RESUMEN
Background: The advent of novel monitoring technologies has dramatically increased the use of ambulatory electrocardiography (AECG) devices. However, few studies have conducted detailed large-scale investigations on the incidence of arrhythmias over 24â h, especially ectopy, in healthy individuals over a wide age range. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the incidence of arrhythmias detected using AECG and associated factors, in healthy individuals, over a wide age range. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we performed AECG on 365 healthy volunteers (median [interquartile range]: 48 [36, 67], 20-89 years, 165 men) under free-running conditions for 24â h. Ultrasonic echocardiography and heart rate variability analysis were performed to explore the factors associated with the incidence of arrhythmias. Results: The 97.5th percentile of single ventricular ectopy (VE) was 149/day, 254/day, and 1,682/day in the 20-39-, 40-59- and 60-89-year age groups, respectively; that of single supraventricular ectopy (SVE) was 131/day, 232/day, and 1,063/day, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that aging was the only independent significant factor influencing the frequency of VE (ß = 0.207, P = 0.001). Age (ß = 0.642, P < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) (ß = -0.112, P = 0.009), and the root mean square of successive differences in RR intervals (ß = 0.097, P = 0.035) were factors significantly associated with SVE frequency. Conclusions: Age-specific reference intervals of VE and SVE in a large population of healthy participants over a wide age range were generated. VE and SVE increased with age; SVE was influenced by BMI and the aging-induced decrease in parasympathetic tone activity.
RESUMEN
AIMS: This study aimed to examine the clinical benefits of targeted ablation of all Premature ventricular complex (PVC) morphologies vs. predominant PVC only. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 171 consecutive patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and ≥2 PVC morphology with high burden (>10%/day) undergoing their first ablation procedure were included in the analysis. At the initial procedure, prevalent PVC alone was ablated in the majority. However, at the redo, all PVC morphologies were targeted for ablation. : At the first procedure, 152 (89%) patients received ablation of the dominant PVC only. In the remaining 19 (11%) patients, all PVC morphologies were ablated. At two years, high PVC burden was detected in 89 (52%) patients. Repeat procedure was performed in 78 of 89, where all PVC morphologies were ablated. At 5 years after the repeat procedure, 71 (91%) had PVC burden of <5% [3.8 ± 1.1% vs. 15.4 ± 4.3% in successful vs. failed subjects (P < 0.001)]. In patients with low PVC burden after the initial procedure, LVEF improved from 37.5% to 41.6% [mean difference (MD): 3.39 ± 2.9%, P < 0.001], whereas a reduction in LVEF from 39.8% to 34.5% (MD: 6.45 ± 4.7%, P < 0.001) was recorded in patients with high PVC burden. One year after the repeat procedure, LVEF improved from 36.2% to 41.7% (MD: 5.5 ± 4.3%, P < 0.001) in patients with successful ablation. CONCLUSION: In this observational series, ablation of all PVC morphologies was associated with significantly lower PVC burden and improvement of LVEF at long-term follow-up, compared with ablation of the dominant morphology only.
Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda , Complejos Prematuros Ventriculares , Humanos , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Función Ventricular Izquierda/fisiología , Complejos Prematuros Ventriculares/diagnóstico , Complejos Prematuros Ventriculares/cirugía , Complejos Prematuros Ventriculares/complicacionesRESUMEN
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Patients with kidney failure treated with maintenance dialysis experience a high rate of mortality, in part due to sudden cardiac death caused by arrhythmias. The prevalence of arrhythmias, including the subset that are clinically significant, is not well known. This study sought to estimate the prevalence of arrhythmias, characterize the pattern of arrhythmic events in relation to dialysis treatments, and identify associated clinical characteristics. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 152 patients with kidney failure treated with maintenance dialysis in Denmark. EXPOSURES: Dialysis treatment; clinical characteristics; cardiac output and preload defined using echocardiography. OUTCOMES: Prevalence and pattern of arrhythmias on 48-hour Holter monitoring; odds ratios for arrhythmias. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Descriptive analysis of the prevalence of arrhythmias. Pattern of arrhythmias described using a repeated-measures negative binomial regression model. Associations between clinical characteristics and echocardiographic findings with arrhythmias were assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 152 patients studied, 83.6% were treated with in-center dialysis; 10.5%, with home hemodialysis; and 5.9%, with peritoneal dialysis. Premature atrial and ventricular complexes were seen in nearly all patients and 41% had paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Clinically significant arrhythmias included persistent atrial fibrillation observed among 8.6% of patients, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation among 3.9%, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia among 19.7%, bradycardia among 4.6%, advanced second-degree atrioventricular block among 1.3%, and third-degree atrioventricular block among 2.6%. Premature ventricular complexes were more common on dialysis days, while tachyarrhythmias were more often observed during dialysis and in the immediate postdialytic period. Older age (OR per 10 years older, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.15-2.03; P=0.003), elevated preload (OR, 4.02; 95% CI, 1.05-15.35; P=0.04), and lower cardiac output (OR per 1L/min greater, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-1.00; P=0.05) were independently associated with clinically significant arrhythmias. LIMITATIONS: Arrhythmia monitoring limited to 48 hours; small sample size; heterogeneous nature of the population, risk for residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS: Arrhythmias, including clinically significant abnormal rhythms, were common. Tachyarrhythmias were more frequent during dialysis and the immediate postdialytic period. The relevance of these findings to clinical outcomes requires additional study.