaciones , Traumatismos Cerebrovasculares/epidemiología , Traumatismos Cerebrovasculares/etiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Incidencia , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos

RESUMEN

Objective: The study aimed to assess and investigate cervical spine fracture in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis and to identify research trends in cervical spine fracture in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis in countries around the world using bibliometric analysis. Method: We examined bibliometric data obtained from the Scopus database collection for the periods 1 January 2000 and 1 January 2022. Authors, institutions, nations, publications, keywords, and references were noted and analyzed. The total number of research articles published on the subject of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis was used to calculate the amount of research on that subject undertaken in the study period. A sample of the publication data collected from the Scopus database was then analyzed using the Bibliometric program and used to develop a relationship chart using the Bibliometrix and VOSviewer programs. Results: The number of citations was assumed to be a qualitative measure of the publication. We estimated the impact of the research using several metrics, including the H-index, in the bibliometric analysis of authors, geographic areas, institutes, and references. A total of 52 studies related to cervical spine fractures in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis were identified. Only 5.12% of those studies were cited in other publications, for a total of 1410 citations in publications by 342 authors, of whom only two authors had published a single study. Co-authorships occurred at 7.273%. Diseases common in elderly males were often studied retrospectively, and "Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis" was a frequently mentioned keyword. Conclusion: The findings of this study provide insights into authors, institutions, key publications, and research trends related to diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis and can potentially serve as a guide for further studies in the field. The bibliometric analysis of cervical spine fractures in patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis highlights important contributors, influential papers, geographical trends, and study characteristics in this area of research.

RESUMEN

Background: This study investigated the rate of acromial insufficiency fractures (AIF) in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with concomitant distal clavicle excision (DCE). Methods: Patients who underwent primary RSA with DCE by a single surgeon from 2010 to 2021 were identified. Exclusion criteria included revision RSA, RSA for fracture, or cases utilizing an augmented baseplate or bone graft. AIF was defined as a radiographically proven acromion or scapular spine fracture. Pain without an identifiable fracture on imaging was defined as an acromial insufficiency reaction. Patient demographics, implant information, and radiograph measurements were compared between patients with and without acromial pathology. Results: One hundred and seventy-five patients were included. Mean age was 72.8 years, and 67% of patients were female. There were 3/174 acromial insufficiency fractures (1.7%). AIF occurred at a mean of 9.3 months after surgery. Twelve patients had insufficiency reactions (6.9%). Patients with acromial pathology were more likely to be female (p = .003) and have a diagnosis of osteoporosis (p = .047) and inflammatory arthritis (p = .049). There was no significant difference between groups in terms of other factors. Conclusion: The AIF rate in patients who underwent RSA with DCE was 1.7%. These findings suggest that DCE in the setting of RSA may have a protective role against AIF.

RESUMEN

Vertebral fractures remain a diagnostic challenge nowadays. The first and most common diagnosis needed to be ruled out is osteoporosis. Other diagnoses to rule out involve pathological fractures. Pathological fractures are a group of pathologies that result in a spine fracture as part of an underlying disease process that affects the spine. This group includes Paget's disease, tumors, osteomyelitis, and vertebral compression fractures. Fractures secondary to vertebral osteomyelitis are presented as collapsed vertebral bodies secondary to bone destruction and the formation of lytic lesions. Clinical presentation includes severe back pain refractory to analgesic therapy, persistent unexplained fever, and leukocytosis without any other obvious focus of infection. In cases like the one presented here, early biopsy and culture should be performed on every patient that fits these criteria. However, as it presents unspecific symptoms most of the time, it is not suspected, and therefore it is associated with high morbidity and mortality.

RESUMEN

Spine fractures represent a critical health concern with far-reaching implications for patient care and clinical decision-making. Accurate segmentation of spine fractures from medical images is a crucial task due to its location, shape, type, and severity. Addressing these challenges often requires the use of advanced machine learning and deep learning techniques. In this research, a novel multi-scale feature fusion deep learning model is proposed for the automated spine fracture segmentation using Computed Tomography (CT) to these challenges. The proposed model consists of six modules; Feature Fusion Module (FFM), Squeeze and Excitation (SEM), Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling (ASPP), Residual Convolution Block Attention Module (RCBAM), Residual Border Refinement Attention Block (RBRAB), and Local Position Residual Attention Block (LPRAB). These modules are used to apply multi-scale feature fusion, spatial feature extraction, channel-wise feature improvement, segmentation border results border refinement, and positional focus on the region of interest. After that, a decoder network is used to predict the fractured spine. The experimental results show that the proposed approach achieves better accuracy results in solving the above challenges and also performs well compared to the existing segmentation methods.

