Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 354
Filtrar
2.
BMC Prim Care ; 25(1): 295, 2024 Aug 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39127653

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Long-lasting symptoms with a possible relation to psychosomatic comorbidity have been described following COVID-19. However, data is sparse in general practice. The trial's objective was to investigate the time-dependent frequency of disease symptoms and relation to psychosomatic comorbidity and daily life impairment (DLI). METHODS: Comparative cohort study of patients reporting a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and uninfected controls in general practice. Participants were recruited in 14 general practices in the greater Munich area. Data collection was questionnaire based with a 12 months follow-up. Descriptive statistics, multivariable regression and bivariate correlations were used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of n = 204 cases infected up to 42 months ago (n = 141 Omicron, n = 63 earlier variants), and n = 119 controls were included. Disease symptoms were substantially more prevalent in cases (55-79% vs. 43% within one year of infection). This difference also appeared in the multivariable analysis adjusting for socio-demographics and psychosomatic comorbidity with odds ratios (OR) of 4.15 (p < 0.001) and 3.51 (p = 0.054) for the cohorts with Omicron or earlier variants infection (vs. controls), respectively. It was persistent with earlier variants (OR 1.00 per month, p = 0.903), while a decreasing trend was observed for Omicron (OR 0.89 per month, p < 0.001). DLI was especially correlated with fatigue (r = 0.628). CONCLUSION: DLI, psychosomatic comorbidity and independently increased disease symptoms require holistic treatment of the patient in general practice according to the bio-psycho-social model. A key role in restoring the daily life capability may be attributed to the symptom fatigue.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Comorbilidad , Medicina General , Trastornos Psicofisiológicos , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/psicología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Psicofisiológicos/epidemiología , Trastornos Psicofisiológicos/psicología , Estudios de Cohortes , Adulto , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Actividades Cotidianas/psicología , Alemania/epidemiología
3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39073170

RESUMEN

As clinicians involved in the care of patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs), we-and many colleagues-have the impression that social media are adversely shaping the nature, presentation, and ability to manage these disorders, especially at the severe end of the DGBI clinical spectrum. We turned to the research literature to see if these clinical impressions were corroborated but found it virtually nonexistent. Social media have rapidly become a ubiquitous, pervasive part of the lives of most people on the planet. Although they bring many benefits, they are also replete with health misinformation, reinforcement of abnormal sick-role behavior, and undermining of the legitimacy of psychological care. We first set out four reasons for concern about social media and DGBIs, particularly severe DGBIs. These reasons stem from phenomena described in medical fields outside DGBIs, but there is no reason to think DGBIs should be exempt from such phenomena. We then present the results of a literature search, which yielded only eight disparate recent empirical studies. We review these studies, which, although not uninformative, reveal a field in its infancy. We set out implications, most urgently multidisciplinary research directly addressing the role of social media and evaluation of interventions to mitigate its ill effects. Gastroenterological clinicians involved in DGBI care and research need to collaborate with experts in social media research, which is a very rapidly evolving, specialized field. Although knowledge is at an early stage, there are implications for specialist practice, education and training, and DGBI service delivery.

4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39063478

RESUMEN

Somatoform symptoms are widely spread in outpatient care. For treating physicians, it can be challenging to establish a relationship that is conducive to compliance and to take stabilising action when dealing with affected patients. As primary care providers, GPs are usually the first point of contact for patients with somatoform disorders; they set the course for stabilisation and further care. To date, there is a lack of studies that focus on how GPs respond to such patients. In particular, strategies for establishing a stable doctor-patient relationship have hardly been explored. Consequently, this study investigated how GPs recognise the symptoms of somatoform disorders, what significance they attach to them and how they handle patients. The primary focus is on experienced patient properties, assumed causes of somatoform disorders, obstacles and complexities in consultation, care and stabilisation strategies, as well as diagnostic forms of support. A total of 2797 GPs in the German federal states of Hesse, Rhineland-Palatinate and Baden-Württemberg were surveyed anonymously by means of a written questionnaire between January and August 2023. A t-test was performed with independent samples to determine significant differences between two groups. In addition, 64 GPs were interviewed between March and April by means of qualitative semi-standardised interviews. The respondents make use of a wide range of communication and stabilisation strategies when treating somatoform physical complaints. The GPs combine the establishment of a tangential doctor-patient relationship with measures to consistently exclude physical causes and to enable the best possible assessment of patients, as well as to gently introduce them to the clinical picture of somatoform disorders. Most physicians are not familiar with current clinical guidelines. Cooperation with specialists and therapists is widely described as complicated. GPs have access to a wide range of communication and stabilisation strategies for the management of somatoform physical complaints. Yet, they experience interaction with this patient group as difficult in daily practice. GPs articulate a clear need for more external support. Apart from increasing therapeutic care capacities and interdisciplinary structures, it seems advisable to extend low-threshold therapy and support services.


Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud , Trastornos Somatomorfos , Trastornos Somatomorfos/psicología , Trastornos Somatomorfos/terapia , Alemania , Médicos Generales/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Adaptación Psicológica , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Anciano , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Habilidades de Afrontamiento
5.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 698, 2024 Jun 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38831287

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Functional somatic symptoms (FFS) and bodily distress disorders are highly prevalent across all medical settings. Services for these patients are dispersed across the health care system with minimal conceptual and operational integration, and patients do not currently access therapeutic offers in significant numbers due to a mismatch between their and professionals' understanding of the nature of the symptoms. New service models are urgently needed to address patients' needs and to align with advances in aetiological evidence and diagnostic classification systems to overcome the body-mind dichotomy. METHOD: A panel of clinical experts from different clinical services involved in providing aspects of health care for patients with functional symptoms reviewed the current care provision. This review and the results from a focus group exploration of patients with lived experience of functional symptoms were explored by the multidisciplinary expert group, and the conclusions are summarised as recommendations for best practice. RESULTS: The mapping exercise and multidisciplinary expert consultation revealed five themes for service improvement and pathway development: time/access, communication, barrier-free care, choice and governance. Service users identified four meta-themes for best practice recommendations: focus on healthcare professional communication and listening skills as well as professional attributes and knowledge base to help patients being both believed and understood in order to accept their condition; systemic and care pathway issues such as stronger emphasis on primary care as the first point of contact for patients, resources to reduce the length of the patient journey from initial assessment to diagnosis and treatment. CONCLUSION: We propose a novel, integrated care pathway for patients with 'functional somatic disorder', which delivers care according to and working with patients' explanatory beliefs. The therapeutic model should operate based upon an understanding of the embodied nature of patient's complaints and provide flexible access points to the care pathway.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Síntomas sin Explicación Médica , Trastornos Somatomorfos , Humanos , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Trastornos Somatomorfos/terapia , Trastornos Somatomorfos/diagnóstico , Grupos Focales , Participación de los Interesados , Femenino
6.
Curr Psychiatry Rep ; 26(7): 331-339, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38748190

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We review recent evidence on Illness Anxiety Disorder (IAD), including risk factors and precipitants, diagnostic classification, clinical characteristics of the disorder, and assessment and treatment in both children and adults. RECENT FINDINGS: IAD places a substantial burden on both individuals and society. Despite its impact, understanding of the disorder is lacking and debates remain about whether IAD should be classified as an anxiety disorder and whether it is distinct from Somatic Symptom Disorder. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for IAD and there are multiple validated measures of health anxiety available. However, research on health anxiety in children and youth is limited. IAD is chronic, and debilitating, but when identified, it can be effectively treated with CBT. Research using DSM-5 IAD criteria is lacking, and more research is needed to better understand the disorder, particularly in children and youth.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad , Humanos , Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Niño
7.
Psychother Res ; : 1-11, 2024 Apr 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38590020

