RESUMEN

The concept of physicians referring patients to their own healthcare entities is considered a "self-referral". A discerning factor of a self-referral is when the physician has a financial interest in the entity of patient referral. Prospects of healthcare overutilization and costs, thereby, rise. Self-referral laws, therefore, are important to regulate overutilization and contain costs. In the 1980s, Congressman Fortney Stark initiated an act that was one of the precursors to one such self-referral law, known as the Stark Law. The Stark Law, in its initial phase, known as Stark I, addressed self-referrals selectively from laboratory services. Stark I, thereafter, in a series of subsequent amendments and enactments, burgeoned to include multiple services, referred as Designated Health Services (DHS), for self-referrals. The expanded law, inclusive of those DHS, is now known as Stark II. The passage of the 2010 Affordable Care Act as well as the prevailing 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic further modified the Stark Law. Given the legislative history of the said law, the present review curates the legal initiatives of this law from its nascent formative stages to the present form. The purpose of the above curation is to present a bird's eye view of its evolution and present analysts of any future research segments. This review, furthermore, describes the waivers of this law specific to COVID-19, or COVID-19 blanket waivers, which are instruments to assuage any barriers and further placate any hurdles arising from this law prevalent in this pandemic.

RESUMEN

AIMS: Nursing is a stressful and emotionally demanding profession. To date, few mental health treatment interventions have been developed for them worldwide. This study aims to explore referral trends in nurses with mental disorders admitted to a pioneer specialized mental health programme in Europe from 2000 to 2019. DESIGN: A retrospective observational study of 1297 medical e-records of nurses with mental health disorders admitted to the Galatea Care Programme in Barcelona was conducted. METHODS: Three periods were analysed: 2000-2006, 2007-2012 and 2013-2019. Socio-demographic and clinical variables were compared. Diagnoses followed Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) criteria. RESULTS: Gender and age at referral did not change over time. Self-referrals grew from 85.1% in the first period to 95.3% in the last period; inpatient admissions decreased from 24.1% to 18.2%, although this was not significant; nurses were less frequently on sick leave on admission over time (59.1% vs. 45.7%); they were more likely to have a temporary contract in the second period (9.5% vs. 4.8% and 4%) and prevalence of main diagnosis changed with a considerable decrease in affective and substance use disorders after 2006 and a progressive increase in adjustment disorders during the whole period. CONCLUSION: Free, voluntary, highly confidential programmes for nurses with mental disorders may enhance voluntary and earlier help seeking. These findings can be considered when implementing specialized interventions for them in other settings. WHAT PROBLEM DID THE STUDY ADDRESS?: Nursing is a stressful and emotionally demanding profession. To date, few specialized mental health services have been developed for them worldwide. This study aims to explore referral trends in nurses with mental disorders admitted to a pioneer programme in Europe, the Galatea Care Programme in Barcelona, from 2000 to 2019. WHAT WERE THE MAIN FINDINGS?: The number of referrals to the programme grew especially after the first 7-year period. Admissions were more likely to be voluntary during the last period. Prevalence of substance use disorders at admission dropped steadily while prevalence of adjustment disorders progressively increased over the two decades. Nurses were also less likely to be on sick leave at admission. WHERE AND ON WHOM WILL THE RESEARCH HAVE IMPACT?: Free, voluntary, highly confidential programmes for nurses with mental disorders may enhance voluntary and earlier help seeking. These findings can be considered when implementing specialized interventions for them in other settings.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Primary care treatable visits in the Emergency Department (ED) are part of the different factors leading to the overcrowding. Their triage and diversion to alternative care centers could potentially help manage the increasing inflow provided the establishment of an advanced triage to ensure patients' safety. We aim to suggest a new triage tool, PERSEE, and prove its feasibility, safety and performance. METHODS: All self-referrals presented to the ED were triaged with the PERSEE algorithm: first, patients were classified with a five-level ED acuity scale and then evaluated by algorithms to determine their appropriate category (ED or Primary Care). Patients were eligible for a redirection if they were triaged by the acuity scale as level 3 or lower, considered as ambulatory patients and finally categorized as primary care patients. We defined appropriate redirections as patients requiring less than three emergency resources, no emergency-specific treatment and no hospitalization. RESULTS: During the study, 1999 patients were admitted to the ED. Among those, 1333 patients were self-referred (66.9%) of whom 1167 patients were triaged as level 3 or below (58.6%) and 775 patients triaged as ambulatory (39.0%). Among the 775 patients, 200 patients were categorized as primary care treatable (10.0%) and thereby, as potentially eligible for a redirection. We noticed an error rate of 7%, sensitivity of 24.06% and specificity of 97.6%. The redirection rate reached 15% of the self-referrals. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that PERSEE triage could lead to a safe redirection and could be an efficient tool to reduce ED crowding provided several adjustments.