RESUMEN

Background: Researchers have attempted to understand the underlying mechanism of the Latarjet procedure; however, its effects on shoulder kinematics have not been well studied. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to analyze shoulder kinematics after the Latarjet procedure. It was hypothesized that the nonanatomic transfer of the coracoid process during the procedure would affect normal shoulder kinematics. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: The study included 10 patients (age range, 20-52 years) who underwent the modified Latarjet procedure between June 2016 and November 2021. Computed tomography and fluoroscopy were conducted on both shoulder joints of all patients, and 3-dimensional models were reconstructed. The 3-dimensional coordinates were encoded on the reconstructed models, and shoulder kinematics were analyzed through a 3-dimensional-2-dimensional model-image registration technique. Scapular rotation parameters (scapular upward rotation, posterior tilt, external rotation, and scapulohumeral rhythm) were compared between the Latarjet and the nonsurgical contralateral sides during humeral abduction, as was anteroposterior (AP) translation relative to the glenoid center during active humeral external rotation. Results: The Latarjet side displayed significantly higher values of scapular upward rotation at higher degrees of humeral elevation (130°, 140°, and 150°) compared with the nonsurgical side (P = .027). Posterior tilt, external rotation, and scapulohumeral rhythm were not significantly different between sides. AP translation at maximal humeral rotation was not significantly different between sides (Latarjet, -0.06 ± 5.73 mm vs nonsurgical, 5.33 ± 1.60 mm; P = .28). Interestingly, on the Latarjet side, AP translation increased until 40° of humeral rotation (4.27 ± 4.64 mm) but began to decrease from 50° of humeral rotation. Conclusion: The Latarjet side demonstrated significant changes in scapular upward rotation during higher degrees of humeral elevation compared with the contralateral shoulder. Posterior movement of the humeral head at >50° of humeral rotation could be the desired effect of anterior stabilization; however, researchers should evaluate long-term complications such as osteoarthritis. Clinical Relevance: Analysis of shoulder kinematics after the Latarjet procedure could provide information regarding long-term outcomes and whether the procedure would affect the daily activities of patients.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The rationale for the Latarjet procedure was described as the "triple blocking" effect. Satisfactory surgical outcomes have been reported after surgery. However, it has been reported that the "triple blocking" effect increases joint stability, but it does not fully restore it. Moreover, the procedure is nonanatomic and concerns remain regarding the effects. The study of scapulohumeral rhythm, which is a clinical parameter used for the functional evaluation of shoulder kinematics, can offer new perspectives on the rationale for the procedure. This study aimed to compare the shoulder kinematics of patients after the Latarjet procedure to the shoulders of a healthy population using magnetic and inertial measurement units with a motion analysis system. METHODS: A retrospective study with prospective data collection was conducted on 28 patients who underwent the open Latarjet procedure for recurrent shoulder instability. At a minimum 12-month follow-up, each patient was evaluated by assessing the range of motion, the Rowe score, and the Constant-Murley score. Patients were examined using the ShowMotion 3D kinematic tracking system (NCS Lab, Modena, Italy), which uses wireless wearable noninvasive magnetic and inertial measurement units sensors to assess the three-dimensional kinematics of the shoulder. For each plane of elevation (ie, flexion and abduction), the scapulohumeral rhythm was described by three scapulothoracic rotations (ie, protraction-retraction, mediolateral rotation and posterior-anterior tilting) as a function of humeral anteflexion or humeral abduction. RESULTS: The mean time from first shoulder dislocation to surgery was 6.6 ± 3 years (range, 1-12 years). No intraoperative complications occurred, and computed tomography (CT) performed 3 months after surgery showed graft union in all patients. After a mean follow-up time of 32.4 ± 20 months (range, 12-96), the mean Constant-Murley score and Rowe scores were 94.5 ± 4.8 (range, 84-100) and 96.7 ± 3.5 (range, 90-100), respectively. All patients showed no signs of glenohumeral arthritis on X-ray examination. Scapular posterior tilt and scapular internal rotation were significantly greater in the patient group than in the healthy population for the flexion-extension and abduction-adduction movements along the whole shoulder range of motion (all P < .05); no differences were found in upward/downward scapular rotation. CONCLUSION: A greater scapular posterior tilt and scapular internal rotation were observed after the Latarjet procedure. The modified position of the scapula was maintained during the entire range of motion, suggesting a shoulder-stabilizing kinematic effect in addition to the bony, sling and bumper effects.