RESUMEN

Ureteral obstruction after urinary diversion is not a rare complication, and the treatment is generally the ureteral stent placement via antegrade approach via the nephrostomy. We present a case of 64-year-old man with history of total pelvic resection and urinary diversion for local recurrence of rectal cancer who presented bilateral ureteral obstruction due to postoperative adhesion. First, bilateral nephrostomies were performed. The antegrade approach via nephrostomy could not break through the obstruction in the left side. Therefore, antegrade and retrograde approaches were attempted, and the internal-external drainage catheter could be placed by the rendezvous technique using bilateral microcatheters and microguidewires. The patient was able to avoid a permanent nephrostomy and continues to undergo regular internal drainage catheter exchange. Permanent nephrostomy considerably reduces the patient's quality of life, and in cases of tight obstruction, rendezvous techniques can be used.

RESUMEN

Background/Objectives: The aim of our study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the rendezvous technique for the treatment of iatrogenic ureteral injuries. Methods: From 2014 to 2019, 29 patients treated with the rendezvous technique for mono- or bilateral iatrogenic ureteral injuries were enrolled in this retrospective study. All the leaks were previously assessed by CT-urography and antegrade pyelography. Ureteral continuity was restored by performing the rendezvous technique, combining antegrade trans-nephrostomic access and a retrograde trans-cystostomic approach. A double J stent was antegradely inserted, and a nephrostomy tube was kept in place at the end of the procedure. A post-procedure CT-urography and a 30-day nephrostogram follow-up were performed. In the absence of a contrast leak, the nephrostomy tube was removed. Patient follow-up was set with CT-urography at 3, 6, and 12 months and stent substitution every 4 months. The CT-urography was performed to confirm the restored integrity of the ureter before stent removal. Results: The rendezvous technique was successful in all cases with the resolution of the ureteral leak. No major complications were observed. In all the patients, the nephrostomy tube was removed after 30 days. After performing CT-urography, the stent was removed permanently after 12 months. Only three cases showed local post-treatment stenosis treated with surgical ureteral reimplantation. Conclusions: The rendezvous technique is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure that can be used to restore the continuity of the ureter, avoiding open surgery and providing valuable support for the management of complications after gynecological surgery.

RESUMEN

Background: The Laceration of the Anterior Mitral leaflet to Prevent Outflow ObtructioN (LAMPOON) procedure may be performed from the leaflet tip to base to prevent left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) in patients with high-risk anatomy undergoing valve-in-valve (VIV) or valve-in-(complete)-ring (VIR) transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR). Methods and Results: Thirteen consecutive patients (6 females, average age 67.7 years) with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 60%, a median STS score of 3.2%, and degenerative surgical mitral bioprosthesis or ring were treated with a combined, single-stage procedure of preventive LAMPOON and trans-septal TMVR with SAPIEN 3 valves (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA). Under real-time 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (RT 3D-TEE) guidance, we included the rendezvous technique in the LAMPOON procedure, and all 13 patients were successfully treated by tip-to-base LAMPOON and TMVR. The use of a modified LAMPOON procedure, aided by a rendezvous technique and guided by RT 3D-TEE imaging, offers precise guidance for positioning and aligning the guidewire. This approach not only reduces the need for fluoroscopy and shortens procedure times, but also significantly increases the likelihood of a successful outcome. Importantly, none of the patients in our study experienced unintentional aortic or aortic valve injuries, nor did they develop significant LVOTO following TMVR. In 11 of the 13 (85%) patients, we used a transcatheter SENTINELTM cerebral protection device (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) for stroke prevention and capture of debris ≥ 2 mm were detected in 8/11 (73%) of the cases. Conclusions: Utilizing intra-operative RT 3D-TEE in conjunction with the rendezvous technique can make the tip-to-base LAMPOON procedure even safer and more effective for patients undergoing VIV or VIR TMVR. Our study also suggests that cerebral protection is indicated in patients undergoing TMVR.

