RESUMEN
Here we build from the central strength of the existing definition of dyslexia-its emphasis on neurobiological origins-and proffer a set of seven core principles for a new, more comprehensive conceptualization of dyslexia. These principles derive from two major research directions: (1) the still evolving history of attempts to explain dyslexia, including in varied writing systems; and (2) the study of the reading brain circuit, its development, and its genetic and environmental influences. What emerges from connecting these two directions is a dynamic conceptualization of dyslexia that incorporates the extensive research on the heterogeneity of dyslexia and the interdependent contributions of multiple biological and socio-cultural risk and preventive factors. A new definition of dyslexia, therefore, needs to transcend both past unitary characterizations and past assumptions based largely on the English orthography. Such a conceptualization references the ways that different languages interact with the reading brain circuit to produce different sources of reading failure. Similarly, the characteristics and consequences of dyslexia that have been considered as secondary sequela (e.g., reduced reading comprehension, social-emotional issues) should be part of a more comprehensive narrative. Of critical importance, any definition of dyslexia should clarify persisting misconceptions that associate dyslexia with a lack of intelligence, potential to learn, or talents. Thus, the overall purpose of such a definition should serve as an instrument of knowledge and an enduring reason for pursuing growth in reading for the individual, the educator, and the public.
Asunto(s)
Dislexia , Lectura , Dislexia/fisiopatología , Humanos , Encéfalo/fisiopatología , LenguajeRESUMEN
In the past several years, a public conversation in the United States about interpersonal violence has flourished, sustained by the work of advocates who are themselves survivors. This surge in public sharing of trauma stories is a rhetorical form of resistance to ideologies in mainstream American culture that impose silence on survivors (e.g., the "just world" belief). However, the developmental progression from trauma 'victim' to empowered public 'survivor/advocate' accommodates to dominant American cultural preferences that stories of adversity have a redemptive story line. In a redemptive story, negative experiences are followed by something positive (e.g., personal growth, lessons learned, strength gained). In this paper, we draw from theory and the sparse relevant literature across multiple disciplines to conceptualize when and for whom the redemptive storying of trauma (or, redemptive master narrative) is available, advantageous, and systemically encouraged. Among the proposed advantages of redemptive storying are its psychological health benefits; potential to empower self and others; promotion of meaning-making, mission, and communal solidarity; and the larger social/political changes that can emerge from giving voice to silenced experiences. Proposed challenges to redemptive storying include layers of societal oppression and marginalization that shape the redemption stories of many survivor-advocates; ongoing connection to or dependence on relationships and communities that enable abuse; and the reality of historical trauma and other forms of intergenerational trauma, which complicate the linear, individualistic story of redemption. With this theory-driven framework, we wish to promote compassion for survivors, along with interdisciplinary, inclusive, and intersectional research in this understudied area.
Asunto(s)
Víctimas de Crimen/psicología , Narración , Poder Psicológico , Sobrevivientes/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Dissociation is a lack of information integration resulting from a process that ranges on a continuum from normative experiences (e.g., daydreaming) to a pervasive traumatic response involving alterations and/or fragmentation in mental processes such as memory, emotion, and perception. Perceived coping self-efficacy (CSE) is a cognitive appraisal ability utilized to regulate internal and external stressors that arise from traumatic events, and is crucial for effective adaptation after extreme stress or trauma. Thus, CSE may be a critical component in decreasing dissociative experiences following a traumatic event. In the present study, 136 undergraduate students (M age = 22.36 years, SD = 6.27; 81% female, 69.1% Caucasian, 77.2% attended some college) completed self-report measures of trauma, dissociation, and coping self-efficacy. All measures were completed by the same participants at two different time points (Time 1 and Time 2) two months apart; all participants reported a history of exposure to at least one Criterion A traumatic event (according to the DSM-5) at Time 1. We hypothesized that CSE for posttraumatic coping demands at Time 2 would mediate the relationship between dissociation at Time 1 and dissociation at Time 2, and subsequently found evidence of significant mediation, 95% CI [.02, .18]. These findings suggest that initial levels of persistent dissociation negatively predict CSE, which in turn directly and negatively influence persistent dissociation at a later time point. This highlights how CSE may serve as a protective factor against persistent dissociation.
Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Trastornos Disociativos/psicología , Autoeficacia , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Estudiantes/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , UniversidadesRESUMEN
Domestic minor sex trafficking (DMST) is the recruitment, harboring, transportation, provision, or obtaining of U.S. minors for the purposes of a commercial sex act. DMST victims and survivors often become involved with state-level systems including the child welfare and/or juvenile justice systems. This study presents exploratory qualitative findings regarding the role of interpersonal relationships in the lives of system-involved DMST survivors from the perspectives of DMST survivors. Results indicate survivors perceive interpersonal relationships as key to promoting risk, providing protection, and fostering resiliency over DMST. Findings from the current study not only provide a context for understanding the role of interpersonal relationships in the lives of DMST survivors but also point to directions for development of interventions targeted toward this population.
Asunto(s)
Adultos Sobrevivientes del Maltrato a los Niños/psicología , Abuso Sexual Infantil/psicología , Trata de Personas/psicología , Relaciones Interpersonales , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Protección a la Infancia , Preescolar , Femenino , Trata de Personas/prevención & control , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resiliencia Psicológica , Trabajo Sexual/psicología , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The school-to-prison pipeline (STPP) refers to a path from the education system to the juvenile or adult criminal justice system. Over the past two decades, this path has grown significantly, and scholars attribute a myriad of contributing factors to this increase. Each factor has its own impact and consequences, which are covered in detail based on an extensive literature review and macro practice through Race Matters for Juvenile Justice. Prior to the STPP concept, education had largely been considered a protective factor for children and a route to success as opposed to a risk factor or track toward juvenile justice involvement. Staying in school and getting good grades were regarded as strategies that even at-risk students could use to overcome poverty, prejudice, and powerlessness. But since the 1990s, the approach to discipline in U.S. public schools has changed, and the effects of this change are only now becoming evident. This article explains the correlates of the STPP and its disparate outcomes, most notably for students of color; those with disabilities; and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning students. The article concludes with implications for social workers in various settings and specific strategies for reducing the impact of the STPP.
Asunto(s)
Grupos Minoritarios/psicología , Prisioneros/psicología , Prisiones/tendencias , Instituciones Académicas/tendencias , Estudiantes/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Servicio Social/métodos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
It has long been recognized that early adversity can have life-long consequences, and the extent to which this is true is gaining increasing attention. A growing body of literature implicates Adverse Childhood Experiences, including physical, sexual, and emotional abuse, in a broad range of negative health consequences including adult psychopathology, cardiovascular, and immune disease. Increasing evidence from animal, clinical, and epidemiological studies highlight the critical role of epigenetic programing, such as DNA methylation and histone modification, in altering gene expression, brain structure and function, and ultimately life-course trajectories. This review outlines our developing insight into the interplay between our human biology and our changing environment, and explores the growing evidence base for how interventions may prevent and ameliorate damage inflicted by toxic stress in early life.