RESUMEN

Background: Image reconstruction is crucial for improving overall image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Q.Clear is a novel reconstruction algorithm that reduces image noise. The aim of the present study is to assess the preferred Q.Clear ß-level for digital [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT reconstruction vs. standard reconstruction (STD) for both overall scan and single-lesion visualization. Methods: Inclusion criteria: (1) patients with/suspected neuroendocrine tumors included in a prospective observational monocentric study between September 2019 and January 2022; (2) [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC digital PET/CT and contrast-enhanced-CT (ceCT) performed at our center at the same time. Images were reconstructed with STD and with Q.Clear ß-levels 800, 1000, and 1600. Scans were blindly reviewed by three nuclear-medicine experts: the preferred ß-level reconstruction was independently chosen for the visual quality of both the overall scan and the most avid target lesion < 1 cm (t) and >1 cm (T). PET/CT results were compared to ceCT. Semiquantitative analysis was performed (STD vs. ß1600) in T and t concordant at both PET/CT and ceCT. Subgroup analysis was also performed in patients presenting discordant t. Results: Overall, 52 patients were included. ß1600 reconstruction was considered superior over the others for both overall scan quality and single-lesion detection in all cases. The only significantly different (p < 0.001) parameters between ß1600 and STD were signal-to-noise liver ratio and standard deviation of the liver background. Lesion-dependent parameters were not significantly different in concordant T (n = 37) and t (n = 10). Among 26 discordant t, when PET was positive, all findings were confirmed as malignant. Conclusions: ß1600 Q.Clear reconstruction for [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC imaging is feasible and improves image quality for both overall and small-lesion assessment.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The distance traveled by the positron before annihilation with an electron, the so-called positron range, negatively effects the positron emission tomography (PET) image quality for radionuclides emitting high-energy positrons such as Gallium-68 (68Ga). PURPOSE: In this study, the effect of a tissue-independent positron range correction for Gallium-68 (68Ga-PRC) was investigated based on phantom measurements. The effect of the 68Ga-PRC was also explored in four patients. METHODS: The positron range distribution profile of 68Ga in water was generated via Monte Carlo simulation. That profile was mapped to a spatially invariant 3D convolution kernel which was incorporated in the OSEM and Q.Clear reconstruction algorithms to perform the 68Ga-PRC. In addition, each reconstruction method included point spread function (PSF) modeling and time-of-flight information. For both Fluorine-18 (18F) and 68Ga, the NEMA IQ phantom was filled with a sphere-to-background ratio of 10:1 and scanned with the GE Discovery MI 5R PET/CT system. Standard non-positron range correction (PRC) reconstructions were performed for both radionuclides, while also PRC reconstructions were performed for 68Ga. Reconstructions parameters (OSEM: number of updates, Q.Clear: beta value) were adapted to achieve similar noise levels between the corresponding reconstructions. The effect of 68Ga-PRC was assessed for both OSEM and Q.Clear reconstructions and compared to non-PRC reconstructions for 68Ga and 18F in terms of image contrast, noise, recovery coefficient (RC), and spatial resolution. For the clinical validation, 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) and 68Ga-DOTATOC PET scans were included of two patients each. For each PET scan, patients were injected with 1.5 MBq/kg of 68Ga-PSMA or 68Ga-DOTATOC and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated and compared to the non-PRC reconstructions. RESULTS: For OSEM reconstructions, including the 68Ga-PRC improved the RC by 9.4% (3.7%-19.3%) and spatial resolution by 21.7% (4.6 mm vs. 3.6 mm) for similar noise levels. For Q.Clear reconstructions, 68Ga-PRC modeling improved the RC by 6.7% (2.8%-10.5%) and spatial resolution by 15.3% (5.9 mm vs. 5.0 mm) while obtaining similar noise levels. In the patient data, the use of 68Ga-PRC enhanced the CNR by 13.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Including 68Ga-PRC in the PET reconstruction enhanced the image quality of 68Ga PET data compared to the standard non-PRC reconstructions for similar noise levels. Limited patient results also supported this improvement.

