RESUMEN
Introduction: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy approved for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). In the phase 3 trial, CARTITUDE-4 (NCT04181827), cilta-cel demonstrated improved efficacy vs. standard of care (SOC; daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone [DPd] or pomalidomide plus bortezomib and dexamethasone [PVd]) with a ≥ complete response (≥CR) rate of 73.1% vs. 21.8%. Methods: A cost-per-responder model was developed to assess the value of cilta-cel and SOC (87% DPd and 13% PVd) based on the CARTITUDE-4 trial data from a US mixed payer perspective (76.7% commercial, 23.3% Medicare). The model was developed using progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and ≥CR endpoints from CARTITUDE-4 over a period of 25.4 months. Inpatient stays, outpatient visits, drug acquisition, administration, and monitoring costs were included. The base-case model assumed an inpatient setting for each cilta-cel infusion; another scenario included 30% outpatient and 70% inpatient infusions. Costs of managing grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) and grade 1-4 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity were included. Subsequent therapy costs were incurred after disease progression; terminal care costs were considered upon death events. Outcomes included total cost per treated patient, total cost per complete responder, and cost per month in PFS between cilta-cel and SOC. Costs were adjusted to 2024 US dollars. Results: Total cost per treated patient, total cost per complete responder, and total cost per month in PFS were estimated at $704,641, $963,941, and $30,978 for cilta-cel, respectively, and $840,730, $3,856,559, and $42,520 for SOC over the 25.4-month period. Cost drivers included treatment acquisition costs before progression and subsequent treatment costs ($451,318 and $111,637 for cilta-cel; $529,795 and $265,167 for SOC). A scenario analysis in which 30% of patients received an outpatient infusion (assuming the same payer mix) showed a lower cost per complete responder for cilta-cel ($956,523) than those with an infusion in the inpatient setting exclusively. Discussion: This analysis estimated that cost per treated patient, cost per complete responder, and cost per month in PFS for cilta-cel were remarkably lower than for DPd or PVd, highlighting the substantial clinical and economic benefit of cilta-cel for patients with RRMM.
Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Lenalidomida , Mieloma Múltiple , Talidomida , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/economía , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Talidomida/uso terapéutico , Talidomida/economía , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/uso terapéutico , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/inmunología , Masculino , Femenino , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pomalidomide-based regimens are the cornerstone of treatment for relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). Despite the high incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in RRMM, individuals with advanced CKD have been excluded from phase II/III RCTs, creating a gap in our understanding of the effects of pomalidomide use in patients with RRMM complicated with advanced CKD. We undertook a cohort to study to understand the efficacy safety of pomalidomide-based regimens among patients with CKD using real-world data. METHODS: Population-based, cohort study of patients ≥ 18 years with RRMM treated with pomalidomide in Ontario, Canada. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were time-to-major adverse kidney events (MAKE), time-to-next treatment, kidney response and safety. RESULTS: Total 748 patients with RRMM utilizing pomalidomide were included; 440 had preserved kidney function, 210 had moderate CKD (eGFR 30-59 mL/min/1.73m2), and 98 had advanced CKD (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m2). Mean age was 70.2 years, 43.3% were women. Patients with advanced CKD had a higher risk of all-cause mortality compared to the preserved kidney function group (aHR 1.37, 95% CI 1.06, 1.78). MAKE was higher in advanced CKD (aHR 1.70, 95% CI 1.03, 2.35). Kidney response was similar between moderate and severe CKD groups (aOR 1.04, 95%, CI 0.56-1.90). Safety outcomes were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with advanced CKD and RRMM on pomalidomide-based regimens exhibited reduced survival and a higher risk for MAKE. However, the probability of experiencing some degree of kidney recovery is 50% in both moderate and severe CKD, with comparable safety outcomes.
RESUMEN
Novel approaches for pest control are essential to ensure a sufficient food supply for the growing global population. The development of new insecticides must meet rigorous regulatory requirements for safety and address the resistance issues of existing insecticides. Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs), originally developed for human diseases, show promise in agriculture. They offer innovative insecticides tailored to overcome resistance, opening avenues for agricultural applications. In this study, we developed small-molecule degraders by incorporating pomalidomide as an E3 ligand. These degraders were linked to a ligand (spirotetratmat enol) targeting the ACC protein through a flexible chain, aiming to achieve the efficient control of insects. Compounds 9a-9d were designed, synthesized, and evaluated for biological activities and mechanisms. Among them, 9b exhibited superior potency against Aphis craccivora (LC50 = 107.8 µg mL-1) compared to others and effectively degraded ACC proteins through the ubiquitin-proteasome system. These findings highlight the potential of utilizing PROTAC-based approaches in the development of insecticides for efficient pest control.
