RESUMEN

Background and Aim: Endoscopic ultrasound shear wave elastography (EUS-SWE) can facilitate an objective evaluation of pancreatic fibrosis. Although it is primarily applied in evaluating chronic pancreatitis, its efficacy in assessing early chronic pancreatitis (ECP) remains underinvestigated. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-SWE for assessing ECP diagnosed using the Japanese diagnostic criteria 2019. Methods: In total, 657 patients underwent EUS-SWE. Propensity score matching was used, and the participants were classified into the ECP and normal groups. ECP was diagnosed using the Japanese diagnostic criteria 2019. Pancreatic stiffness was assessed based on velocity (Vs) on EUS-SWE, and the optimal Vs cutoff value for ECP diagnosis was determined. A practical shear wave Vs value of ≥50% was considered significant. Results: Each group included 22 patients. The ECP group had higher pancreatic stiffness than the normal group (2.31 ± 0.67 m/s vs. 1.59 ± 0.40 m/s, p < 0.001). The Vs cutoff value for the diagnostic accuracy of ECP, as determined using the receiver operating characteristic curve, was 2.24m/s, with an area under the curve of 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.69-0.94). A high Vs was strongly correlated with the number of EUS findings (rs = 0.626, p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis revealed that a history of acute pancreatitis and ≥2 EUS findings were independent predictors of a high Vs. Conclusions: There is a strong correlation between EUS-SWE findings and the Japanese diagnostic criteria 2019 for ECP. Hence, EUS-SWE can be an objective and invaluable diagnostic tool for ECP diagnosis.