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The shoulder joint complex in the overhead athlete is organized to effectively transfer the proximally generated forces distally into the arm. The organization also protects the joints and anatomic structures against the repetitive high velocities, large ranges of motions, and compressive, shear, translational, and distraction loads in the overhead motion while placing the hand in the "launch window." Coupling of the movements of the scapula, clavicle, and humerus results in scapulohumeral rhythm (SHR). Effective SHR requires the clavicle and scapula-and, at times, the mechanically linked claviscapular segment-to move the arm into the task-specific position and motion and requires the humerus to move through the ranges of motion to achieve the specific task in the throwing motion. Alterations in SHR can negatively affect effective shoulder joint complex function in the overhead throwing motion and increase injury risk. There are 4 phases of clavicular, scapular, and claviscapular motion that are coupled with arm motion in SHR. The first 3 phases occur in arm elevation motions from 0°-90° and result in the claviscapula and humerus being placed in task-specific positions. The fourth phase is coupling of claviscapular motion with humeral motion to maintain ball-and-socket kinematics throughout the throwing motion. Alterations in this composite motion are termed "scapular dyskinesis." The dyskinesis is considered an impairment of the efficient mobility of the claviscapular segment of the shoulder complex. The most prevalent problem with scapular dyskinesis is the association of scapular protraction and consequent glenoid antetilt with alterations in humeral rotation and posterior humeral head translation to produce shoulder joint internal impingement. Task effectiveness in overhead throwing is also based on and determined by humeral range of motion, precision of humeral motion, and velocity of humeral motion, as well as humeral and arm position in 3-dimensional space. This activity requires maximum ball-and-socket kinematics to create the highest amount of concavity-compression that creates stability for the joint. There are bony and soft-tissue contributions to this stability. Injuries to the glenoid labrum are among the most common deficits that alter concavity-compression. Clinical evaluation of the shoulder joint complex in the injured throwing athlete should be comprehensive and systematic, following an evaluation pathway for proximal and distal causative factors and including observation of humeral motion. This type of evaluation can result in intervention protocols that address the pathoanatomic, pathophysiological, and pathomechanical deficits identified.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although visual examination and palpation are used to assess shoulder motion in clinical practice, there is no consensus on shoulder motion under dynamic and static conditions. This study aimed to compare shoulder joint motion under dynamic and static conditions. METHODS: The dominant arm of 14 healthy adult males was investigated. Electromagnetic sensors attached to the scapular, thorax, and humerus were used to measure three-dimensional shoulder joint motion under dynamic and static elevation conditions and compare scapular upward rotation and glenohumeral joint elevation in different elevation planes and angles. RESULTS: At 120° of elevation in the scapular and coronal planes, the scapular upward rotation angle was higher in the static condition and the glenohumeral joint elevation angle was higher in the dynamic condition (P<0.05). In scapular plane and coronal plane elevation 90°- 120°, the angular change in scapular upward rotation was higher in the static condition and the angular change in scapulohumeral joint elevation was higher in the dynamic condition (P<0.05). No differences were found in shoulder joint motion in the sagittal plane elevation between the dynamic and static conditions. No interaction effects were found between elevation condition and elevation angle in all elevation planes. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in shoulder joint motion should be noted when assessing shoulder joint motion in different dynamic and static conditions. Level of evidence: Level III, diagnostic cross-sectional study.