RESUMEN

Previous reviews on the cost of illness (COI) of Parkinson's disease (PD) have often focused on health-care costs due to PD, underestimating its effects on other sectors. This systematic review determines the COI of PD from a societal perspective. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023428937). Embase, Medline, and EconLit were searched up to October 12, 2023, for studies determining the COI of PD from a societal perspective. From 2812 abstracts, 17 studies were included. The COI of PD averaged €20,911.37 per patient per year, increasing to almost €100,000 in the most severely affected patients. Health-care costs accounted for 46.1% of total costs, followed by productivity loss (37.4%) and costs to patient and family (16.4%). The COI of PD strongly varied between different geographical regions, with costs in North America 3.6 times higher compared to Asia. This study is the first to identify the relative importance of different cost items. Most important were reduced employment, government benefits, informal care, medication, nursing homes, and hospital admission. There was strong variety in the cost items that were included, with 55.2% of cost items measured in fewer than half of articles. Our review shows that PD-COI is high and appears in various cost sectors, with strong variety in the cost items included in different studies. Therefore, a guideline for the measurement of COI in PD should be developed to harmonize this. This article provides a first step toward the development of such a tool by identifying which cost items are most relevant. © 2024 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC) has emerged as a promising solution to improve efficiency, accessibility, and quality of care and to reduce the strain on emergency departments. As this modality gains traction in diverse healthcare settings, it is increasingly important to fully assess its societal value-for-money and conduct thorough process evaluations. However, current economic evaluations mostly emphasise direct- and short-term effect measures, thus lacking a broader societal perspective. AIM: This study offers a comprehensive overview of current effect measures in OOH-PC evaluations and proposes additional measures from the evaluation of integrated care programmes. APPROACH AND DEVELOPMENT: First, we systematically identified the effect measures from published cost-effectiveness studies and classified them as process, outcome, and resource use measures. Second, we elaborate on the incorporation of 'productivity gains', 'health promotion and early intervention', and 'continuity of care' as additional effects into economic evaluations of OOH-PC. Seeking care affects personal and employee time, potentially resulting in decreased productivity. Challenges in taking time off work and limited access to convenient care are often cited as barriers to accessing primary care. As such, OOH-PC can potentially reduce opportunity costs for patients. Furthermore, improving access to healthcare is important in determining whether people receive promotional and preventive services. Health promotion involves empowering people to take control of their health and its determinants. Given the unscheduled nature and the fragmented or rotational care in OOH-PC, the degree to which interventions and modalities provide continuity should be monitored, assessed, and included in economic evaluations. Continuity of care in primary care improves patient satisfaction, promotes adherence to medical advice, reduces reliance on hospitals, and reduces mortality. CONCLUSION: Although it is essential to also address local settings and needs, the integration of broader scope measures into OOH-PC economic evaluations improves the comprehensive evaluation that aligns with welfare gains.

Asunto(s)

