RESUMEN

Recurrent pericarditis (RP) has been traditionally regarded as a "nightmare" for both clinicians and patients. Until approximately a decade ago, available treatments were thin on the ground with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, glucocorticoids, colchicine, and classical immunosuppressants being the only options. The first important step in the tale of RP was the advent of colchicine in clinical practice, which has been shown to halve the rate of first and subsequent pericarditis recurrences. The second major breakthrough advance in this setting was the introduction of interleukin-1 inhibitors based on the recently unveiled autoinflammatory nature of pericarditis. At present, anti-interleukin-1 inhibitors available for clinical use in patients with refractory RP include anakinra and rilonacept, with the latter having obtained FDA approval for this indication. Apart from the remarkable efficacy and good safety profile which is a common feature of all anti-interleukin-1 compounds, rilonacept has the advantage of weekly administration (instead of daily compared to anakinra) which is important in terms of adherence to treatment and improved quality of life albeit at the expense of a higher cost. This review aims to summarize the available evidence on the role of rilonacept in the treatment of RP and the reduction of the recurrences risk.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Still's disease is a rare autoinflammatory disorder characterized by systemic inflammation, fever, rash, and arthritis. The term "Still's disease" covers the pediatric subtype systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA) and adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD), which affects adults. Biological drugs, including anti-interleukin-1 agents anakinra, canakinumab, rilonacept, and the interleukin-6 antagonist tocilizumab, are used in the management of Still's disease. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, and the study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023450442). MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were screened from inception until September 17, 2023. We included patients with Still's disease who received placebo or biological drugs: anakinra, canakinumab, rilonacept, or tocilizumab. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were achievement of ACR50 response and occurrence of serious adverse events, respectively. The interventions were ranked using rankograms and SUCRA values. RESULTS: Nine trials with 430 patients were included. All biological drugs were associated with greater odds of ACR50 response compared with placebo. There was no statistically significant association between biological drugs and serious adverse events. The multivariate meta-analysis found no difference between biological drugs. As per SUCRA rankings, anakinra was the most effective and safe option with respect to ACR50 response and occurrence of serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of biological drugs in pediatric and adult patients with Still's disease. Biological drugs were effective in achieving ACR response and demonstrated a low adverse event profile in the management of Still's disease.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rilonacept, a once-weekly interleukin-1 alpha and beta cytokine trap, reduced pericarditis recurrence in the phase 3 study, RHAPSODY (Rilonacept Inhibition of Interleukin-1 Alpha and Beta for Recurrent Pericarditis: A Pivotal Symptomatology and Outcomes Study). The RHAPSODY long-term extension further explored recurrent pericarditis natural history and treatment duration decision-making during 24 additional months of open-label rilonacept treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-four patients commenced the long-term extension, with a median (maximum) total rilonacept duration of 22 (35) months. Individually, 18 months after the most proximal pericarditis recurrence, investigators decided to continue rilonacept on study, suspend rilonacept for off-treatment observation (rescue allowed), or discontinue the study. The annualized incidence of pericarditis recurrence on rilonacept up to the 18-month decision milestone was 0.04 events/patient-year versus 4.4 events/patient-year prestudy while on oral therapies. At the 18-month decision milestone, 64% (33/52) continued rilonacept, 15% (8/52) suspended rilonacept for observation, and 21% (11/52) discontinued the study. Among the 33 patients (1/33; 3.0%) continuing rilonacept (median time to recurrence could not be estimated due to too few events), a single recurrence occurred 4 weeks after a treatment interruption. Among patients suspending rilonacept, 75% (6/8) experienced recurrence (median time to recurrence, 11.8 weeks [95% CI, 3.7 weeks to not estimable]). There was a 98% reduction in risk of pericarditis recurrence among patients continuing rilonacept treatment after the 18-month decision milestone versus those suspending treatment for observation (hazard ratio, 0.02; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In the RHAPSODY long-term extension, continued rilonacept treatment resulted in continued response; treatment suspension at the 18-month decision milestone was associated with pericarditis recurrence. