RESUMEN

Aims and objectives: To investigate whether interference screw fixation through an anteromedial portal into an outside-in drilled femoral tunnel via a flip cutter results in acceptable hardware position. Materials & methods: 10 cadaveric knees underwent ACL-reconstruction with patellar BTB autograft. Femoral tunnel drilling was performed utilizing an outside-in flip cutter drill and interference screws for femoral fixation. Lateral and anterior-posterior (AP) fluoroscopic images were taken to measure screw divergence within the femoral tunnel. The means of AP and lateral divergence angles were compared using two-tailed t-tests. Results: Using the flip cutter, the AP and lateral divergence angles were 7.3° ± 4.5° and 9.3° ± 9.3°, respectively, while the total divergence angles were 16.6° ± 11.8°. Divergence angles using a cannulated reamer were found to be 14.4° ± 2.5° and 6.8° ± 2.8° for AP and lateral, respectively and 21.1° ± 5.2° for the total divergence. The AP divergence angles using the flip cutter were significantly less than those reported using a cannulated reamer (p = 0.001). Conclusions: The flip cutter method resulted in significantly reduced divergence angle between the screw and graft when compared to previous cadaveric studies in the coronal plane. There was no significant difference in divergence angle in the sagittal plane. Both methods appear to result in divergence angles below the threshold which would be considered to significantly decrease pull-out strength. Large standard deviations also reflect limited sample size but may also suggest more variability in divergence when compared to historical control set. This study clearly establishes the outside-in technique using a retrograde reamer as a viable independent femoral drilling solution for ACL reconstruction when using a BTB autograft with a femoral interference screw.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Latarjet procedure is an effective procedure for the treatment of anterior glenohumeral joint instability; however, the complications are concerning. The purpose of this study was to review a single institution's experience with the Latarjet procedure for recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability specifically focusing on early complications. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all Latarjet procedures performed at a single institution from August 2008 to July 2018. The 90-day complication rate and associated risk factors for all complications and graft failure were recorded. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed for coracoid graft position and screw divergence. RESULTS: During the study period, 190 Latarjet procedures were performed with 90-day follow-up. The average age was 28.7 ± 11.3 years, male patients comprised 84.2% of the population, and 62.6% of patients had undergone a prior stabilization procedure. We observed 15 complications, for a 90-day complication rate of 9.0%; of the patients, 8 (4.2%) underwent reoperations. Graft or hardware failure occurred in 9 patients (4.7%) with loosened or broken screws, and 6 required reoperations (revision Latarjet procedure in 4, distal tibia allograft in 1, and iliac crest autograft in 1). Fixation with only 1 screw (P < .001) and an increased screw divergence angle (37° ± 8° vs. 24° ± 11°, P = .0257) were statistically associated with graft failure, whereas the use of cannulated screws (P = .487) was not. There were 6 nerve injuries (3.2%), including 2 combined axillary and suprascapular nerve injuries, 1 musculocutaneous nerve injury, 1 brachial plexopathy, 1 peripheral sensory nerve deficit (likely axillary), and 1 sensory plexopathy. Suprascapular nerve injury at the spinoglenoid notch was associated with a longer superior screw (41.0 ± 1.4 mm vs. 33.5 ± 3.5 mm, P = .035) and increased screw divergence angle (40° ± 6° vs. 24° ± 11°, P = .0197). The coracoid graft was correctly positioned in the axial plane in 71% of cases and in the coronal plane in 73% of cases. CONCLUSION: The Latarjet procedure is a procedure that can reliably restore shoulder stability; however, graft- and nerve-related complications are relatively common. Two-thirds of the graft failures required reoperations, and half of the nerve injuries in this study led to residual symptoms. Fixation with only 1 screw and an increased screw divergence angle were significant predictors of graft failure. Suprascapular nerve injury at the spinoglenoid notch was associated with an increased screw divergence angle and longer superior screw.

Asunto(s)

Inestabilidad de la Articulación , Articulación del Hombro , Adulto , Artroplastia , Humanos , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/etiología , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/cirugía , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Articulación del Hombro/cirugía