RESUMEN

Choledocholithiasis, characterized by the presence of stones in the common bile duct, poses significant challenges in clinical management, particularly when the stones are massive. While endoscopic methods are often effective in stone removal, complications such as the impaction of foreign bodies like Dormia baskets can occur. These complications may necessitate alternative approaches, including surgical intervention, highlighting the importance of exploring innovative interventional techniques. We report on an 89-year-old patient presenting with massive choledocholithiasis, involving complete filling of the intra- and extrahepatic bile duct system with large stones up to a maximum of 2 cm. The patient underwent interventional removal of a Dormia basket (3.5Fr. Boston Scientific, USA) impacted in the common bile duct. This procedure proved challenging due to the metallic end marker of the basket perforating through the wall of the distal common bile duct, rendering it fixed. Given the complexity of the case, a parallel approach combining percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and drainage with simultaneous endoscopy was employed to successfully extract the fixed Dormia basket. In cases of severe choledocholithiasis complicated by the impaction of foreign bodies such as Dormia baskets, innovative interventional strategies are crucial for successful management. Our case highlights the effectiveness of a parallel approach involving percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and drainage alongside simultaneous endoscopy in safely removing the fixed foreign body from the common bile duct. This multidisciplinary approach not only offers a viable alternative to surgical intervention but also underscores the importance of collaboration between interventional radiologists and endoscopists in optimizing patient outcomes in complex biliary interventions.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in duodenal switch (DS) patients is challenging given their surgically altered anatomy. There have been very few reported cases of trans enteric rendezvous ERCP to relieve biliary obstruction in DS patients. More specifically, there has not been any reported cases of this procedure being performed in loop DS, also known as SADI (single anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy) or SIPS (stomach intestinal pylorus sparing procedure). Case Description: This case reports describes a 50-year-old male with prior loop DS who presented with gallstone pancreatitis. He underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy with positive intraoperative cholangiogram requiring the need for trans enteric rendezvous ERCP. Discussion: Although never reported, trans enteric rendezvous ERCP is a feasible approach in relieving biliary obstruction in patients with loop DS anatomy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided rendezvous with a 22-gauge needle and a 0.018-inch guidewire, assisted by a 3-Fr microcatheter, effectively addresses challenges in biliary cannulation, improving guidewire manipulation and reducing risks of injury and leakage. Natsume and colleagues describe the successful extraction of common bile duct stones to demonstrate the efficacy of this technique.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic transpapillary approach by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the established technique for preoperative biliary drainage (PBD). Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been reported to be a useful alternative technique after ERCP fail. However, the optimal strategy remain controversial. AREA COVERED: This review summarizes the literature on EUS-BD techniques for PBD with a literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database between 2000 and 2023 using keywords for 'preoperative biliary drainage' and all types of EUS-BD techniques. EXPERT OPINION: As there is no consensus on the optimal EUS-BD technique for PBD, selection of the EUS-BD approach depends on the patient's condition, the biliary obstruction site, the anastomosis after surgical intervention, and the preference of the endoscopist. However, we consider that EUS-HGS using a dedicated plastic stent may have some advantages in the adverse impact of surgical procedure because the location where the fistula is created by EUS-HGS is away from the site of the surgical procedure. Although there remain many issues that require further investigation, EUS-BD can be a feasible and safe alternative method of PBD for malignant biliary obstruction after ERCP fail.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Management of papillary stenosis after endoscopic papillectomy is technically challenging. Yamamoto et al. report a case of successful biliary cannulation for bile duct stenosis after endoscopic papillectomy using the "guidewire placed in the scope" technique, which is a hybrid procedure that combines the advantages of conventional endoscopic ultrasound-guided rendezvous techniques.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Higher cesarean section rates and better ultrasound diagnostics have led to a more frequent diagnosis of isthmocele, a cesarean scar defect. Sometimes, endometriosis is found in the isthmocele, but simultaneous extrauterine endometriosis and endometriosis in the isthmocele have not yet been reported. Additionally, the surgical technique to repair the isthmocele is the subject of ongoing controversy. The aim of this study is to analyze a possible correlation between uterine scar (isthmocele) endometriosis and extrauterine endometriosis and to investigate the outcome of laparoscopic isthmocele resection in the rendezvous technique. In this single-center retrospective study, we included 83 women of reproductive age with symptomatic isthmocele undergoing laparoscopic isthmocele repair in rendezvous technique from 2004 to 2020 at the University of Bern. We collected data on patient and surgical characteristics as well as on postoperative outcomes (symptoms, further pregnancy, and pregnancy outcomes) retrospectively. We analyzed and compared these data for patients with and without endometriosis. Endometriosis was diagnosed during surgery in 22 out of 83 operated patients (26.5%). Diagnosis of isthmocele endometriosis (n = 9, 11%) was significantly higher in patients with extrauterine endometriosis (n = 6, p = 0.004). While the duration of surgery was significantly longer for patients with endometriosis (p = 0.006), the groups did not differ with regard to blood loss or complications. In addition, both groups showed similar indications for isthmocele repair (infertility, abnormal uterine bleeding, or dysmenorrhea). Surgery significantly improved abnormal uterine bleeding (χ2 p < 0.001), dysmenorrhea (χ2, p = 0.03), and infertility (χ2, p < 0.001). Regardless of the presence of endometriosis, 25 of 40 (63%) infertile patients became pregnant after surgery. In one out of eight pregnancies, however, we observed scar complications during pregnancy such as uterine scar pregnancy (n = 3), uterine scar dehiscence (n = 3), and placenta previa (n = 1). Endometriosis is a non-negligible intraoperative finding in patients with symptomatic isthmocele. The laparoscopic approach in the rendezvous technique is safe and effective. Therefore, this method should be recommended, especially in women with secondary infertility, and preoperatively simultaneous endometriosis resection should be discussed with the patient. In follow-up, postoperative pregnancies have to be monitored with care.