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The alteration of scapular kinematics can predispose patients to shoulder pathologies and dysfunction. Previous literature has associated various types of shoulder injuries with scapular dyskinesis, but there are limited studies regarding the effect that proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) have on scapular dyskinesis. This study aims to determine the change in scapulohumeral rhythm following treatment of a proximal humerus fracture as well as differences in shoulder motion and functional outcomes among patients who presented with or without scapular dyskinesis. We hypothesized that differences in scapular kinematics would be present following treatment of a proximal humerus fracture, and patients who presented with scapular dyskinesis would subsequently have inferior functional outcome scores. METHODS: Patients treated for a proximal humerus fracture from May 2018 to March 2021 were recruited for this study. The scapulohumeral rhythm and global shoulder motion were determined using a 3-dimensional motion analysis (3DMA) and the scapular dyskinesis test. Functional outcomes were then compared among patients with or without scapular dyskinesis, including the SICK (scapular malposition, inferomedial border prominence, coracoid pain and malposition, and dyskinesis of scapular movement) Scapula Rating Scale, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and the EuroQol-5 Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). RESULTS: Twenty patients were included in this study with a mean age of 62.9 ± 11.8 years and follow-up time of 1.8 ± 0.2 years. Surgical fixation was performed in 9 of the patients (45%). Scapular dyskinesis was present in 50% of patients (n = 10). There was a significant increase in scapular protraction on the affected side of patients with scapular dyskinesis during abduction of the shoulder (P = .037). Additionally, patients with scapular dyskinesis demonstrated worse SICK scapula scores (2.4 ± 0.5 vs. 1.0 ± 0.4, P = .024) compared to those without scapular dyskinesis. The other functional outcome scores (ASES, VAS pain scores, and EQ-5D-5L) showed no significant differences among the 2 groups (P = .848, .713, and .268, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Scapular dyskinesis affects a significant number of patients following treatment of their PHFs. Patients presenting with scapular dyskinesis exhibit inferior SICK scapula scores and have more scapular protraction during shoulder abduction compared to patients without scapular dyskinesis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is very limited information about the changes in shoulder kinematics in patients with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The aim of the study was to investigate the changes in the scapulohumeral rhythm and shoulder kinematics over time after the reverse shoulder procedure. METHODS: Nineteen patients with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (age: 65.8 ± 10.3 years) were included to the study. During arm elevation in the sagittal and scapular planes, operated shoulder kinematics (humerothoracic elevation, glenohumeral elevation, scapulohumeral rhythm, and scapular rotations) were assessed using an electromagnetic tracking system at the postoperative 3rd, 6th, and 18th months. Asymptomatic shoulder kinematics were also assessed at the postoperative 18th month. Shoulder function was assessed using The Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand score at the postoperative 3rd, 6th, and 18th months. FINDINGS: Maximum humerothoracic elevation increased from 98° to 109° over the postoperative period (p = 0.01). The scapulohumeral rhythm was similar on the operated and asymptomatic shoulders at the final follow-up (p = 0.11). Both the operated and asymptomatic shoulder demonstrated similar scapular kinematics at the postoperative 18th month (p > 0.05). The Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand score decreased over time in the postoperative period (p < 0.05). INTERPRETATION: Shoulder kinematics may be improved after reverse shoulder arthroplasty in the postoperative period. Focusing on scapular stabilization and deltoid muscle control in the postoperative rehabilitation program may enhance the shoulder kinematics and upper extremity function.