RESUMEN

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging after 90 Y liver radioembolization is used for both lesion identification and dosimetry. Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithms are an alternative to ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) with improved image quality and lesion detectability. The investigation of optimal parameters for 90 Y image reconstruction of Q.Clear, a commercial BPL algorithm developed by General Electric (GE), in PET/MR is a field of interest and the subject of this study. The NEMA phantom was filled at an 8:1 sphere-to-background ratio. Acquisitions were performed on a PET/MR scanner for clinically relevant activities between 0.7 and 3.3 MBq/ml. Reconstructions with Q.Clear were performed varying the ß penalty parameter between 20 and 6000, the acquisition time between 5 and 20 min and pixel size between 1.56 and 4.69 mm. OSEM reconstructions of 28 subsets with 2 and 4 iterations with and without Time-of-Flight (TOF) were compared to Q.Clear with ß = 4000. Recovery coefficients (RC), their coefficient of variation (COV), background variability (BV), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and residual activity in the cold insert were evaluated. Increasing ß parameter lowered RC, COV and BV, while CNR was maximized at ß = 4000; further increase resulted in oversmoothing. For quantification purposes, ß = 1000-2000 could be more appropriate. Longer acquisition times resulted in larger CNR due to reduced image noise. Q.Clear reconstructions led to higher CNR than OSEM. A ß of 4000 was obtained for optimal image quality, although lower values could be considered for quantification purposes. An optimal acquisition time of 15 min was proposed considering its clinical use.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Q.Clear, a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm, has shown high potential in improving quantitation accuracy in PET systems. The Q.Clear algorithm controls noise during the iterative reconstruction through a ß penalization factor. This study aimed to determine the optimal ß-factor for accurate quantitation of dynamic PET scans. METHODS: A Flangeless Esser PET Phantom with eight hollow spheres (4-25 mm) was scanned on a GE Discovery MI PET/CT system. Data were reconstructed into five sets of variable acquisition times using Q.Clear with 18 different ß-factors ranging from 100 to 3500. The recovery coefficient (RC), coefficient of variation (CVRC) and root-mean-square error (RMSERC) were evaluated for the phantom data. Two male patients with recurrent glioblastoma were scanned on the same scanner using 18F-PSMA-1007. Using an irreversible two-tissue compartment model, the area under curve (AUC) and the net influx rate Ki were calculated to assess the impact of different ß-factors on the pharmacokinetic analysis of clinical PET brain data. RESULTS: In general, RC and CVRC decreased with increasing ß-factor in the phantom data. For small spheres (< 10 mm), and in particular for short acquisition times, low ß-factors resulted in high variability and an overestimation of measured activity. Increasing the ß-factor improves the variability, however at a cost of underestimating the measured activity. For the clinical data, AUC decreased and Ki increased with increased ß-factor; a change in ß-factor from 300 to 1000 resulted in a 25.5% increase in the Ki. CONCLUSION: In a complex dynamic dataset with variable acquisition times, the optimal ß-factor provides a balance between accuracy and precision. Based on our results, we suggest a ß-factor of 300-500 for quantitation of small structures with dynamic PET imaging, while large structures may benefit from higher ß-factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03951142. Registered 5 October 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03951142 . EudraCT no 2018-003229-27. Registered 26 February 2019, https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2018-003229-27/NO .

RESUMEN

We compared the image quality and quantification parameters through bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm (Q.Clear) and ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm for 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT scans performed for response monitoring in patients with metastatic breast cancer in prospective setting. We included 37 metastatic breast cancer patients diagnosed and monitored with 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT at Odense University Hospital (Denmark). A total of 100 scans were analyzed blinded toward Q.Clear and OSEM reconstruction algorithms regarding image quality parameters (noise, sharpness, contrast, diagnostic confidence, artefacts, and blotchy appearance) using a five-point scale. The hottest lesion was selected in scans with measurable disease, considering the same volume of interest in both reconstruction methods. SULpeak (g/mL) and SUVmax (g/mL) were compared for the same hottest lesion. There was no significant difference regarding noise, diagnostic confidence, and artefacts within reconstruction methods; Q.Clear had significantly better sharpness (p < 0.001) and contrast (p = 0.001) than the OSEM reconstruction, while the OSEM reconstruction had significantly less blotchy appearance compared with Q.Clear reconstruction (p < 0.001). Quantitative analysis on 75/100 scans indicated that Q.Clear reconstruction had significantly higher SULpeak (5.33 ± 2.8 vs. 4.85 ± 2.5, p < 0.001) and SUVmax (8.27 ± 4.8 vs. 6.90 ± 3.8, p < 0.001) compared with OSEM reconstruction. In conclusion, Q.Clear reconstruction revealed better sharpness, better contrast, higher SUVmax, and higher SULpeak, while OSEM reconstruction had less blotchy appearance.