Asunto(s)
Acetil-CoA Carboxilasa , Insecticidas , Proteolisis , Insecticidas/química , Insecticidas/farmacología , Animales , Acetil-CoA Carboxilasa/metabolismo , Acetil-CoA Carboxilasa/genética , Acetil-CoA Carboxilasa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Acetil-CoA Carboxilasa/química , Proteínas de Insectos/metabolismo , Proteínas de Insectos/genética , Proteínas de Insectos/química , Diseño de Fármacos , Talidomida/química , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Talidomida/farmacologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The treatment landscape of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is rapidly evolving in Taiwan. The present study aimed to assess the treatment patterns among RRMM patients in Taiwan. METHODS: This retrospective, chart review-based, non-interventional study collected data on RRMM patients (≥20 years old) receiving pomalidomide-based treatment between January 2017 and December 2020 across five sites in Taiwan. RESULTS: Median age of the study population was 65.6 years. Approximately 75% patients received a doublet regimen and 25% were on a triplet regimen. Disease progression was the most common cause for switching to pomalidomide-based treatments in doublet (71.2%) and triplet (58.3%) groups. Patients in doublet and triplet groups (>80%) received 4 mg pomalidomide as a starting dose. Overall response rate (ORR: 31.5% and 45.8%) and median progression-free survival (PFS: 4.7 and 6.8 months) were reported in the doublet and triplet regimen. Doublet regimen was discontinued mainly due to disease progression or death (78.1%); however, triplet regimen patients mainly terminated their treatment due to reimbursement limitations (29.2%). Healthcare resource utilization (HRU) was comparable between doublet and triplet groups. CONCLUSION: In Taiwan, half of RRMM patients received pomalidomide-based triplet regimens. Triplet regimens showed a trend towards better outcomes with longer PFS and higher response rates compared to doublets. Notably, the duration of triplet use is influenced by reimbursement limitations. This study provides insight into RRMM treatment patterns in Taiwan and the findings suggest that triplet regimens may be a better alternative than doublet regimens.
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Talidomida , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Talidomida/uso terapéutico , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Taiwán , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
Despite recent advances in the treatment of cancer, the issue of therapy resistance remains one of the most significant challenges in the field. In this context, signaling molecules, such as cytokines have emerged as promising targets for drug discovery. Examples of cytokines include macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and its closely related analogue D-dopachrome tautomerase (D-DT). In this study we aim to develop a new chemical class of D-DT binders and subsequently create a dual-targeted inhibitor that can potentially trigger D-DT degradation via the Proteolysis Targeting Chimera (PROTAC) technology. Here we describe the synthesis of a novel library of 1,2,3-triazoles targeting D-DT. The most potent derivative 19c (IC50 of 0.5 ± 0.04 µM with high selectivity toward D-DT) was attached to a cereblon (CRBN) ligand through aliphatic amides, which were synthesized by a remarkably convenient and effective solvent-free reaction. Enzyme inhibition experiments led to the discovery of the compound 10d, which exhibited moderate inhibitory potency (IC50 of 5.9 ± 0.7 µM), but unfortunately demonstrated no activity in D-DT degradation experiments. In conclusion, this study offers valuable insight into the SAR of D-DT inhibition, paving the way for the development of novel molecules as tools to study D-DT functions in tumor proliferation and, ultimately, new therapeutics for cancer treatment.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores Enzimáticos , Oxidorreductasas Intramoleculares , Triazoles , Triazoles/farmacología , Triazoles/química , Triazoles/síntesis química , Oxidorreductasas Intramoleculares/antagonistas & inhibidores , Oxidorreductasas Intramoleculares/metabolismo , Humanos , Relación Estructura-Actividad , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/farmacología , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/síntesis química , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/química , Estructura Molecular , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antineoplásicos/síntesis química , Antineoplásicos/químicaRESUMEN