RESUMEN

Background and objective: Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for somatoform disorders (SFDs) is understudied in China. Western findings may not be applicable to Chinese culture. This preliminary study evaluated the efficacy of CBT for patients in China, relative to treatment-as-usual (TAU). Methods: Seventy patients with SFDs randomly received either combined CBT and TAU (CBT + TAU), or TAU alone between January 2018 to May 2019. The CBT + TAU group received 12 weekly individual 50-minute CBT sessions. Participants were blindly assessed at 4 timepoints (baseline, week 6, end of treatment: week 12; 12 weeks post-treatment: week 24) using the following outcome measures: SQSS (Self-screening Questionnaire for Somatic Symptoms); PHQ-15 (Patient-Health-Questionnaire-15) and the WI (Whiteley Index); GAD-7 (General Anxiety Disorder-7); HAMD-17 (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17); Family Burden Interview Schedule (FBIS); Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS); and the Short Form of Quality-of-Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q-SF). The primary endpoint was the difference between the SQSS total score at week 24 and the baseline. A mixed model for repeated measures was used to analyze inter- and intra-group changes from the baseline. Results: At week 24, The least-squares mean (LSM) change of the total score on the SQSS was -18.87 points and -9.69 points, respectively in the CBT + TAU group and in the TAU group (LSM difference, -9.18 points; 95% confidence interval, -15.72 to -2.64; P = 0.0068). At week 24, the LSM changes from baseline in the WI, HAMD, PHQ15, FBIS and SDS total scores were significantly different between the two groups, however, there was no significant difference in the Q-LES-Q-SF. The SQSS of group effect sizes were 0.63 at 24 weeks. The dropout rates of the CBT + TAU and TAU groups were comparable (22.9% and 19.3%). Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest that CBT may be helpful for improving the symptoms of patients with SFDs in China.

9.
Int J Psychophysiol ; 200: 112342, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38614440

RESUMEN

Cardinal characteristics of somatoform disorders (SFDs) are worry of illness, and impaired affective processing. We used relative frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA), a method to measure functional lateralization of affective processing, to investigate psychobiological correlates of SFDs. With alpha activity being inversely related to cortical network activity, relative FAA refers to alpha activity on the right frontal lobe minus alpha activity on the left frontal lobe. Less relative left frontal activity, reflected by negative FAA scores, is associated with lower positive and greater negative affectivity, such as observed in depression. Due to its negative affective component (illness anxiety), we expected to find less relative left frontal activity pattern in SFDs, and positive associations with self-reported chronic stress and depression symptoms. We recorded resting-state EEG activity with 64 electrodes, placed in a 10-10 system in 26 patients with a primary SFD, 23 patients with a major depressive disorder and 25 healthy control participants. The groups did not differ in FAA. Nevertheless, across all participants, less relative left frontal activity was associated with chronic stress and depression symptoms. We concluded that FAA may not serve as an indicator of SFDs. As the relationship of FAA and depressive symptoms was fully mediated by chronic stress, future studies have to clarify whether the association between FAA and chronic stress may represent a shared underlying factor for the manifestation of mental health complaints, such as depression.


Asunto(s)
Ritmo alfa , Depresión , Lóbulo Frontal , Trastornos Somatomorfos , Estrés Psicológico , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Ritmo alfa/fisiología , Trastornos Somatomorfos/fisiopatología , Estrés Psicológico/fisiopatología , Lóbulo Frontal/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Depresión/fisiopatología , Lateralidad Funcional/fisiología , Enfermedad Crónica , Electroencefalografía , Adulto Joven
10.
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 36(3): 197-205, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38481168

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Functional seizures are common among people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Subjective cognitive concerns refer to a person's own perception of problems with cognitive functioning in everyday life. The authors investigated the presence and correlates of subjective cognitive concerns and the response to neurobehavioral therapy among adults with TBI and functional seizures (TBI+FS group). METHODS: In this observational study, participants in the TBI+FS group (N=47) completed a 12-session neurobehavioral therapy protocol for seizures, while participants in the comparison group (TBI without seizures) (N=50) received usual treatment. Subjective cognitive concerns, objective cognition, mental health, and quality of life were assessed before and after treatment. Data collection occurred from 2018 to 2022. RESULTS: Baseline subjective cognitive concerns were reported for 37 (79%) participants in the TBI+FS group and 20 (40%) participants in the comparison group. In a multivariable regression model in the TBI+FS group, baseline global mental health (ß=-0.97) and obsessive-compulsive symptoms (ß=-1.01) were associated with subjective cognitive concerns at baseline. The TBI+FS group had fewer subjective cognitive concerns after treatment (η2=0.09), whereas the TBI comparison group showed a nonsignificant increase in subjective cognitive concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Subjective cognitive concerns are common among people with TBI and functional seizures and may be related to general mental health and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Evidence-based neurobehavioral therapy for functional seizures is a reasonable treatment option to address such concerns in this population, although additional studies in culturally diverse samples are needed. In addition, people with functional seizures would likely benefit from rehabilitation specifically targeted toward cognitive functioning.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Convulsiones , Humanos , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/rehabilitación , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Convulsiones/etiología , Convulsiones/psicología , Convulsiones/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Disfunción Cognitiva/etiología , Disfunción Cognitiva/rehabilitación , Disfunción Cognitiva/terapia , Disfunción Cognitiva/fisiopatología , Calidad de Vida , Cognición/fisiología , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Adulto Joven
11.
Complex Psychiatry ; 10(1-4): 10-18, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38455259