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aims to determine whether Q.Clear positron emission tomography (PET) reconstruction may reduce tracer injection dose or shorten scanning time in 68Gallium-labelled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (68 Ga-FAPI) PET/magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. METHODS: We retrospectively collected cases of 68 Ga-FAPI whole-body imaging performed on integrated PET/MR. PET images were reconstructed using three different methods: ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction with full scanning time, OSEM reconstruction with half scanning time, and Q.Clear reconstruction with half scanning time. We then measured standardized uptake values (SUVs) within and around lesions, alongside their volumes. We also evaluated image quality using lesion-to-background (L/B) ratio and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). We then compared these metrics across the three reconstruction techniques using statistical methods. RESULTS: Q.Clear reconstruction significantly increased SUVmax and SUVmean within lesions (more than 30%) and reduced their volumes in comparison with OSEM reconstruction. Background SUVmax also increased significantly, while background SUVmean showed no difference. Average L/B values for Q.Clear reconstruction were only marginally higher than those from OSME reconstruction with half-time. SNR decreased significantly in Q.Clear reconstruction compared with OSEM reconstruction with full time (but not half time). Differences between Q.Clear and OSEM reconstructions in SUVmax and SUVmean values within lesions were significantly correlated with SUVs within lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Q.Clear reconstruction was useful for reducing PET injection dose or scanning time while maintaining the image quality. Q.Clear may affect PET quantification, and it is necessary to establish diagnostic recommendations based on Q.Clear results for Q.Clear application.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Bayesian penalized likelihood PET reconstruction (BPL) algorithm, Q.Clear (GE Healthcare), has recently been clinically applied to clinical image reconstruction. The BPL includes a relative difference penalty (RDP) as a penalty function. The ß value that controls the behavior of RDP determines the global strength of noise suppression, whereas the γ factor in RDP controls the degree of edge preservation. The present study aimed to assess the effects of various γ factors in RDP on the ability to detect sub-centimeter lesions. METHODS: All PET data were acquired for 10 min using a Discovery MI PET/CT system (GE Healthcare). We used a NEMA IEC body phantom containing spheres with inner diameters of 10, 13, 17, 22, 28 and 37 mm and 4.0, 5.0, 6.2, 7.9, 10 and 13 mm. The target-to-background ratio of the phantom was 4:1, and the background activity concentration was 5.3 kBq/mL. We also evaluated cold spheres containing only non-radioactive water with the same background activity concentration. All images were reconstructed using BPL + time of flight (TOF). The ranges of ß values and γ factors in BPL were 50-600 and 2-20, respectively. We reconstructed PET images using the Duetto toolbox for MATLAB software. We calculated the % hot contrast recovery coefficient (CRChot) of each hot sphere, the cold CRC (CRCcold) of each cold sphere, the background variability (BV) and residual lung error (LE). We measured the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the micro hollow hot spheres ≤ 13 mm to assess spatial resolution on the reconstructed PET images. RESULTS: The CRChot and CRCcold for different ß values and γ factors depended on the size of the small spheres. The CRChot, CRCcold and BV increased along with the γ factor. A 6.2-mm hot sphere was obvious in BPL as lower ß values and higher γ factors, whereas γ factors ≥ 10 resulted in images with increased background noise. The FWHM became smaller when the γ factor increased. CONCLUSION: High and low γ factors, respectively, preserved the edges of reconstructed PET images and promoted image smoothing. The BPL with a γ factor above the default value in Q.Clear (γ factor = 2) generated high-resolution PET images, although image noise slightly diverged. Optimizing the ß value and the γ factor in BPL enabled the detection of lesions ≤ 6.2 mm.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithm, Q.Clear, can achieve a higher signal-to-noise ratio on images and more accurate quantitation than ordered subset-expectation maximization (OSEM). The reconstruction parameter (ß) in BPL requires optimization according to the radiopharmaceutical tracer. The present study aimed to define the optimal ß value in BPL required to diagnose Alzheimer disease from brain positron emission tomography (PET) images acquired using 18 F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18 F]FDG) and 11 C-labeled Pittsburg compound B ([11 C]PiB). METHODS: Images generated from Hoffman 3D brain and cylindrical phantoms were acquired using a Discovery PET/computed tomography (CT) 710 and reconstructed using OSEM + time-of-flight (TOF) under clinical conditions and BPL + TOF (ß = 20-1000). Contrast was calculated from images generated by the Hoffman 3D brain phantom, and noise and uniformity were calculated from those generated by the cylindrical phantom. Five cognitively healthy controls and five patients with Alzheimer disease were assessed using [18 F]FDG and [11 C]PiB PET to validate the findings from the phantom