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In recent years, it has been seen that, despite the existence of emergency services in Primary Care, some users attend emergency services of their referral hospital on their own initiative. The objective of this study was to explore the causes of the increase in the Northern Health Management Area of Huelva (Spain) population's own initiative to attend hospital emergency services, to the detriment of the provision of emergency services by Primary Care. METHODS: A qualitative study based on the Grounded Theory by Glasser and Strauss was carried out on a sample of nineteen patients and sixteen physicians from the Northern Health Management Area of Huelva (Spain), divided into four focus groups. This method has four phases: data collection, data organisation, data analysis, and theory development. RESULTS: The qualitative analysis process of the four focus groups resulted in 104 codes or minimum units of information. The main causes of the increase in this own initiative were related to delays in medical appointments and complementary tests, mistrust in Primary Care physicians and greater trust in hospital specialists, ignorance regarding the offer of services, proximity to the hospital, and the closure of the Riotinto (Huelva) emergency point. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of accessibility to specialised care, geographic dispersion, mistrust due to deterioration of the physician-patient relationship, lack of health education among the population, and the culture of immediacy are the main causes of the increase in attending hospital emergency services on their own initiative identified in this population.

OBJETIVO: En los últimos años se ha apreciado que, pese a existir servicios de Urgencias en Atención Primaria, muchos usuarios acuden a los servicios de Urgencias de su hospital de referencia por iniciativa propia. El objetivo de este estudio fue explorar las causas del aumento de la iniciativa propia de la población del Área de Gestión Sanitaria Norte de Huelva (España) para acudir a los servicios de Urgencias Hospitalarias, en detrimento de la prestación de servicios de Urgencias por Atención Primaria. METODOS: Se realizó un estudio cualitativo basado en la Teoría Fundamentada de Glasser y Strauss sobre una muestra de diecinueve pacientes y dieciséis facultativos del Área de Gestión Sanitaria Norte de Huelva (España), divididos en cuatro grupos focales. Este método presenta cuatro fases: recogida de datos, organización de datos, análisis de datos y desarrollo de la teoría. RESULTADOS: El proceso de análisis cualitativo de los cuatro grupos focales ofreció como resultado 104 códigos o unidades mínimas de información. Las principales causas de aumento de la iniciativa propia estuvieron relacionadas con la demora en las citas médicas y en las pruebas complementarias, la desconfianza con el médico de Atención Primaria y por la mayor confianza en los especialistas del hospital, por el desconocimiento en la oferta de servicios, por la cercanía del hospital y por el cierre del punto de Urgencias de Riotinto (Huelva). CONCLUSIONES: La falta de accesibilidad a la asistencia especializada, la dispersión geográfica, la desconfianza por el deterioro de la relación médico-paciente, la falta educación sanitaria de la población y la cultura de la inmediatez son las principales causas del aumento de la iniciativa propia a acudir al servicio de Urgencias Hospitalarias.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Self-referrals to inappropriate levels of care result in an increased patient waiting time, overburdening of higher levels of care, reduced primary healthcare utilisation rate and increasing healthcare costs. Furthermore, self-referral places an additional encumbrance on various levels of care as allocation of resources and infrastructure cannot be accurately planned, based on the facility catchment population. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and determinants of patient self-referral at the out-patient department of Stanger Hospital, KwaZulu-Natal between January and June 2017. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the out-patient department in Stanger Hospital, using interviewer administered questionnaires to collect information from 385 patients, through convenience sampling, between January and June 2017. Multivariable regression analysis was used to test for factors associated with self-referral. RESULTS: of the 385 patients interviewed 36% (n = 138) were self-referrals. Most of the self-referrals were male (51.5%) and of the African race (57.2%). Five institutional factors namely: care received from healthcare workers (91.3%); waiting times (88.4%); help offered (87%); treatment and attitude of healthcare workers (63%) and availability of medication (55.8%) were considered as the main drivers of self-referral. Multivariable regression analysis established a significant positive association between patient self-referral and age (40 years and below), attitude of healthcare workers, quality of care received form healthcare workers, waiting times and the availability of diagnostic tests. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that most patients attending Stanger Hospital do comply with the prescribed referral pathway, however a significant proportion still bypass the referral system.