RESUMEN

Introduction: Somatic symptom disorder (SSD) as introduced by the DSM-5 is characterized by chronic somatic symptoms not fully explained by underlying pathology and accompanied by psychological factors, the diagnostic B-criteria. These cognitive, affective, and behavioral disturbances are related to increased attention to somatic symptoms. However, there is a lack of empirical evidence regarding the association between the B-criteria and high symptom reporting in clinical settings. Methods: This 12-year retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study examined 6,491 patients from a German psychosomatic outpatient center. The somatoform subscale of HEALTH-49 was used to evaluate somatic symptom reporting. Excessive health concerns and other potential criteria associated with symptom reporting were determined using the ICD-10-Symptom Rating and other HEALTH-49 subscales. Results: Regression analysis revealed that the established B-criteria for SSD were the strongest factors associated with somatic symptom reporting, with a standardized beta-coefficient of ß = 0.31 (R2 = 0.428, df = 24, F = 187.886). Other psychobehavioral factors were clearly less associated with somatic symptom reporting, such as depressive symptoms with ß = 0.15 and impaired activity and participation with ß = 0.12. Sociodemographic factors, such as age (ß = 0.16) and gender (ß = 0.12), were also independently associated with somatic symptom reporting. Conclusion: This study provides evidence for the concept of SSD related to specific B-criteria associated with somatic symptom reporting, based on a large patient sample. These results point to an important role of psychological symptomatology in patients with somatic symptoms. The findings also suggest that additional factors contribute to the reporting of somatic symptoms. Our results may inform future diagnostic criteria for SSD.


This scientific study examines the association between psychobehavioral factors and somatic symptom reporting in a large sample of psychosomatic outpatients. We investigated the association of established and possible additional psychobehavioral criteria for somatic symptom disorder (SSD) as defined in the DSM-V. The study included 6,491 patients from a psychosomatic outpatient center over a 12-year period. The participants completed self-report questionnaires to assess somatic symptom reporting and psychobehavioral factors. The results showed that the B-criteria of SSD were associated with somatic symptom reporting, indicating the validity of these criteria in clinical practice. Other psychobehavioral factors, such as depressive symptoms and impaired activity and participation, as well as sociodemographic factors such as age and gender were also associated with somatic symptom reporting but to a much lesser extent. This study has limitations, including its retrospective and cross-sectional design, reliance on self-report measures, and the need for further research using longitudinal data and clinician-rated assessments to complement self-report data. However, our research highlights the importance of psychological symptomatology in individuals who report somatic symptoms. These findings may inform future diagnostic criteria and treatment approaches for individuals with SSD and improve treatment and patient outcomes.

12.
Indian J Psychiatry ; 66(1): 58-66, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38419934

RESUMEN

Background: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a neuro-sensorimotor disorder which is scarcely researched and is commonly missed in routine psychiatry practice. Aim: To evaluate the prevalence of RLS and its correlates in patients with anxiety, depression, and somatoform disorders. Methods: A cross-sectional single-center study was undertaken in patients aged 18-65 years suffering from ICD-10 (International Statistical Classification of Diseases-10th edition) diagnosis of anxiety, depressive, and somatoform disorders. RLS was evaluated by using diagnostic criteria of International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) and severity measured on IRLSSG scale. Depression and anxiety were rated on Hamilton Depression and Anxiety Rating Scales respectively, insomnia severity measured by Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and quality of life measured by WHO Quality of Life-Brief version (WHO-QOL BREF) scale. Serum ferritin levels were measured for evaluating iron deficiency. Results: The rate of RLS was 66.7%, 50%, and 48% in patients with depressive, anxiety, and somatoform disorders, respectively, with no significant inter-group difference. Nearly one-third of patients suffered from severe to very severe symptoms of RLS, and quality of life was poorest in those with depressive disorders. RLS was significantly higher in females (P = 0.019), who were married (P = 0.040), diagnosed with severe depression (P = 0.029), and abused benzodiazepines (P = 0.045). On binary logistic regression, female gender and presence of clinical insomnia predicted occurrence of RLS. Conclusion: The prevalence of RLS is very high in patients with common psychiatric disorders which is often missed. Clinical enquiry and examination for reversible causes such as iron deficiency may assist in its diagnosis and improve clinical outcome.