study. The ß values were restricted by the findings of the phantom study, then one certified nuclear medicine physician and two certified nuclear medicine technologists visually determined optimal ß values by scoring the quality parameters of image contrast, image noise, cerebellar stability, and overall image quality of PET images from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). RESULTS: The contrast in BPL satisfied the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine (JSNM) criterion of ≥55% and exceeded that of OSEM at ranges of ß = 20-450 and 20-600 for [18 F]FDG and [11 C]PiB, respectively. The image noise in BPL satisfied the JSNM criterion of ≤15% and was below that in OSEM when ß = 150-1000 and 400-1000 for [18 F]FDG and [11 C]PiB, respectively. The phantom study restricted the ranges of ß values to 100-300 and 300-500 for [18 F]FDG and [11 C]PiB, respectively. The BPL scores for gray-white matter contrast and image noise, exceeded those of OSEM in [18 F]FDG and [11 C]PiB images regardless of ß values. Visual evaluation confirmed that the optimal ß values were 200 and 450 for [18 F]FDG and [11 C]PiB, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The BPL achieved better image contrast and less image noise than OSEM, while maintaining quantitative standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR) due to full convergence, more rigorous noise control, and edge preservation. The optimal ß values for [18 F]FDG and [11 C]PiB brain PET were apparently 200 and 450, respectively. The present study provides useful information about how to determine optimal ß values in BPL for brain PET imaging.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Q.Clear is a block sequential regularized expectation maximization penalized-likelihood reconstruction algorithm for Positron Emission Tomography (PET). It has shown high potential in improving image reconstruction quality and quantification accuracy in PET/CT system. However, the evaluation of Q.Clear in PET/MR system, especially for clinical applications, is still rare. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of Q.Clear on the 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/MR system and to determine the optimal penalization factor ß for clinical use. METHODS: A PET National Electrical Manufacturers Association/ International Electrotechnical Commission (NEMA/IEC) phantom was scanned on GE SIGNA PET/MR, based on NEMA NU 2-2012 standard. Metrics including contrast recovery (CR), background variability (BV), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and spatial resolution were evaluated for phantom data. For clinical data, lesion SNR, signal to background ratio (SBR), noise level and visual scores were evaluated. PET images reconstructed from OSEM + TOF and Q.Clear were visually compared and statistically analyzed, where OSEM + TOF adopted point spread function as default procedure, and Q.Clear used different ß values of 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 800, 1100 and 1400. RESULTS: For phantom data, as ß value increased, CR and BV of all sizes of spheres decreased in general; images reconstructed from Q.Clear reached the peak SNR with ß value of 400 and generally had better resolution than those from OSEM + TOF. For clinical data, compared with OSEM + TOF, Q.Clear with ß value of 400 achieved 138% increment in median SNR (from 58.8 to 166.0), 59% increment in median SBR (from 4.2 to 6.8) and 38% decrement in median noise level (from 0.14 to 0.09). Based on visual assessment from two physicians, Q.Clear with ß values ranging from 200 to 400 consistently achieved higher scores than OSEM + TOF, where ß value of 400 was considered optimal. CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicated that, on 18F-FDG PET/MR, Q.Clear reconstruction improved the image quality compared to OSEM + TOF. ß value of 400 was optimal for Q.Clear reconstruction.

RESUMEN

AIM/INTRODUCTION: Digital PET/CT allows Q.Clear image reconstruction with different Beta (ß) levels. However, no definitive standard ß level for [68 Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT has been established yet. As patient's body mass index (BMI) can affect image quality, the aim of the study was to visually and semi-quantitatively assess different ß levels compared to standard OSEM in overweight patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Inclusion criteria: (1) patients with NEN included in a prospective CE-approved electronic archive; (2) [68 Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT performed on a digital tomograph between September2019/March2021; (3) BMI ≥ 25. Images were acquired following EANM guidelines and reconstructed with OSEM and Q.Clear with three ß levels (800, 1000, 1600). Scans were independently reviewed by three expert readers, unaware of clinical data, who independently chose the preferred ß level reconstruction for visual overall image quality. Semi-quantitative analysis was performed on each scan: SUVmax of the highest uptake lesion (SUVmax-T), liver background SUVmean (SUVmean-L), SUVmax-T/SUVmean-L, Signal-to-noise ratio for both liver (LSNR) and the highest uptake lesion (SNR-T), Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). RESULTS: Overall, 75 patients (median age: 63 years old [23-87]) were included: pre-obesity sub-group (25 ≤ BMI < 30, n = 50) and obesity sub-group (BMI ≥ 30, n = 25). PET/CT was positive for disease in 45/75 (60.0%) cases (14 obese and 31 pre-obese patients). Agreement among readers' visual rating was high (Fleiss κ = 0.88) and the ß1600 was preferred in most cases (in 96% of obese patients and in 