Atención Posterior , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud

RESUMEN

Economic evaluations are used to compare the costs and consequences of healthcare interventions, including those for musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders, which are very common and a major source of morbidity and absence from work. Reimbursement decisions for interventions for MSK disorders by decision-makers rely on the findings of economic evaluations, the design and results of which depend largely on the perspective adopted. Despite methodological advancements in economic evaluations, there are no clear guidelines on the perspective to adopt. This paper explores the adoption of a societal perspective in economic evaluations of MSK disorders. Within health economics evaluations, the most commonly used perspectives include the payer perspective, the healthcare perspective, and the societal perspective. To facilitate optimal resource allocation decisions in order to reduce the significant economic burden of MSK disorders and improve the health outcomes of individuals with these disorders, all costs and benefits associated with interventions for them should be included. Thus, the societal perspective is arguably a preferable option to the others for economic evaluations of interventions for MSK disorders.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies for subtypes of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) from the societal perspective, and for any nAMD from the patient perspective in Japan. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to simulate the lifetime transitions of a cohort of patients with nAMD through various health states based on the involvement of nAMD, the treatment status, and decimal best-corrected visual acuity. Ranibizumab biosimilar was compared with aflibercept from the societal perspective regardless of treatment regimen for the analysis of three subtypes (typical nAMD, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), and retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP)). Two analyses from the patient perspective focusing on the treat-and-extend regimens were performed, one with a cap on patients' copayments and one without. Ranibizumab biosimilar was compared with branded ranibizumab, aflibercept, aflibercept as the loading dose switching to ranibizumab biosimilar during maintenance (aflibercept switching to ranibizumab biosimilar), and best supportive care (BSC), for patients with any nAMD. RESULTS: In the subtype analyses, ranibizumab biosimilar when compared with aflibercept resulted in incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of - 0.015, 0.026, and 0.009, and the incremental costs of Japanese yen (JPY) - 50,447, JPY - 997,243, and JPY - 1,286,570 for typical nAMD, PCV, and RAP, respectively. From the patient perspective, ranibizumab biosimilar had incremental QALYs of 0.015, 0.009, and 0.307, compared with aflibercept, aflibercept switching to ranibizumab biosimilar, and BSC, respectively. The incremental costs for ranibizumab biosimilar over a patient lifetime excluding the cap on copayment were estimated to be JPY - 138,948, JPY - 391,935, JPY - 209,099, and JPY - 6,377,345, compared with branded ranibizumab, aflibercept, aflibercept switching to ranibizumab biosimilar, and BSC, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ranibizumab biosimilar was demonstrated as a cost-saving option compared to aflibercept across all subtypes of nAMD, irrespective of the perspectives considered.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Health technology assessment bodies advocate capturing the value of interventions in terms of their benefits to health and broader welfare. The wider societal impacts (WSI) framework considers how changes in health alter a person's net contribution to society-that is, what they produce minus what they consume. In this research, we review this framework and explore the scope to differentiate WSI by equity-relevant sociodemographic characteristics. METHODS: This research updates previous calculations using publicly available data from population-based surveys in the United Kingdom. We then estimate for 199 chronic conditions: (1) WSI for the average person with the condition and (2) gain in WSI for an improvement of 0.1 in health-related quality of life score. RESULTS: The nature and availability of information varied across population-based surveys and precluded analyses to examine WSI by population subgroup. Our updated estimates mirrored earlier findings that consideration of the broader societal impacts of health would reprioritize interventions compared with assessment on health alone. For example, for the same improvement in health, a woman experiencing diseases of the circulatory system has the highest potential gain in WSI (£354/month) whereas a man experiencing HIV has the lowest potential gain (£233/month). CONCLUSIONS: The WSI framework provides a simple, indirect method to inform resource allocation decisions. Understanding the equity implications of this approach was hindered by differences in the information collected across population-based surveys. Findings demonstrate the potential reprioritization that may occur if the broader welfare benefits of health interventions were used to inform coverage decisions.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This cost-utility analysis assessed the long-term clinical and economic benefits of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) triple therapy vs FF/VI or UMEC/VI from a Quebec societal perspective in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with ≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the previous year. METHODS: The validated GALAXY disease progression model was utilized, with parameters set to baseline and efficacy data from IMPACT. Treatment costs (2017 Canadian dollars [C$]) were estimated using Quebec-specific unit costs. Costs and health outcomes were discounted at 1.5 %/year. A willingness-to-pay threshold of C$50,000/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was considered cost-effective. Outcomes modeled were exacerbation rates, QALYs, life years (LYs), costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Subgroup analyses were performed according to prior treatment, exacerbation history in the previous year, and baseline lung function. RESULTS: Over a lifetime horizon, FF/UMEC/VI resulted in more QALYs and LYs gained, at a small incremental cost compared with FF/VI and UMEC/VI. From a societal perspective, the estimated ICER for the base case was C$18,152/QALY vs FF/VI, and C$15,847/QALY vs UMEC/VI. For the subgroup analyses (FF/UMEC/VI compared with FF/VI and UMEC/VI), ICERs ranged from: C$17,412-25,664/QALY and C$16,493-18,663/QALY (prior treatment); C$15,247-19,924/QALY and C$15,444-28,859/QALY (exacerbation history); C$14,025-34,154/QALY and C$16,083-17,509/QALY (baseline lung function). INTERPRETATION: FF/UMEC/VI was predicted to improve outcomes and be cost-effective vs both comparators in the base case and all subgroup analyses, and based on this analysis would be an appropriate investment of health service funds in Quebec. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: IMPACT trial NCT02164513.