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to analyze the SHR of patients diagnosed with small (SRCTs) and massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs), adhesive capsulitis (AC), and glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GH-OA) and compare their measurements to those of patient controls with healthy shoulders using DDR. We hypothesize that various diagnoses will vary with regards to SHR. METHODS: The sequences of pulsed radiographs collated in DDR to create a moving image were prospectively analyzed during humeral abduction in normal controls and in 4 distinct shoulder pathology groups: SRCT, MRCT, AC, and GH-OA. GH and ST joint angles were measured at 0°-30°, 30°-60°, 60°-90°, and maximal coronal plane humeral abduction. SHR was defined as the ratio of the change in humeral abduction over the change in scapula upward rotation during humeral abduction and was calculated within the above angle intervals. RESULTS: A total of 121 shoulders were analyzed. Forty normal controls were compared to 13 SRCTs, 29 MRCTs, 16 AC, and 23 GH-OA. SHR during humeral abduction differed significantly in patients with MRCT (1.91 ± 0.72), AC (1.55 ± 0.37), and GH-OA (2.31 ± 1.01) compared to controls (3.39 ± 0.79). When analyzed across 30° intervals of abduction, there was a significantly lower SHR found at 0°-30°, 30°-60°, and 60°-90° in MRCT, AC, and GH-OA across each motion range compared to controls. Control patients had an arc of abduction of 103° ± 32°, which was significantly larger than all other pathologies (MRCT: 76° ± 23°, SRCT: 81° ± 21°, AC: 65° ± 27°, GH-OA: 71° ± 35°) and an average scapular abduction of 33° ± 14°, which was significantly less than patients with an MRCT (46° ± 10°) and AC (65° ± 27°). CONCLUSION: SHR remained significantly lower throughout shoulder abduction in MRCT (43.65%), AC (-54.29%), and GH-OA (32.01%) compared to controls. When isolating for humeral and scapular motion, all 4 pathologies had decreased GH abduction, whereas AC and MRCT had an increased scapular compensatory motion compared to controls. Quantifying kinematic patterns like SHR using DDR can be implemented as a novel, safe, and cost-effective method to diagnose shoulder pathology and to monitor response to treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Due to the influence of spinal and respiratory movements, it is difficult to accurately measure the range of motion of each joint. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a three-dimensional (3D) measurement of each joint in the shoulder complex in different postures in the sagittal plane of the upper extremity. METHODS: Thirteen healthy adults with no history of shoulder surgery for trauma or chronic pain were enrolled in the present study. The computed tomography (CT) imaging data of the shoulder complex were acquired in four postures via the reconstruction and alignment of 3D images. The angles of the postural changes were measured, and rotation vectors were used for descriptions and statistical analyses. RESULTS: There was a statistical difference in the rotation angles between the dominant and non-dominant sides of the sternoclavicular joint when the posture changed from a resting position to a posterior inferior position. During the postural change from a resting position to a horizontal position, the regression coefficient (ß) of the humerothoracic joint to the sternoclavicular joint was 0.191, and the ß of the humerothoracic joint to the glenohumeral joint was 0.621. During the postural change from the horizontal position to the rear upper position, the ß of the humerothoracic joint to the sternoclavicular joint was 0.316, and the ß of the humerothoracic joint to the glenohumeral joint was 0.845. During the postural change from the resting position to the rear lower position, the ß of the humerothoracic joint to the glenohumeral joint was 0.991. CONCLUSION: The application of the image alignment technique enabled the direct and accurate measurement of the bony structures of the shoulder joint. The helical approach accurately described the scapulohumeral rhythm during 3D motion. There was a scapulohumeral rhythm of the shoulder complex during 3D composite sagittal movement, with different ratios for different joints and postures.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Multiple papers have described aspects of treatment of acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries. Most have emphasized aspects of surgical treatment, and some papers have addressed non-operative treatment. Few papers have highlighted the specific pathoanatomy of an AC joint injury or have described methods of evaluating the 3-dimensional pathomechanics resulting from the pathoanatomical injury. This paper is based on 3 observations: (1) AC joint injuries exist and present on a spectrum of pathoanatomy; (2) The effect of the pathoanatomy on normal AC joint mechanics to produce pathomechanics is dependent on the extent of the pathoanatomy; and (3) Treatment protocols should be developed to address the specific pathoanatomy to optimize the mechanics. A comprehensive clinical approach emphasizing the evaluation of the extent of the anatomic injury and understanding its mechanical consequences regarding shoulder and arm function is a key in the development of guidelines for developing operative or non-operative treatment protocols and for establishing outcomes of the treatment protocols.