53.3% of pre-obese cases). OSEM was considered visually equal to ß1600 in 44.7% of pre-obese cases and in 4% of obese patients. In a minority of pre-obese cases, OSEM was preferred (2%). In the whole population, CNR, SNR-T and LSNR were significantly different (p < 0.001) between OSEM and ß1600, conversely to SUVmean-L (not significant). These results were also confirmed when calculated separately for the pre-obesity and obesity sub-groups ß800 and ß1000 were always rated inferior. CONCLUSIONS: Q.Clear is a new technology for PET/CT image reconstruction that can be used to increase CNR and SNR-T, to subsequently optimise overall image quality as compared to standard OSEM. Our preliminary data on [68 Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT demonstrate that in overweight NEN patients, ß1600 is preferable over ß800 and ß1000. Further studies are warranted to validate these results in lesions of different anatomical region and size; moreover, currently employed interpretative PET positivity criteria should be adjusted to the new reconstruction method.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Image quality and quantitative accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET) depend on several factors such as uptake time, scanner characteristics and image reconstruction methods. Ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) is considered the gold standard for image reconstruction. Penalized-likelihood estimation (PL) algorithms have been recently developed for PET reconstruction to improve quantitation accuracy while maintaining or even improving image quality. In PL algorithms, a regularization parameter ß controls the penalization of relative differences between neighboring pixels and determines image characteristics. In the present study, we aim to compare the performance of Q.Clear (PL algorithm, GE Healthcare) and OSEM (3 iterations, 8 subsets, 6-mm post-processing filter) for 68Ga-DOTATATE (68Ga-DOTA) PET studies, both visually and quantitatively. Thirty consecutive whole-body 68Ga-DOTA studies were included. The data were acquired in list mode and were reconstructed using 3D OSEM and Q.Clear with various values of ß and various acquisition times per bed position (bp), thus generating images with reduced injected dose (1.5 min/bp: ß = 300-1100; 1.0 min/bp: ß = 600-1400 and 0.5 min/bp: ß = 800-2200). An additional analysis adding ß values up to 1500, 1700 and 3000 for 1.5, 1.0 and 0.5 min/bp, respectively, was performed for a random sample of 8 studies. Evaluation was performed using a phantom and clinical data. Two experienced nuclear medicine physicians blinded to the variables assessed the image quality visually. RESULTS: Clinical images reconstructed with Q.Clear, set at 1.5, 1.0 and 0.5 min/bp using ß = 1100, 1300 and 3000, respectively, resulted in images with noise equivalence to 3D OSEM (1.5 min/bp) with a mean increase in SUVmax of 14%, 13% and 4%, an increase in SNR of 30%, 24% and 10%, and an increase in SBR of 13%, 13% and 2%. Visual assessment yielded similar results for ß values of 1100-1400 and 1300-1600 for 1.5 and 1.0 min/bp, respectively, although for 0.5 min/bp there was no significant improvement compared to OSEM. CONCLUSION: 68Ga-DOTA reconstructions with Q.Clear, 1.5 and 1.0 min/bp, resulted in increased tumor SUVmax and in improved SNR and SBR at a similar level of noise compared to 3D OSEM. Q.Clear with ß = 1300-1600 enables one-third reduction of acquisition time or injected dose, with similar image quality compared to 3D OSEM.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm (Q.Clear) for 89Zr-immunoPET image reconstruction and its potential to improve image quality and reduce the administered activity of 89Zr-immunoPET tracers. METHODS: Eight 89Zr-immunoPET whole-body PET/CT scans from three 89Zr-immunoPET clinical trials were selected for analysis. On average, patients were imaged 6.3 days (range 5.0-8.0 days) after administration of 69 MBq (range 65-76 MBq) of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-daratumumab, [89Zr]Zr-DFO-pertuzumab, or [89Zr]Zr-DFO-trastuzumab. List-mode PET data was retrospectively reconstructed using Q.Clear with incremental ß-values from 150 to 7200, as well as standard ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction (2-iterations, 16-subsets, a 6.4-mm Gaussian transaxial filter, "heavy" z-axis filtering and all manufacturers' corrections active). Reduced activities were simulated by discarding 50% and 75% of original counts in each list mode stream. All reconstructed PET images were scored for image quality and lesion detectability using a 5-point scale. SUVmax for normal liver and sites of disease and liver signal-to-noise ratio were measured. RESULTS: Q.Clear reconstructions with ß = 3600 provided the highest scores for image quality. Images reconstructed with ß-values of 3600 or 5200 using only 50% or 25% of the original counts provided comparable or better image quality scores than standard OSEM reconstruction images using 100% of counts. CONCLUSION: The Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm Q.Clear improved the quality of 89Zr-immunoPET images. This could be used in future studies to improve image quality and/or decrease the administered activity of 89Zr-immunoPET tracers.