RESUMEN

Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of sedation with midazolam and remimazolam for colorectal endoscopy. Methods: This single-center, two-arm, post-hoc analysis of the REM-IICTJP01 study investigated the efficacy and safety of remimazolam for gastrointestinal endoscopic sedation. We enrolled 40 and 208 patients who underwent colonoscopy under remimazolam and midazolam sedation, respectively, during the same period. The primary outcome was the time from the end of the colonoscopy until discharge. The secondary outcomes included the time from the end of the colonoscopy until awakening, dosage, and adverse events. Propensity score matching was employed to eliminate the effect of confounding factors. Results: Thirty-seven patients in each group were matched. After propensity matching, the time to awakening after colonoscopy was 28.0 (13.0-37.0) min in the midazolam group and 0 (0-0) min in the remimazolam group; moreover, the time till discharge was 40.0 (35.0-46.5) min in the midazolam group and 0 (0-5.0) min in the remimazolam group, both of which were significantly shorter in the remimazolam group (p < 0.01). The number of additional doses was 0 (0-0) and 2 (1-3) in the midazolam and remimazolam groups, respectively. The total dose was 2.0 (2.0-3.5) and 6.0 (5.0-7.0) mg in the midazolam and remimazolam groups, respectively. Conclusions: Remimazolam yielded significantly faster times to awakening and discharge safely compared to midazolam.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Open liver resection necessitates a substantial upper abdominal inverted-L incision, resulting in severe pain and compromising patient recovery. Despite the efficacy of epidural analgesia in providing adequate postoperative analgesia, the potential epidural-related adverse effects should be carefully considered. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of continuous epidural analgesia and intravenous analgesia in open liver resection. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted, collecting data from patients who underwent open liver resection between 2007 and 2017. Propensity score matching was implemented to mitigate confounding variables, with patients being matched in a 1:1 ratio based on propensity scores. The primary outcome was the comparison of postoperative morphine consumption at 24, 48, and 72 hours between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, postoperative outcomes, and epidural-related adverse effects. RESULTS: A total of 612 patients were included, and after matching, there were 204 patients in each group. Opioid consumption at 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively was statistically lower in the epidural analgesia group compared to the intravenous analgesia group (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in pain scores (p = 0.422). Additionally, perioperative hypotension requiring treatment, as well as nausea and vomiting, were significantly higher in the epidural analgesia group compared to the intravenous analgesia group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Epidural analgesia is superior to intravenous morphine in terms of reducing postoperative opioid consumption within the initial 72 h after open liver resection. Nevertheless, perioperative hypotension, which necessitates management, should be approached with consideration and vigilance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ , NCT number: NCT06301932.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We explored the effects of dexmedetomidine (DEX) versus propofol on outcomes in critically ill patients and to assess whether these effects are dissimilar under different sedation depths. METHODS: A stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting cohort study was conducted using data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database from 2008 to 2019. Adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients who were administered DEX or propofol as the primary sedative were identified. Various statistical methods were used to evaluate the effects of DEX versus propofol on outcomes. RESULTS: Data on 107 and 2318 patients in DEX and propofol groups, respectively, were analyzed. Compared to the propofol group, the DEX group exhibited longer ventilator-free days on day 28 and a shorter ICU stay. Conversely, it showed null associations of DEX with the risk of 90-day ICU mortality, the odds of persistent organ dysfunction on day 14 and acute kidney injury, and the duration of vasopressor-free days on day 28. Subgroup analyses revealed that DEX positively impacted persistent organ dysfunction on day 14, ventilator-free days on day 28, and ICU stay in the subgroup with a Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) score of ≥-2. However, DEX negatively impacted 90-day ICU mortality, persistent organ dysfunction on day 14, and ventilator-free days on day 28 in the subgroup with a RASS score of <-2. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that, compared with propofol, DEX had beneficial and adverse impacts on certain ICU outcomes in critically ill patients, and these impacts appeared to depend on sedation depths.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: World Health Organization (WHO) grade 4 astrocytoma is a high-grade brain tumour in adults. Tumour treating fields (TTF) has been shown to improve overall survival (OS). Few studies have explored quality-of-life (QoL) in these patients. This study aims to assess the QoL of TTF patients and OS. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter study of adult patients diagnosed with WHO grade 4 astrocytoma from 2018 to 2023 receiving TTF for >1 month after completing standard therapy. A propensity-score matched comparison with a 1:2 ratio with historical control was performed for OS analysis. The patients completed European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-30/BN20 questionnaires before TTF and at 3-month interval. Primary outcomes included OS, and secondary outcomes included QoL and TTF-associated adverse effects at 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients were reviewed, with TTF patients (n=47, 33%) and propensity-score matched controls (n=94). The mean duration of TTF use was 10±8 months. The mean age of the TTF group was 54±13 years, and for the control group 52±13 years. Sixty percent (n=28) were male, similar to the control group with 71% (n=67) (P=0.16). Seventy-two percent of TTF patients had preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score ≥80, while controls had 70% (P=0.79). Five (11%) TTF patients and 8 (9%) controls were IDH1 mutant (P=0.70). Twenty (43%) TTF patients and 42 (45%) controls were O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter (pMGMT) methylated (P=0.81). Twenty-one (45%) of TTF patients and 55 (59%) of controls had gross total resection (P=0.72). After adjusting for independent predictors for OS, the median OS of the TTF group was 22.4 months [interquartile range (IQR): 18.6-26.5 months], significantly longer than the control group (17.2 months; IQR: 12.1-22.3 months) (log-rank test: P=0.01). Forty-seven TTF patients and 40 control patients completed EORTC questionnaires. There was no difference for EORTC functional and symptom scores between the TTF and control group [P=0.45, analysis of variance (ANOVA)] at 3 months. Thirty-two (67%) of TTF patients reported associated RTOG grade I scalp dermatitis. CONCLUSIONS: TTF for WHO grade 4 astrocytoma patients is an independent predictor for OS. QoL between the groups was similar, and overall QoL over time for TTF patients was not affected. TTF is a novel and effective outpatient treatment with minimal adverse effects.