Patients with high-risk multiple-myeloma (HRMM) and ultra-high-risk multiple-myeloma (UHRMM) show rapid disease progression and shorter survival compared to those with standard-risk multiple-myeloma (SRMM). Lenalidomide maintenance after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has shown inferior outcomes in this subgroup compared to SRMM, and there is an unmet need for improved post-ASCT therapy. This retrospective study, from September 2016 to March 2023, assesses elotuzumab combined with lenalidomide or pomalidomide and dexamethasone (ERd or EPd) as consolidation therapy post-ASCT for HRMM and UHRMM patients. HRMM (1 cytogenetic abnormality) and UHRMM (≥2 cytogenetic abnormalities) were defined using IMWG and mSMART criteria. Among 75 patients (median age: 64 years), 59 received ERd and 16 EPd. Median progression-free survival was 29.3 months for all patients, 32.7 months for HRMM, and 21.9 months for UHRMM. Elotuzumab plus an IMiD consolidation therapy post-ASCT demonstrated promising efficacy compared to other studies, with a fixed duration and reduced lenalidomide-related toxicity.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMiDs) thalidomide, lenalidomide and pomalidomide may exhibit therapeutic efficacy in the prostate. In lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), voiding and storage disorders may arise from benign prostate hyperplasia, or overactive bladder. While current therapeutic options target smooth muscle contraction or cell proliferation, side effects are mostly cardiovascular. Therefore, we investigated effects of IMiDs on human detrusor and porcine artery smooth muscle contraction, and growth-related functions in detrusor smooth muscle cells (HBdSMC). METHODS: Cell viability was assessed by CCK8, and apoptosis and cell death by flow cytometry in cultured HBdSMC. Contractions of human detrusor tissues and porcine interlobar and coronary arteries were induced by contractile agonists, or electric field stimulation (EFS) in the presence or absence of an IMID using an organ bath. Proliferation was assessed by EdU assay and colony formation, cytoskeletal organization by phalloidin staining, RESULTS: Depending on tissue type, IMiDs inhibited cholinergic contractions with varying degree, up to 50â¯%, while non-cholinergic contractions were inhibited up to 80â¯% and 60â¯% for U46619 and endothelin-1, respectively, and EFS-induced contractions up to 75â¯%. IMiDs reduced viable HBdSM cells in a time-dependent manner. Correspondingly, proliferation was reduced, without showing pro-apoptotic effects. In parallel, IMiDs induced cytoskeletal disorganization. CONCLUSIONS: IMiDs exhibit regulatory functions in various smooth muscle-rich tissues, and of cell proliferation in the lower urinary tract. This points to a novel drug class effect for IMiDs, in which the molecular mechanisms of action of IMiDs merit further consideration for the application in LUTS.
Asunto(s)
Proliferación Celular , Contracción Muscular , Miocitos del Músculo Liso , Vejiga Urinaria , Humanos , Contracción Muscular/efectos de los fármacos , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Vejiga Urinaria/efectos de los fármacos , Miocitos del Músculo Liso/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Porcinos , Masculino , Talidomida/farmacología , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Músculo Liso/efectos de los fármacos , Agentes Inmunomoduladores/farmacología , Células Cultivadas , Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Supervivencia Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Lenalidomida/farmacologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Central nervous system involvement in chronic lymphocytic leukemia rarely occurs, and there is no standard therapy for central nervous system involvement in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. This article aims to analyze the diagnosis and treatment of central nervous system involvement in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. CASE PRESENTATION: It reports two cases of central nervous system involvement in chronic lymphocytic leukemia describing the clinical course, therapy, and prognosis. Case 1 is a 67-year-old Asian male patient, he experienced complications with central nervous system involvement after developing resistance to ibrutinib, bendamustine, and rituximab (BR) chemotherapies. The central nervous system lesion was controlled with high-dose methotrexate combined with pomalidomide, but Richter transformation occurred several months later. Case 2 is a 62-year-old Asian female patient, she had central nervous system involvement at initial diagnosis, and bone marrow and central nervous system lesions were controlled by ibrutinib therapy. CONCLUSION: Central nervous system involvement in chronic lymphocytic leukemia is rare and can be diagnosed on the basis of clinical features, cerebrospinal fluid testing, and radiographic evaluation. Ibrutinib, pomalidomide, and other drugs that can cross the blood-brain barrier may be effective for treating central nervous system involvement in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Asunto(s)
