RESUMEN

In recent years, endovascular treatments have become more common in patients with renal artery stenosis and aneurysm. Although the treatment algorithms are not universally accepted, endovascular therapy can be readily utilized for the appropriate indications in the context of surgical treatment for renovascular diseases. The most important factor to consider is that the correct indication is applied for such treatment. Although the applied procedures are believed to have minimal risk, any complications that occur may result in major problems. Moreover, the pathology that is being treated (e.g., hypertension, high serum creatinine concentration, or low glomerular filtration rate) must be well defined. As stent and balloon technologies continue to be developed, more positive results are expected in the coming years. In the present study, we reviewed the endovascular treatment algorithms for atherosclerotic renovascular disease and performed a narrative review of the current literature.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate factors affecting hemostasis in iatrogenic renal hemorrhage. METHODS: Seventy-three patients with iatrogenic renal hemorrhage experiencing selective renal artery angiography between Jan 2015 and Dec 2020 were enrolled in this study. The clinical features, treatment modalities and outcomes were reviewed. Factors affecting hemostasis were analyzed by univariate and multivariate models using linear regression techniques. The optimum values of the independent factors to predict postangiographic hemostasis were conducted by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: Of the 73 iatrogenic renal hemorrhage patients, 47 (64.4%) patients had positive angiographic findings and received therapeutic embolization. Of the patients with negative angiographic findings, 20 (76.9%) and 6 (23.1%) received conservative therapy and prophylactic embolization, respectively. The red blood cell (RBC) count (OR = 0.61, P = 0.04), the hematuria time before angiography (OR = - 0.19, P < 0.01) and treatment modality were independent factors affecting hemostasis time. The ROC curve analysis showed that the RBC count of 3.5 × 109/L and the hematuria time before angiography of 7 days were the optimum indicators. Therapeutic embolization and prophylactic embolization were protective factors affecting hemostasis time compared with conservative treatment (OR = - 1.59, P = 0.02; OR = - 3.31, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The hematuria time before selective renal artery angiography, the RBC count, and embolization treatment are associated with rapid hemostasis. Embolization is an effective strategy for iatrogenic renal hemorrhage, and also enables rapid hemostasis in patients with negative angiographic findings.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: With limited pediatric renal trauma management literature, treatment pathways for children have been extrapolated from the adult population. A shift to non-operative management has led to higher renal preservation rates; however, characterization of endovascular intervention in the pediatric trauma population is lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study uses the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), to evaluate renal outcomes after use of renal artery angiography. We hypothesized that patients undergoing renal artery angiography for renal trauma are unlikely to require additional surgical interventions. STUDY DESIGN: All children ≤18 years old treated for traumatic renal injuries from 2012 to 2015 were identified by the Abbreviated Injury Scaled Score (AISS) codes in the NTDB. AISS codes were converted to American Association for Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grades. ICD-9 codes were used to identify patients that had renal artery angiography, and additional renal interventions such as nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, percutaneous nephrostomy tube or ureteral stent placement. RESULTS: 536,379 pediatric trauma cases were in the NTDB from 2012 to 2015, with 4506 renal injury cases identified. A total of 88 patients had renal artery angiography (ICD-9 88.45). Only 10% (n = 9) of patients who received renal artery angiography underwent an additional urological intervention. Of those nine, two patients were excluded due to renal angiography taking place after nephrectomy was performed. The remaining seven patients had high grade laceration (AAST grade 4-5). Overall, two patients underwent post angiography nephrectomies, two patients had partial nephrectomies, one percutaneous nephrostomy tube was placed (prior to partial nephrectomy), one aspiration of a kidney (prior to ureteral stent placement), and three had ureteral stent placements. DISCUSSION: The limitations of this study include: the NTDB is a national dataset that is not population based, inclusion is limited to the first hospitalization, inaccuracies exist in encounter coding, and the database is lacking laterality of the renal injury. Based on nonspecific nature of ICD-9 coding for angioembolization, we are unable to discern the number of cases that subsequently had angioembolization after or at the time of angiography. CONCLUSION: Renal artery angiography in children remains a rare procedure, 88/4,506, in children with renal trauma. In pediatric trauma cases that undergo renal artery angiography additional procedures are more common with higher grade injuries. Further studies are needed to create pediatric specific trauma management algorithms.