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that activated clotting time (ACT)-guided heparinization leads to better anticoagulation levels during noncardiac arterial procedures (NCAP) than a standardized bolus of 5000 IU. Better anticoagulation should potentially result in lower incidence of thrombo-embolic complications (TEC). Comparative investigations on clinical outcomes of these heparinization strategies are scarce. This study investigated clinical outcomes of ACT-guided heparinization with a starting dose of 100 IU/kg in comparison with a single standardized bolus of 5000 IU heparin during NCAP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analysis from a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing NCAP in 2 vascular centers was performed. Patients receiving ACT-guided heparinization were matched 1:1 with patients receiving 5000 IU heparin using propensity score matching (PSM). Primary outcomes were TEC, bleeding complications, and mortality within 30 days of procedure or during the same admission. RESULTS: A total of 759 patients (5000 IU heparin: 213 patients, ACT-guided heparinization: 546 patients) were included. Propensity score matching resulted in 209 patients in each treatment group. After PSM, the groups were comparable, with the exception of a higher prevalence of peripheral arterial disease in the ACT-guided heparinization group (103 patients, 49% vs 82 patients, 39%, p=0.039). The target ACT (>200 seconds) was reached in 198 patients (95%) of the ACT-guided group versus 71 patients (34%) of the 5000 IU group (p<0.001), indicating successful execution of the ACT-guided protocol. Incidence of TEC (13 patients, 6.2% vs 10 patients, 4.8%, p=0.52), mortality (3 patients, 1.4% vs 0 patients, p=0.25), and bleeding complications (32 patients, 15% vs 25 patients, 12%, p=0.32) did not differ between patients receiving ACT-guided heparinization and 5000 IU heparin. Protamine was administered in 118 patients (57%) in the ACT group versus 11 patients (5.3%) in the 5000 IU group (p<0.001), but did not influence incidence of TEC (17 patients, 5.9% vs 6 patients, 4.7%, p=0.61) or bleeding complications (34 patients, 12% vs 22 patients, 17%, p=0.14). CONCLUSION: No difference in TEC, bleeding complications, or mortality was found between ACT-guided heparinization and a single bolus of 5000 IU heparin during NCAP. CLINICAL IMPACT: Previous studies have shown that activated clotting time (ACT)-guided heparinization leads to better anticoagulation levels during non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAP) then a standardized bolus of 5000 IU. Comparative investigations on clinical outcomes are scarce. This study focussed on clinical outcomes of both protocols in NCAP in a propensity score matched cohort. Thrombo-embolic complications (TEC), bleeding complications and mortality within 30 days after NCAP or during the same admission were comparable between groups. Future studies should focus on optimizing ACT-guided protocols, specifically in patients with a high risk of TEC and bleeding complications.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the real-world impact of acupuncture on analgesics and healthcare resource utilization among breast cancer survivors. METHODS: From a United States (US) commercial claims database (25% random sample of IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus for Academics), we selected 18-63 years old malignant breast cancer survivors experiencing pain and ≥ 1 year removed from cancer diagnosis. Using the difference-in-difference technique, annualized changes in analgesics [prevalence, rates of short-term (< 30-day supply) and long-term (≥ 30-day supply) prescription fills] and healthcare resource utilization (healthcare costs, hospitalizations, and emergency department visits) were compared between acupuncture-treated and non-treated patients. RESULTS: Among 495 (3%) acupuncture-treated patients (median age: 55 years, stage 4: 12%, average 2.5 years post cancer diagnosis), most had commercial health insurance (92%) and experiencing musculoskeletal pain (98%). Twenty-seven percent were receiving antidepressants and 3% completed ≥ 2 long-term prescription fills of opioids. Prevalence of opioid usage reduced from 29 to 19% (P < 0.001) and NSAID usage reduced from 21 to 14% (P = 0.001) post-acupuncture. The relative prevalence of opioid and NSAID use decreased by 20% (P < 0.05) and 19% (P = 0.07), respectively, in the acupuncture-treated group compared to non-treated patients (n = 16,129). However, the reductions were not statistically significant after adjustment for confounding. Patients receiving acupuncture for pain (n = 264, 53%) were found with a relative decrease by 47% and 49% (both P < 0.05) in short-term opioid and NSAID fills compared to those treated for other conditions. High-utilization patients (≥ 10 acupuncture sessions, n = 178, 36%) were observed with a significant reduction in total healthcare costs (P < 0.001) unlike low-utilization patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although adjusted results did not show that patients receiving acupuncture had better outcomes than non-treated patients, exploratory analyses revealed that patients treated specifically for pain used fewer analgesics and those with high acupuncture utilization incurred lower healthcare costs. Further studies are required to examine acupuncture effectiveness in real-world settings.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes and toxicities of induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) vs. CCRT alone in patients with non-operable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2008 and 2022, 271 ESCC patients who received definitive CCRT based on intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)/volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were enrolled. Through a propensity score-matched (PSM) method, 71 patients receiving IC and CCRT were matched 1:1 to patients who received CCRT alone. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were applied to analyze survival and prognosis. RESULTS: The IC + CCRT group had no improvement in 5-year overall survival (OS) rate, recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate, and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rate (all p > 0.05) compared with the CCRT group. The 5-year OS rate (65.6% vs. 17.6% vs. 29.3%, p < 0.001), RFS rate (65.6% vs. 17.6% vs. 26.9%, p < 0.001), and DMFS rate (62.5% vs. 10.3% vs. 27.2%, p < 0.001) of the IC good responders were significantly higher than that of the IC poor responders and CCRT group. Multivariate analysis revealed that total radiotherapy time (≥ 49 days) and stage III/IV were independent predictive factors of OS, RFS, and DMFS. No significant differences were observed in the rates of grade 3-4 toxicities between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed the addition of IC to CCRT was not superior to CCRT in unselected ESCC patients, while IC responders could benefit from this regime without an increase in toxicities.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treatment guidelines were developed early in the pandemic when much about COVID-19 was unknown. Given the evolution of SARS-CoV-2, real-world data can provide clinicians with updated information. The objective of this analysis was to assess mortality risk in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 during the Omicron period receiving remdesivir+dexamethasone versus dexamethasone alone. METHODS: A large, multicenter US hospital database was used to identify hospitalized adult patients, with a primary discharge diagnosis of COVID-19 also flagged as "present on admission" treated with remdesivir+dexamethasone or dexamethasone alone from December 2021 to April 2023. Patients were matched 1:1 using propensity score matching and stratified by baseline oxygen requirements. Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess time to 14- and 28-day in-hospital all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 33 037 patients were matched, with most patients ≥65 years old (72%), White (78%), and non-Hispanic (84%). Remdesivir+dexamethasone was associated with lower mortality risk versus dexamethasone alone across all baseline oxygen requirements at 14 days (no supplemental oxygen charges: adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.79 [0.72-0.87], low flow oxygen: 0.70 [0.64-0.77], high flow oxygen/non-invasive ventilation: 0.69 [0.62-0.76], invasive mechanical ventilation/extracorporeal membrane oxygen (IMV/ECMO): 0.78 [0.64-0.94]), with similar results at 28 days. CONCLUSIONS: Remdesivir+dexamethasone was associated with a significant reduction in 14- and 28-day mortality compared to dexamethasone alone in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 across all levels of baseline respiratory support, including IMV/ECMO. However, the use of remdesivir+dexamethasone still has low clinical practice uptake. In addition, these data suggest a need to update the existing guidelines.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has consistently demonstrated lower patient satisfaction compared to total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, prior investigations failed to account for the patients' demographic characteristics. This study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes between TKA and THA while adjusting for patient background. METHODS: A total of 326 primary TKAs and 259 THAs conducted at a single center were assessed using Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores preoperatively and at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Notably, TKA patients exhibited advanced age and higher body mass index (BMI) than their THA counterparts. To mitigate the impact of these differences, we employed propensity score-matched data, adjusting for background characteristics such as age, gender, BMI, and diagnosis. RESULTS: THA consistently demonstrated significantly superior WOMAC total, pain, and stiffness scores compared to TKA at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Nevertheless, no statistically significant disparity in WOMAC physical function scores was observed between the two groups at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively in the matched data (3 months, p = 0.131; 1 year, p = 0.269). CONCLUSION: In contrast to earlier findings, our analysis of propensity score-matched data revealed no significant differences in WOMAC physical function scores between the TKA and THA groups at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively. The distinctive background factors observed in patients undergoing TKA and THA, notably advanced age and higher BMI, coupled with the delayed improvement timeline in TKA's WOMAC scores compared to that of THA, have the potential to impact patient-reported outcomes. Consequently, clinicians should be mindful of the potential impact of patient background on variations in patient-reported outcome measures following total joint arthroplasty.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Statins exert pleiotropic anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects in addition to their cholesterol-lowering properties. This study aimed to investigate whether statin use is associated with improved outcomes of sepsis. METHODS: Data from sepsis patients were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. Patients with a history of receiving prescriptions for statins (i.e. atorvastatin, lovastatin, pitavastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, or simvastatin) were matched with non-users using propensity-score matching, to balance confounding factors between the groups. Mendelian Randomization (MR) analyses were performed using information from the UK Biobank dataset to explore the potential causal link between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and LDL-C lowering effects via genetically inhibiting ß­hydroxy ß-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase and the susceptibility to sepsis, and the sepsis-related 28-day mortality. MAIN RESULTS: 90-day mortality rate was lower among the 10,323 statin users when compared to matched non-users [hazard ratio (HR): 0.612, 95 % CI: 0.571 to 0.655]. In-hospital mortality was also lower for statin users compared to non-users (11.3% vs. 17.8 %, p < 0.0001, HR: 0.590, 95 % CI: 0.548 to 0.634). Statin use was associated with better outcome in all investigated subpopulations apart from patients with severe liver disease. MR analyses further pointed toward pleiotropic effects beyond lipid-lowering effects of statins on sepsis-related outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Statin use is associated with improved outcomes following sepsis-related ICU admission, most likely from its pleiotropic properties, characterized by lower 90-day and in-hospital mortality among statin users.