14.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 144(4): 1575-1584, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38386066

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: To test the hypothesis, whether HADS/SOMS is practical in a spine surgery consultation setting and that patients with CLBP, but a high-risk of psychic comorbidities using above screenings will not improve after minimal-invasive spine interventions (MIS). METHODS: n = 150 completed HADS and SOMS prior to the acquisition of history and examination. Primary outcome was improvement by numeric rating scale (NRS), Pain disability index (PDI) and oswestry disability index (ODI) at baseline and 6 months after intervention. In case of sciatica due to disc herniation epidural neurolysis, for facet or SI-joint-syndrome, radiofrequency and for discogenic pain intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) was performed. RESULTS: 6 months after interventions, pat. with a high-risk of anxiety or depression showed no clinically important improvements in NRS, PDI and ODI, whereas in the low-risk group all 3 parameters were significantly reduced. We found a statistically significant difference in the improvement of NRS (p < 0·05), PDI (p < 0·001), ODI (p < 0·001) between high- and low-risk HADS-anxiety and depression groups and in the improvement of NRS and PDI (p < 0·05) between high- and low-risk SOMS-2-subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of CLBP patients, the easy-to-administer HADS/SOMS reliably predicted outcome after MIS due to the detection of somatoform comorbidities. Thus, 30 out of 150 patients were invasively treated without improvement. This is alarming not only because of unnecessary MIS being performed on these individuals, but also because it represents an inefficient allocation of increasingly limited healthcare funds. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.


Asunto(s)
Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral , Vértebras Lumbares , Humanos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Dolor , Manejo del Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
J Clin Psychol Med Settings ; 31(3): 607-613, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38400952

RESUMEN

Amidst broad changes to the somatic disorder diagnoses, DSM-IV pain disorder was absorbed into DSM-5's somatic symptom disorder (SSD) as a specifier. However, clinical research testing of its use for the chronic pain population has been limited and its utility remains inconclusive. Using the exemplar of fibromyalgia, this article evaluates the validity, reliability, clinical utility, and acceptability of the SSD pain specifier. The diagnosis appears to have moderate validity but low specificity for the fibromyalgia population. The pain specifier has neither undergone sufficient field testing nor been evaluated for use by medical providers, with available data suggesting low reliability. Further research is needed to establish clinical utility via assessment of differential treatment outcomes. Concerns about social, legal, and economic consequences of classifying pain patients with a mental health diagnosis are outstanding. The current SSD criteria should be used with caution among the fibromyalgia patient population until its application for chronic pain has been further researched.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Fibromialgia , Trastornos Somatomorfos , Fibromialgia/diagnóstico , Fibromialgia/complicaciones , Humanos , Trastornos Somatomorfos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Somatomorfos/psicología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Síntomas sin Explicación Médica
16.
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 36(3): 214-219, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38343313