RESUMEN

Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is associated with high rates of midterm complications including scapular notching, implant wear, and mechanical impingement. Scapulo-humeral rhythm (SHR), described by Codman in the 1920's, is defined as the ratio of glenohumeral motion to scapulothoracic motion. SHR is used as an indicator of shoulder dysfunction, as alterations in SHR can have profound implications on shoulder biomechanics. The determination of SHR can be hindered by soft-tissue motion artifacts and high radiation burdens associated with traditional surface marker or fluoroscopic analysis. EOS low dose stereoradiographic imaging analysis utilizing 3D model construction from a 2D X-ray series may offer an alternative modality for characterizing SHR following RSA. Methods: Patients (n=10) underwent an EOS imaging analysis to determine SHR at six and twelve months post-RSA. Leveraging 3D models of the implants, 2D/3D image registration methods were used to calculate relative glenohumeral and scapulothoracic positioning at 60, 90 and 120° of shoulder elevation. Subject-specific SHR curves were assessed and midterm changes in post-RSA SHR associated with follow-up time and motion phase were evaluated. Pearson correlations assessed associations between patient-specific factors and post-RSA SHR. Results: Mean post-RSA SHR was 0.81:1 across subjects during the entire midterm postoperative period. As a cohort, post-RSA SHR was more variable for 60-90° of shoulder motion. SHR for 90-120° of motion decreased (0.43:1) at twelve months post-RSA. Post-RSA SHR could be categorized using three relative motion curve patterns, and was not strongly associated with demographic factors such as BMI. 50% of subjects demonstrated a different SHR relative motion curve shape at twelve months post-RSA, and SHR during the 90120° of motion was found to generally decrease at twelve months. Conclusion: Midterm post-RSA SHR was successfully evaluated using EOS technology, revealing lower SHR values (i.e., greater scapulothoracic motion) compared to normal values reported in the literature. SHR continued to change for some subjects during the midterm post-RSA period, with the greatest change during 90-120° of shoulder motion. Study findings suggest that future post RSA rehabilitation efforts to address elevated scapulothoracic motion may benefit from being patient-specific in nature and targeting scapular stabilization during 90-120° of shoulder motion. Level of Evidence: IV.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Shoulder exercises focused on strengthening the rotator cuff and scapular stabilizing muscles as well as addressing scapular dyskinesis and motor control have been shown to improve rotator cuff function and decrease shoulder pain. A single motion shoulder exercise that effectively activates the rotator cuff and scapular stabilizing muscles, engages the scapulohumeral rhythm, and includes eccentric contractions may be more effective and easier for patients to consistently perform as compared to multiple standard shoulder exercises. PURPOSE: To compare the electromyographic muscle activation of key shoulder complex muscles during a single motion exercise and individual exercises (standard exercises) typically included in shoulder rehabilitation protocols. STUDY DESIGN: Case-controlled, cohort study. METHODS: Nineteen healthy men and women without shoulder pain or dysfunction were studied. Muscle activity of the rotator cuff and scapular stabilizing muscles (supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor, trapezius [upper, middle and lower], serratus anterior, middle deltoid) was measured using surface EMG while subjects performed, in a standing position, several standard shoulder exercises typically included in shoulder rehabilitation protocols (resisted shoulder flexion, abduction in the scapular plane/scaption, external rotation, extension) and a single motion shoulder exercise consisting of a continuous movement creating the shape of "Figure of 8" in the transverse plane. The subjects used a weight between 5-15 pounds that produced muscle activation at 40-60% maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) for shoulder external rotation. That weight was then used for all of the exercises performed by the subject. The single highest EMG reading for each of the eight muscles studied, expressed as a percentage of MVIC, at any point during the second, third and fourth repetitions in a five repetition set was used to compare the single motion shoulder exercise and each exercise in the standard exercises set. RESULTS: Ten men and nine women between 18-65 years of age were tested. No significant difference (p=.05) between the exercises was noted for the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor, serratus anterior, middle deltoid or upper trapezius. There was a significant difference favoring the standard exercises in the middle and lower trapezius. (p= 0.0109 and 0.0002 respectively). CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, muscle activation during the single motion, Figure of 8 pattern exercise was not significantly different from the standard shoulder exercises in six of eight key muscles that are usually included in shoulder rehabilitation protocols. The exceptions were the middle and lower trapezius which were activated to a significantly higher degree with the standard exercises. Further evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of the single motion shoulder exercise is needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3b.