RESUMEN

Bladder cancer (BCa) with variant histology (VH) is associated with an increased risk of recurrence and progression, as well as worse survival. However, the available literature does not provide the prognostic value of VH based on its tumor burden in non-muscle invasive BCa (NMIBC). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the prognosis of VH in NMIBC with low-tumor volume compared with conventional urothelial carcinoma (UC) with a similar tumor burden. The present single-center study analyzed patients diagnosed with NMIBC and retrospectively characterized them based on their VH status. Propensity scores for VH status were calculated to match patients with VH with those with conventional UC (1:3). The VH group was further divided into two subgroups based on pathological aggressiveness: Aggressive and highly aggressive variants. Oncological outcomes were compared among the three groups. Among the 494 patients with NMIBC, 60 (12.1%) had VH. Patients with VH had a higher tumor stage and grade and more multiple tumors (all P<0.05). In the matched cohort, >80% had tumors <3 cm, and >65% had solitary tumors. During a median follow-up of 42.5 months (range, 4.0-122.0 months), 35.1% (85/240) experienced recurrence and 5.4% (13/240) progressed to muscle-invasive disease. Prognosis did not differ between patients with aggressive or highly aggressive variants and those with conventional UC, including 5-year recurrence-free and pathologic progression-free survival (log-rank, P=0.510 and 0.257, respectively). Intravesical Bacillus Galmette-Guerin was the only factor associated with reduced recurrence (P<0.001). In conclusion, NMIBC with low-tumor burden and VH have similar oncologic outcomes to conventional UC with a similar tumor burden, indicating that bladder-sparing methods currently used for high-risk conventional NMIBC may be effective for managing low-tumor burden NMIBC with VH.

RESUMEN

Background: Re-resection is recommended for patients with incidental gallbladder carcinoma (iGBC) at T1b stage and above. It is unclear whether continuation of laparoscopic re-resection (CLR) for patients with intraoperatively detected iGBC (IDiGBC) is more beneficial to short- and long-term clinical outcomes than with conversion to radical extensive-resection (RER). Methods: This single-centre, retrospective cohort study of patients with iGBC was conducted between June 2006 and August 2021. Patients who underwent immediate reresection for T1b or higher ID-iGBC were enrolled. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match the two groups (CLR and RER) of patients, and differences in clinical outcomes before and after matching were analyzed. Result: A total of 102 patients with ID-iGBC were included in this study. 58 patients underwent CLR, and 44 underwent RER. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 56 patients were matched to all baselines. Patients in the RER group had a lower total postoperative complication rate, lower pulmonary infection rate, and shorter operation time than those in the CLR group did. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the overall survival rate of patients who underwent CLR was significantly lower than that of patients who underwent RER. Multivariate analysis showed that CLR, advanced T stage, lymph node positivity, and the occurrence of postoperative ascites were adverse prognostic factors for the overall survival of patients. Conclusion: Patients with ID-iGBC who underwent RER had fewer perioperative complications and a better prognosis than those who underwent CLR. For patients with ID-iGBC, conversion to radical extensive-resection appears to be a better choice.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis is conventionally performed using the McKeown esophagectomy. However, an optimal anastomotic technique has not yet been established. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of triangular anastomosis (TA) and totally mechanical Collard anastomosis (TMCA) for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis during minimally invasive esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction through the retrosternal route. METHODS: In this matched- cohort study, 117 patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy between 2019 and 2024 were divided into TA and TMCA groups. The TA technique was performed between September 2019 and December 2021, and the TMCA technique was performed between January 2022 and January 2024. We then compared the surgical outcomes and postoperative complications (pneumonia, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, anastomotic leakage, and stricture) between the two groups. RESULTS: Propensity score matching revealed that 40 patients were included in both the TA and TMCA groups. The rates of pneumonia, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, and anastomotic leakage were not significantly different between the two groups. However, the rate of anastomotic stricture was lower in the TMCA than in the TA group (2.5% vs. 27.5%, respectively, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the TA technique, the TMCA technique reduced the rate of anastomotic stricture when performing cervical esophagogastric anastomosis during minimally invasive esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction through the retrosternal route.