Asunto(s)

Androstadienos , Alcoholes Bencílicos , Clorobencenos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Quinuclidinas , Humanos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/economía , Quebec , Alcoholes Bencílicos/economía , Alcoholes Bencílicos/administración & dosificación , Alcoholes Bencílicos/uso terapéutico , Quinuclidinas/economía , Quinuclidinas/administración & dosificación , Quinuclidinas/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Clorobencenos/economía , Clorobencenos/administración & dosificación , Clorobencenos/uso terapéutico , Androstadienos/economía , Androstadienos/administración & dosificación , Androstadienos/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Combinación de Medicamentos , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores/economía , Administración por Inhalación , Anciano , Pirrolidinas/economía , Pirrolidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirrolidinas/administración & dosificación , Broncodilatadores/economía , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome with high mortality and hospitalization rates. Non-invasive remote patient monitoring (RPM) interventions have the potential to prevent disease worsening. However, the long-term cost-effectiveness of RPM remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of RPM in the Netherlands (NL), the United Kingdom (UK), and Germany (DE) highlighting the differences between cost-effectiveness from a societal and healthcare perspective. METHODS: We developed a Markov model with a lifetime horizon to assess the cost-effectiveness of RPM compared with usual care. We included HF-related hospitalization and non-hospitalization costs, intervention costs, other medical costs, informal care costs, and costs of non-medical consumption. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario analyses were performed. RESULTS: RPM led to reductions in HF-related hospitalization costs, but total lifetime costs were higher in all three countries compared to usual care. The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), from a societal perspective, were €27,921, €32,263, and €35,258 in NL, UK, and DE respectively. The lower ICER in the Netherlands was mainly explained by lower costs of non-medical consumption and HF-related costs outside of the hospital. ICERs, from a healthcare perspective, were €12,977, €11,432, and €11,546 in NL, the UK, and DE, respectively. The ICER was most sensitive to the effectiveness of RPM and utility values. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that RPM for HF can be cost-effective from both healthcare and societal perspective. Including costs of living longer, such as informal care and non-medical consumption during life years gained, increased the ICER.

RESUMEN

Indirect effects of childhood pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) have diminished the cost-effectiveness of current adult vaccine recommendations. An in-development adult-formulated 21-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV21) may play a critical role in reducing pneumococcal illness by targeting a larger number of serotypes responsible for adult pneumococcal infections. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of PCV21 in US adults aged 50 years or older compared with currently recommended pneumococcal vaccines, from both the societal and healthcare perspectives. A Markov model evaluated the lifetime cost-effectiveness of PCV21 (given at age 50 years only, at ages 50/65 years, and risk-based at ages < 65 years plus age-based at age 65 years) compared to no vaccination and to currently recommended pneumococcal vaccines given either as currently recommended or routinely at ages 50/65 years. The analysis was conducted in hypothetical Black and non-Black cohorts aged 50 years or older, with and without considering childhood pneumococcal vaccination indirect effects. Model parameters were based on US data. Parameter uncertainty was assessed using 1-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. From the societal perspective, PCV21 at ages 50/65 years compared to PCV21 at age 50 years cost $7,410 per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained in Black cohort analyses and $85,696/QALY gained in the non-Black cohort; PCV21 at ages 50/65 years had the most favorable public health outcomes. From the healthcare perspective, compared to no vaccination, PCV21 at age 50 years cost $46,213/QALY gained in the Black cohort and $86,629/QALY in non-Blacks. All other strategies were dominated in both cohorts and from both perspectives. When considering childhood pneumococcal vaccination indirect effects, costs of PCV21 at ages 50/65 years remained less than $140,000/QALY gained from the societal perspective in both populations. PCV21 is potentially cost-effective compared to currently approved pneumococcal vaccines in adults aged 50 years or older from both the societal and healthcare perspectives.