RESUMEN

Biliary complications, including biliary stricture and obstruction, remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality after living donor liver transplantation. In these patients the biliary system may not be accessible by endoscopic approach due to Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy, and a percutaneous approach may be considered to avoid surgical interventions. When there is complete biliary obstruction, the conventional percutaneous approaches may not be successful to cross the hepaticojejunostomy anastomosis. In this study, a totally percutaneous rendezvous technique was used to create a neo-biliary-enteric tract using a trans-biliary Rosch-Uchida needle in a patient with complete biliary obstruction and Roux-en-Y anastomosis after a split liver transplant. A biodegradable stent was placed after recanalization with long-term patency on follow up.

RESUMEN

Gallstone disease and complications from gallstones are a common clinical problem. The clinical presentation ranges between being asymptomatic and recurrent attacks of biliary pain requiring elective or emergency treatment. Bile duct stones are a frequent condition associated with cholelithiasis. Amidst the total cholecystectomies performed every year for cholelithiasis, the presence of bile duct stones is 5%-15%; another small percentage of these will develop common bile duct stones after intervention. To avoid serious complications that can occur in choledocholithiasis, these stones should be removed. Unfortunately, there is no consensus on the ideal management strategy to perform such. For a long time, a direct open surgical approach to the bile duct was the only unique approach. With the advent of advanced endoscopic, radiologic, and minimally invasive surgical techniques, however, therapeutic choices have increased in number, and the management of this pathological situation has become multidisciplinary. To date, there is agreement on preoperative management and the need to treat cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis, but a debate still exists on how to cure the two diseases at the same time. In the era of laparoscopy and mini-invasiveness, we can say that therapeutic approaches can be performed in two sessions or in one session. Comparison of these two approaches showed equivalent success rates, postoperative morbidity, stone clearance, mortality, conversion to other procedures, total surgery time, and failure rate, but the one-session treatment is characterized by a shorter hospital stay, and more cost benefits. The aim of this review article is to provide the reader with a general summary of gallbladder stone disease in association with the presence of common bile duct stones by discussing their epidemiology, clinical and diagnostic aspects, and possible treatments and their advantages and limitations.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with stenting is the treatment modality of choice for patients with benign and malignant bile duct obstruction. ERCP could fail in cases of duodenal obstruction, duodenal diverticulum, ampullary neoplastic infiltration or surgically altered anatomy. In these cases percutaneous biliary drainage (PTBD) is traditionally used as a rescue procedure but is related to high morbidity and mortality and lower quality of life. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is a relatively new interventional procedure that arose due to the development of curvilinear echoendoscope and the various endoscopic devices. A large amount of data is already collected that proves its efficacy, safety and ability to replace PTBD in cases of ERCP failure. It is also possible that EUS-BD could be chosen as a first-line treatment option in some clinical scenarios in the near future. Several EUS-BD techniques are developed EUS-guided transmural stenting, antegrade stenting and rendezvous technique and can be personalized depending on the individual anatomy. EUS-BD is normally performed in the same session from the same endoscopist in case of ERCP failure. The lack of training, absence of enough dedicated devices and lack of standardization still makes EUS-BD a difficult and not very popular procedure, which is related to life-threatening adverse events. Developing training models, dedicated devices and guidelines hopefully will make EUS-BD easier, safer and well accepted in the future. This paper focuses on the technical aspects of the different EUS-BD procedures, available literature data, advantages, negative aspects and the future perspectives of these modalities.