RESUMEN

Purpose: The study aimed to develop a nomogram model for individual prognosis prediction in patients with hormone receptors positive (HR+) mucinous breast carcinoma (MBC) and assess the value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in this context. Methods: A total of 6,850 HR+ MBC patients from the SEER database were identified and randomly (in a 7:3 ratio) divided into training cohorts and internal validation cohorts. 77 patients were enrolled from the Chongqing University Cancer Hospital as the external validation cohort. Independent risk factors affecting overall survival (OS) were selected using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis, and nomogram models were constructed and validated. A propensity score matching (PSM) approach was used in the exploration of the value of NAC versus adjuvant chemocherapy (AC) for long-term prognosis in HR+ MBC patients. Results: Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed 8 independent prognostic factors: age, race, marital status, tumor size, distant metastasis, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. The constructed nomogram model based on these 8 factors exhibited good consistency and accuracy. In the training group, internal validation group and external validation group, the high-risk groups demonstrated worse OS (p<0.0001). Subgroup analysis revealed that NAC had no impact on OS (p = 0.18), or cancer specific survival (CSS) (p = 0.26) compared with AC after PSM. Conclusions: The established nomogram model provides an accurate prognostic prediction for HR+ MBC patients. NAC does not confer long-term survival benefits compared to AC. These findings provide a novel approach for prognostic prediction and clinical practice.

RESUMEN

Introduction: The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of vitamin D supplementation on the muscle strength of the elderly. Methods: This retrospective, propensity score-matched study included 160 middle-aged and elderly individuals from a community in Beijing, China. The control group (n=110) received health education and lifestyle guidance, while the intervention group (n=50) was given oral vitamin D supplementation in addition to health education and lifestyle guidance. All participants underwent laboratory tests, muscle function, and physical function at baseline and follow-up. Results: In the propensity score-matched cohort of 41 patients per group, the levels of serum calcium and 25-hydroxyvitamin D in both groups were improved significantly by the end of the study (p<0.05), with the intervention group showing a more significant improvement. The muscle strength of the left lower limb in the intervention group significantly increased after the intervention (p<0.05). The results also showed that the grip strength and pinch strength of the patients in both groups increased after the intervention, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p<0.05). Discussion: The findings of this study suggest that vitamin D supplementation, in conjunction with lifestyle guidance and health education, is beneficial for enhancing the upper and lower limb strength of patients.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Gardening has been found to increase vegetable intake and reduce BMI; this suggests that it may improve diets by lowering inflammatory content. The goal of this study goal was to evaluate the effect of gardening on Dietary Inflammatory Index scores. Methods: Longitudinal data were collected annually between 2015 and 2018 from adults in low-income, urban neighborhoods of Cleveland and Columbus, Ohio. The authors measured the association between gardening and Dietary Inflammatory Index in the full data set using multivariable mixed-effect models with a random intercept for participant (Model 1; n=409). To further explore potential causation, the author used propensity score analyses in a subset of the data by building a 1-to-1 matched model (Model 2; n=339). Results: Of 409 adults, 30.3% were gardeners with Dietary Inflammatory Index scores ranging from -6.228 to +6.225. Participating in gardening was associated with lower Dietary Inflammatory Index scores in the mixed-effects model (-0.45; 95% CI= -0.85, -0.04; Model 1) and the 1-to-1 matched model (-0.77; 95% CI= -1.40, -0.14; Model 2). Conclusions: The analyses indicate that gardeners had lower Dietary Inflammatory Index scores than nongardeners, implying lower diet-driven inflammation. These findings highlight the potential for a causal relationship between gardening and Dietary Inflammatory Index, which should be confirmed in future studies. If this relationship is validated, strategies to increase gardening may be worth testing as primary prevention tools for diet-driven chronic disease.

RESUMEN

The innovative use of real-world data (RWD) can answer questions that cannot be addressed using data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs). While the sponsors of RCTs have a central database containing all individual patient data (IPD) collected from trials, analysts of RWD face a challenge: regulations on patient privacy make access to IPD from all regions logistically prohibitive. In this research, we propose a double inverse probability weighting (DIPW) approach for the analysis sponsor to estimate the population average treatment effect (PATE) for a target population without the need to access IPD. One probability weighting is for achieving comparable distributions in confounders across treatment groups; another probability weighting is for generalizing the result from a subpopulation of patients who have data on the endpoint to the whole target population. The likelihood expressions for propensity scores and the DIPW estimator of the PATE can be written to only rely on regional summary statistics that do not require IPD. Our approach hinges upon the positivity and conditional independency assumptions, prerequisites to most RWD analysis approaches. Simulations are conducted to compare the performances of the proposed method against a modified meta-analysis and a regular meta-analysis.

RESUMEN

Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) use before ovarian cancer diagnosis has been associated with improved survival but whether the association varies by type and duration of use is inconclusive; data on MHT use after treatment, particularly the effect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), are scarce. We investigated survival in women with ovarian cancer according to MHT use before and after diagnosis, and post-treatment MHT use and its association with HRQOL in a prospective nationwide cohort in Australia. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and propensity scores to reduce confounding by indication. Among 690 women who were peri-/postmenopausal at diagnosis, pre-diagnosis MHT use was associated with a significant 26% improvement in ovarian cancer-specific survival; with a slightly stronger association for high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC, HR = 0.69, 95%CI 0.54-0.87). The associations did not differ by recency or duration of use. Among women with HGSC who were pre-/perimenopausal or aged ≤55 years at diagnosis (n = 259), MHT use after treatment was not associated with a difference in survival (HR = 1.04, 95%CI 0.48-2.22). Compared to non-users, women who started MHT after treatment reported poorer overall HRQOL before starting MHT and this difference was still seen 1-3 months after starting MHT. In conclusion, pre-diagnosis MHT use was associated with improved survival, particularly in HGSC. Among women ≤55 years, use of MHT following treatment was not associated with poorer survival for HGSC. Further large-scale studies are needed to understand menopause-specific HRQOL issues in ovarian cancer.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The role of laparoscopy in the treatment and diagnosis of penetrating thoraco-abdominal injury has been established. However, there is no clear consensus on the role of laparoscopy in blunt injury due to numerous reasons, such as concerns of missed injury and technical problems in treating various abdominal organs. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of laparoscopy and evaluate its safety in managing blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma. METHODS: The medical records and Korean Trauma Data Base (KTDB) of patients who underwent abdominal surgery from January 2018 to December 2022 at a single level I center were collected. Patients were classified into a laparoscopy group and a laparotomy group. The laparoscopy groups were matched 1:1 with the laparotomy group by using propensity score matching (PSM). Patient demographics, injured organ and its grade, operative procedure, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 128 patients were included. There was no significant imbalance in demographics between the two groups except sex. Injured organ and its grade showed no significant differences between the two groups except for the incidence of omentum. Small bowel and mesenteric repair were performed most often in both groups. Splenectomy, pancreatic surgery, duodenectomy, and liver resection were performed exclusively in the laparotomy group. Severe postoperative complication rate (3% vs. 20%: p = 0.004), length of stay in ICU (3.3 ± 3.2 days vs. 4.6 ± 3.7; p = 0.046), and operation time (93.9 ± 47.7 min vs. 112.8 ± 57.7; p = 0.046) were significantly lower in the laparoscopy group. The conversion rate was about 16%. There was no missed injury. CONCLUSIONS: In hemodynamically stable abdominal trauma patients who sustained penetrating or blunt injury, laparoscopy is feasible and safe as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality in selected cohort of abdominal trauma.