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03737110.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: FMF is the most common hereditary monogenic fever syndrome marked by recurrent attacks of fever and polyserositis. Colchicine is the current recommended first-line treatment for FMF. However, a small portion of FMF patients are unresponsive or intolerant to colchicine. Anti-IL-1 agents are alternative treatment options for colchicine-resistant or -intolerant FMF patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide qualitative and quantitative evidence for the efficacy and safety of anti-IL-1 agents in adult and paediatric FMF patients. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Web of Science were screened from inception to May 2023. We included adult and paediatric FMF patients who received continuous treatment with at least one of the anti-IL-1 drugs: anakinra, canakinumab and rilonacept. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved complete remission of attacks and the primary safety outcome was the proportion of patients who experienced at least one adverse event during treatment. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed for the quantitative synthesis. RESULTS: Fourty-four reports consisting of 1399 FMF patients were included. Sixty percent (95% CI 49%, 72%) of the adult patients and 81% (95% CI 72%, 89%) of the paediatric patients achieved complete remission. Anti-IL-1 agents significantly decreased levels of inflammatory markers. At least one adverse event was observed in 25% (95% CI 13%, 37%) of the adult patients and 12% (95% CI 3%, 21%) of the paediatric patients. CONCLUSION: Anti-IL-1 agents were effective and demonstrated a low adverse event profile in paediatric and adult FMF patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effects of interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) inhibitors on gout flares. METHODS: Studies published between 2011 and 2022 that evaluated the effects of IL-1ß inhibitors in adult patients experiencing gout flares were eligible for inclusion. Outcomes including pain, frequency and intensity of gout flares, inflammation, and safety were assessed. Five electronic databases (Pubmed/Medline, Embase, Biosis/Ovid, Web of Science and Cochrane Library) were searched. Two independent reviewers performed study screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessments (Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2 for randomised controlled trials [RCTs] and Downs and Black for non-RCTs). Data are reported as a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: Fourteen studies (10 RCTs) met the inclusion criteria, with canakinumab, anakinra, and rilonacept being the three included IL-1ß inhibitors. A total of 4367 patients with a history of gout were included from the 14 studies (N = 3446, RCTs; N = 159, retrospective studies [with a history of gout]; N = 762, post hoc analysis [with a history of gout]). In the RCTs, canakinumab and rilonacept were reported to have a better response compared to an active comparator for resolving pain, while anakinra appeared to be not inferior to an active comparator for resolving pain. Furthermore, canakinumab and rilonacept reduced the frequency of gout flares compared to the comparators. All three medications were mostly well-tolerated compared to their comparators. CONCLUSION: IL-1ß inhibitors may be a beneficial and safe medication for patients experiencing gout flares for whom current standard therapies are unsuitable. REVIEW PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ID: CRD42021267670.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: We review the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and contemporary treatment for recurrent pericarditis, with focus on interleukin-1 (IL-1) inhibitors. RECENT FINDINGS: Recurrent pericarditis occurs in about 15-30% of patients who have acute pericarditis. With increased understanding of the autoinflammatory pathophysiology of recurrent pericarditis, IL-1 inhibitors including anakinra, canakinumab, and rilonacept have been applied to this condition with great promise. In particular, the RHAPSODY trial found rilonacept significantly improves pain and inflammation, while also reducing recurrence with few adverse events. The next IL-1 inhibitor on the block for pericarditis, goflikicept, is also discussed. Understanding the role of the inflammasome via the autoinflammatory pathway in pericarditis has led to incorporation of IL-1 inhibitors in the treatment of recurrent pericarditis, with proven efficacy and safety and randomized trials. This will lead to increase uptake of this agent which demonstrated lower rates of recurrence and faster time to resolution.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cold urticaria (ColdU) is characterized by pruritic wheals following exposure of the skin to cold. Many patients show insufficient response to antihistamines, the first line treatment. Based on the high efficacy of interleukin-1(IL-1)-inhibition in cold-induced urticarial autoinflammatory diseases, we assessed the effects of rilonacept, an IL-1 inhibitor, in ColdU patients unresponsive to standard treatment. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled two-center study, we included 20 patients with ColdU. In the first part, patients received 320 mg rilonacept or placebo (1:1) followed by weekly doses of 160 mg rilonacept or placebo for 6 weeks. In the second part, all patients received weekly 160 mg or 320 mg rilonacept for 6 weeks, open-label. The primary endpoint was change in critical temperature threshold (CTT). Secondary endpoints included changes in quality of life impairment (Dermatology Life Quality Index, DLQI), differences of inflammatory mediators upon cold provocation and safety assessment over the study period. RESULTS: Baseline mean CTTs were 20.2°C (placebo) and 17.3°C (rilonacept). Mean CTTs did not change significantly during the 6-week double-blind treatment (placebo - 0.45°C; rilonacept +0.89°C). IL-6, IL-18 and HSP-70 blood levels showed interindividual variability without significant changes during hand cold water bath provocation in placebo- or rilonacept-treated patients. In contrast, DLQI significantly improved in the rilonacept (mean DLQI reduction of 3.8; p = 0.002) but not in the placebo group (mean DLQI reduction of 0). Comparing baseline with the rilonacept open-label treatment, there were no changes in CTTs or DLQI scores. CONCLUSION: IL-1 inhibition with rilonacept did not improve ColdU, but demonstrated a good safety profile. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2012-005726-30. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT02171416.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Acute pericarditis is the most frequent pericardial disease characterized by inflammation of the pericardial layers resulting in pain, dyspnea and fatigue. Often limited to an isolated event, up to 30% of patients experience one or more recurrences. There is limited knowledge about the pathophysiology of this disease, possibly due to the limited availability of animal models. More recently, following seminal clinical trials with colchicine and interleukin-1 (IL-1) blockers and a novel murine model of acute pericarditis using zymosan A, it has become clear that the NLRP3 (NACHT, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) inflammasome/IL-1 ß axis plays a central role in driving acute pericardial inflammation and in sustaining this process during recurrences. Diagnostic management of pericarditis has been implemented with multimodality imaging including echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance. These imaging modalities provide essential diagnostic and pathogenetic information, and are able to characterize pericardial inflammation, allowing to refine risk stratification and personalize treatment. Recent acquisitions yield relevant implications with regard to the therapeutic management of acute and recurrent pericarditis. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and colchicine are cornerstone therapies either for acute and recurrent pericarditis. However, the benefits of targeted agents, such as anakinra - a recombinant human IL-1 receptor antagonist - and rilonacept - an IL-1 α /IL-1 ß trap, are being increasingly recognized. To this end, phenotyping patients with pericarditis and addressing such therapies to those presenting with auto-inflammatory features (elevated C-reactive protein, sustained pericardial and systemic inflammation, multiple recurrences) is of utmost importance to identify patients who might be more likely to benefit from NLRP3 inflammasome/IL-1 ß pathway blockade.

RESUMEN

Aims: In this protocol-predefined substudy of the RHAPSODY trial, the primary aim was to assess whether pericardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was associated with time to pericarditis recurrence. Methods and results: RHAPSODY was a Phase 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized-withdrawal trial that demonstrated the efficacy of rilonacept in recurrent pericarditis (RP). Patients with a history of multiple RP and an active recurrence were enrolled and had the option to participate in a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging substudy. CMRs were interpreted by a blinded independent core laboratory with prespecified criteria to define pericardial LGE. Compared to patients with trace or mild pericardial LGE (n = 9), patients with moderate or severe pericardial LGE (n = 16) generally had a higher number of recurrent episodes per year (5.3 vs. 3.9) and a higher mean CRP level (3.6 vs. 1.1 mg/dL). Overall, 10/14 (71.4%) who received a placebo had a recurrence compared to 0/11 (0%) who received rilonacept. In patients randomized to placebo who had moderate or severe pericardial LGE, the median time to recurrence was 4.2 weeks compared to 10.7 weeks in patients who had trace or mild pericardial LGE. At the conclusion of the event-driven randomized-withdrawal period, among patients receiving a placebo, 5/7 (71.4%) with trace or mild pericardial LGE and 5/7 (71.4%) with moderate or severe pericardial LGE had a recurrence. Conclusions: Among patients with multiple RP, these preliminary findings support the concept of pericardial LGE as an imaging biomarker that may inform the duration of treatment and risk of recurrence with cessation of therapy and larger studies should be considered. ClinicalTrialsgov Identifier: NCT03737110.