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) algorithm Q.Clear (GE Healthcare) allows fully convergent iterative reconstruction that results in better image quality and quantitative accuracy, while limiting image noise. The present study aimed to optimize BPL reconstruction parameters for 18F-NaF PET/CT images and to determine the feasibility of 18F-NaF PET/CT image acquisition over shorter durations in clinical practice. METHODS: A custom-designed thoracic spine phantom consisting of several inserts, soft tissue, normal spine, and metastatic bone tumor, was scanned using a Discovery MI PET/CT scanner (GE Healthcare). The phantom allows optional adjustment of activity distribution, tumor size, and attenuation. We reconstructed PET images using OSEM + PSF + TOF (2 iterations, 17 subsets, and a 4-mm Gaussian filter), BPL + TOF (ß = 200 to 700), and scan durations of 30-120 s. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), contrast, and coefficients of variance (CV) as image quality indicators were calculated, whereas the quantitative measures were recovery coefficients (RC) and RC linearity over a range of activity. We retrospectively analyzed images from five persons without bone metastases (male, n = 1; female, n = 4), then standardized uptake values (SUV), CV, and SNR at the 4th, 5th, and 6th thoracic vertebra were calculated in BPL + TOF (ß = 400) images. RESULTS: The optimal reconstruction parameter of the BPL was ß = 400 when images were acquired at 120 s/bed. At 90 s/bed, the BPL with a ß value of 400 yielded 24% and 18% higher SNR and contrast, respectively, than OSEM (2 iterations; 120 s acquisitions). The BPL was superior to OSEM in terms of RC and the RC linearity over a range of activity, regardless of scan duration. The SUVmax were lower in BPL, than in OSEM. The CV and vertebral SNR in BPL were superior to those in OSEM. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal reconstruction parameters of 18F-NaF PET/CT images acquired over different durations were determined. The BPL can reduce PET acquisition to 90 s/bed in 18F-NaF PET/CT imaging. Our results suggest that BPL (ß = 400) on SiPM-based TOF PET/CT scanner maintained high image quality and quantitative accuracy even for shorter acquisition durations.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Q.Clear is a new Bayesian penalized-likelihood PET reconstruction algorithm. It has been documented that Q.Clear increases the SUVmax values of different malignant lesions. PURPOSE: SUVmax values are crucial for the interpretation of PET/CT images in patients with lymphoma, particularly when the early and final responses to treatment are evaluated. The aim of the study was to systematically analyse the impact of the use of Q.Clear on the interpretation of PET/CT in patients with lymphoma. METHODS: A total of 280 18F-FDG PET/CT scans in patients with lymphoma were performed for staging (sPET), for early treatment response (iPET), after the end of treatment (ePET) and when a relapse of lymphoma was suspected (rPET). Scans were separately reconstructed with two algorithms, Q.Clear and OSEM, and further compared. RESULTS: The stage of lymphoma was concordantly diagnosed in 69/70 patients with both algorithms on sPET. Discordant assessment of the Deauville score (p < 0.001) was found in 11 cases (15.7%) of 70 iPET scans and in 11 cases of 70 ePET scans. An upgrade from a negative to a positive scan by Q.Clear occurred in 3 cases (4.3%) of iPET scans and 7 cases (10.0%) of ePET scans. The results of all 70 rPET scans were concordant. The SUVmax values of the target lymphoma lesions measured with Q.Clear were higher than those measured with OSEM in 88.8% of scans. CONCLUSION: Although the Q.Clear algorithm may alter the interpretations of PET/CT in only a small proportion of patients, we recommend using standard OSEM reconstruction for the assessment of treatment response.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Many advances in PET/CT technology can potentially improve image quality and the ability to detect small lesions. A new digital TOF-PET/CT scanner based on silicon photomultipliers (SiPM) integrated with a Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) PET reconstruction algorithm (Q.Clear; GE Healthcare) has been introduced into clinical practice. The present study aimed to quantify the ability of a digital TOF-PET/CT scanner combined with BPL reconstruction to detect small lesions, and to determine the optimal penalization factor (ß) in BPL to accurately detect such lesions. METHODS: All PET data were acquired from a NEMA body phantom using a Discovery MI (DMI) PET/CT system (GE Healthcare). The phantom included six spheres with diameters of 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, and 13 mm, and contained a background activity level of 5.3 kBq/mL, with target-to-background ratios (TBR) of 4:1 and 8:1. Images were reconstructed using a baseline OSEM algorithm, with OSEM + PSF, OSEM + TOF, OSEM + PSF + TOF, and BPL + PSF + TOF (ß: 50-400). The matrix size was 192 × 192 and 384 × 384. Data acquired in 100-min list mode were re-binned into acquisition times ranging from 2 to 100 min. The quantitative accuracy and detectability of small hot spheres were evaluated by physical assessment of a recovery coefficient (RC) and a detectability index (DI), as well as visual assessment of PET images at each acquisition time. RESULTS: The RC and DI of sub-centimeter spheres were improved, because the digital TOF-PET/CT scanner has a larger TOF performance gain due to better timing resolution. The RC and DI were higher with BPL in sub-centimeter spheres, than with other OSEM-based types of reconstruction. The BPL for an 8-mm sphere overestimated uptake due to edge artifact overshoot induced by PSF modeling. The variability of RC and DI for acquisition times and TBR differed considerably according to ß values. The RC for ~ 8-mm spheres were > 1 at ß values between 50 and 100, but were close to 1 at ß value of 200. The visual scores for ß = 200 in BPL were maximal, whereas those for spheres that were ≥ 6 mm exceeded the criterion of 3. CONCLUSION: The BPL in the digital TOF-PET/CT scanner improved the quantitation and detectability of sub-centimeter spheres compared with OSEM-based reconstruction. Optimization of the ß value in BPL might allow the detection of lesions ≤ 6 mm, although detectability depended on the TBR of lesions. A ß value of 200 seemed optimal for detecting sub-centimeter lesions.