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To provide insight into the motives for hospital self-referral during office hours and the barriers deterring general practitioner (GP) consultation with a primary care request. SETTING: People who self-referred at a Daytime General Practice Cooperative (GPC) in two hospitals in The Hague, The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 44 people who self-referred were interviewed in two hospitals. The average age of interviewees was 35 years (range 19 months to 83 years), a parent of a young patient was interviewed, but the age of patients is shown here. There were more male patients (66%) than female patients (34%). Patients were recruited using a sampling method after triage. Triage was the responsibility of an emergency department (ED) nurse in one hospital and of a GP in the other. Those excluded from participation included (a) children under the age of 18 years and not accompanied by a parent or legal guardian, (b) foreign patients not resident in the Netherlands, (c) patients unable to communicate in Dutch or English and (d) patients directly referred to the ED after triage by the GP (in one hospital). RESULTS: People who self-referred generally reported several motives for going to the hospital directly. Information and awareness factors played an important role, often related to a lack of information regarding where to go with a medical complaint. Furthermore, many people who self-referred mentioned hospital facilities, convenience and perceived medical necessity as motivational factors. Barriers deterring a visit to the own GP were mainly logistical, including not being registered with a GP, the GP was too far away, poor GP telephone accessibility or a waiting list for an appointment. CONCLUSION: Information and awareness factors contribute to misperceptions among people who self-referred concerning the complaint, the GP and the hospital. As a range of motivational factors are involved, there is no straightforward solution. However, better dissemination of information might alleviate misconceptions and contribute to providing the right care to the right patient in the right setting.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To influence self-referral, it is crucial to know a patient's motives to directly visit the emergency department (ED). The goal of this study is to examine motives for self-referral to the ED and compare these motives in relation to appropriateness. METHODS: All self-referred patients visiting the ED of a Dutch hospital over four separate months in a 1-year period were included. Patients were handed questionnaires that included questions on their reasons to visit the ED directly and where they would seek medical help next time. Additionally, the motives of patients that either appropriately or inappropriately visited the ED were compared. In a previous study on the same patient cohort, the appropriateness of the ED visits was determined using predefined criteria. RESULTS: A total of 3196 self-referred patients were included, and 48.9 % completed the questionnaires. The majority of patients (28.0 %) attended the ED without a referral because they thought they would get help faster; the next reason was the easier access to radiologic and laboratory investigations (answered by 23.8 %); and the third was the symptoms were considered too severe to visit a general practitioner (GP) (answered by 22.7 %). The majority (78.5 %) would attend the ED the next time they are faced with similar symptoms. Appropriate visits were significantly more seen in females, elderly, and patients in higher triage categories. Patients who expect investigations are necessary, think their symptoms are too severe to visit a GP, or would return to the ED next time were more often appropriately visiting the ED. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of patients to self-refer to an ED is often an explicate decision. Patients are looking for specialist help and want fast and easy access to radiologic and laboratory investigations. Even though the primary care network is well developed in the Netherlands, the reasons for self-referral are similar to the reasons found in previous literature based in other countries. Patients who visit the ED because of health concerns visit the ED more often appropriately than patients visiting for practical reasons.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nearly all Dutch citizens have a general practitioner (GP), acting as a gatekeeper to secondary care. Some patients bypass the GP and present to the emergency department (ED). To make best use of existing emergency care, Dutch health policy makers and insurance companies have proposed the integration of EDs and GP cooperatives (GPCs) into one facility. In this study, we examined ED use and assessed the characteristics of self-referrals and non-self-referrals, their need for hospital emergency care and self-referrals' motives for presenting at the ED. METHODS: A descriptive cohort study was conducted in a Dutch level 1 trauma centre. Differences in patient characteristics, time of presentation and need for hospital emergency care were analysed using χ (2) tests and t tests. A patient was considered to need hospital emergency care when he/she was admitted to the hospital, had an extremity fracture and/or when diagnostic tests were performed. Main determinants of self-referral were identified via logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 5,003 consecutive ED patients registering within the 5-week study period, 3,028 (60.5%) were self-referrals. Thirty-nine percent of the self-referrals had urgent acuity levels, as opposed to 65% of the non-self-referrals. Self-referrals more often suffered from injuries (49 vs. 20%). One third of the self-referrals presented during office hours. Of all self-referrals, 51% needed hospital emergency care. Younger age; non-urgent acuity level; chest pain, ear, nose or throat problems; and injuries were independent predictors for self-referral. Most cited motives for self-referring were 'accessibility and convenience' and perceived 'medical necessity'. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial part of the self-referrals needed hospital emergency care. The 49% self-referrals who were eligible for GP care presented during out-of-hours as well as during office hours. This calls for an integrative approach to this health care problem.