RESUMEN

In infectious meningitis, pathogens preferentially attack the leptomeninges (pia mater and arachnoid) rather than the pachymeninges (dura mater). This study aims to provide ultra-anatomical insights from our extensive collection of electron microscopy images and propose mechanisms, highlighting structures that favor the introduction, adherence, colonization, and proliferation of microorganisms leading to spinal meningitis. Over several years, we analyzed an extensive collection of transmission and scanning electron microscopy images of human spinal meninges captured in our laboratories. Upon examining 378 of those images, we identified potential sites for the iatrogenic or hematogenic introduction and adherence of microorganisms, as well as sites for their colonization and proliferation. These included the outer surface of the spinal dural sac, structures within the epidural space, and the spinal dural sac itself, which comprises compact dura mater with interwoven collagen fibers and tightly bound arachnoid cells. Also, the subdural (extra-arachnoid) compartment, consisting of fragile neurothelial cells prone to rupture under force, formed an acquired spinal subdural space, a new subarachnoid compartment, limited by arachnoid trabeculae, that surrounded the nerve roots and spinal cord and the pia mater. Macrophages, fibroblasts, mast cells, and plasma cells were also observed within the dura mater, arachnoid layer, arachnoid trabeculae, and pia mater. These images illustrate how the characteristics of the meningeal layers could contribute to bacterial adhesion and proliferation at various locations, inducing selective inflammation during (iatrogenic) spinal meningitis. In addition, the images help to explain why magnetic resonance imaging enhancement appears preferentially at specific sites.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Hip fracture surgeries in patients present significant challenges, particularly in managing pain during spinal anesthesia positioning. The Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) has shown promise in addressing this issue, but the ideal volume of local anesthetic for PENG is still uncertain. In our study, we aimed to analyze the effects of administering PENG block with two different volumes on analgesic quality for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Methods: In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, the effects of administering a PENG block with 20 mL versus 30 mL of local anesthetic in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery under spinal anesthesia were compared. The primary outcome was pain during spinal anesthesia positioning, and secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption. Results: A total of 60 patients were analyzed, with 30 in each group. Critical parameters such as the time of spinal anesthesia administration and the satisfaction of the anesthesiologist showed no significant differences (p=0.918; p=0.741, respectively). NRS scores recorded before, during, and after the positioning for spinal anesthesia exhibited similar patterns (p=0.290; p=0.247; p=0.288, respectively). The cumulative opioid requirements did not exhibit a statistically significant difference at 24 hours (p = 0.098). Quadriceps weakness was significantly more in the PENG-30 group 6 hours after surgery but had recovered by the 9th hour (p= 0.004). Conclusion: In patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, the effects of applying the PENG block with 20 mL or 30 mL of local anesthetic are comparable in terms of positioning for spinal anesthesia and postoperative analgesic requirements.

RESUMEN

Background Neuraxial blockade includes epidural and spinal anesthesia (SA) that have gained wide acceptance for major lower limb orthopedic surgery. Both techniques are competent in rendering surgical anesthesia and pain relief, with specific advantages and disadvantages. SA has the merits of rapid onset and adequate anesthesia with a small volume of the drug but has significant hypotension and unpredictable duration. Epidural anesthesia allows for finer control over analgesia and the duration of anesthesia but requires more substantial volumes of drugs and is slower in onset. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) combines the rapid commencement of action of SA with flexibility in epidural anesthesia, thus optimizing the management of the intraoperative and postoperative phases. This study aims to evaluate hemodynamic changes, compare the severity and duration of sensory and motor block, and track any problems related to CSEA and SA in major lower limb orthopedic procedures. Additionally, this study contrasts the hemodynamic, motor, and sensory changes in the two groups. Methodology A total of 30 individuals were randomized to one of two groups in this prospective comparative trial, which included 60 patients receiving major lower limb orthopedic surgery and meeting the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II criteria. Group A received CSEA, and Group B received SA. The degree and duration of sensory and motor blockade, hemodynamic changes, and complications were all recorded. A p-value of less than 0.05 was used to evaluate statistical significance using Student's t-test and chi-square test. Results The onset of sensory block in our study was earlier in Group B compared to Group A. In both groups, hemodynamic stability was maintained throughout the study. We recorded the onset/duration of sensory and motor block and hemodynamic changes and took mean values to find any significant difference. Postoperative complications and rescue analgesic requirements were monitored and managed and were a part of our study. Conclusions This study compared CSEA and SA regarding the severity and duration of sensory and motor block, hemodynamic stability, and associated complications in major lower limb orthopedic surgeries. The results shed light on the advantages and shortcomings of each anesthesia technique and, therefore, will help choose the correct method of anesthesia in a given surgery.