Asunto(s)

Infecciones Neumocócicas , Adulto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Vacunas Conjugadas/uso terapéutico , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Vacunas Neumococicas , Vacunación , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study assesses the impact of expanding pneumococcal vaccination to all 50-year-olds to decrease racial disparities by estimating from the societal perspective, the cost-effectiveness of 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) and 15-valent conjugate vaccine followed by 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine (PCV15/PPSV23) for 50-year-olds. METHODS: A Markov model compared the cost-effectiveness of PCV20 or PCV15/PPSV23 in all general population 50- and 65-years-olds compared with current US recommendations and with no vaccination in US Black and non-Black cohorts. US data informed model parameters. Pneumococcal disease societal costs were estimated using direct and indirect costs of acute illness and of pneumococcal-related long-term disability and mortality. Hypothetical 50-year-old cohorts were followed over their lifetimes with costs and effectiveness discounted 3% per year. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses assessed model uncertainty. RESULTS: In Black cohorts, PCV20 for all at ages 50 and 65 was the least costly strategy and had greater effectiveness than no vaccination and current recommendation strategies, whereas PCV15/PPSV23 at 50 and 65 cost more than $1 million per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained compared with PCV20 at 50 and 65. In non-Black cohorts, PCV20 at 50 and 65 cost $62 083/QALY and PCV15/PPSV23 at 50 and 65 cost more than $1 million/QALY with current recommendations, again being more costly and less effective. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, PCV20 at 50 and 65 was favored in 85.7% (Black) and 61.8% (non-Black) of model iterations at a $100 000/QALY gained willingness-to-pay threshold. CONCLUSIONS: When considering the societal costs of pneumococcal disease, PCV20 at ages 50 and 65 years in the general US population is a potentially economically viable strategy, particularly in Black cohorts.

Asunto(s)

Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Cadenas de Markov , Infecciones Neumocócicas , Vacunas Neumococicas , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Vacunas Neumococicas/economía , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Neumocócicas/economía , Infecciones Neumocócicas/etnología , Estados Unidos , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Vacunación/economía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Negro o Afroamericano , Análisis de Costo-Efectividad

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates the importance of valuing vaccines from a broad societal perspective (SP), as opposed to a narrower health-payer perspective (HPP). COVID-19's catastrophic global impacts extend not only to its health-related effects, but also to the profound macroeconomic losses caused by lockdowns required for disease control, leading to the worst global economic crisis in a century. COVID-19 vaccination (CV) has been the central policy tool for resolving this economic crisis, and it has been hypothesized that this macroeconomic benefit alone justifies the cost of CV many times over. Yet HPP-based vaccine valuations are wholly insensitive to this enormous benefit, not allowing it to influence the allocation of given health budgets nor the determination of the magnitudes of such budgets, thereby risking inadequate societal spending on CV. HPP allocates given health budgets to maximize only health, giving no weight to macroeconomic outcomes, causing allocative inefficiency by not allowing welfare-improving trade-offs of health for wealth. HPP assumes health budgets are optimal, not scrutinizing whether their scale adequately reflects the macroeconomic benefits of health spending, thereby risking productive inefficiency by foregoing health spending increases such as on CV that could raise both population-level health and wealth. These allocative and productive inefficiencies in turn distort for-profit R&D incentives, risking dynamic inefficiency. And since the socio-economic and health burdens of COVID-19 are disproportionately borne by the worse off, HPP's failure to promote optimal levels of societal investment in CV may disproportionately burden the worse off as well, exacerbating inequality. Vaccine valuations from the societal perspective allow the allocation and determination of health budgets to reflect macroeconomic and distributional values, thereby promoting allocative, productive, and dynamic efficiency, as well as equity. These considerations of efficiency and equity support evaluating CV, and to ensure a level playing field, all vaccines, from a societal perspective.