RESUMEN

(1) Background: In elderly patients with type II odontoid fractures, accompanying severe atlantoaxial instability (AAI) is discussed as a marker possibly warranting more aggressive surgical therapy. This study aimed to characterize adverse events as well as the radiological and functional outcomes of surgical vs. conservative therapy in patients with odontoid fracture and AAI. (2) Methods: Patients aged 65 years and older with type II odontoid fracture and AAI treated were included. AAI was assumed if the mean subluxation across both atlantoaxial facet joints in the sagittal plane was greater than 50%. Data on demographics, comorbidities, treatment, adverse events, radiological, and functional outcomes were analyzed. (3) Results: Thirty-nine patients were included. Hospitalization time was significantly shorter in conservatively treated patients compared to patients with ventral or dorsal surgery. Adverse events occurred in 11 patients (28.2%), affecting 10 surgically treated patients (35.7%), and 1 conservatively treated patient (9.1%). Moreover, 25 patients were followed-up (64.1%). One secondary dislocation occurred in the conservative group (11.1%) and three in the surgical group (18.8%). (4) Conclusions: Despite the potential for instability in this injury, conservative treatment does not seem to lead to unfavorable short-term results, less adverse events, and a shorter hospital stay and should thus be considered and discussed with patients as a treatment option, even in the presence of severe AAI.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic subaxial fractures account for more than half of all cervical spine injuries. The optimal surgical approach is a matter of debate and may include anterior, posterior or a combined anteroposterior (360º) approach. Analyzing a cohort of patients initially treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for traumatic subaxial injuries, the study aimed to identify predictors for treatment failure and the subsequent need for supplementary posterior fusion (PF). METHODS: A retrospective, single center, consecutive cohort study of all adult patients undergoing primary ACDF for traumatic subaxial cervical spine fractures between 2006 and 2018 was undertaken and 341 patients were included. Baseline clinical and radiological data for all included patients were analyzed and 11 cases of supplementary posterior fixation were identified. RESULTS: Patients were operated at a median of 2.0 days from the trauma, undergoing 1-level (78%), 2-levels (16%) and ≥ 3-levels (6.2%) ACDF. A delayed supplementary PF was performed in 11 cases, due to ACDF failure. On univariable regression analysis, older age (p = 0.017), shorter stature (p = 0.031), posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) injury (p = 0.004), injury to ligamentum flavum (p = 0.005), bilateral facet joint dislocation (p < 0.001) and traumatic cervical spondylolisthesis (p = 0.003) predicted ACDF failure. On the multivariable regression model, older age (p = 0.015), PLL injury (p = 0.048), and bilateral facet joint dislocation (p = 0.010) remained as independent predictors of ACDF failure. CONCLUSIONS: ACDF is safe and effective for the treatment of subaxial cervical spine fractures. High age, bilateral facet joint dislocation and traumatic PLL disruption are independent predictors of failure. We suggest increased vigilance regarding these cases.

Asunto(s)

Vértebras Cervicales , Discectomía , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Fusión Vertebral , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Humanos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Discectomía/métodos , Discectomía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Vértebras Cervicales/lesiones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Anciano

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the most important and life-threatening complications in orthopaedic surgery. According to current scientific reports, there are several variables that can affect the severity of CVD, including the site of the pathology or the type of treatment implemented. The aim of the study was to analyze the risk of VTE depending on the location of the pathology, as well as to evaluate the impact of surgical treatment compared to conservative management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Analysis of laboratory results and clinical picture of 276 patients hospitalized for orthopaedic reasons, admitted between January 2008 - December 2019, with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). RESULTS: Among patients diagnosed with PE, the most common location of the disease was in the lower limb 59/116 (50.9%), followed by the pelvis location - 22/116 (19.0%), the spine - 19/116 (16.4%), disseminated lesions in oncological patients - 12/116 (10.3%), and a group of pathologies in the upper limb - 4/116 (3.5%). Significant statistical differences were found between the incidence of PE and the diagnosis of pathology in the lower limb and the pelvis. In the group of patients, there was no statistically significant relationship between the incidence of PE associated with surgical treatment, compared to conservative management. CONCLUSIONS: The group with the highest risk of VTE were lower limb and pelvic pathologies. The results are largely consistent with numerous reports treating the risk of CVD among orthopaedic patient populations.