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Renal arteriovenous malformation (AVM) is a rare cause of massive hematuria, and patients with renal AVM may present with symptoms like urinary tract infections in the emergency department. CASE REPORT: A 37-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with symptoms of hematuria, urinary hesitancy, and severe suprapubic pain that had been present for a few hours. A urine examination revealed no pyuria, but urine occult blood for 3+ and a red blood cell count of >100 per high-power field. Bedside echocardiography revealed right kidney hydronephrosis and a distended bladder with a blood clot. A 3-way Foley catheter was inserted and drained 800 mL of bloody urine. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan was ordered that showed a 1.1-cm hypervascular tumor in the lower pole of right kidney, with active bleeding and rupture into the adjacent collecting system. Active renal tumor bleeding or renal AVM was suspected. The patient was transferred to a tertiary medical center where right renal artery angiography was arranged and disclosed an AVM with aneurysm formation at the right renal lower pole. Transarterial embolization was performed immediately to embolize the 3 feeders of the AVM. WHY SHOULD EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS BE AWARE OF THIS?: Renal AVM is a rare but potentially life-threatening cause of massive hematuria. Delayed or missed diagnosis is possible because renal AVM may present with symptoms like urinary tract infection, especially in young females. Renal artery angiography is the diagnosis of choice, and emergent transarterial embolization is now the standard of treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the capability of inflow inversion recovery (IFIR) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), compared with contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) as reference standard, in evaluating renal artery stenosis (RAS). METHODS: Seventy-two subjects were examined by IFIR MRA with respiratory-gated, prior to CE-MRA with a 1.5-T scanner. Two readers evaluated the quality of IFIR MRA images and renal artery depiction on artery-by-artery basis. The agreement of two methods to assess RAS was analyzed using the Kappa test. The relationship between image quality of IFIR MRA and respiratory rate was analyzed by ANOVA test. RESULTS: The visibility of renal artery branch vessels was significantly higher using IFIR MRA than CE-MRA (p < 0.05). A good agreement of two methods in evaluating stenosis grade, and a near-perfect inter-observer agreement for IFIR MRA (Kappa value 0.98) and CE-MRA (Kappa value 0.93), were demonstrated. As RAS ≥50%, the sensitivity and specificity of IFIR MRA were 92 and 98% in reader 1, 93 and 98% in reader 2, respectively. The image quality was significantly better in patients with stable respiration (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: IFIR MRA in patients with stable respiration has higher visibility of renal artery branch vessels than CE-MRA, and a good agreement with CE-MRA in evaluating stenosis grade. It could be used to evaluate RAS for screening, and monitoring treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective To evaluate the clinical value of percutaneous renal artery angiography and embolization of the renal artery pseudoaneurysms. Methods A retrospective analysis was made on 15 cases of postoperative urethral bleeding following urinary calculi surgery from January 2012 to February 2014, which were diagnosed of renal artery pseudoaneurysms via the renal artery angiography.Superselective catheter placement was carried out into the proximal of parent artery and the pseudoaneurysm was embolized by using a coil and gelatin sponge. Results Renal artery angiography clearly displayed pseudoaneurysms in the 15 cases, which were located in interlobular artery in 11 cases, arcuate artery in 3 cases, and minor interlobular artery in 1 case.Urethral bleeding was stopped after using gelatin sponge and spring coil embolization.Among them urethral bleeding recurred in 1 case after two days, and a second embolization was conducted.After the embolization, transient renal colic happened in 2 cases and a fever of 37.8-39.3 ℃lasting for 3-8 d was seen in 7 cases.Follow-ups for 3-24 months ( mean, 15 months) showed no renal dysfunction and urinary tract bleeding. Conclusion The transcatheter embolization and angiography can diagnose and treat renal artery pseudoaneurysms, with safe and effective outcomes.