Patients with recurrent pericarditis (RP) can suffer from debilitating pain and a poor quality of life. Rilonacept blocks interleukin 1 (IL-1), the major inflammatory driver of RP, and is highly effective at treating active episodes of RP and preventing recurrence. In pericarditis, there is the recruitment of blood vessels to the pericardium, and the extent of these new blood vessels tracks with the degree of inflammation. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) readily images this blood supply and can therefore assess inflammation by the magnitude of pericardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). In this study of RP patients with CMR, no patients who continued rilonacept had a recurrence compared to 10/14 (71.4%) patients who stopped rilonacept and received a placebo. In the patients who received a placebo, the rate of eventual recurrence was similar among patients with trace or mild pericardial LGE at baseline (5/7) compared to patients with moderate or severe pericardial LGE at baseline (5/7). However, patients who demonstrated moderate or severe pericardial LGE had a faster recurrence (∼4 weeks after stopping rilonacept) compared to patients with trace or mild pericardial LGE (∼11 weeks after stopping rilonacept). These results suggest that pericardial LGE can serve as an imaging biomarker to assess the severity of RP and raise the possibility that CMR could be studied in future clinical trials to determine appropriate therapy and treatment duration in patients with RP.

RESUMEN

Interleukin 1 (IL-1) has been indicated as a mediator of recurrent pericarditis. Rilonacept, a soluble IL-1 receptor chimeric fusion protein neutralizing interleukin 1 alpha (IL-1α) and interleukin 1 beta (IL-1ß), has demonstrated promising results in a phase II study in recurrent or refractory pericarditis. Anakinra is a recombinant inhibitor of the IL-1 receptor with a demonstrated reduction in the incidence of recurrent pericarditis. Definite pharmacological management of pericarditis is key to preventing recurrences, mostly treatment options for recurrent pericarditis refractory to conventional drugs. Here we critically discuss the existing therapy options for recurrent pericarditis, with a focus on new pharmacological approaches: rilonacept and anakinra. A systematic search was conducted across online databases such as PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, CINAHL, Scopus, and Embase to obtain clinical trials that assess the effectiveness of anti-interleukin 1 therapy such as anakinra and rilonacept in the management of recurrent pericarditis. Our study concluded that anti-interleukin 1 therapy significantly improved both the quality of life and the clinical outcomes of the study population. These outcomes were most prominent with the use of rilonacept and anakinra in the trial treatment. Rilonacept and anakinra are valuable options in case of recurrent pericarditis refractory to conventional drugs.

RESUMEN

Background Recurrent pericarditis is characterized by painful flares and inflammation, which negatively impact health-related quality of life. RHAPSODY (rilonacept inhibition of interleukin-1 alpha and beta for recurrent pericarditis: a pivotal symptomatology and outcomes study) evaluated the efficacy and safety of rilonacept (IL-1α and -ß cytokine trap) in recurrent pericarditis. A secondary analysis of these data evaluated the patient-reported outcome questionnaire score change during the trial. Methods and Results Participants completed 5 patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires assessing pericarditis pain, health-related quality of life, general health status, sleep impact, and overall symptom severity. PRO score changes during the treatment run-in period (12 weeks) and the blinded randomized withdrawal period (up to 24 weeks) were evaluated using descriptive statistics and mixed model repeated measures analyses. Participants with PRO data from the run-in period (n=84) and the randomized withdrawal period (n=61; 30 rilonacept, 31 placebo) were included in analyses. Run-in baseline PRO scores indicated that pericarditis symptoms during pericarditis recurrence impacted health-related quality of life. All PRO scores significantly improved (P<0.001) on rilonacept treatment during the run-in period. For the randomized withdrawal period, PRO scores were maintained for participants receiving rilonacept. For those receiving placebo and who experienced a recurrence, PRO scores deteriorated at the time of recurrence and then improved following rilonacept bailout. At randomized withdrawal Week 24/End of Study, scores of participants who received bailout rilonacept were similar to those of participants who had continued rilonacept. Conclusions These results demonstrate the burden of pericarditis recurrences and the improved physical and emotional health of patients with recurrent pericarditis while on rilonacept treatment. These findings extend prior rilonacept efficacy results, demonstrating improvements in patient-reported health-related quality of life, sleep, pain, and global symptom severity while on treatment. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03737110.