Asunto(s)

Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To measure the economic impacts of the longer pre-XDR-TB treatment regimen and the shorter BEAT-TB India regimen. METHODS: In the current study, the economic impacts of the current 18-month pre-XDR-TB treatment regimen and the 6-9 month BEAT-TB regimen were evaluated using an economic model via a decision tree analysis from a societal perspective. The incremental costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained from the introduction of the BEAT-TB regimen for pre-XDR-TB patients were estimated. RESULTS: For a cohort of 1000 pre-XDR-TB patients, we found that the BEAT-TB India regimen yielded higher undiscounted life years (40,548 vs. 21,009) and more QALYs gained (27,633 vs. 15,812) than the 18-month regimen. The BEAT-TB India regimen was found to be cost-saving, with an incremental cost of USD -128,651 when compared to the 18-month regimen. The current analysis did not consider the possibility of reduced TB recurrence after use of the BEAT-TB regimen, so it might have under-estimated the benefits. CONCLUSION: As a lower-cost intervention with improved health outcomes, the BEAT-TB India regimen is dominant when compared to the 18-month regimen.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence of Lisfranc fractures is rising, along with the incidence of foot fractures in general. These injuries can lead to long-term healthcare use and societal costs. Current economic evaluation studies are scarce in Lisfranc fracture research, and only investigate the healthcare costs. The aim of the present study was to accurately measure the monetary societal burden of disease and quality of life in the first 6 months after the injury in patients with Lisfranc fractures in the Netherlands. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study used a prevalence-based, bottom-up approach. Patients were included through thirteen medical centres in the Netherlands. Both stable and unstable injuries were included. The societal perspective was used. The costs were measured at baseline, 12 weeks and 6 months using the iMTA MCQ and PCQ questionnaires. Reference prices were used for valuation. Quality-of-life was measured using the EQ-5D-5 L and VAS scores. RESULTS: 214 patients were included. The mean age was 45.9 years, and 24.3% of patients had comorbidities. The baseline questionnaires yielded approximately €2023 as the total societal costs in the 3 months prior to injury. The follow-up questionnaires and surgery costs assessment yielded approximately €17,083 as the total costs in the first 6 months after injury. Of these costs, approximately two thirds could be attributed to productivity losses. The EQ-5D-5 L found a mean index value of 0.449 at baseline and an index value of 0.737 at the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: The total monetary societal costs in the first 6 months after injury are approximately €17,083. Approximately two thirds of these costs can be attributed to productivity losses. These costs appear to be somewhat higher than those found in other studies. However, these studies only included the healthcare costs. Furthermore, the baseline costs indicate relatively low healthcare usage before the injury compared to the average Dutch patient. The mean QoL index was 0.462 at baseline and 0.737 at 6 months, indicating a rise in QoL after treatment as well as a long-lasting impact on QoL. To our knowledge, this is only the first study investigating the societal costs of Lisfranc injuries, so more research is needed.

Asunto(s)

Fracturas Óseas , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Costo de Enfermedad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios

RESUMEN

Background: Schizophrenia is a serious mental disorder that has greater negative consequences on role functioning than many other severe chronic diseases. Objective: We evaluated the economic impact of long-acting injections of paliperidone palmitate (PP) vs daily oral antipsychotics to treat chronic schizophrenia from a societal perspective over a 2-year period. Methods: A static budget impact model was developed to compare PP with daily oral antipsychotics (risperidone, olanzapine, and aripiprazole) in the treatment of patients with chronic schizophrenia. Our study included treatments used during relapse and hospitalization, validated by an expert panel. The clinical parameters were extracted from the PRIDE trial. Direct medical costs and indirect costs were measured. The unit cost of drug acquisition for all medications was extracted from the public sector. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: The target population in our model was estimated to be 142 incident patients. In the first year, the total drug costs in Egyptian pounds (EGP) for PP and oral antipsychotics were £2.7 million and £724 004, respectively, while the total medical costs for PP and oral antipsychotics were £3 million and £5.6 million, respectively. In the second year, the total drug costs for PP and oral antipsychotics were £2.7 million and £724 004, respectively, while the total medical costs for PP and oral antipsychotics were £3 million and £5 million, respectively. The total costs for PP (£11.6 million) over 2 years were less than those of oral antipsychotics without PP (£12.7 million). PP produced an estimated budget savings of £1 046 561 (budget savings per patient per year, £3667). In addition, PP resulted in the avoidance of 18 hospitalizations per year compared with the without-PP arm. Sensitivity analyses showed that the percent of hospitalizations for both oral antipsychotics and PP had the greatest impact on the results. Conclusion: The lower hospitalization rates associated with PP offset the increase in drug costs. PP may potentially be cost-saving compared with the standard of care in chronic schizophrenia in Egyptian representative healthcare settings. Policy makers may consider this approach to improve patient outcomes and budget sustainability.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score test is used to estimate distant recurrence risk of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) early-stage breast cancer and inform decisions on the use of adjuvant chemotherapy. A model-based budget impact analysis compared the Oncotype DX test in combination with clinical-pathological risk against using clinical-pathological risk alone for HR+/HER2- node-negative (N0) and node-positive (N1; 1-3 axillary lymph nodes) early-stage breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Test and medical costs associated with treatment of breast cancer were assessed through a US healthcare payer perspective. Distributions of patients by Recurrence Score result and distant recurrence probabilities with chemo-endocrine and endocrine therapy were derived from the TAILORx (N0) and RxPONDER (N1) trials. Changes in budget impact were evaluated over a 5-year horizon for a 1,000,000-member hypothetical health plan. RESULTS: With the Oncotype DX test, there was an incremental budget impact of $261,067 (per member per month (PMPM): $0.004), in the N0 population, and $56,143 (PMPM: $0.001) in the N1 population over the 5-year period. The largest budget impact reduction in the N0 population was attributed to reduced breast cancer recurrence costs (incremental: -$633,457, PMPM: -$0.011), while chemotherapy sparing reduced costs in the N1 population (incremental: -$94,884, PMPM: -$0.002). CONCLUSION: The clinical benefit of using the Oncotype DX test to inform adjuvant chemotherapy decisions has been shown in multiple randomized controlled trials. This analysis demonstrated that while using the Oncotype DX test to inform adjuvant chemotherapy decisions may slightly increase US healthcare costs over an initial 5-year time horizon (driven by a cost increase in the first year with cost savings reflected in remaining 4 years), there is significant scope for cost savings when assessing beyond this period due to avoided downstream costs of distant recurrence and long-term chemotherapy adverse events. PMPM costs also remain low across all populations examined, demonstrating a close-to-neutral budget impact.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias de la Mama , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Humanos , Femenino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/genética , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética

RESUMEN

Background: The phase 3 clinical trial KEYNOTE-426 suggested a higher efficacy regarding overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of pembrolizumab+axitinib compared to sunitinib as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. In this analysis, the potential cost-effectiveness of this combination treatment versus sunitinib for patients with advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (accRCC) was examined from the societal perspective in the Netherlands. Methods: For this analysis, a partitioned survival model was constructed. Clinical data were obtained from the published KEYNOTE-426 trial reports; data on costs and (dis-)utilities were derived from published literature. Costs outside of the healthcare sector included treatment-related travel, informal care and productivity loss. Next to a probabilistic scenario analysis, various scenario analyses were performed that aimed at survival extrapolation, different utility values, treatment duration and drug pricing, as well as restricting the cohort to patients with an intermediate or poor prognosis. Further, a budget impact analysis over three years was conducted, in which a sensitivity analysis concerning ranges in costs and the number of patients was applied. Moreover, a scenario concerning increasing market penetration of pembrolizumab+axitinib up to a market share of 80% in the third year was analyzed. Results: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of pembrolizumab+axitinib was estimated at €368,396/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, with an incremental QALY gain of 0.55 over sunitinib. The probability of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €80,000/QALY was estimated at 0%, a 50% probability was estimated at €340,000/QALY. Cost-effectiveness was not achieved in any of the applied scenarios. The budget impact over three years amounted to €417.3 million upon instantaneous and full replacement of sunitinib, and to €214.9 million with increasing market penetration. Conclusion: Pembrolizumab+axitinib was not estimated to be cost-effective compared to sunitinib as a first-line treatment for patients with accRCC in the Netherlands from a societal perspective. In none of the analyzed scenarios, cost-effectiveness was achieved. However, price reductions and shorter treatment durations might lead to a more favorable ICER.