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Limited research has directly investigated whether and how placebo effects can be harnessed for the treatment of functional neurological disorder (FND), despite a long-standing and controversial history of interest in this area. METHODS: A small exploratory study was conducted with adults with a cognitive subtype of FND recruited from a single cognitive neurology center in the United States. Participants were given the expectation of receiving cranial stimulation that could benefit their memory symptoms; however, the intervention was sham transcranial magnetic stimulation (placebo). Outcomes included measures of short-term memory testing, subjective memory rating, and state anxiety before and after stimulation. After the study, the true objective and rationale for investigating placebo effects were explained in a scripted debriefing session. Acceptability of the study design and qualitative feedback were collected. Institutional ethics approval and signed consent were obtained. RESULTS: Three patients (female, N=2; male, N=1; average age=57 years) were recruited. Outcome data were analyzed descriptively at the patient level. Trends of improvement in subjective memory rating, but not objective cognitive test scores, and decreases in state anxiety were observed. After the debriefing session, all patients found the study design to be acceptable (ratings of 70%, 90%, and 100%), and two of the three patients believed that withholding mechanistic information about the intervention was needed to leverage placebo effects as treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In the first study to prospectively investigate the feasibility of harnessing placebo effects for the treatment of FND, promising preliminary findings were obtained, and methods and resources for use in larger future studies are offered.


Asunto(s)
Estudios de Factibilidad , Efecto Placebo , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Proyectos Piloto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/métodos , Anciano , Adulto , Ansiedad/terapia , Trastornos del Conocimiento/terapia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38397671

RESUMEN

In Germany, long-term opioid treatment (L-TOT) for chronic non-tumor pain (CNTP) is discussed as not being performed according to the German guideline on L-TOT for CNTP. In the present analysis, the occurrence and predictors of inappropriate care/overuse in a cohort of German insureds with L-TOT for CNTP by the presence of a contraindication with concurrent opioid analgesic (OA) therapy were investigated. We also analyzed whether prescribing physicians themselves diagnosed a contraindication. The retrospective cohort study was based on administrative claims data from a German statutory health insurance. Eight contraindication groups were defined based on the German guideline. Logistic regressions were performed in order to identify predictors for OA prescriptions despite contraindications. The possible knowledge of the prescribing physician about the contraindication was approximated by analyzing concordant unique physician identification numbers of OA prescriptions and contraindication diagnoses. A total of 113,476 individuals (75% female) with a mean age of 72 years were included. The most common documented contraindications were primary headaches (8.7%), severe mood disorders (7.7%) and pain in somatoform disorders (4.5%). The logistic regressions identified a younger age, longer history of OA therapy, opioid related psychological problems, and outpatient psychosomatic primary care as positive predictors for all contraindication groups.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Neoplasias , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Analgésicos , Prescripciones , Alemania/epidemiología , Análisis de Datos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina
18.
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 36(2): 166-171, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38258378

RESUMEN

Neuroscience-based patient education has become an evidence-based strategy for enhancing chronic pain treatment. Advances in understanding the neuroscience of functional neurological disorder (FND) may allow similar approaches to be developed and disseminated to clinicians, given the public health need for greater provider awareness and expertise around the condition. Accordingly, the authors developed an online video module for clinicians that delivers neuroscience-based psychoeducation for FND and assessed whether the intervention would be associated with changes in clinicians' perception of FND patients and knowledge about the condition. The online intervention consisted of a 20-minute video module, including an 8-minute scripted role-play that modeled neuroscience-informed diagnosis delivery. Pre- and postintervention questionnaires were embedded into the online module and included a self-assessment of FND-related perceptions and knowledge and a multiple-choice assessment of retention of the neuroscience-based content. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and McNemar's tests were used for statistical analyses. Of the 103 individuals who submitted surveys, 40 participants provided a complete data set from before and after the intervention. Following the intervention, self-assessment items showed respondents had significantly greater comfort with diagnosis delivery and treatment options and decreased negative perception of FND patients. The percentage of correct responses on a multiple-choice assessment regarding the functional neuroanatomy of FND was significantly increased. In summary, the online neuroscience-based educational intervention was effective for increasing clinician knowledge about FND and comfort with diagnosis delivery and treatment options. Implementing web-based formats may be a viable and cost-effective approach to disseminating knowledge and basic clinical skills in the care of patients with FND.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Conversión , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso , Neurociencias , Humanos , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/diagnóstico , Internet
19.
Alerta (San Salvador) ; 7(1): 69-78, ene. 26, 2024. ilus, tab.
Artículo en Español | BISSAL, LILACS | ID: biblio-1526716