Adenina , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B , Piperidinas , Talidomida , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Talidomida/uso terapéutico , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/secundario , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/diagnóstico por imagen , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Objective: To identify the optimal dose of selinexor in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (SPd). Methods: An analysis of efficacy and safety of 2 once-weekly selinexor regimens (60 mg and 40 mg) with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (SPd-60 and SPd-40, respectively) given to patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the STOMP (NCT02343042) and XPORT-MM-028 (NCT04414475) trials. Results: Twenty-eight patients (60.7% males, median age 67.5 years) and 20 patients (35.0% males, median age 65.5 years) were analyzed in the SPd-40 and SPd-60 cohorts, respectively. Overall response rate was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI] 30.6-69.4%) and 65% (95% CI 40.8-84.6%), respectively. Very good partial response or better was reported in 28.6% (95% CI 13.2-48.7%) and 30.0% (95% CI 11.9-54.3%) of patients, respectively. Among 27 responders in both cohorts, the 12-month sustained response rate was 83.3% (95% CI 64.7-100.0%) for SPd-40 and 28.1% (95% CI 8.9-88.8%) for SPd-60. Median progression-free survival was 18.4 months (95% CI 6.5 months, not evaluable [NE]) and 9.5 months (95% CI 7.6 months-NE) for SPd-40 and SPd-60, respectively. Twenty-four-month survival rates were 64.2% (95% CI 47.7-86.3%) for SPd-40 and 51.1% (95% CI 29.9-87.5%) for SPd-60. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included neutropenia (all grades: SPd-40 64.3% versus SPd-60 75.0%), anemia (46.4% versus 65.0%), thrombocytopenia (42.9% versus 45.0%), fatigue (46.4% versus 75.0%), nausea (32.1% versus 70.0%) and diarrhea (28.6% versus 35.0%). Conclusion: The all-oral combination of SPd exhibited preliminary signs of efficacy and was generally tolerable in patients with RRMM. The overall risk-benefit profile favored the SPd-40 regimen.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies suggest that combining nivolumab, a programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor, with pomalidomide/dexamethasone (Pd) with or without elotuzumab, an antisignaling lymphocytic activation molecule F7 monoclonal antibody, may improve multiple myeloma (MM) treatment efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The phase 3 CheckMate 602 study (NCT02726581) assessed the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus pomalidomide/dexamethasone (NPd) and NPd plus elotuzumab (NE-Pd). Eligible patients (aged ≥ 18 years) had measurable MM after ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy, that included an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) and proteasome inhibitor (PI), each for ≥ 2 consecutive cycles, alone or combined, and were refractory to their last line of therapy. Patients were randomized 3:3:1 to receive NPd, Pd, or NE-Pd. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); overall response rate (ORR) was a key secondary endpoint. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 16.8 months, PFS was similar between treatment arms (Pd, 7.3 months [95% CI, 6.5-8.4]; NPd, 8.4 months [95% CI, 5.8-12.1]; NE-Pd, 6.3 months [95% CI, 2.4-11.1]). ORR was similar in the Pd (55%), NPd (48%), and NE-Pd (42%) arms. Nivolumab-containing arms were associated with a less favorable safety profile versus Pd, including a higher rate of thrombocytopenia (NPd, 25.0%; NE-Pd, 16.7%; Pd, 15.7%), any-grade immune-mediated adverse events (NPd, 13.9%; NE-Pd, 16.7%; Pd, 2.9%), and adverse events leading to discontinuation (NPd, 25.0%; NE-Pd, 33.3%; Pd, 18.6%). No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSION: CheckMate 602 did not demonstrate clinical benefit of nivolumab (+/- elotuzumab) plus Pd versus Pd for patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM).
