RESUMEN
Prior research indicates that couples who cope with chronic illness from a relational "we" orientation experience more positive outcomes than couples that cope individually; however, little prior research identifies clinical processes that promote reciprocity or how societal gender processes are involved. This grounded theory analysis of 25 videotaped therapy sessions with six heterosexual couples coping with chronic liver disease (LD) used a feminist-informed relational lens to focus on the clinical processes involved in shifting from an individual to a relational orientation. Findings identified three contextual barriers to attaining a "we orientation": (a) autonomy discourse, (b) illness-related power, and (c) gendered power. Analysis detailed therapist actions that decreased the impact of barriers to reciprocity and fostered relational coping. Clinical implications attend to complex intersections among gender, caregiving, and contextual barriers to reciprocity.
Investigaciones anteriores indican que las parejas que hacen frente a una enfermedad crónica desde una orientación relacional basada en el "nosotros" tienen resultados más positivos que las parejas que la enfrentan individualmente; sin embargo, existen escasas investigaciones previas que identifiquen los procesos clínicos que promueven la reciprocidad o la manera en la que están implicados los procesos de género social. Este análisis de teoría fundamentada de 25 sesiones de terapia videograbadas con seis parejas heterosexuales que enfrentan una enfermedad hepática crónica utilizó una óptica relacional fundamentada en el feminismo para centrarse en los procesos clínicos relacionados con el paso de una orientación individual a una relacional. Los hallazgos identificaron tres obstáculos contextuales para lograr una "orientación basada en el nosotros": (a) el discurso de autonomía, (b) el poder relacionado con la enfermedad, y (c) el poder asociado al género. El análisis detalló las medidas del terapeuta que redujeron el efecto de los obstáculos para la reciprocidad y fomentaron el afrontamiento relacional. Las implicancias clínicas tratan de las intersecciones complejas entre el género, el cuidado y los obstáculos contextuales para la reciprocidad.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Terapia de Parejas/métodos , Hepatopatías/psicología , Esposos/psicología , Adaptación Psicológica , Enfermedad Crónica , Empoderamiento , Femenino , Teoría Fundamentada , Heterosexualidad/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Autonomía Personal , Investigación Cualitativa , Factores Sexuales , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
This article explores how children see their relationships, particularly their sibling relationships, in families affected by domestic violence (DV) and how relationality emerges in their accounts as a resource to build an agentic sense of self. The 'voice' of children is largely absent from the DV literature, which typically portrays them as passive, damaged and relationally incompetent. Children's own understandings of their relational worlds are often overlooked, and consequently, existing models of children's social interactions give inadequate accounts of their meaning-making-in-context. Drawn from a larger study of children's experiences of DV and abuse, this article uses two case studies of sibling relationships to explore young people's use of relational resources, for coping with violence in the home. The article explores how relationality and coping intertwine in young people's accounts and disrupts the taken-for-granted assumption that children's 'premature caring' or 'parentification' is (only) pathological in children's responses to DV. This has implications for understanding young people's experiences in the present and supporting their capacity for relationship building in the future.