RESUMEN

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) is an uncommon disease characterized by immune cell-mediated inflammation of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract resulting in vague abdominal symptoms, most commonly nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. We report the case of a 16-year-old male presenting with a six-week history of progressive pruritus, jaundice, fatigue, abdominal pain, acholic stools, and dark-colored urine. This patient was diagnosed via endoscopy with biliary obstruction caused by a large, solitary, duodenal ulcer secondary to EGE. This is a severe complication of EGE and to our knowledge, this is the first reported case of biliary obstruction caused by a duodenal ulcer in a pediatric patient with EGE. Additionally, we describe the first pediatric combined percutaneous-endoscopic rendezvous technique after failed therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) to relieve the biliary obstruction.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of ureteral stent placement using the rendezvous technique for the treatment of postoperative ureteral complications in cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2005 to April 2015, 19 patients (2 men and 17 women; median age, 59; range, 42-79 years old) with unilateral ureteral lesions (ureteral leakages in 6, strictures in 4, and both in 9) underwent ureteral stent placement using the rendezvous technique. Percutaneous nephrostomy was performed, and stent placement was attempted via antegrade and retrograde approaches. The technical success, procedure-related complications, and clinical success were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 29.8 months (range, 0.3-116.5 months). The ureteral stent placement was successful in 17 out of 19 patients (89.5%). Double J ureteral stent was used in 6 patients, and straight catheter as an internal-external nephro-ureteral stent was used in 11 patients. The rendezvous technique was used in the retroperitoneal space and urinary tract in 6 and 11 patients, respectively. No major complications related to the rendezvous technique occurred. Finally, 4 patients achieved stent-free condition (21.1%), and periodic stent exchange was continued in 9 (47.4%). However, permanent external drainage and surgical reconstruction were needed in 4 (21.1%) and 2 (10.5%) patients, respectively. The final clinical success rate was 68.4% (13 out of 19 patients). CONCLUSION: Ureteral stent placement using the rendezvous technique for the treatment of postoperative ureteral complications in cancer patients is safe and may be alternative to permanent external drainage and invasive surgical reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4, Case series.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