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: The cytokine interleukin (IL)-1 plays a pivotal role in immune-mediated disorders, particularly in autoinflammatory diseases. Targeting this cytokine proved to be efficacious in treating numerous IL-1-mediated pathologies. Currently, three IL-1 blockers are approved, namely anakinra, canakinumab and rilonacept, and two additional ones are expected to receive approval, namely gevokizumab and bermekimab. However, there is no systematic review on the safety and efficacy of these biologics in treating immune-mediated diseases. Objective: To evaluate safety and efficacy of anakinra, canakinumab, rilonacept, gevokizumab, and bermekimab for the treatment of immune-mediated disorders compared to placebo, standard-of-care treatment or other biologics. Methods: The PRISMA checklist guided the reporting of the data. We searched the PubMed database between 1 January 1984 and 31 December 2020 focusing on immune-mediated disorders. Our PubMed literature search identified 7363 articles. After screening titles and abstracts for the inclusion and exclusion criteria and assessing full texts, 75 articles were included in a narrative synthesis. Results: Anakinra was both efficacious and safe in treating cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (CAPS), familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), gout, macrophage activation syndrome, recurrent pericarditis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA). Conversely, anakinra failed to show efficacy in graft-versus-host disease, Sjögren's syndrome, and type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Canakinumab showed efficacy in treating CAPS, FMF, gout, hyper-IgD syndrome, RA, Schnitzler's syndrome, sJIA, and TNF receptor-associated periodic syndrome. However, use of canakinumab in the treatment of adult-onset Still's disease and T1DM revealed negative results. Rilonacept was efficacious and safe for the treatment of CAPS, FMF, recurrent pericarditis, and sJIA. Contrarily, Rilonacept did not reach superiority compared to placebo in the treatment of T1DM. Gevokizumab showed mixed results in treating Behçet's disease-associated uveitis and no benefit when assessed in T1DM. Bermekimab achieved promising results in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa. Conclusions: This systematic review of IL-1-targeting biologics summarizes the current state of research, safety, and clinical efficacy of anakinra, bermekimab, canakinumab, gevokizumab, and rilonacept in treating immune-mediated disorders. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42021228547.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and colchicine are first-line treatments for acute and recurrent pericarditis. Drugs blocking the NACHT, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome/interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) axis are beneficial in patients with multiple recurrences. AREAS COVERED: In this review, the role of the NLRP3 inflammasome/IL-1ß axis in the pathophysiology of pericarditis is discussed. Updates about novel therapies targeting IL-1 for recurrent pericarditis (RP) and practical considerations for their use are provided. EXPERT OPINION: IL-1 inhibitors have been increasingly studied for RP in recent years. NLRP3 inflammasome is a key mediator in the pathophysiology of RP. IL-1ß, its main product, can sustain its own production and feeds local and systemic inflammation. Randomized clinical trials testing anakinra (a recombinant form of the IL-1 receptor antagonist blocking IL-1α and IL-1ß) and rilonacept (an IL-1α and IL-1ß trap) have shown that IL-1 blockade reduces recurrences. These trials also helped in phenotyping patients with RP. Patients with multiple recurrences and signs of pericardial and/or systemic inflammation might benefit from IL-1 blockers in order to interrupt cyclic flares of auto-inflammation. Given this evidence, guidelines should consider incorporating IL-1 blockers.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Chronic subclinical inflammation is a key process in the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Along with lipids, inflammation is essential for the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis with macrophages playing a pivotal role through the induction of oxidative stress and cytokine secretion. Several pro-inflammatory cytokines have been described in the primary and secondary prevention of ASCVD. Although extensive work over the past decades has established the role of lipid-lowering medications in the prevention and treatment of ASCVD, modulation of inflammation is a subject of active debate. It remains to be confirmed whether targeting the residual cardiovascular risk by adding anti-inflammatory agents to the conventional cardiovascular treatment becomes a shifting paradigm for ASCVD management. This review aims to discuss novel therapeutic agents targeting inflammatory pathways in ASCVD in light of the canakinumab anti-inflammatory thrombosis outcomes study (CANTOS) trial results. Further we discuss the effects of different anti-inflammatory agents administered in patients with ASCVD and their potential to change clinical practice in preventive cardiology.