RESUMEN

Severe preeclampsia and pulmonary edema pose significant challenges for an anesthesiologist. Pregnancy is associated with major physiologic changes to meet the increased demands of the mother and fetus. Preeclampsia complicates this balance by adding additional stress to the mother and baby. Pulmonary edema is a rare complication of preeclampsia, and it is a potentially life-threatening condition. Meticulous care is needed in the anesthetic management of this condition, especially when the patient is morbidly obese and presents for an emergency cesarean section.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Aortic stenosis is a cause of mortality or morbidity. It complicates the selection and management of anesthetic procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, hemodynamic effects and postoperative outcome of unilateral spinal anesthesia in geriatric patients with hip fractures with moderate or severe aortic stenosis. Material and Method: A retrospective observational study was conducted on geriatric high-risk patients with cardiac conditions who underwent surgery for hip fractures under unilateral spinal anesthesia with low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine. The study period spanned from January 2018 to December 2021. The inclusion criteria were individuals with moderate to severe aortic stenosis, as defined by the American Heart Association Criteria. Data on demographic information, cardiac pathologies, hemodynamic data, data on motor and sensory block, perioperative complications, and mortality rates at 30th and 180th days were collected. Results: Mortality rates at the 30th day and 180th day were 8.9% (n:4) and 24.4% (n:11), respectively. T6 level was predominantly obtained level of anesthesia (44.4%). Motor and sensory block formation times averaged 7.6 and 4.8 minutes, respectively. Surgical procedures were performed mostly within 1 hour (66.7%), and complications were rare (11.1% hypotension). Initial analgesic effect showed a rapid resolution, with 64.4% of patients requiring analgesic within the first hour postoperatively. Conclusion: In elderly patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis scheduled for hip fracture surgery, we posit that unilateral spinal anesthesia with ultra-low dose is safe and effective option.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: The repeated or lengthy use of general anesthesia (GA) in children under three years old is cautioned against due to potential neurodevelopment effects. Spinal anesthesia (SA) has emerged as a safe and effective alternative for routine pediatric urologic procedures. In this study, we describe the use of SA in the urgent surgical treatment of neonatal testicular torsion. OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SA for urgent scrotal exploration in neonates. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively collected data on neonates younger than 30 days old undergoing SA for the indication of testicular torsion from May 2018 to June 2022. We recorded patient demographics, adjuvant medications use, and time points for start/stop of spinal injection, procedure, and operating room utilization. RESULTS: Six neonates, with an average age of 1.9 days of life and average weight of 3.4 kg, underwent scrotal exploration for testicular torsion using SA. Four patients (67%) required orchiectomy of the nonviable torsed testicle, and all patients underwent orchiopexy of the unaffected testicle. Mean total operative time was 45.3 (SD 11.7) minutes, including Gomco circumcision in five patients. One patient received preoperative intranasal dexmedetomidine for sedation. Mean time for SA administration was 6.3 (SD 5.5) minutes, with a mean total time in the operating room of 77.3 (SD 9.8) minutes. There were no perioperative or postoperative complications. DISCUSSION: We describe a single institution experience of surgical management of neonatal torsion under SA. In this case series, SA was safely utilized for all neonates involved without the need for conversion to GA or intravenous (IV) sedation. CONCLUSION: The use of SA is safe and efficacious for urgent scrotal exploration for testicular torsion in neonates, even those under 48 h of age. More widespread utilization requires collaboration between pediatric urologists and experienced pediatric anesthesiologists trained in SA.