There are various reconstruction techniques that are used after upper gastrointestinal surgery. In recent years, opportunities for endoscopic diagnosis and treatment have been increasing in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. With the advent of interventional endoscopic ultrasound (IV-EUS), various procedures have been developed mainly for patients in whom endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is difficult to carry out. Indications for such procedures are expanding. IV-EUS for surgically altered anatomy (SAA) includes EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration, biliary interventions (e.g. biliary drainage, treatment of bile duct stricture, removal of bile duct stones, and the rendezvous technique), and pancreatic interventions (e.g. rendezvous technique after Whipple surgery). In addition, there have been reports of various EUS-related procedures using a forward-viewing curved linear-array echoendoscope that are carried out for postoperative intestinal tract reconstruction. Although interventional EUS is a useful therapeutic procedure for SAA, there are still no dedicated devices, and standardization of the procedure is warranted.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To present a modified technique of laparoscopic surgery (Rendezvous technique) for cholecystocholedocholithiasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 41 patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis who underwent hybrid single-stage laparoscopic surgery (Rendezvous technique) as an alternative to conventional two-stage approach. RESULTS: Two (4.8%) patients had elevated serum amylase level without signs of pancreatitis in postoperative period. Other 2 patients required redo transpapillary intervention due to residual stones. Laparoscopic interventions were successful in 95.2% of cases.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In patients with large stones in the common bile duct (CBD), advanced treatment modalities are generally needed. Here, we present an interesting case of a huge CBD stone treated with electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) by the percutaneous approach and rendezvous endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) using a nasal endoscope. CASE SUMMARY: A 91-year-old woman underwent ERC for a symptomatic large CBD stone with a diameter of 50 mm. She was referred to our institution after the failure of lithotomy by ERC, and after undergoing percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. We attempted to fragment the stone by transhepatic cholangioscopy using EHL. However, the stones were too large and partly soft clay-like for lithotripsy. Next, we attempted lithotomy with ERC and cholangioscopy by the rendezvous technique using a nasal endoscope and achieved complete lithotomy. No complication was observed at the end of this procedure. CONCLUSION: Cholangioscopy by rendezvous technique using a nasal endoscope is a feasible and safe endoscopic method for removing huge CBD stones.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: A postoperative clinically relevant pancreatic fistula can cause severe sequelae. We aimed to describe our minimally invasive procedure (rendezvous technique) for the treatment of a pancreatic fistula resulting from pancreaticojejunal anastomosis dehiscence involving a dislodged main pancreatic duct tube. METHODS: In our rendezvous technique, a guidewire is advanced into the jejunal lumen from the access site of the drainage tube and is caught by a snare catheter, which is used to replace the dislodged main pancreatic duct tube. Then, the guidewire is passed from the access site of the drainage tube to the site of the dislodged main pancreatic duct tube. A sheath is inserted along the route of the dislodged main pancreatic duct tube and is placed across the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis over the guidewire. Another guidewire is advanced into the main pancreatic duct via the sheath, and a new main pancreatic duct tube is inserted into the main pancreatic duct over the second wire. This technique was performed in two patients with a pancreatic fistula. RESULTS: Our rendezvous technique was successfully performed in a 73-year-old man with an intractable clinically relevant pancreatic fistula and large discharge from the drain and a 74-year-old woman with a pancreatic fistula and fluid collection between the elevated jejunum and remnant pancreas. Discharge from the drain and fluid collection decreased after the procedure. CONCLUSION: Our rendezvous technique is an effective minimally invasive approach for a pancreatic fistula resulting from pancreaticojejunal anastomosis dehiscence.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Complex ureteric strictures present a significant challenge to the endourologist and uro-radiologist. Multiple separate interventions to try to cross the stricture are often attempted. We describe our experience managing a heterogenous patient group using the 'rendezvous' procedure. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 16 patients and 18 ureters (one bilateral procedure, and two separate procedures in one patient) underwent rendezvous procedures. Seven patients had coexisting ureteric calculi treated. Each case was followed up for between 3 months and 5 years. RESULTS: In 16/18 ureters there was technical success at time of surgery; successfully crossing the stricture, allowing ureteroscopic access to the ureter, dilating and/or stenting the ureter. 2/18 were unsuccessful; one secondary to advanced malignancy resulting in a uretero-vaginal fistula and the second a failure to remove a retained, displaced ureteric stent. Of the 18 ureteric procedures; 7/18 were stent free at 3 months, improving to 8/18 stent free at 6 months. 4/18 remained nephrostomy dependent (failure of drainage despite stent or failure to stent) at 3 months, increasing to 6/18 being nephrostomy dependent at 6 months. 1/16 remained dialysis dependent with a nephrostomy tube. For those procedures involving ureteric calculi, 6/7 were stone free and 1/5 had a persistent stone fragment requiring further intervention. CONCLUSIONS: A combined approach may decrease the number of separate interventions required, with the aim of removing the need for a long-term nephrostomy, as well as providing opportunity to treat ureteric calculi in the context of stricture disease. Our experience has been that where the rendezvous has been required to treat strictures caused by malignant extrinsic compression, stenting has not been successful; this information is key to informed consent in a group of patients who may have a limited life expectancy.

Asunto(s)