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Despite major advances in treatment options for multiple myeloma (MM), patients refractory to the main drug classes and those with aggressive, especially extramedullary disease, still face a dismal outcome. For these patients, effective therapeutic options are urgently warranted. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we report on the safety and efficacy of the intensive combination regimen of pomalidomide plus cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (Pom-PACE) in patients with relapsed refractory MM (RRMM) or plasma cell leukemia (PCL). A study population of 20 consecutive patients treated with Pom-PACE at two academic centers was included for analysis. All patients had to have a confirmed relapse according to International Myeloma Working Group criteria and adequate organ function prior to the start of therapy. Data were collected by reviewing medical charts. Exploratory analyses were performed with regard to efficacy and safety. RESULTS: Patients were heavily pretreated with a median number of four prior therapies (range: 1-10). All patients were exposed to immunomodulators, proteasome inhibitors, and alkylating agents, 80% were double-class refractory, 40% were triple-class refractory. Extramedullary MM or PCL were present in 15 patients (75%). Overall response rate (ORR) was 68%, with 31% achieving at least a very good partial response. Responses were achieved rapidly with an ORR of 64% after one cycle. Median progression-free survival was 8.9 months (0.92-not reached [NR]) and median overall survival was 11.8 months (3-40.6). Pom-PACE was associated with significant toxicity. All evaluable patients experienced Grade 4 hematological toxicity. However, no treatment related mortality was observed. CONCLUSION: Pomalidomide-PACE was able to induce rapid responses in heavily pretreated, aggressive RRMM with a manageable toxicity profile and therefore offers an effective salvage regimen and a potential bridging strategy to further treatment options such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: IMAGE is a retrospective cohort study of patients enrolled in early access programs (EAPs) in France with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) receiving isatuximab with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Isa-Pd). METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with RRMM who received ≥1 dose of Isa under the EAPs between July 29, 2019 and August 30, 2020 were included. Effectiveness endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and response rates. Verbatim terms for adverse events (AEs) were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities and not graded for severity. RESULTS: A total of 294 and 299 patients were included in the effectiveness and safety populations, respectively. IMAGE included patients who received one prior line of treatment (10.2%) and were daratumumab-refractory (19.1%). At median follow-up of 14.2 months, median PFS in the effectiveness population was 12.4 months (95% CI 9.0-15.0). Overall response and very good partial response rates were 46.3% and 27.9%, respectively. Subgroup analyses reflected similar results. In the safety population, 26.4% of patients reported at least one AE; the most common any-grade AE was neutropenia (9.4%). CONCLUSION: IMAGE demonstrated Isa-Pd had meaningful effectiveness in median PFS and depth of response and no new safety signals in a real-world context, consistent with clinical trial results.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Dexametasona , Mieloma Múltiple , Talidomida , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
The ELOQUENT-3 trial demonstrated the superiority of the combination of elotuzumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (EloPd) in terms of efficacy and safety, compared to Pd in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), who had received at least two prior therapies, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor. The present study is an 18-month follow-up update of a previously published Italian real-life RRMM cohort of patients treated with EloPd. This revised analysis entered 319 RRMM patients accrued in 41 Italian centers. After a median follow-up of 17.7 months, 213 patients (66.4%) experienced disease progression or died. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 7.5 and 19.2 months, respectively. The updated multivariate analysis showed a significant reduction of PFS benefit magnitude both in advanced International Staging System (ISS) (II and III) stages and previous exposure to daratumumab cases. Instead, advanced ISS (II and III) stages and more than 2 previous lines of therapy maintained an independent prognostic impact on OS. Major adverse events included grade three-fourths neutropenia (24.9%), anemia (13.4%), lymphocytopenia (15.5%), and thrombocytopenia (10.7%), while infection rates and pneumonia were 19.3% and 8.7%, respectively. A slight increase in the incidence of neutropenia and lymphocytopenia was registered with longer follow-up. In conclusion, our real-world study still confirms that EloPd is a safe and possible therapeutic choice for RRMM. Nevertheless, novel strategies are desirable for those patients exposed to daratumumab.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Dexametasona , Mieloma Múltiple , Talidomida , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/efectos adversos , Talidomida/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Comparative investigations evaluating the efficacy of pomalidomide-based (Pom-based) versus daratumumab-based (Dara-based) therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) remain scarce, both in randomized controlled trials and real-world studies. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 140 RRMM patients treated with Pom-based or Dara-based or a combination of pomalidomide and daratumumab (DPd) regimens in a Chinese tertiary hospital between December 2018 and July 2023. RESULTS: The overall response rates (ORR) for Pom-based (n = 48), Dara-based (n = 68), and DPd (n = 24) groups were 57.8%, 84.6%, and 75.0%, respectively (p = 0.007). At data cutoff on August 1, 2023, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.7 months (95% CI: 5.0-6.5) for the Pom-based group, 10.5 months (5.2-15.8) for the Dara-based group, and 6.7 months (4.0-9.3) for the DPd group (p = 0.056). Multivariate analysis identified treatment regimens (Dara-based vs. Pom-based, DPd vs. Pom-based) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) as independent prognostic factors for PFS. In the subgroups of patients aged >65 years, with ECOG PS ≥2, lines of therapy ≥2, extramedullary disease or double-refractory disease (refractory to both lenalidomide and proteasome inhibitors), the superiority of Dara-based regimens over Pom-based regimens was not evident. A higher incidence of infections was observed in patients receiving Dara-based and DPd regimens (Pom-based 39.6% vs. Dara-based 64.7% vs. DPd 70.8%, p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: In real-world settings, Pom-based, Dara-based, and DPd therapies exhibited favorable efficacy in patients with RRMM. Dara-based therapy yielded superior clinical response and PFS compared to Pom-based therapy.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Mieloma Múltiple , Talidomida , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Talidomida/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , China , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Resistencia a AntineoplásicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lenalidomide and Pomalidomide are chiral immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and have antiangiogenic and anti-immunomodulatory activity. Each enantiomer may have distinct binding and biological activity. This study aimed to explore the in-silico binding of both enantiomers of Lenalidomide and Pomalidomide with Prostaglandin and its potential impact on persisting inflammatory activity in cancer. This can further provide insight into the transport of pro-inflammatory mediators and their potential implications for the inflammatory microenvironment within tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Molecular docking studies were performed to explore the binding potential of both enantiomers of Lenalidomide and Pomalidomide with Pg protein. The crystal structure of Pg-protein (PDB ID: 1IW7) was obtained from the Protein Data Bank. RESULTS: The binding energies for (-)-Lenalidomide and (+)-Lenalidomide were -6.7 and -7.2 kcal/mol, respectively, while the binding energies for (-)-Pomalidomide and (+)-Pomalidomide were -7.8 and -8.1 kcal/mol, respectively. The binding mode analysis revealed that all four compounds formed hydrogen bonds with key amino acid residues of Pg-protein. The hydrogen bond distances for (-)-Lenalidomide, (+)-Lenalidomide, (-)-Pomalidomide, and (+)-Pomalidomide were 2.1 Å, 2.0 Å, 2.2 Å, and 2.1 Å, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that both enantiomers of Lenalidomide and Pomalidomide have a high affinity for Pg-protein and can effectively target the Pg-protein pathway to persist inflammatory activity in cancer. By targeting inflammation-mediated processes, these drugs may offer a novel strategy to combat tumor progression.
RESUMEN
Relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and B-cell leukemia/lymphoma with extramedullary disease (EMD) have poor prognosis and high mortality, lack of effective therapeutic approaches. We reported for the first time that 6 patients with malignant hematological diseases with EMD received chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T treatment combined with pomalidomide, and CAR-T cells were treated with pomalidomide in vitro to determine its killing activity and cytokine secretion. Three patients with RRMM were given B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-CAR-T therapy. All 3 patients with B-cell leukemia/lymphoma received CD19/22-CAR-T sequential infusion. There were no treatment-related deaths. The maximum overall response rate (ORR) was 100%. Median follow-up was 211.5 days (75-407 days). Three patients (50%) experienced cytokine release syndrome, all of which were grade 1, and no neurotoxicity was observed. In vitro experiments showed that the killing activity did not differ significantly between BCMA-CAR-T cells with and without pomalidomide (10, 25, or 50 µg/mL) in 8226/U266 cell cocultures (P > .05). Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interferon (IFN)-γ secretion was significantly higher from 8226 and Raji cells cocultured with BCMA-CAR-T and cluster of differentiation (CD)19-CAR-T cells (P < .05). Based on the cocultures, adding pomalidomide significantly promoted IFN-γ and TNF-α secretion (P < .05). Based on the above clinical and in vitro studies demonstrating the co-administration of pomalidomide with CAR-T cell treatment demonstrated favorable tolerability and therapeutic effectiveness in RRMM or B-cell leukemia/lymphoma.