RESUMEN

Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most preferred method for cesarean section (C-section). This meta-analysis was performed to determine the effect of low and high intrathecal doses of pethidine on the maternal outcomes after C-section. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was performed. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to derive odds ratios (ORs) from dichotomous data. Results: Seventeen randomized controlled trials with 1304 C-section patients were included. Patients who had received intrathecal pethidine experienced decreased shivering and intensity of shivering (OR 0.13; P<0.001) and (OR 0.21; P<0.001), respectively. Moreover, vomiting (OR 2.47; P=0.002) and pruritus (OR 5.92; P<0.001) were significantly higher in the pethidine group. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of nausea (OR 2.55; P=0.06) and hypotension (OR 0.91; P=0.67). Conclusions: Intrathecal pethidine can effectively decrease shivering, although it increases the risk of vomiting and pruritus. No significant difference was found both in the maternal hypotension and nausea.

RESUMEN

Anterior spinal artery occlusion resulting in bilateral medial medullary infarction (bMMI) and anterior spinal artery syndrome (ASAS) simultaneously has been rarely described. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of such occurrence during pregnancy. A 23-year-old preeclamptic parturient at 374/7 weeks underwent an emergent cesarean section after developing gradual neurological deficits. Her symptoms started with a severe occipital headache and progressed to right-hand tingling, left-hand weakness, dyspnea, and elevated blood pressure (165/117 mmHg). Spinal anesthesia was performed by injection of bupivacaine 0.5% with no complications. Twenty minutes into the surgery, after the patient's systolic pressure fell below 85 mmHg, a bolus dose of ephedrine was administered. After a while, the patient presented with sudden respiratory distress and declining consciousness, prompting her immediate intubation. In the intensive care unit, she initially exhibited flaccid quadriplegia, sensory loss, areflexia, upward vertical nystagmus, and some cranial nerve (CN) palsy, including CN 9, 10, and 12, indicative of a medullary-level infarction extending downward. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain revealed a heart-shaped sign in the medulla, suggesting bMMI as a result of anterior spinal artery (ASA) occlusion. During the course of hospitalization, the patient regained the senses of vibration, touch, and proprioception; however, she has remained quadriplegic up to now.

RESUMEN

Sudden respiratory and circulatory collapse during or immediately after delivery, vaginal or surgical, can have many causes that can lead to poor maternal outcomes. A pregnancy-induced amniotic fluid embolism and anaphylaxis are two distinct medical conditions that appear similar clinically but have very different underlying mechanisms and treatment approaches. Amniotic fluid embolism is a rare but life-threatening obstetric emergency that leads to a systemic inflammatory response that can be easily confounded with an anaphylactic reaction. We report the case of a patient with no comorbidities or allergies before the current pregnancy that was proposed for delivery by C-Section under spinal anesthesia. After delivery of the placenta and administering the test dose of antibiotic, the patient developed sudden circulatory collapse, altered neurological status, and critical respiratory distress. At that point, the two presumed diagnoses were amniotic fluid embolism and anaphylaxis. Concurrently with the diagnostic pathway, supportive measures (intubation, mechanical ventilation, hemodynamic support) were taken. The clinical evolution was favorable, and after day three, the patient was discharged from the hospital. Our case highlights the significance of promptly distinguishing between anaphylaxis and amniotic fluid embolism to facilitate the timely management of the critical situation.