RESUMEN

Background: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has an estimated general population prevalence of 2% to 3%. The impact of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) on the patients' experienced quality of life and psychological well-being and the resulting societal burden are increasingly recognized. However, there is limited knowledge on the economic burden of AIS. This cross-sectional, prevalence-based, bottom-up approach burden of disease study aims to determine the impact associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in terms of the cost-of-illness and health-related quality of life from a societal perspective in the Netherlands. Methods: Persons diagnosed with AIS or parents of a child with AIS that are willing and able to answer the questionnaires will be eligible to participate. Patients will be included consecutively between June until January 2023. Costs and self-perceived health-related quality of life will be estimated using 3 steps: identification, measurement and valuation. To assess the costs associated with AIS the institute for Medical Technology Assessment - Medical Consumption Questionnaire and the institute for Medical Technology Assessment - Productivity Cost Questionnaire will be used. To assess the HRQoL of adult AIS patients the EuroQol 5-dimensions or EuroQol 5-dimensions Youth questionnaire for children under the age of 12 and the Scoliosis Research Society-22 revised questionnaire will be considered. Discussion: This is the first study in this field. It will help raise awareness for AIS and wider support for both the patient community and informal care takers among healthcare professionals and policymakers. Major strengths of this study will be the use of mostly validated, standardized questionnaires. Limitations include the cross-sectional and retrospective nature of the study design.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of a very low-protein diet (VLPD) supplemented with ketoanalogues of essential amino acids compared with a conventional low-protein diet (LPD) in Vietnam. METHODS: The study was conducted from payer (base case), patient, and societal perspectives. A Markov model simulated costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for patients with chronic kidney disease stage 4 or 5 (CKD4+) who were followed up during their lifetimes. Patients received a VLPD (0.3- to 0.4-g/kg/d diet) supplemented with ketoanalogues (5 kg/d [1 tablet]) versus LPD (0.6 g/kg/d, mixed proteins). In each model cycle, patient transitions among the health states-CKD4+ (nondialysis), dialysis, and death-were based on transition probabilities taken from the published literature. The time horizon covered the cohort's lifetime. Utilities and costs were estimated from literature review and projected for the lifespan considered in the model. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed. FINDINGS: The ketoanalogue-supplemented VLPD increased survival and QALYs compared with the LPD. From a payer's perspective, total cost of care in Vietnam was ₫216,854,268 (€8684/$9242) per patient with LPD versus ₫200,928,819 (€8046/$8563) per patient with a supplemented VLPD (sVLPD) (difference, -₫15,925,449 [-€638/-$679]). From a patient's perspective, total cost of care in Vietnam was ₫217,872,043 (€8724/$9285) per patient with LPD versus ₫116,015,672 (€4646/$4944) per patient with sVLPD (difference, -₫101,856,371 [-€4,079/ -$4341]). From a societal perspective, total cost of care in Vietnam was ₫434,726,312 (€17,408/-$18,527) per patient with LPD versus ₫316,944,491 (€12,692/ $13,508) per patient with sVLPD (difference, -₫117,781,820 [-€4716 €/$5020). IMPLICATIONS: Ketoanalogue-supplemented VLPD lowered costs compared with LPD in all 3 perspectives considered.

Asunto(s)

Dieta con Restricción de Proteínas , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Humanos , Vietnam , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Diálisis Renal , Suplementos Dietéticos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida

RESUMEN

Background Economic evaluation has become an essential decision-making tool for health systems worldwide. This study was aimed at estimating the difference in the use of healthcare resources, days on sick leave, and costs between patients undergoing a standard-volume versus a low-volume ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block. Methods This is a post-hoc cost analysis of a double-blind, randomized, and controlled clinical trial. Forty-eight patients undergoing ultrasound-guided interscalene block received either 10 ml or 20 ml of levobupivacaine 0.25%. Analyses involved the public healthcare payer perspective (including visits to general practitioners, nursing staff, physiotherapy facilities, hospital admissions, outpatient diagnostic tests, etc.) and the limited societal perspective, including productivity losses (days on sick leave). Measurements were made at one-month and one-year follow-ups post-intervention. Differences in costs were estimated using two-part models adjusted by the costs incurred in the previous year. Results Subjects in the 10 ml group made greater use of general practitioner visits (mean difference [95% CI]: 3.35 [0.219 to 6.49]; p=0.036) and diagnostic tests (2.43 [0.601 to 4.26]; p=0.009), but less use of physical therapy (-12.9 [-21.7 to -4.06]; p=0.004). Mean (SD) cost differences from the public healthcare payer's perspective were 1,461.34 $ (1,541.62) and 1,024.08$ (943.83) for the 10 ml and 20 ml groups, respectively (p=0.293). From the limited societal perspective, the differences were as follows: 7,036.53$ (8,077.58) and 8,666.56$ (9,841.10), respectively (p=0.937). While there were no differences in the above parameters at the one-month follow-up. Conclusion The volume reduction proposed following interscalene block resulted in meaningful, albeit not statistically significant, clinical benefits and lower costs from a limited societal perspective for shoulder surgery. Thus, healthcare use and days on sick leave are variables to be taken into consideration when calculating the economic impact of surgical procedures.