RESUMEN

Background: The movement of the arm relative to the trunk results from 3-dimensional (3D) coordinated movements of the glenohumeral (GH) and scapulothoracic (ST) joints and dictates the scapulohumeral rhythm (SHR). Alterations in SHR increase joint overload and may lead to low functional scores, pain, and failures in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine 3D SHR kinematics after RSA and compare it to that of asymptomatic shoulders. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of articles in English were performed using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and SciELO. Additional studies were identified by searching bibliographies. Search terms included "Reverse shoulder arthroplasty", "3D", and "scapula". It was selected cross-sectional studies that reported SHR with 3D motion analysis systems in patients who underwent RSA and asymptomatic controls. Two authors independently performed the extraction of articles using predefined data fields, including study quality indicators. Results: Data from four studies were included in quantitative analysis, totaling 48 shoulders with RSA and 63 asymptomatic shoulders. Pooled analyses were based on random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird). A statistically smaller SHR ratio was observed in the RSA group than that in the control group (P < .00001), meaning a greater contribution of ST joint in relation to GH joint for arm elevation. The standardized mean difference was -1.16 (95% confidence interval: -1.64, -0.67). A sensitivity analysis with three more studies that had imputed data on control group did not change the direction of the effect. The standardized mean difference on sensitivity analysis was -0.60 (P = .03; 95% confidence interval: -1.13, -0.06). It was detected as "not important heterogeneity" within the comparison (I2: 22%). Chi-square was not statistically significant (Chi2: 3.85), and I2 was 22%. Tau2 was not zero (Tau2: 0.05). Sensitivity analysis showed an I2 of 74%, which might represent substantial heterogeneity, Chi-square was not statistically significant (Chi2: 23.01), and Tau2 was not zero (Tau2: 0.37). Conclusion: This study found that RSA shoulders have an increased contribution of ST joint during arm elevation, compared with asymptomatic shoulders. More movement in ST joint in proportion to GH joint increases GH joint contact forces, which could lead to component loosening or other complications. Further studies should address the clinical implications of this kinematic finding.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is often assumed that body posture, standing vs. supine, changes shoulder muscle activation and range of motion, but these altered shoulder mechanics have not been objectively assessed. We expected the supine posture might facilitate scapular rotation and change subacromial pressure. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of body posture on shoulder kinematics during arm elevation. METHODS: Ten males and eight females with a mean age of 33 years participated in this study. Shoulder kinematics were assessed during scapular plane elevation in the standing and supine postures by using single-plane fluoroscopic images. Kinematics were measured using 3-dimensional to 2-dimensional model-image registration techniques: matching the 3-dimensional bone model derived from computed tomography onto each fluoroscopic image. Glenohumeral superior/inferior translation, acromiohumeral distance, and scapular rotations were compared between the postures. The effect of sex also was evaluated. RESULTS: With the arm at the side position, the humeral head in the supine posture was located 0.5 mm superior compared to the standing posture (P < .001). During humeral elevation, the humeral head significantly shifted more inferiorly in the supine posture than in standing; the biggest mean difference was 0.6 mm, P = .003. But acromiohumeral distance during elevation was not significantly affected by the body posture (P = .05). Scapular upward rotation and posterior tilt were significantly different between the postures (P < .001). Sex had statistically significant, but quantitatively small, effects on shoulder kinematics. CONCLUSIONS: Body postures affect shoulder kinematics during humeral elevation. This knowledge will be useful to optimize rehabilitation exercises and for diagnostic insight.