RESUMEN

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate patients' expectative pain of spinal anesthesia puncture and anxiety pre-anesthesia, and to examine the effect of lidocaine-prilocaine cream and remimazolam prior to spinal anesthesia puncture on pain relief and anxiety release. Methods: Patients undergoing spinal anesthesia were divided into control, lidocaine-prilocaine cream, and lidocaine-prilocaine cream with remimazolam groups. A questionnaire consisting of The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) and patient's concerns and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate patient's anxiety and pain. The primary outcomes were differences in VAS and anxiety scores. Patient's spinal anesthesia-related concerns, advent events and hemodynamic index were also recorded. Results: The expected spinal anesthesia puncture pain was 5.34±0.27 and anxiety scores before spinal anesthesia was 10.88 ± 0.64. A statistically significant positive correlation of 31.3% was detected between VAS and APAIS scores (r = 0.313; P=0.003). The VAS score at the time of puncture decreased by 29.7% (3.78±0.40, P=0.001) in lidocaine-prilocaine cream group and 29.2% (3.75±0.39, P=0.001) in lidocaine-prilocaine cream with remimazolam group compared with the expected VAS score. Lidocaine-prilocaine cream combined with or without remimazolam reduced the percentage of moderate pain (21.4% and 31.3% vs 50.0%, P=0.0001) and increased mild pain (60.7% vs 59.4% vs 22.7%, P=0.03). Anxiety score in lidocaine-prilocaine cream group was reduced by 2.84 (8.04±0.76 vs 10.88 ± 0.46, P=0.05) when compared with pre-anesthesia. Concerns about postoperative pain (P=0.03) and fear of the needle or intervention (P=0.000) both decreased post-anesthesia among groups. Conclusion: Approximately half of the patients scheduled for spinal anesthesia experienced a moderate level of preoperative anxiety. The patient's pain expectation from the spinal anesthesia puncture was moderate, which was higher than the actual pain. Lidocaine-prilocaine cream with or without remimazolam sedative before spinal anesthesia puncture reduced the patient's pain and anxiety scores after surgery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Spinal anesthesia is commonly used for lower limb procedures, its duration may be limited with potential complications due to high doses of local anesthetic. This study describes the technique and experience of using suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SIFI) as an adjunct to spinal anesthesia in an elderly patient undergoing lower extremity surgery. The case presented here involves an 81-year-old female undergoing hip surgery, where a SIFI block was performed prior to the administration of spinal anesthesia. Despite the unexpectedly prolonged surgical duration of approximately 5 hours, the patient remained comfortable, and the surgery was completed without complications. Subarachnoid block for provision of surgical anesthesia generally lasts between 2 and 3 hours with dose-dependent local anesthetic-related adverse effects. This may hinder the utility of spinal anesthesia in complex cases where extended surgical duration may be expected. The continuous spinal anesthesia and combined spinal-epidural (CSE) are useful techniques to provide consistent peri-operative anesthesia with precise titration of anesthesia levels. However, this presents with a risk of accidental dural puncture with CSE, post-dural puncture headache, and inadvertent drug errors with a spinal or epidural catheter. The judicious use of other adjuvants alongside local anesthetics offers advantages in extending the duration of anesthesia by a modest increment. The integration of spinal anesthesia with SIFI is a promising strategy to extend block duration, reduce peri-operative opioid requirements, and enhance patient outcomes. Overall, SIFI is a safe anesthetic technique for the peri-operative management of hip fracture patients and may present synergistic effects when combined with spinal anesthesia and may prolong the duration of regional anesthesia during unexpectedly prolonged surgery.