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radiotracers such as [18F]PSMA-1007 used with positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is promising for initial staging and detection of recurrent disease in prostate cancer patients. The block-sequential regularization expectation maximization algorithm (BSREM) is a new PET reconstruction algorithm, which provides higher image contrast while also reducing noise. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of different acquisition times and different noise-suppressing factors in BSREM (ß values) in [18F]PSMA-1007 PET-CT regarding quantitative data as well as a visual image quality assessment. We included 35 patients referred for clinical [18F]PSMA-1007 PET-CT. Four megabecquerels per kilogramme were administered and imaging was performed after 120 min. Eighty-four image series per patient were created with combinations of acquisition times of 1-4 min/bed position and ß values of 300-1400. The noise level in normal tissue and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of pathological uptakes versus the local background were calculated. Image quality was assessed by experienced nuclear medicine physicians. RESULTS: The noise level in the liver, spleen, and muscle was higher for low ß values and low acquisition times (written as activity time products (ATs = administered activity × acquisition time)) and was minimized at maximum AT (16 MBq/kg min) and maximum ß (1400). There was only a small decrease above AT 10. The median CNR increased slowly with AT from approximately 6 to 12 and was substantially lower at AT 4 and higher at AT 14-16. At AT 4-6, many images were regarded as being of unacceptable quality. For AT 8, ß values of 700-900 were considered of acceptable quality. CONCLUSIONS: An AT of 8 (for example as in our study, 4 MB/kg with an acquisition time of 2 min) with a ß value of 700 performs well regarding noise level, CNR, and visual image quality assessment.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare widely used ordered subset expectation maximisation (OSEM) algorithm with a new Bayesian penalised likelihood (BPL) Q.Clear algorithm in 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 25 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT scans with both OSEM and Q.Clear reconstructions available. Each scan was independently reported by two physicians both in OSEM and Q.Clear. SUVmax, SUVmean and tumour-to-background ratio (TBR) of each lesion were measured. Reports were also compared for their final conclusions and the number and localisation of lesions. RESULTS: In both reconstructions the same 87 lesions were reported. Mean SUVmax, SUVmean and TBR were higher for Q.Clear than OSEM (7.01 vs 6.53 [p = 0.052], 4.16 vs 3.84 [p = 0.036] and 20.2 vs 16.8 [p < 0.00001], respectively). Small lesions (< 10 mm) had statistically significant higher SUVmax, SUVmean and TBR in Q.Clear than OSEM (5.37 vs 4.79 [p = 0.032], 3.08 vs 2.70 [p = 0.04] and 15.5 vs 12.5 [p = 0.00214], respectively). For lesions ≥ 10 mm, no significant differences were observed. Findings with higher tracer avidity (SUVmax ≥ 5) tended to have higher SUVmax, SUVmean and TBR values in Q.Clear (11.6 vs 10.3 [p = 0.00278], 7.0 vs 6.7 [p = 0.077] and 33.9 vs 26.7 [p < 0.00001, respectively). Mean background uptake did not differ significantly between Q.Clear and OSEM (0.42 vs 0.39, p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: In 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, Q.Clear SUVs and TBR tend to be higher (regardless of lesion localisation), especially for small and highly avid lesions. Increase in SUVs is also higher for lesions with high tracer uptake. Still, Q.Clear does not affect 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT specificity and sensitivity.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for PET (e.g., GE Q.Clear) aims at improving convergence of lesion activity while ensuring sufficient signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). This study evaluated reconstructed spatial resolution, maximum/peak contrast recovery (CRmax/CRpeak) and SNR of Q.Clear compared to time-of-flight (TOF) OSEM with and without point spread function (PSF) modeling. METHODS: The NEMA IEC Body phantom was scanned five times (3 min scan duration, 30 min between scans, background, 1.5-3.9 kBq/ml F18) with a GE Discovery MI PET/CT (3-ring detector) with spheres filled with 8-, 4-, or 2-fold the background activity concentration (SBR 8:1, 4:1, 2:1). Reconstruction included Q.Clear (beta, 150/300/450), "PSF+TOF4/16" (iterations, 4; subsets, 16; in-plane filter, 2.0 mm), "OSEM+TOF4/16" (identical parameters), "PSF+TOF2/17" (2 it, 17 ss, 2.0 mm filter), "OSEM+TOF2/17" (identical), "PSF+TOF4/8" (4 it, 8 ss, 6.4 mm), and "OSEM+TOF2/8" (2 it, 8 ss, 6.4 mm). Spatial resolution was derived from 3D sphere activity profiles. RC as (sphere activity concentration [AC]/true AC). SNR as (background mean AC/background AC standard deviation). RESULTS: Spatial resolution of Q.Clear150 was significantly better than all conventional algorithms at SBR 8:1 and 4:1 (Wilcoxon, each p < 0.05). At SBR 