RESUMEN
Se presenta el caso clínico de una fémina de 39 años de edad, quien fue asistida en el Hospital General Docente Guillermo Domínguez López de Puerto Padre, provincia de Las Tunas, por presentar una masa tumoral de aproximadamente 10 cm en el hipogastrio. Luego de realizados el examen clínico y los estudios complementarios pertinentes, se decidió practicar la resección completa del tumor. Durante el procedimiento quirúrgico, se tomó muestra para biopsia cuyo resultado indicó la existencia de un leiomioma simplástico en el espacio de Retzius. La paciente evolucionó satisfactoriamente y egresó de la institución a los 5 días, pero se continuó su seguimiento por consulta externa.
The case report of a 39 years woman is presented, who was assisted in Guillermo Domínguez López Teaching General Hospital from Puerto Padre, Las Tunas province, due to a tumoral mass of around 10 cm in the hypogastrium. After the clinical exam and the pertinent complementary studies, it was decided to practice the complete resection of the tumor. During the surgical procedure, a sample for biopsy was taken which result indicated the existence of a symplastic leiomyoma in the Retzius space. The patient had a favorable clinical course and she was discharged from the institution 5 days later, but continued with follow up in outpatient department.
RESUMEN
Background: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has positioned itself as the approach of choice in the treatment of prostate cancer. Objective: To compare the outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the Retzius-Sparing (RS) approach against the modified Frankfurt (MF) technique. Method: To describe the perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes of 13 patients with prostate cancer who underwent RS robotic radical prostatectomy compared to MF, evaluating pathological results, urinary continence, sexual function and oncological control in 1 year of follow-up. Results: The average age was 64 years in RS group vs. 61 years in MF group. The values of total prostate antigen were higher in the RS group (25 ng/dl) vs. MF group (11 ng/dl). The volume of gland in RS group was 40.62 ml vs. 63.33 ml in the RS group. All patients were bilaterally neuropreserved, being statistically significant in favor of MF group (p = 0.016). Positive surgical margins were higher in R-S group (38.4%) vs. MF group (33.3%). Conclusions: With RS the same tendency to urinary continence is observed, with a significant difference in erectile function in favor of MF. This preliminary study shows better impact on erectile function.
Antecedentes: La prostatectomía radical asistida por robot se ha posicionado como el abordaje de elección en el tratamiento del cáncer de próstata. Objetivo: Comparar los resultados de la prostatectomía radical asistida por robot utilizando el abordaje Retzius-Sparing (RS) contra el Frankfurt modificado (FM). Método: Se describen los desenlaces perioperatorios, funcionales y oncológicos de 13 pacientes con cáncer de próstata que fueron llevados a prostatectomía radical robótica con RS, en comparación con FM, y se evalúan los resultados patológicos, continencia urinaria, función sexual y control oncológico a 1 año de seguimiento. Resultados: La media de edad fue de 64 años en el grupo RS y de 61 años en el grupo FM. Los valores de antígeno prostático total fueron mayores en el grupo RS (25 ng/dl) que en el FM (11 ng/dl). El volumen de la glándula fue menor en el grupo RS (40.62 ml) que en el FM (63.33 ml). Todos los pacientes fueron neuropreservados bilateralmente, siendo la diferencia estadísticamente significativa a favor de FM (p = 0.016). Los márgenes quirúrgicos positivos fueron mayores en el grupo RS (38.4%) que en el FM (33.3%). Conclusiones: Con RS se observa la misma tendencia a la continencia urinaria, con diferencia significativa en la función eréctil a favor de FM. Este estudio preliminar muestra mejor impacto en la función eréctil.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Radical prostatectomy is the standard of care for prostate cancer. Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) is being widely adopted due to positive functional outcomes compared to conventional robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (c-RARP). Concerns regarding potency, oncological outcomes, and learning curve are still a matter of debate. METHODS: Following Preferred Instrument for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines and PROSPERO registration CRD42023398724, a systematic review was performed in February 2023 on RS-RARP compared to conventional c-RARP. Outcomes of interest were continence recovery, potency, positive surgical margins (PSM), biochemical recurrence (BCR), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), operation time and complications. Data were analyzed using R version 4.2.2. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies were included, totaling 2751 patients, out of which 1221 underwent RS-RARP and 1530 underwent c-RARP. Continence was analyzed using two definitions: zero pad and one safety pad. Cumulative analysis showed with both definitions statistical difference in terms of continence recovery at 1 month (0 pad odds ratio [OR] = 4.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.32-15.77]; Safety pad OR = 13.19; 95% CI = [8.92-19.49]), as well as at 3 months (0 pad OR, 2.93; 95% CI = [1.57-5.46]; Safety pad OR = 5.31; 95% CI = [1.33-21.13]). Continence recovery at 12 months was higher in the one safety pad group after RS-RARP (OR = 4.37; 95% CI = [1.97-9.73]). The meta-analysis revealed that overall PSM rates without pathologic stage classification were not different following RS-RARP (OR = 1.13; 95% CI = [0.96-1.33]. Analysis according to the tumor stage revealed PSM rates in pT2 and pT3 tumors are not different following RS-RARP compared to c-RARP (OR = 1.46; 95% CI = [0.84-2.55]) and (OR = 1.41; 95% CI = [0.93-2.13]), respectively. No difference in potency at 12 months (OR = 0.98; 95% CI = [0.69-1.41], BCR at 12 months (OR = 0.99; 95% CI = [0.46-2.16]), EBL (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.01; 95% CI = [-0.31 to 0.29]), LOS (SMD = -0.01; 95% CI = [-0.48 to 0.45]), operation time (SMD = -0.14; 95% CI = [-0.41 to 0.12]) or complications (OR = 0.9; 95% CI = [0.62-1.29]) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that RS-RARP is safe and feasible. Faster continence recovery rate is seen after RS-RARP. Potency outcomes appear to be similar. PSM rates are not different following RS-RARP regardless of pathologic stage. Further quality studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Masculino , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Biopsia , Márgenes de EscisiónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Salvage Radical Prostatectomy is challenging and associated with high rates of incontinence. The novel Retzius-sparing RARP (RS-RARP) approach has shown impressive high immediate and 1-year continence rates (> 90%) when applied as primary treatment. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of salvage Retzius-sparing RARP (sRS-RARP) on continence outcomes in the salvage scenario. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles was conducted on Medline through PubMed and on Cochrane through Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to select 17 retrospective cohort studies published until April 2023 about sRS-RARP and continence. Data were extracted independently by at least two authors. The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) was registered. Retrospective studies were subjected to a domain-based risk of bias assessment in accordance with the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale cohort studies (NOS). Prostate cancer patients were chosen from prospective nonrandomized or randomized sRS-RARP or sS-RARP studies that examined continence outcomes. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included: 14 were retrospectives only and 3 described retrospective comparison cohorts (sRS-RARP vs sS-RARP). All the retrospective studies were of "fair" quality using the NOS. sRS-RARP may increase recovery of urinary continence after surgery compared to sS-RARP [OR 4.36, 95% CI 1.7-11.17; I2 = 46.8%; studies = 4; participants = 87]. CONCLUSIONS: sRS-RARP approach has potential to improve continence outcomes in the salvage setting. sRS-RARP approach has potential to positively impact continence function on patients who underwent salvage surgery.