RESUMEN

Background and objectives Intracavitary applicators are a source of significant discomfort after brachytherapy procedures while undergoing subsequent radiation treatment. With strides towards opioid-sparing anesthesia and analgesia, it's essential to find appropriate substitutes. This procedure requires adequate relaxation of pelvic muscles during the procedure and proper analgesia after the procedure, with the presence of intracavitary applicators, needed for radiation treatment. We studied the day-case safety and analgesic efficacy of adjuvants dexmedetomidine 3 µg and fentanyl 15 µg intrathecally to low-dose 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Methods Seventy females scheduled for brachytherapy procedures were randomly allocated to receive either Group I (0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (1.8 ml) plus 3µg dexmedetomidine (0.3ml)) or Group II (0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (1.8 ml) plus 15µg fentanyl (0.3ml)). The primary outcome was to assess and compare the brachytherapy (day-case) feasibility with 3µg dexmedetomidine and 15µg fentanyl (time taken to meet hospital discharge criteria). The secondary outcomes were the absolute duration of spinal analgesia, pain scores, patient satisfaction scores, and any associated adverse events. Data analysis was done using IBM SPSS software for Windows, version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results All patients in Group I were discharged on the same day without any adverse effects. They underwent an intracavitary brachytherapy procedure under spinal anesthesia with stable hemodynamics successfully. The mean time taken to meet hospital discharge criteria in Group II was shorter than in Group I (258.43 ± 27.460 vs. 335.71 ± 21.114). The mean absolute duration of spinal analgesia was significantly longer in Group I as compared to Group II (406.82 ± 51.78 mins vs. 267 ± 16.23 mins) (p<.001). Seventeen patients required rescue analgesia in Group II versus eight in Group I (p<0.025). Conclusion Patients in both groups received excellent analgesia with enhanced patient satisfaction. Three µg intrathecal dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine can be used safely in day-case brachytherapy procedures. It provides adequate anesthesia and prolonged spinal analgesia as compared to 15 µg fentanyl.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Remimazolam is often used for perioperative sedation due to its rapid onset and offset. However, the possible association between remimazolam and postoperative delirium (POD) remains undetermined. The present study evaluated whether remimazolam increased the incidence of POD compared with dexmedetomidine in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery of the lower extremities. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients aged ≥ 65 years who had undergone orthopedic surgery of the lower extremities under spinal anesthesia from January 2020 to November 2022 and were sedated with continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine or remimazolam. The incidence of POD was assessed through a validated comprehensive review process of each patient's medical records. The effect of remimazolam on the occurrence of POD compared with dexmedetomidine was evaluated by propensity score weighted multivariable logistic models. RESULTS: A total of 447 patients were included in the final analysis. The crude incidence of POD within 3 days after surgery was 7.5% (17/226) in the dexmedetomidine group and 11.8% (26/221) in the remimazolam group, increasing to 9.7% (22/226) and 15.8% (35/221), respectively (p = 0.073), within 5 days. The multivariable models showed that, compared with dexmedetomidine, intraoperative sedation with remimazolam significantly increased the occurrence of POD within 3 days (odds ratio [OR] 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31 to 3.82, p = 0.003) and 5 days (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.32 to 3.40, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Compared with dexmedetomidine, remimazolam infusion may be associated with a higher risk of POD in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery of the lower extremities under spinal anesthesia.

RESUMEN

Existing evidence of the effect of spinal anesthesia (SA) on cardiac systolic function is scarce and inconclusive. This study aimed to evaluate the effects induced by a single injection of SA for elective vascular surgery on left (LV) and right (RV) ventricular systolic performance using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). A prospective study. Single-center study, university hospital. Adult patients undergoing elective vascular surgery with SA. During patients' evaluations fluid administration was targeted using arterial waveform monitoring. All patients underwent TTE studies before and after SA induction for the assessment of indices reflective of LV and RV systolic function. Blood samples were drawn to measure troponin and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. A total of 62 patients (88.7% males, 71.00 ± 9.42 years) were included in the study. The primary outcome was the difference before and after SA in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). In total population, LVEF significantly increased after SA 53.07% [16.51]vs 53.86% [13.28]; p < 0.001). End-systolic volume (ESV, 69.50 [51.50] vs. 65.00 [29.50] ml; p < 0.001) decreased while stroke volume (SV) insignificantly increased (70.51 ± 16.70 vs. 73.00 ± 18.76 ml; p = 0.131) during SA. TAPSE remained unchanged (2.23 [0.56] vs. 2.25 [0.69] mm; p = 0.558). In patients with impaired compared to those with preserved LV systolic function, the changes evidenced in LVEF (7.49 ± 4.15 vs. 0.59 ± 2.79; p < 0.001), ESV (-18.13 ± 18.20 vs-1.53 ± 9.09; p < 0.001) and SV (8.71 ± 11.96 vs-1.43 ± 11.89; p = 0.002) were greater. This study provides evidence that SA in patients undergoing elective vascular surgery improved LV systolic function, while changes in RV systolic function are minimal.