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to compare scapulohumeral coordination used before and after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (RTSA) during the ascent phase of scapular plane arm elevation tasks performed with varied shoulder rotations (neutral, external rotation, and internal rotation). We expected that after RTSA, participants would decrease scapulothoracic upward rotation angular displacement and increase the scapulohumeral rhythm (SHR) vs. before RTSA. 11 RTSA patients (12 shoulders) participated in this study before and after RTSA while optical motion capture measured kinematics of the humerus and scapula relative to the thorax. Angular kinematics were compared pre vs. post-RTSA within-participant using One Dimensional Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) t-tests (α = 0.05) and across-participants, using paired t-tests (α = 0.05) adjusted for multiple comparisons. As a group, during arm elevation with neutral rotation, the mean (SD) SHR pre-RTSA was 1.5 (0.5) and increased to 1.7 (0.3) post-RTSA, though, not significantly (p = 0.182). In contrast, during arm elevation with external rotation, the mean (SD) SHR pre-RTSA was 1.3 (0.4) and significantly increased (p = 0.018) post-RTSA to 1.7 (0.3). Likewise, during arm elevation with internal rotation, the mean (SD) SHR pre-RTSA was 1.2 (0.3) and significantly increased (p < 0.001) post-RTSA to 1.7 (0.2). In addition to these and other group trends, participant-specific patterns were uncovered through SPM analyses - with some participants significantly increasing and others significantly decreasing scapulothoracic angular displacements across humerothoracic elevation ranges. Both before and after RTSA, scapulohumeral rhythm ratios were within the range of those previously reported in post-RTSA patients and were smaller than those used by healthy populations.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Various factors may be related to outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) including patient and surgical factors. Differences in shoulder kinematics might be associated with poor function after RSA; however, kinematic differences between shoulders with good or poor elevation have not been elucidated. The purpose of this study was to compare RSA kinematics between shoulders with good or poor elevation. METHODS: The study included 28 shoulders with a minimum 6-month follow-up after RSA using Grammont-type prostheses. Subjects comprised 17 men and 11 women with the mean age of 75 years (range, 63-91). Subjects underwent fluoroscopy during active scapular plane abduction. Computed tomography of their shoulders was performed to create 3-dimensional scapular implant models. Using model-image registration techniques, poses of 3-dimensional implant models were iteratively adjusted to match their silhouettes with the silhouettes in the fluoroscopic images, and 3-dimensional kinematics of implants were computed. Kinematics and glenosphere orientation were compared between shoulders with good (>90 degree) or poor (<90 degree) scapular plane abduction. RESULTS: Nineteen and 9 shoulders were assigned to the good- and poor-elevation groups, respectively. There were no significant differences between the groups in age, sex, height, weight, preoperative range of motion, or Constant score, but body mass index in the poor elevation shoulders was significantly larger than that in the good elevation shoulders. There were no significant differences in glenosphere (upward/downward rotation, anterior/posterior tilt, internal/external rotation) or glenohumeral (internal/external rotation, abduction/adduction) kinematics between the good and poor elevation shoulders. Scapulohumeral rhythm was significantly higher in the good elevation shoulders than the poor elevation shoulders (P = .04). Glenosphere superior tilt was 2.3° ± 4.2° in the good-elevation group and 8.1° ± 8.9° in the poor-elevation group, and the difference was statistically significant (P = .03). DISCUSSION: Shoulders with good elevation after RSA demonstrated better scapulohumeral rhythm than those with poor elevation, though there were no significant differences in glenosphere and glenohumeral kinematics. It may be important for better elevation to achieve good glenohumeral motion in shoulders with RSA. Glenosphere orientations may affect postoperative shoulder function.

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives; Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) are effective in improving and maintaining Range of motion(ROM), increasing muscular strength and power, and increasing athletic performance, especially after exercise. The scapula patterns defined in PNF are activated within the upper extremity patterns and scapula motions together. Proper function of the upper extremities requires both motion and stability of the scapula. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of scapula stabilization exercise training involving muscle strengthening, muscle balance, and movement control exercises on office workers with scapula dysfunction. Materials and Methods: A total of 42 office workers with scapula dyskinesis were recruited and randomly divided into three groups: muscle strengthening exercise group (n = 14), muscle balance exercise group (n = 14), and movement control exercise group (n = 14). The participants underwent 18 sessions (25 min/session, 3 days a week for 6 weeks) of training involving the three types of exercises. Results: The measurement outcomes included the scapula index, measured using a digital Vernier caliper; scapula function, evaluated using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire (pain and performing, work ability, and sports and art activities); and scapulohumeral movements (scapula upward rotation at humeral abduction angles of 0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, and 180°), evaluated using inclinometers. After the exercise intervention, the scapula index (p = 0.002), DASH pain and performing score (p = 0.000), DASH work ability score (p = 0.000), DASH sports and art activity score (p = 0.027), and scapulohumeral movements (scapula upward rotation at 0° (p = 0.013) and 45° (p = 0.043) humeral abduction) showed significantly greater improvements in the movement control group than in the muscle strengthening and muscle balance groups. Conclusions: Thus, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation can be used as a rehabilitation intervention for scapula position and movement, pain reduction, and functional improvement in office workers with scapula dyskinesis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Characterization of scapular kinematics under demanding load conditions might aid to distinguish between physiological and clinically relevant alterations. Previous investigations focused only on submaximal external load situations. How scapular movement changes with maximal load remains unclear. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate 3D scapular kinematics during unloaded and maximal loaded shoulder flexion and extension. Twelve asymptomatic individuals performed shoulder flexion and extension movements under unloaded and maximal concentric and eccentric loaded isokinetic conditions. 3D scapular kinematics assessed with a motion capture system was analyzed for 20° intervals of humeral positions from 20° to 120° flexion. Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to evaluate kinematic differences between load conditions for scapular position angles, scapulohumeral rhythm and scapular motion extent. Increased scapular upward rotation was seen during shoulder flexion and extension as well as decreased posterior tilt and external rotation during eccentric and concentric arm descents of maximal loaded compared to unloaded conditions. Load effects were further seen for the scapulohumeral rhythm with greater scapular involvement at lower humeral positions and increased scapular motion extent under maximal loaded shoulder movements. With maximal load applied to the arm physiological scapular movement pattern are induced that may imply both impingement sparing and causing mechanisms.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Assessment of scapular kinematics and the dynamics of the scapulohumeral rhythm (SHR) would be important for understanding pathologies of the shoulder and to inform treatment. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the SHR and scapular kinematics in patients with a rotator cuff tear (RCT), compared to a control group with healthy shoulders using image-matching techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The shoulder kinematics of large or massive RCT patients were evaluated and compared to a control group with healthy shoulders. Radiographic surveillance was performed throughout the full range of external rotation and scapular plane abduction. Computed tomography imaging of the shoulder complex was performed, with three-dimensional image reconstruction and matching to the radiographs to measure three-dimensional positions and orientations. SHR and angular values of the scapula were measured. RESULTS: Scapular external rotation in the late phase of external rotation movement was greater in the RCT group than in the control group (p < 0.05), but with no difference in the SHR. During scapular plane abduction, there were significant differences in SHR, scapular posterior tilt and scapular upward rotation between the RCT and control group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Regarding clinical relevance, this study clarified the differences of SHR and angular values of the scapula between the RCT and control group. These results underline the importance of assessment the SHR and scapular kinematics in individuals with a RCT. RCT is associated with specific compensation in the kinematics of the scapula and SHR during external rotation and scapular plane abduction, which could inform treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The coordination of the glenohumeral joint and the shoulder girdle has been known as scapulohumeral rhythm. The effects of anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) are still subject to research. Former studies showed a higher amount of scapula lateral rotation to compensate for reduced glenohumeral elevation. The purpose of the present study was to confirm this mechanism and examine additional effects on the sternoclavicular and acromioclavicular joints' kinematics. METHODS: 3D motion analysis was used to examine 23 shoulders of 16 patients with a mean age of 71.2 (SD: 5.2) years with a mean follow up of 5.4 (SD: 2.1) years after aTSA and to compare kinematics and coordination to 22 shoulders of 11 healthy age-matched individuals with a mean age of 69.6 (SD: 5.3) years while performing elevation movement in frontal and sagittal plane. RESULTS: The ratio of glenohumeral to shoulder girdle contribution was reduced compared to healthy individuals: Shoulder girdle contribution to elevation was 36.5% (SD: 8.1) in the aTSA group vs. 28.5% (SD: 8.2) in the control group in the sagittal plane and 38.1% (SD: 9.1) vs. 30.2% (SD: 7.1) in the frontal plane. Kinematics of the sternoclavicular and acromioclavicular joints showed significantly different patterns. CONCLUSION: Patients after aTSA showed altered shoulder girdle kinematics and higher contribution of the shoulder girdle towards elevation. Whether this is a result of the surgery, of limited glenohumeral range of motion or due to the preoperative status remains unclear. Further investigation with a prospective study design is necessary.

Asunto(s)