RESUMEN

Introduction: The main objective of this study was to assess the cost of prostate cancer over a 1-year period from a societal perspective. Methods: We constructed a cost-of-illness model to assess the cost of different health states of prostate cancer, metastatic or nonmetastatic, among Egyptian men. Population data and clinical parameters were extracted from the published literature. We relied on different clinical trials to extract clinical data. We considered all direct medical costs, including the costs of treatment and required monitoring, in addition to the indirect costs. The unit costs were captured from Nasr City Cancer Center and Egyptian Authority for Unified Procurement, Medical Supply, and Management of Medical Technology, and resource utilization were collected from clinical trials and validated by the Expert Panel. One-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to ensure model robustness. Results: The number of targeted patients with nonmetastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer was 215,207, 263,032, and 116,732, respectively. The total costs, in Egyptian pounds (EGP) and US dollars (USD), for the targeted patients, including drug costs and nondrug costs over a time horizon of 1 year, were EGP 41.44 billion (USD 9.010 billion) for localized prostate cancer; for metastatic prostate cancer, they doubled to EGP 85.14 billion (USD 18.510 billion), which reflects a huge burden on the Egyptian healthcare system. The drug costs for localized and metastatic prostate cancer are EGP 41,155,038,137 (USD 8.946 billion) and EGP 81,384,796,471 (USD 17.692 billion), respectively. A significant difference in nondrug costs between localized and metastatic prostate cancer was demonstrated. Nondrug costs were estimated at EGP 293,187,203 (USD 0.063 billion) for localized prostate cancer and EGP 3,762,286,092 (USD 0.817 billion) for metastatic prostate cancer. This significant difference in nondrug costs highlights the importance of early treatment due to the increased costs of progression and the burden of follow-up and productivity loss associated with metastatic prostate cancer. Conclusion: Metastatic prostate cancer has a huge economic burden on the Egyptian healthcare system compared with localized prostate cancer owing to the increased costs of progression, follow-up, and productivity loss. This highlights the necessity of early treatment of these patients to save costs and lighten the burden of the disease on the patient, society, and economy.

RESUMEN

Introduction: The use of telemedicine in critical care is emerging, however, there is a paucity of information surrounding the costs relative to health gains in the pediatric population. This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of a pediatric tele-resuscitation (Peds-TECH) intervention compared to the usual care in five community hospital emergency departments (EDs). Using a decision tree analysis approach with secondary retrospective data from a 3-year time period, this cost-effectiveness analysis was completed. Methods: A mixed methods quasi-experimental design was embedded in the economic evaluation of Peds-TECH intervention. Patients aged <18 years triaged as Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale 1 or 2 at EDs were eligible to receive the intervention. Qualitative interviews were conducted with parents/caregivers to explore the out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses. Patient-level health resource utilization was extracted from Niagara Health databases. The Peds-TECH budget calculated one-time technology and operational costs per patient. Base-case analyses determined the incremental cost per year of life lost (YLL) averted, and additional sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the results. Results: Odds ratio for mortality among cases was 0.498 (95% CI: 0.173, 1.43). The average cost of a patient receiving the Peds-TECH intervention was $2,032.73 compared to $317.45 in usual care. In total, 54 patients received the Peds-TECH intervention. Fewer children died in the intervention group resulting in 4.71 YLL. The probabilistic analysis revealed an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $64.61 per YLL averted. Conclusion: Peds-TECH appears to be a cost-effective intervention for resuscitating infants/children in hospital emergency departments.