RESUMEN

Transtibial femoral tunnel drilling is still an alternative technique in ACL reconstruction. Femoral interference screw divergence is a potential pitfall associated with transtibial tunnel technique, as angles greater than 15° jeopardize graft fixation. Our mathematical model theorizes the proper degrees of knee flexion during femoral screw insertion and the correct screwdriver position to obtain a minimal divergence of the screw in the femoral tunnel. The cadaveric study confirms our method. Mathematical model: using rototranslation matrices, a correlation is demonstrated between the ACLtibial- guide angle, the knee flexion, and the screwdriver position. A theoretical minimal divergence between femoral interference screw and the femoral tunnel is obtainable following these assumptions: 1) knee hyperflexion during femoral screw insertion is obtained adding a flexion corresponding to the ACL-tibial-guide angle to the flexion while drilling the femoral tunnel; 2) screwdriver position (through the AM portal) is kept parallel to tibial plateau at a rotation of 15° medial to tibial sagittal plane. Cadaveric study: 24 cadaver knees were used. The transtibial tunnel was drilled with an 8 mm drill bit with the help of an ACL tibial guide set at 55°. To simulate femoral tunnel direction, a 2.4 mm K. wire was drilled through the femur with a transtibial 7 mm offset femoral drill guide. To simulate the femoral screw direction, a second 2.4 mm K. wire was drilled from the femoral entry point of the first wire through the femur, with a cannulated screwdriver. Screwdriver direction and knee flexion during the simulation were obtained following two different methods: GROUP A (mathematical model group, 12 knees), screwdriver direction and knee flexion were calculated following the mathematical model; in GROUP B (control group, 12 knees), knee hyperflexion and screwdriver medialization were manually obtained by a senior surgeon. The divergence between the femoral interference screw and the femoral tunnel was identified as the angle formed by the two wires, measured on the plane formed by the direction of the wires. Mean divergence angles between the K. wires were significantly different (p< 0.05) between the groups: GROUP 1 (mathematical rule): 7.25° (SD 2.2); GROUP 2 (free-hand technique): 17.3° (SD 2.9). Our study shows that a minimal divergence between the femoral tunnel and the screwdriver can be achieved simply by following a mathematical rule for correct intraoperative knee flexion and screwdriver position without the need for any specialized instrumentation. Namely, during femoral interference screw insertion through the anteromedial portal: 1) the correct knee flexion is the sum between the knee flexion angle while drilling the transtibial femoral tunnel AND the ACL tibial guide angle used during tibial tunnel drilling; 2) Correct screwdriver position is parallel to the tibial plateau, engaging the femoral tunnel with a position of 15° medial to tibial sagittal plane. This simple concept has clinical relevance in helping the surgeons in obtaining an optimal alignment between the femoral tunnel and the femoral interference screw during transtibial ACL reconstruction. Furthermore, following the assumptions of this study, a starting knee flexion angle around 70° during femoral tunnel drilling seems preferable for ACL reconstruction when the transtibial tunnel technique is used. Indeed, because ACL-tibial-guide angles range commonly from 50° to 60° and in vivo, the maximal intraoperative knee flexion attainable is 130°, a starting knee flexion around 70° is optimal to allows for adding flexion angles up to 60° before reaching the physiological limit value of 130°.

Asunto(s)

Fémur , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Tornillos Óseos , Cadáver , Fémur/cirugía , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Tibia/cirugía

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: It is known that the screws of the eight-plate hemiepiphysiodesis construct diverge as growth occurs through the physis. Our objective was to investigate whether there is a correlation between the amount of change of the joint orientation angle (JOA) and that of the interscrew angle (ISA) of the eight-plate hemiepiphysiodesis construct before and after correction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After the institutional review board approval, medical charts and X-rays of all patients operated for either genu valgum or genu varum with eight-plate hemiepiphysiodesis were analyzed retrospectively. All consecutive patients at various ages with miscellaneous diagnoses were included. JOA and ISA were measured before and after correction. After review of the X-rays, statistical analyses were performed which included Pearson correlation coefficient and regression analyses. RESULTS: There were 53 segments of 30 patients included in the study. Eighteen were males, and 12 were females. Mean age at surgery was 9.1 (range 3-17). Mean follow-up time was 21.5 (range, 7-46) months. The diagnoses were diverse. A strong correlation was found between the delta JOA (d-JOA) and delta ISA (d-ISA) of the eight-plate hemiepiphysiodesis construct (r = 0.759 (0.615-0.854, 95%CI), p < 0.001). This correlation was independent of the age and gender of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: There is a strong correlation between the d-ISA and the d-JOA. The d-ISA follows the d-JOA at a predictable amount through formulas which regression analysis yielded. This study confirms the clinical observation of the diverging angle between the screws is in correlation with the correction of the JOA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic study.

Asunto(s)

Desarrollo Óseo/fisiología , Placas Óseas/efectos adversos , Tornillos Óseos/efectos adversos , Huesos , Deformidades Adquiridas de la Articulación , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Adolescente , Huesos/diagnóstico por imagen , Huesos/patología , Huesos/cirugía , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Placa de Crecimiento/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Deformidades Adquiridas de la Articulación/etiología , Deformidades Adquiridas de la Articulación/fisiopatología , Deformidades Adquiridas de la Articulación/prevención & control , Masculino , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/patología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/cirugía , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/instrumentación , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/métodos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Radiografía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estadística como Asunto , Turquía

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Interference screw is a popular fixation device used to rigidly fix bone-patellar tendon-bone (B-PT-B) graft both in femoral and tibial tunnels in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Parallel placement of screw is difficult in transtibially drilled femoral tunnel but always desired as it affects pullout strength of the graft. Commonly, interference screw into the femoral tunnel is inserted through the anteromedial (AM) or accessory AM portal. These portals are not-in-line with the transtibially drilled femoral tunnel. Furthermore, these portals increase the divergence of the interference screw in the femoral tunnel. We hypothesized that interference screw placement through patellar tendon (PT) portal (through donor defect) in transtibially drilled femoral tunnel can be less divergent. We report the prospective randomized study to investigate the difference of divergence of interference screw placed through PT portal and AM portal and its clinical relevance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients underwent femoral tunnel B-PT-B graft fixation through AM portal (group 1) and other 41 (group 2) through PT portal. Femoral tunnel-interference screw divergence was measured on postoperative digital lateral X-rays. Ha's method was used to grade divergence. The clinical outcome was assessed by postoperative intervention knee documentation committee grading (IKDC) and Lysholm score at 2 years followup. RESULTS: Mean tunnel-screw divergence in sagittal plane through AM portal was 13.38° (95% CI: 12.34-14.41) and through PT portal was 7.20° (95% CI: 6.25-8.16) (P<0.0001). In AM portal group, 82.9% patients had divergence in either grade 3 or 4 category, whereas in PT portal group, 82.9% patients were in grade 1 or 2 category (P<0.0001). Mean Lysholm score were 92.8 and 94.5 at two-year follow-up in both groups which were statistically not significant. The International knee documentation committee grades of patients in both groups were similar and had no statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Femoral interference screw placement through the PT portal leads to significantly less screw divergence as compared with screw placement through the AM portal. However, this difference in divergence is not reflected in clinical outcome.