Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Neural Comput Appl ; 35(7): 4975-4992, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34341626

RESUMEN

With the origin of smart homes, smart cities, and smart everything, smart phones came up as an area of magnificent growth and development. These devices became a part of daily activities of human life. This impact and growth have made these devices more vulnerable to attacks than other devices such as desktops or laptops. Text messages or SMS (Short Text Messages) are a part of smartphones through which attackers target the users. Smishing (SMS Phishing) is an attack targeting smartphone users through the medium of text messages. Though smishing is a type of phishing, it is different from phishing in many aspects like the amount of information available in the SMS, the strategy of attack, etc. Thus, detection of smishing is a challenge in the context of the minimum amount of information shared by the attacker. In the case of smishing, we have short text messages which are often in short forms or in symbolic forms. A single text message contains very few smishing-related features, and it consists of abbreviations and idioms which makes smishing detection more difficult. Detection of smishing is a challenge not only because of features constraint but also due to the scarcity of real smishing datasets. To differentiate spam messages from smishing messages, we are evaluating the legitimacy of the URL (Uniform Resource Locator) in the message. We have extracted the five most efficient features from the text messages to enable the machine learning classification using a limited number of features. In this paper, we have presented a smishing detection model comprising of two phases, Domain Checking Phase and SMS Classification Phase. We have examined the authenticity of the URL in the SMS which is a crucial part of SMS phishing detection. In our system, Domain Checking Phase scrutinizes the authenticity of the URL. SMS Classification Phase examines the text contents of the messages and extracts some efficient features. Finally, the system classifies the messages using Backpropagation Algorithm and compares results with three traditional classifiers. A prototype of the system has been developed and evaluated using SMS datasets. The results of the evaluation achieved an accuracy of 97.93% which shows the proposed method is very efficient for the detection of smishing messages.

2.
SN Comput Sci ; 1(6): 361, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33163974

RESUMEN

The SMS phishing is another method where the phisher operates the SMS as a medium to communicate with the victims and this method is identified as smishing (SMS + phishing). Researchers promoted several anti-phishing methods where the correlation algorithm is applied to explore the relevancy of the features since there are numerous features in the features corpus. The correlation algorithm assesses the rank of the features that is the highest rank leads to the more relevant to the appropriate assignment. Therefore, this paper analyses four rank correlation algorithms particularly Pearson rank correlation, Spearman's rank correlation, Kendall rank correlation, and Point biserial rank correlation with a machine-learning algorithm to determine the best features set for detecting Smishing messages. The result of the investigation reveals that the AdaBoost classifier offered better accuracy. Further analysis shows that the classifier with the ranking algorithm that is Kendall rank correlation appeared superior accuracy than the other correlation algorithms. The inferred of this experiment confirms that the ranking algorithm was able to reduce the dimension of features with 61.53% and presented an accuracy of 98.40%.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA