RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pituitary adenoma is one of the most common brain tumors. Most pituitary adenomas are benign and can be cured by surgery and/or medication. However, some pituitary adenomas show aggressive growth with a fast growth rate and are resistant to conventional treatments such as surgery, drug therapy, and radiation therapy. These tumors, referred to as refractory pituitary adenomas, often relapse or regrow in the early postoperative period. The tumor microenvironment (TME) has recently been identified as an important factor affecting the biological manifestations of tumors and acts as the main battlefield between the tumor and the host immune system. MAIN BODY: In this review, we focus on describing TME in pituitary adenomas and refractory pituitary adenomas. Research on the immune microenvironment of pituitary adenomas is currently focused on immune cells such as macrophages and lymphocytes, and extensive research and experimental verifications are still required regarding other components of the TME. In particular, studies are needed to determine the role of the TME in the specific biological behaviors of refractory pituitary adenomas, such as high invasion, fast recurrence rate, and high tolerance to traditional treatments and to identify the mechanisms involved. CONCLUSION: Overall, we summarize the similarities and differences between the TME of pituitary adenomas and refractory pituitary adenomas as well as the changes in the biological behavior of pituitary adenomas that may be caused by the microenvironment. These changes greatly affect the outcome of patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Accurate localization of the site(s) of active disease is key to informing decision-making in the management of refractory pituitary adenomas when autonomous hormone secretion and/or continued tumor growth challenge conventional therapeutic approaches. In this context, the use of non-standard MR sequences, alternative post-acquisition image processing, or molecular (functional) imaging may provide valuable additional information to inform patient management.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Most of pituitary adenomas (PAs) are slow-growing benign tumors which can be cured or controlled by conventional therapies, including surgery, medical treatment or radiotherapy. A small set of PAs, usually known as aggressive PAs or refractory PAs, present with more aggressive behavior and lead to poorer prognosis than classical PAs. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and pathological characteristics of 44 patients who were diagnosed with refractory PAs by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). All the patients' demographic characteristics, radiological findings, Knosp grade, treatment details and clinical outcomes were abstracted from the medical records. Additionally, 44 patients with nonrefractory PAs (NRPAs) matched for age and gender were selected to serve as the control group. Results: Despite using all combined treatments including surgery, radiotherapy and conventional medical treatments, all the refractory PAs showed tumor progression or hormone hypersecretion which caused increased morbidity and mortality and remained challenging to management. Compared with those of the non-refractory PAs, the tumor size, invasive rate and tumor growth rate (TGR) were significantly higher in the refractory PAs. TGR >2.2% per month may be considered as a preoperative indicator of refractoriness. The Ki-67 index in the refractory PAs were all ≥3%. EGFR, but not MMP2 or MMP9, was significantly overexpressed in refractory PAs compared with the corresponding levels in nonrefractory PAs. Conclusion: Refractory PAs are unresponsive to surgery, radiotherapy and conventional medical treatments with a poor prognosis. Moreover, a TGR ≥2.2% per month, Ki-67 index ≥3% and EGFR overexpression may be independent predictors of clinical refractoriness.

RESUMEN

In 1932, Harvey Cushing first proposed pituitary adenoma (PA) as the term for the cause of acromegaly. After nearly 90 years of research, PA is recognized as the second most common intracranial neoplasm. Most PAs can be easily cured or controlled by conventional therapies, including surgery, medical treatment or radiotherapy. However, nearly 40% of PAs are invasive, and some adenomas show aggressive behavior, with rapid growth patterns and resistance to conventional treatments, which leads to a poor prognosis; this type of adenoma is called aggressive or refractory PA. For a very small proportion of PAs (approximately 0.2%), subarachnoid or systemic metastasis may develop, at which point it is considered malignant and called pituitary carcinoma. Based on distinctions regarding the biological behaviors of adenoma, aggressive adenoma and pituitary carcinoma, the International Pituitary Pathology Club in 2016 formally proposed new terminology for PA: pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET). Over the last three years, an increasing number of relevant articles have used the term PitNET in place of PA. Interestingly, the fourth edition of the WHO classification of PA released in 2017 did not adopt this nomenclature, and the Pituitary Society published a paper in 2019 suggesting that the new nomenclature does not improve clinical diagnosis or treatment and confuses patients more than the PA terminology. The Pituitary Society insists on using the term PA, as PAs with aggressive behavior only account for a very small proportion of all PAs. Overall, the new terminology may cause significant and unnecessary patient anxiety and confusion. Here, we describe the current perspectives and bases of the two naming methods and offer our opinions on maintaining the original naming system for PA. Nevertheless, early diagnosis and intensive treatment of aggressive PAs is extremely important for improving patient prognosis, regardless of the nomenclature.

RESUMEN

Background: Studies investigating the change in distance between the bilateral internal carotid arteries (ICAs) in acromegalic patients have provided ambiguous results. The influencing factors of these changes have not been well-identified. Objective: To further investigate the change in distance between bilateral ICAs in acromegaly patients and identify the influencing factors of the change. Method: Patients diagnosed as acromegaly from Jan 2016 to Sep 2019 in the Department of Neurosurgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, were included in this study. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) data were obtained for all patients for three-dimensional reconstruction of the ICAs. Distance between bilateral ICAs was measured and recorded for assessment. Result: 172 patients including 86 cases with acromegaly in the study group and 86 cases with non-functional pituitary adenoma in the control group were enrolled in this study. The difference of adenoma sizes between two groups was not statistically significant. Patients in acromegaly group had significantly larger maximum distances between bilateral siphon carotid ectasias (25.5 ± 4.1 vs. 23.4 ± 3.5 mm, P = 0.001) and between bilateral lacerum segments (26.2 ± 3.2 vs. 24.1 ± 4.3 mm, P < 0.001) compared with those of patients with non-functional pituitary adenomas. Multivariate analysis showed that the increased bilateral ICAs distance was associated with disease duration (odds ratio = 1.01, 95% confidence interval = 1.01-1.02, P = 0.005) and refractory pituitary adenoma (odds ratio = 9.8, 95% confidence interval = 1.1-88.7, P = 0.043) but not with level of growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and adenoma size in acromegaly. Conclusion: Our study showed significant change in distance between the bilateral ICAs in acromegalic patients, comparing to patients with non-functional pituitary adenomas. The increased intercarotid artery distance is associated with disease duration but not with preoperative level of GH and IGF-1. Refractory pituitary adenoma and longer disease duration are the both risk factors of the increased ICAs distance in patient with acromegly.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Purpose: To investigate the different clinical characteristics of silent corticotroph adenomas (SCAs) with positive and negative adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) immunostaining, and to explore the value of pituitary-restricted transcription factor (Tpit) immunostaining for diagnosing SCAs. Methods: The clinical materials of patients with SCAs who had a typical pathological feature with positive Tpit immunostaining and positive/negative ACTH immunostaining, and without clinical features and biochemical evidence for Cushing's Syndrome in our center from April 2018 to March 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. The differences in clinical characteristics and surgical results between ACTH-positive and -negative SCAs were explored. Results: A total of one hundred and five patients (94.3% female) with SCAs were included. There were 66 SCAs with ACTH-negative (66/105, 62.9%), and 39 SCAs with ACTH-positive (39/105, 37.1%). Cases with ACTH-negative SCAs were more likely to have lower ACTH levels (27.5 ± 24.0 vs. 54.4 ± 58.6, P = 0.011), more multiple microcysts (81.8% vs. 61.5%, P = 0.022) and lower levels of Ki-67 expression (low expression rate 90.9% vs. 74.4%, P = 0.023). No statistical significant differences were observed between patients with ACTH-positive and -negative SCAs regarding gender (97.0% vs. 89.7%, P = 0.192), age (50.3 ± 10.3 vs. 49.0 ± 11.2, P = 0.543), surgical history (16.7% vs. 23.1%, P = 0.419), suprasellar extension (66.7% vs. 74.4%, P = 0.408), sphenoid sinus extension (51.5% vs. 56.4%, P = 0.627), cavernous sinus invasion (75.8% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.314), large cyst on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) (47.0% vs. 61.5%, P = 0.149), or gross total resection rate (42.4% vs. 51.3%, P = 0.379). Conclusions: ACTH-negative SCAs were observed to be more clinically silent and more likely to demonstrate multiple microcysts on MRI. The prevalence of SCAs, especially ACTH-negative SCAs, proved to be substantially underestimated and thus they should be given enough attention in consideration of the high aggressiveness of this subtype of refractory pituitary adenoma (PA).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prolactinomas are the most common functional pituitary adenomas and dopamine agonists are the primary therapy. However, some patients are resistant to dopamine agonists. Recently, metformin has been proposed as a cancer treatment. CASE DESCRIPTION: This study is a retrospective review of 2 cases including 1 patient with prolactinoma who was resistant to bromocriptine, diagnosed with impaired glucose tolerance, and administered metformin. Surprisingly, combining the patient's treatment with metformin decreased prolactin (PRL) levels to 12 ng/mL and significantly decreased the size of the tumor after 1 year of combination therapy. As menstruation resumed and galactorrhea resolved, the patient became pregnant and stopped using metformin but continued taking bromocriptine. She gave birth to a healthy boy in August 2016. After delivery, she decided to breastfeed the baby and only took bromocriptine. After 14 months of using bromocriptine alone, her PRL level increased to 208 ng/mL and the tumor reappeared (7 mm × 8 mm × 9 mm). Interestingly, the patient's PRL level decreased from 208 ng/mL to 150 ng/mL 2 months after using combination treatment with bromocriptine and metformin. On the basis of these findings, a second bromocriptine-resistant patient was recruited. After 3 months of combined treatment with bromocriptine and metformin, the patient's PRL level decreased to 2.08 ng/mL, testosterone levels increased significantly, and the tumor size decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Although more cases and investigations into the mechanisms underlying these effects are needed, these 2 cases support the hypothesis that the combination of metformin and bromocriptine might be a new treatment for resistant prolactinomas.

Asunto(s)