Asunto(s)

Ortopedia , Embolia Pulmonar , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/complicaciones , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiología , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , Hospitalización , Factores de Riesgo

RESUMEN

In large-scale naval battles during World War II, sailors sometimes sustained serious lower limb injuries when explosion blast of sea mines was transmitted from underneath through the metal deck of the ships. Some of these sailors were thrown in the air due to the blast and sustained axial trauma of the spine when they landed on the hard deck, which was thus called a deck slap by Captain Joseph Barr in 1946, among others. Nowadays, this peculiar mechanism has shifted to the civilian setting. Tourists unaware of the danger may sustain spine compression fractures when they sit at the bow of speed boats while underway on a calm sea. When the craft unexpectedly crosses the wake of another ship, tourists are thrown a few feet in the air before suffering a hard landing on their buttocks. This historical vignette is presented as a preventive message to help to reduce this poorly known yet avoidable "summer wave of vertebral fractures."

Asunto(s)

Traumatismos por Explosión , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Segunda Guerra Mundial , Humanos , Traumatismos por Explosión/historia , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Personal Militar/historia , Navíos/historia , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/historia , Viaje

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mortality rates following emergency spine fracture surgery are high, especially in the elderly. However, how the postoperative mortality rate following spine fractures compares to other geriatric fractures such as hip fractures remains unclear. Therefore, this retrospective cohort study aimed to compare 30-day mortality rates and risk factors between emergency spine fracture versus hip fracture surgery in the elderly. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried between 2011 and 2021 for emergency spine fractures and hip fractures in the elderly. Univariate analyses evaluated demographic data, perioperative factors, comorbidities, and 30-day mortality rates as the primary outcomes. A multivariable regression model was then constructed to control for significant baseline and demographic differences and evaluate independent predictors of mortality. RESULTS: A total of 18,287 emergency hip fractures and 192 emergency spine fractures were included in our study. Univariate analysis demonstrated significant differences in female sex, body mass index (BMI), operation time, length of hospital stays, disseminated cancer, and functional dependence between spine and hip fractures. Thirty-day mortality rates were significantly higher in spine versus hip fractures (9.4% vs. 5%). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated emergent spine fracture surgery, disseminated cancer, functional dependence, and length of stay as independent predictors of mortality in our cohort. Female sex, BMI, and operation time were protective factors for mortality in our cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency spine fractures in the elderly represent an independent predictor for 30-day postoperative mortality compared to emergency hip fractures. Disseminated cancer, functional dependence, and length of stay were independent predictors of mortality while female sex, BMI, and operation time were protective factors. These data demonstrate the severity of injury and high rates of mortality that clinicians can use to counsel patients and their families.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This study analyzed the incidence of secondary dislocations (sDLs) after surgical stabilization of AO Spine type B and C injuries of the subaxial cervical spine (sCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated for injuries of the sCS from 2010 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed for the incidence of sDL within 60 days after first surgery. A univariate analysis of variables potentially influencing the risk of sDL was performed. Patients with solitary anterior stabilization underwent subgroup analysis. The treatment of sDLs was described. RESULTS: A total of 275 patients were included. sDLs occurred in 4.0% of patients (n = 11) in the total sample, most frequently after solitary anterior stabilization with 8.0% (n = 10, p = 0.010). Only one sDL occurred after combined stabilization and no sDLs after posterior stabilization. In the total sample and the anterior subgroup, variables significantly associated with sDL were older age (p = 0.001) and concomitant unstable facet joint injury (p = 0.020). No neurological deterioration occurred due to sDL and most patients were treated with added posterior stabilization. sDL is frequent after solitary anterior stabilization and rare after posterior or combined stabilization. DISCUSSION: Patients of higher age and with unstable facet joint injuries should be followed up diligently to detect sDLs in time. Neurological deterioration does not regularly occur due to sDL, and most patients can be treated with added posterior stabilization.

RESUMEN

Blunt vertebral artery injuries (BVAI) associated with cervical spine fractures are often problematic due to symptoms of occlusion. Denver grade V cases, in which the vertebral artery is transected, are rare but often fatal, and treatment has rarely been reported. We encountered a case of hemorrhagic shock due to an injury to a branch of the vertebral artery associated with an upper cervical spine fracture. Transcatheter arterial embolization was performed successfully to achieve hemostasis, requiring superselective arterial embolization to preserve the main trunk of the vertebral artery. It is important to be aware that vascular injuries to the branch vessels as well as the main trunk can cause complications.