RESUMEN
Multi-agent regimens incorporating immunomodulatory (IMiD®) agents such as thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide have become the preferred standard of care for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), resulting in improved survival outcomes. Currently, there are three IMiD agents approved for the treatment of MM: thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide. Lenalidomide is commonly used to treat patients with newly diagnosed MM and as maintenance therapy following stem cell transplant or after disease relapse. Pomalidomide, the focus of this review, is approved in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). Despite survival benefits, IMiD agents each have different safety profiles requiring consideration both prior to starting therapy and during treatment. Adverse event (AE) management is essential, not only to ensure treatment adherence and thus ensure optimal efficacy but also to maintain patient quality of life. Here, we discuss AEs associated with pomalidomide and present five clinically relevant hypothetical case studies in patients with RRMM to provide scenario-driven guidance regarding treatment selection and AE prevention and management in the clinical setting. Lastly, as new treatment approaches continue to be explored in MM, we also discuss novel cereblon E3 ligase modulator (CELMoD™) agents including iberdomide (CC-220) and mezigdomide (CC-92480).
RESUMEN
Neuronal damage resulting from traumatic brain injury (TBI) causes disruption of neuronal projections and neurotransmission that contribute to behavioral deficits. Cellular generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) is an early event following TBI. ROS often damage DNA, lipids, proteins, and carbohydrates while RNS attack proteins. The products of lipid peroxidation 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) and protein nitration 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NT) are often used as indicators of oxidative and nitrosative damages, respectively. Increasing evidence has shown that striatum is vulnerable to damage from TBI with a disturbed dopamine neurotransmission. TBI results in neurodegeneration, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, neuronal apoptosis, and autophagy in the striatum and contribute to motor or behavioral deficits. Pomalidomide (Pom) is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved immunomodulatory drug clinically used in treating multiple myeloma. We previously showed that Pom reduces neuroinflammation and neuronal death induced by TBI in rat cerebral cortex. Here, we further compared the effects of Pom in cortex and striatum focusing on neurodegeneration, oxidative and nitrosative damages, as well as neuroinflammation following TBI. Sprague-Dawley rats subjected to a controlled cortical impact were used as the animal model of TBI. Systemic administration of Pom (0.5 mg/kg, intravenous [i.v.]) at 5 h post-injury alleviated motor behavioral deficits, contusion volume at 24 h after TBI. Pom alleviated TBI-induced neurodegeneration stained by Fluoro-Jade C in both cortex and striatum. Notably, Pom treatment reduces oxidative and nitrosative damages in cortex and striatum and is more efficacious in striatum (93% reduction in 4-HNE-positive and 84% reduction in 3-NT-positive neurons) than in cerebral cortex (42% reduction in 4-HNE-positive and 55% reduction in 3-NT-positive neurons). In addition, Pom attenuated microgliosis, astrogliosis, and elevations of proinflammatory cytokines in cortical and striatal tissue. We conclude that Pom may contribute to improved motor behavioral outcomes after TBI through targeting oxidative/nitrosative damages and neuroinflammation.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Enfermedades Neuroinflamatorias , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Ratas , Animales , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Especies Reactivas de Oxígeno , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/tratamiento farmacológico , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/metabolismo , Estrés Oxidativo , Citocinas/metabolismo , Corteza Cerebral/metabolismo , Modelos Animales de EnfermedadRESUMEN
Once-weekly carfilzomib at 56 mg/m2 plus immunomodulatory drugs and dexamethasone has shown efficacy and tolerability treating early relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The phase 2 SELECT study (NCT04191616) evaluated efficacy/safety of weekly carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (KPd) in early RRMM patients refractory to lenalidomide. All 52 treated patients were refractory to prior treatment, and 19 (37%) were triple-class refractory. Overall response rate (ORR; primary endpoint) was 58% (35% ≥ very good partial response, 6% ≥ complete response); median response duration was 20.3 months. Minimal residual disease negativity (10-5) was achieved in 10% of patients. Median progression-free survival was 11.1 months; median overall survival was 18.8 months. Adverse events (AEs) were consistent with the known safety profile including grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs reported in 67% of patients. Although the primary endpoint of ORR was not met, KPd showed meaningful clinical benefits in lenalidomide-refractory RRMM patients, including those who were daratumumab-refractory and/or triple-class refractory.