RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Treponemal tests provide advantage of better detection during early, late and latent stages of syphilis with equal or higher sensitivity & specificity in comparison to non-treponemal tests. The objective of the present study was to analyse the level of concordance between treponemal and non-treponemal tests for donor screening and to correlate them with donor history. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of syphilis screening by treponemal (Chemiluminescence & TPHA) and non-treponemal tests (RPR) was done and donor history for high-risk behaviour and factors associated with false positivity were collected from post-donation counselling and collected data was coded and analysed. RESULTS: Amongst the 12,000 donors screened, reactivity rate by RPR, TPHA and Chemiluminescence was 0.45%, 0.8% and 1.17% respectively. There was discordance of 62% and 32% for reactive results by RPR and TPHA respectively when compared with Chemiluminescence. History of high-risk behaviour was present in â¼ 50% and 15% of donors with discordant results by RPR and TPHA respectively. Of 34 donors who were reactive only by Chemiluminescence and were followed up, 15% had history of high-risk behaviour and 56% had factors associated with false reactivity. CONCLUSION: Treponemal tests showed high syphilis reactivity amongst blood donors as compared to non-treponemal tests most likely due to their ability to detect early, late and latent syphilis cases. This may confer added transfusion safety in centres dependent on replacement donors without NAT testing by identifying donors with high-risk history with negligible increase in discard rate due to false reactivity.
Asunto(s)
Donantes de Sangre/estadística & datos numéricos , Selección de Donante/métodos , Sífilis/terapia , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sífilis/sangre , Atención Terciaria de SaludRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Post-donation counselling informs donors of unusual test results. Timely notification and counselling regarding their Transfusion Transmitted Infection (TTI) status is necessary for early clinical intervention in the donor and reducing risk of transmission. We share our experience with respect to Hepatitis B (HBV) and Hepatitis C (HCV) positive donors who were counselled and followed-up for clinical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was prospective 2-year study in TTI positive blood donors. Confirmed positive HBV/ HCV donors were notified to attend the donor-clinic or to visit local hepatologist for further management. At donor clinic, donor's immediate emotional response was observed; donors were offered contact-testing, associated risk factors were noted, counselled, referred to hepatologist, treated and followed-up for clinical outcome. RESULTS: Of 481 donors (0.91%) confirmed positives, 351 were contacted telephonically; 280 promised to attend donor clinic and 71 were referred to their local hepatologist. 145 donors attended the donor clinic, eventually. Most common immediate emotional response noted were 'feeling of fear' (55.2%) and 'disbelief' (35.2%). Most common associated risk factor was history of medical treatment/ injections without knowledge of sterilisation. Five donors availed contact testing and four (spouses in all four cases) came out positive. Of 98 donors contacted post-counselling; 89 went to hepatologist. No medication was advised to seven donors (low viral load), 59 donors completed treatment course and 23 donors were undergoing treatment at time of follow-up. Nine donors opted for alternative treatment or "no treatment". CONCLUSION: Donor-clinic proved beneficial to substantial number of donors and their families.