RESUMEN
PURPOSE: There are reports that performing lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in a prone, single position (single-prone LLIF) can be done safely in the prone position because the retroperitoneal organs reflect anteriorly with gravity. However, only a few study has investigated the safety of single-prone LLIF and retroperitoneal organ positioning in the prone position. We aimed to investigate the positioning of retroperitoneal organs in the prone position and evaluate the safety of single-prone LLIF surgery. METHODS: A total of 94 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The anatomical positioning of the retroperitoneal organs was evaluated by CT in the preoperative supine and intraoperative prone position. The distances from the centre line of the intervertebral body to the organs including aorta, inferior vena cava, ascending and descending colons, and bilateral kidneys were measured for the lumbar spine. An "at risk" zone was defined as distance less than 10 mm anterior from the centre line of the intervertebral body. RESULTS: Compared to supine preoperative CTs, bilateral kidneys at the L2/3 level as well as the bilateral colons at the L3/4 level had statistically significant ventral shift with prone positioning. The proportion of retroperitoneal organs within the at-risk zone ranged from 29.6 to 88.6% in the prone position. CONCLUSIONS: The retroperitoneal organs shifted ventrally with prone positioning. However, the amount of shift was not large enough to avoid risk for organ injuries and substantial proportion of patients had organs within the cage insertion corridor. Careful preoperative planning is warranted when considering single-prone LLIF.
Asunto(s)
Posicionamiento del Paciente , Fusión Vertebral , Humanos , Posición Prona , Estudios Retrospectivos , Espacio Retroperitoneal/diagnóstico por imagen , Espacio Retroperitoneal/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugíaRESUMEN
The prone lateral transpsoas approach for lumbar interbody fusion and posterior instrumentation enables a large surface area implant without disruption of the posterior spine musculature from a single position.1,2 The addition of virtual live fluoroscopy instrument tracking navigation to surgery provides multiple benefits, including a reduction in patient and surgeon radiation exposure, highly accurate and dynamic spatial tool localization, and flexible equipment and patient positioning.3,4 Here, we highlight the use of virtual live fluoroscopy in prone lateral spine surgery. A 75-year-old man presented with prior L3-L5 fusion and progressive lower extremity pain and weakness. Using the described techniques, the patient underwent a lateral retroperitoneal interbody fusion and posterior instrumentation at L2-L3. The operation proceeded without complication, and the patient reported improved ambulation at 6-week follow-up. The prone lateral transpsoas approach and minimally invasive posterior instrumentation for lumbar interbody fusion permits effective fusion without significant posterior muscle disruption from a single position. The integration of virtual live fluoroscopy enables real-time instrument tracking throughout the minimally invasive case, with reductions in patient and surgeon radiation exposure. Video 1 depicts the use and benefits of this technology in lateral spine surgery. Compared with computed tomography-guided navigation, virtual live fluoroscopy technology enables rapid remapping to iatrogenic anatomic changes for more fluid progression through the operation.5 Virtual live fluoroscopy instrument tracking is a valuable tool that increases the safety and efficiency of single-position lateral spine surgery.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Fusión Vertebral , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Fluoroscopía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To describe a comprehensive setting of the different alternatives for performing a single position fusion surgery based on the opinion of leading surgeons in the field. METHODS: Between April and May of 2021, a specifically designed two round survey was distributed by mail to a group of leaders in the field of Single Position Surgery (SPS). The questionnaire included a variety of domains which were focused on highlighting tips and recommendations regarding improving the efficiency of the performance of SPS. This includes operation room setting, positioning, use of technology, approach, retractors specific details, intraoperative neuromonitoring and tips for inserting percutaneous pedicle screws in the lateral position. It asked questions focused on Lateral Single Position Surgery (LSPS), Lateral ALIF (LA) and Prone Lateral Surgery (PLS). Strong agreement was defined as an agreement of more than 80% of surgeons for each specific question. The number of surgeries performed in SPS by each surgeon was used as an indirect element to aid in exhibiting the expertise of the surgeons being surveyed. RESULTS: Twenty-four surgeons completed both rounds of the questionnaire. Moderate or strong agreement was found for more than 50% of the items. A definition for Single Position Surgery and a step-by-step recommendation workflow was built to create a better understanding of surgeons who are starting the learning curve in this technique. CONCLUSION: A recommendation of the setting for performing single position fusion surgery procedure (LSPS, LA and PLS) was developed based on a survey of leaders in the field.