RESUMEN

Background: C-section is usually performed under spinal anesthesia also known as a subarachnoid block (SAB) over general anesthesia. Because of the lesser amount of dose used, there is a lower risk of local anesthetic toxicity and minimal transfer of drugs to the fetus. Obstetric patients have a higher risk of having post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). PDPH occurs due to leakage of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through the hole created by a spinal needle. There are many elements affecting the frequency of PDPH, these elements can also consist of age, female sex, needle size, and types, pregnancy, preceding records of PDPH, median-paramedian distinction in approach, a puncture level. PDPH is commonly in the form of a frontal, occipital, or retro-orbital headache that starts in 12-72 h after the dural puncture and will increase when standing and decrease when lying down or resting. We aimed to learn about headache frequency between elective and emergency lower segment cesarean section using 26-G Quincke spinal needle in full-term pregnant patients. Objectives: To study the incidence of PDPH using the 26G Quincke spinal needle. To analyze the causal factors/determinants such as adequate preloading of fluids, size of spinal needle, number of pricks, and technique of lumbar puncture effects on the incidence of PDPH. Methodology: This study is a prospective questionnaire-based comparative observational study using the convenience sampling method. The patients were interviewed with a structured questionnaire at the Symbiosis University Hospital and Research Centre, Lavale, Pune. The patients observed for the study were between 20 and 40 of age group, posted for emergency or elective lower segment cesarean section, with body mass index (BMI) less than 14.5 to 24.9 and with ASA I and II grades. Patients with any comorbidities, recurrent headaches, obesity, and spine deformity were excluded. According to the review of the literature and with the help of a formula, the sample size was calculated as 20; 10 patients for elective LSCS, and 10 patients for emergency LSCS. Results: Out of 20 patients, 10 patients were posted for elective LSCS, and the rest 10 patients were for emergency LSCS under spinal anesthesia. The incidence of PDPH was found only in 2 out of 10 emergency LSCS patients, and no patients from elective LSCS cases showed up with the incidence of PDPH.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Ultrasound view of the interlaminar structure is likely to be associated with difficult spinal anesthesia (DSA), and a poor ultrasound view which cannot show the anterior and posterior complex predicts a difficult spinal technique. As our target site is the posterior complex, this study aimed to assess whether the ratio of posterior complex length to depth measured by ultrasound can predict DSA in cesarean delivery. METHODS: Four anesthesiologists with 1-2 years of experience located and marked the puncture interspace using a traditional surface landmark. Subsequently, the ultrasound examiner located and measured the marked interspace via an oblique parasagittal ultrasound scan. The anesthesiologists, who were blinded to the ultrasound results, performed spinal anesthesia using a 25-gauge Whitacre spinal needle. The total number of attempts, including skin punctures and needle passes, was recorded and the DSA was defined as 10 unsuccessful attempts. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent predictors, and receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to evaluate the performance of the ratio of posterior complex length to depth for predicting DSA. RESULTS: A total of 397 cesarean delivery parturients with successfully measured posterior complex were included in the analysis. DSA occurred in 64 parturients (16.1%). Reduced length [odds ratio (OR) = 0.010, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.002-0.062, P < 0.001] and increased depth [OR = 6.127, 95% CI, 2.671-14.056, P < 0.001] of the posterior complex were independently predictive of DSA compared with body mass index, abdominal circumference, and palpable surface landmarks. The ratio of posterior complex length to depth for predicting DSA had an area under the curve of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82-0.90). The optimal cutoff was 0.23, with a sensitivity of 86% (95% CI, 74-93%) and specificity of 72% (95% CI, 67-77%). CONCLUSION: The ratio of posterior complex length to depth measured by ultrasound demonstrated a considerable accuracy in predicting DSA for inexperienced anesthesiologists. A higher ratio at ultrasound is an indication to evaluate the optimal puncture body position and interspace in the clinic practice. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2200065171 https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=180855.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture surgeries in elderly patients often require spinal or general anesthesia, posing risks of severe hypotension and inadequate pain management. The optimal anesthesia type for minimizing these risks remains undetermined. Preliminary studies suggest that a combination of fascia iliaca block (FIB) and low-dose low-specific-gravity spinal anesthesia (LLSA) might offer a solution, but comprehensive evidence is lacking. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of combining FIB with LLSA for reducing severe hypotension and enhancing analgesia during hip fracture surgery in elderly patients. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted. SETTING: An operating theatre of a tertiary hospital. METHODS: The study comprised 68 patients. They were separated into 2 equal parallel groups 34 patients each: the FIB+LLSA group and the general anesthesia (GA) group. Patients aged 75-96 undergoing primary hip arthroplasty for hip fracture were randomized to receive either FIB+LLSA or GA. The primary outcome was the incidence of severe hypotension; secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, use of rescue analgesia, vasopressor dosage, and complications. RESULTS: We found a significantly lower incidence of severe hypotension in the FIB+LLSA group compared to the GA group (32.4% vs 67.6%). Additionally, postoperative pain scores were significantly lower, and the need for rescue analgesia was reduced in the FIB+LLSA group. Vasopressor use during surgery was also significantly lower in the FIB+LLSA group. The hospital stay was shorter in the FIB+LLSA group, with an average of 5.9 days compared to 6.7 days in the GA group. LIMITATIONS: The study's limitations include its single-center nature, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the inability to conduct a double-blind study could introduce biases, though measures were taken to minimize this. The sample size might not be sufficient to determine the broader implications of LLSA. CONCLUSIONS: Combining FIB with LLSA for elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery significantly reduces the incidence of severe intraoperative hypotension and postoperative pain. It also decreases the need for rescue analgesia and shortens hospital stays, suggesting that FIB+LLSA could be a beneficial regional anesthesia technique for elderly hip fracture surgery patients, aligning with enhanced recovery protocols.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Factor (F)XI deficiency is a rare bleeding disorder with a poor correlation between bleeding tendency and FXI level. Management of pregnant women with FXI deficiency is not clearly established, especially regarding neuraxial analgesia (NA). Objectives: A retrospective multicenter observational study was conducted in French hemostasis centers on pregnant women with FXI of <60 IU/dL. Methods: Data to report were (i) FXI levels before pregnancy and at time of delivery, (ii) type of NA and delivery management modalities, and (iii) possible complications related to NA and bleeding complications. Results: Three hundred fourteen pregnancies in patients with FXI deficiency of <60 IU/dL were reported (from 20 centers); among them, 199 NA procedures have been completed (137 epidurals and 61 spinals, 1 had both). The period of childbirth was mostly from 2014 to 2020 (281/314; 89.5%). Congenital FXI deficiency was established with certainty by investigators in 32.8% patients (n = 103). Previous bleedings were described in 20.4% of the patients (64/314; 45.3% cutaneous, 31.3% gynecologic, and 15.6% postsurgical). Thirteen deliveries had an NA procedure with FXI of <30 IU/dL, 42 with FXI of 30-40 IU/dL, and 118 with FXI of 40-60 IU/dL. Median FXI levels at delivery in the epidural and spinal groups were not significantly different but were significantly lower in the group without NA by medical staff contraindications. There were no complications related to NA. A 17.5% postpartum hemorrhage or excessive postpartum bleeding incidence was reported, which is consistent with previous data. Conclusion: Our data support the use of a 30 IU/dL FXI threshold for NA, as suggested by the French proposals published in August 2023.