RESUMEN

Introducción. El trastorno somatomorfo se caracteriza por la presentación de múltiples síntomas físicos que no pueden ser atribuidos a otra enfermedad física, mental o al uso de sustancias, teniendo como comorbilidad más prevalente a los trastornos de personalidad. Objetivo. Determinar la frecuencia de trastorno somatomorfo, sus características principales y diferentes rasgos de personalidad entre pacientes con lumbalgia crónica. Metodología. Estudio descriptivo transversal realizado con pacientes ingresados en el servicio de neurocirugía del Hospital General del Instituto Salvadoreño del Seguro Social. La recolección de datos se realizó a través de la escala Screening for Somatoform Symptoms 2 y la escala InternationalPersonality Disorder Examination. Las variables cualitativas fueron analizadas a través de frecuencias absolutas. Las variables cuantitativas fueron analizadas a través de medidas de tendencia central y de dispersión. Los análisis estadísticos fueron realizados en el programa Statistical Package for the Social Sicience, versión 26. Resultados. Se incluyeron 60 pacientes, 40 de ellos mujeres, 31 entre los 41 y 60 años. Veintiocho pacientes presentaron ocho o más síntomas, excluyéndose dolor lumbar. Cuarenta y cinco pacientes reportaron sintomatología por más de un año. Cincuenta y tres pacientes presentaron trastorno somatomorfo. Los trastornos de personalidad más frecuentes fueron obsesivo-compulsivos (31), límites (21) y paranoides (21). Conclusión. Los pacientes con dolor lumbar crónico que requieren ingreso hospitalario presentan una alta frecuencia de trastornos somatomorfos, con dolor en piernas o brazos como síntoma principal; además, estos pacientes se caracterizan por presentar en su mayoría rasgos de personalidad obsesivo-compulsivos.


Introduction. The somatoform symptoms disorder is characterized by multiple psychical symptoms that can't be attributed to another physical or mental health diagnosis or drug abuse, having personality disorders as the most common comorbidity. Objective. To determine the frequency of somatoform disorders, it's most important characteristics and different personality traits among patients with chronic back pain. Methodology. Cross-sectional descriptive study carried out with patients admitted to the neurosurgery department of the General Hospital of the Salvadoran Social Security Institute. Data collection was carried out using the Screening for Somatoform Symptoms 2 scale and the International Personality Disorder Examination scale. The qualitative variables were analyzed through absolute frequencies. The quantitative variables were analyzed through measures of central tendency and dispersion. The statistical analyzes were carried out using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 26. Results. The study included 60 patients, 40 of them women, 31 between 41 and 60 years old. Twenty-eight patients presented eight or more symptoms, excluding low back pain. Forty-five patients reported symptoms for more than one year. Fifty-three patients presented somatoform disorder. The most frequent personality disorders were obsessive-compulsive (31), borderline (21) and paranoid (21). Conclusion. Patients with chronic lower back pain who require hospital admission have a high frequency of somatoform disorders, with the main symptom being pain in the legs or arms; furthermore, these patients are characterized by mostly presenting obsessive-compulsive personality traits


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , El Salvador
20.
Health Psychol Rev ; 18(1): 75-116, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36651573

RESUMEN

Persistent physical symptoms (PPS) remain a challenge in the healthcare system due to time-constrained consultations, uncertainty and limited specialised care capacity. Self-help interventions may be a cost-effective way to widen the access to treatment. As a foundation for future interventions, we aimed to describe intervention components and their potential effects in self-help interventions for PPS. A systematic literature search was made in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CENTRAL. Fifty-one randomised controlled trials were included. Interventions were coded for effect on outcomes (standardised mean difference ≥0.2) related to symptom burden, anxiety, depression, quality of life, healthcare utilisation and sickness absence. The Behaviour Change Technique (BCT) Taxonomy v1 was used to code intervention components. An index of potential was calculated for each BCT within an outcome category. Each BCT was assessed as 'potentially effective' or 'not effective' based on a two-sided test for binomial random variables. Sixteen BCTs showed potential effect as treatment components. These BCTs represented the themes: goals and planning, feedback and monitoring, shaping knowledge, natural consequences, comparison of behaviour, associations, repetition and substitution, regulation, antecedents and identity. The results suggest that specific BCTs should be included in new PPS self-help interventions aiming to improve the patients' physical and mental health.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Conductista , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Terapia Conductista/métodos , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Síntomas Conductuales , Incertidumbre
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA