RESUMEN
The stretch of cardiac muscle increases developed force in two phases. The first phase occurs immediately after stretch and is the expression of the Frank-Starling mechanism, while the second one or slow force response (SFR) occurs gradually and is due to an increase in the calcium transient amplitude. An important step in the chain of events leading to the SFR generation is the increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) leading to redox sensitive ERK1/2, p90RSK, and NHE1 phosphorylation/activation. Conversely, suppression of ROS production blunts the SFR. The purpose of this study was to explore whether overexpression of the ubiquitously expressed antioxidant molecule thioredoxin-1 (TRX1) affects the SFR development and NHE1 phosphorylation. We did not detect any change in basal phopho-ERK1/2, phopho-p90RSK, and NHE1 expression in mice with TRX1 overexpression compared to wild type (WT). Isolated papillary muscles from WT or TRX1-overexpressing mice were stretched from 92 to 98% of its maximal length. A prominent SFR was observed in WT mice that was completely canceled in TRX1 animals. Interestingly, myocardial stretch induced a significant increase in NHE1 phosphorylation in WT mice that was not detected in TRX1-overexpressing mice. These novel results suggest that magnification of cardiac antioxidant defense power by overexpression of TRX1 precludes NHE1 phosphorylation/activation after stretch, consequently blunting the SFR development.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Myocardial stretch increases cardiac force in two consecutive phases: The first one due to Frank-Starling mechanism, followed by the gradually developed slow force response (SFR). The latter is the mechanical counterpart of an autocrine/paracrine mechanism involving the release of angiotensin II (Ang II) and endothelin (ET) leading to Naâº/H⺠exchanger 1 (NHE-1) phosphorylation and activation. Since previous evidence indicates that p38-MAP kinase (p38-MAPK) negatively regulates the Ang II-induced NHE1 activation in vascular smooth muscle and the positive inotropic effect of ET in the heart, we hypothesized that this kinase might modulate the magnitude of the SFR to stretch. METHODS: Experiments were performed in isolated rat papillary muscles subjected to sudden stretch from 92 to 98% of its maximal length, in the absence or presence of the p38-MAPK inhibitor SB202190, or its inactive analogous SB202474. Western blot technique was used to determine phosphorylation level of p38-MAPK, ERK1/2, p90RSK and NHE-1 (previously immunoprecipitated with NHE-1 polyclonal antibody). Dual specificity phosphatase 6 (DUSP6) expression was evaluated by RT-PCR and western blot. Additionally, the Naâº-dependent intracellular pH recovery from an ammonium prepulse-induced acid load was used to asses NHE-1 activity. RESULTS: The SFR was larger under p38-MAPK inhibition (SB202190), effect that was not observed in the presence of an inactive analogous (SB202474). Myocardial stretch activated p38-MAPK, while pre-treatment with SB202190 precluded this effect. Inhibition of p38-MAPK increased stretched-induced NHE-1 phosphorylation and activity, key event in the SFR development. Consistently, p38-MAPK inhibition promoted a greater increase in ERK1/2-p90RSK phosphorylation/activation after myocardial stretch, effect that may certainly be responsible for the observed increase in NHE-1 phosphorylation under this condition. Myocardial stretch induced up-regulation of the DUSP6, which specifically dephosphorylates ERK1/2, effect that was blunted by SB202190. CONCLUSION: Taken together, our data support the notion that p38-MAPK activation after myocardial stretch restricts the SFR by limiting ERK1/2-p90RSK phosphorylation, and consequently NHE-1 phosphorylation/activity, through a mechanism that involves DUSP6 up-regulation.