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Monogenic periodic fever syndromes are heterogeneous group of autoinflammatory diseases including distinct syndromes, such as cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome (CAPS), tumor necrosis factor alpha receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS), mevalonate kinase deficiency/hyper IgD syndrome (MKD/HIDS), and familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). Individual diseases differ in pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and severity. However, cytokines from the interleukin 1 (IL-1) family play a key role in all of them. Inhibition of these cytokines, especially IL-1, thus plays a crucial role in their treatment. At present, we have a wide range of drugs that differ in structure, mechanism of action, efficacy, and spectrum of side effects. The most available are anakinra, canakinumab and rilonacept. Moreover, several clinical trials are currently underway with other very promising drugs, such as gevokizumab, tadekinig alfa or tranilast. In the following review, we provide a new perspective on the efficacy and safety of IL-1 inhibitors that have provided the novel results coming from recently published clinical trials.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We reviewed the contemporary literature and clinical trials to discuss the applications of the interleukin-1 (IL-1) inhibitor rilonacept to treat pericarditis, with regards to pathophysiology, pharmacology, efficacy, and safety. RECENT FINDINGS: Rilonacept is an emerging novel agent for treating recurrent pericarditis, with phase II and III clinical trials recently published. Rilonacept rapidly resolved pericarditis pain and inflammation, markedly reduced recurrent pericarditis episodes, and had few adverse events indicating a high safety profile. Recurrent pericarditis is associated with significant morbidity and unmet need for novel therapies. Inflammasomes and the IL-1 pathways were found to be critical in its pathophysiology, leading to IL-1 inhibitors being developed. The high efficacy and safety of rilonacept for recurrent pericarditis means it could potentially be considered as a second-line therapy ahead of or as an alternative to corticosteroids, and highlight the great promise of targeted immunomodulatory therapy in this field.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Recurrent pericarditis is one of the most troublesome complications of pericarditis affecting a substantial amount of patients and often severely impairing the quality of life. Current medical treatments range from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), colchicine, and corticosteroids to biological agents (anti IL-1 agents, especially anakinra and rilonacept), intravenous immunoglobulins and immunosuppressive treatments. Safety is a major issue to deal with since the disease often affects relatively young or middle-aged patients. AREAS COVERED: The review is aimed at providing an update on the efficacy and safety of current medical therapies for recurrent pericarditis including most recent advances represented by anti IL-1 agents. EXPERT OPINION: Therapy of recurrent pericarditis has evolved over years leading to a more evidence-based and personalized treatment based on clinical presentation and pathophysiology. The main distinction is between patients with an inflammatory phenotype (e.g. fever, elevation of markers of inflammation, pericardial, and/or pleural effusion) vs. those without an inflammatory phenotype. Colchicine and anti IL-1 agents are especially efficacious and indicated for those with an inflammatory phenotype, while corticosteroids, azathioprine, and immunoglobulins seem more indicated for those without evidence of systemic inflammation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is a debilitating disease that has an underlying autoinflammatory pathophysiology mediated by cytokine interleukin (IL)-1. Rilonacept, a recombinant dimeric fusion protein that blocks IL-1α and IL-1ß signaling has emerged as a valuable therapeutic option of RP. Rilonacept has been evaluated in Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials and was recently approved for RP treatment. AREAS COVERED: This article reviews available clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of rilonacept for the treatment of RP. EXPERT OPINION: Findings from the Rhapsody study) trial suggest that rilonacept represents a promising new therapy for those patients with colchicine resistant or glucocorticoid-dependent disease. Treatment leads to rapid clinical response, with a median resolution of symptoms in 5 days, normalization of C-reactive protein (CRP) in a median of 7 days, and successful weaning from glucocorticoids. This novel therapy also reduces recurrence rates compared with placebo. Rilonacept has also demonstrated a good safety profile, with the most common adverse events including injection-site reactions and upper respiratory tract infections. This anti-IL 1 agent has emerged as an efficacious treatment for RP, with potential use for glucocorticoid-free regimens and as monotherapy. Future trials are needed to explore these treatment options and to clarify the appropriate therapy duration.

Asunto(s)