4:1 and 2:1, the spatial resolution of Q.Clear300/450 was similar or inferior to PSF+TOF4/16 and OSEM+TOF4/16. Small sphere CRpeak generally underestimated true AC, and it was similar for Q.Clear150/300/450 as with PSF+TOF4/16 or PSF+TOF2/17 (i.e., relative differences < 10%). Q.Clear provided similar or higher CRpeak as OSEM+TOF4/16 and OSEM+TOF2/17 resulting in a consistently better tradeoff between CRpeak and SNR with Q.Clear. Compared to PSF+TOF4/8/OSEM+TOF2/8, Q.Clear150/300/450 showed lower SNR but higher CRpeak. CONCLUSIONS: Q.Clear consistently improved reconstructed spatial resolution at high and medium SBR compared to PSF+TOF and OSEM+TOF, but only with beta = 150. However, this is at the cost of inferior SNR with Q.Clear150 compared to Q.Clear300/450 and PSF+TOF4/16/PSF+TOF2/17 while CRpeak for the small spheres did not improve considerably. This suggests that Q.Clear300/450 may be advantageous for the 3-ring detector configuration because the tradeoff between CR and SNR with Q.Clear300/450 was superior to PSF+TOF4/16, OSEM+TOF4/16, and OSEM+TOF2/17. However, it requires validation by systematic evaluation in patients at different activity and acquisition protocols.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Q.Clear is a block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) penalized-likelihood reconstruction algorithm for PET. It tries to improve image quality by controlling noise amplification during image reconstruction. In this study, the noise properties of this BSREM were compared to the ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm for both phantom and patient data acquired on a state-of-the-art PET/CT. METHODS: The NEMA IQ phantom and a whole-body patient study were acquired on a GE DMI 3-rings system in list mode and different datasets with varying noise levels were generated. Phantom data was evaluated using four different contrast ratios. These were reconstructed using BSREM with different ß-factors of 300-3000 and with a clinical setting used for OSEM including point spread function (PSF) and time-of-flight (TOF) information. Contrast recovery (CR), background noise levels (coefficient of variation, COV), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were used to determine the performance in the phantom data. Findings based on the phantom data were compared with clinical data. For the patient study, the SUV ratio, metabolic active tumor volumes (MATVs), and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were evaluated using the liver as the background region. RESULTS: Based on the phantom data for the same count statistics, BSREM resulted in higher CR and CNR and lower COV than OSEM. The CR of OSEM matches to the CR of BSREM with ß = 750 at high count statistics for 8:1. A similar trend was observed for the ratios 6:1 and 4:1. A dependence on sphere size, counting statistics, and contrast ratio was confirmed by the CNR of the ratio 2:1. BSREM with ß = 750 for 2.5 and 1.0 min acquisition has comparable COV to the 10 and 5.0 min acquisitions using OSEM. This resulted in a noise reduction by a factor of 2-4 when using BSREM instead of OSEM. For the patient data, a similar trend was observed, and SNR was reduced by at least a factor of 2 while preserving contrast. CONCLUSION: The BSREM reconstruction algorithm allowed a noise reduction without a loss of contrast by a factor of 2-4 compared to OSEM reconstructions for all data evaluated. This reduction can be used to lower the injected dose or shorten the acquisition time.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Block-sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM), commercially Q. Clear (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA), is a reconstruction algorithm that allows for a fully convergent iterative reconstruction leading to higher image contrast compared to conventional reconstruction algorithms, while also limiting noise. The noise penalization factor ß controls the trade-off between noise level and resolution and can be adjusted by the user. The aim was to evaluate the influence of different ß values for different activity time products (ATs = administered activity × acquisition time) in whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT) regarding quantitative data, interpretation, and quality assessment of the images. Twenty-five patients with known or suspected malignancies, referred for clinical 18F-FDG PET-CT examinations acquired on a silicon photomultiplier PET-CT scanner, were included. The data were reconstructed using BSREM with ß values of 100-700 and ATs of 4-16 MBq/kg × min/bed (acquisition times of 1, 1.5, 2, 3, and 4 min/bed). Noise level, lesion SUVmax, and lesion SUVpeak were calculated. Image quality and lesion detectability were assessed by four nuclear medicine physicians for acquisition times of 1.0 and 1.5 min/bed position. RESULTS: The noise level decreased with increasing ß values and ATs. Lesion SUVmax varied considerably between different ß values and ATs, whereas SUVpeak was more stable. For an AT of 6 (in our case 1.5 min/bed), the best image quality was obtained with a ß of 600 and the best lesion detectability with a ß of 500. AT of 4 generated poor-quality images and false positive uptakes due to noise. CONCLUSIONS: For oncologic whole-body 18F-FDG examinations on a SiPM-based PET-CT, we propose using an AT of 6 (i.e., 4 MBq/kg and 1.5 min/bed) reconstructed with BSREM using a ß value of 500-600 in order to ensure image quality and lesion detection rate as well as a high patient throughput. We do not recommend using AT < 6 since the risk of false positive uptakes due to noise increases.