RESUMEN
To benefit allergy patients and the medical practitioners, pollen information should be available in both a reliable and timely manner; the latter is only recently possible due to automatic monitoring. To evaluate the performance of all currently available automatic instruments, an international intercomparison campaign was jointly organised by the EUMETNET AutoPollen Programme and the ADOPT COST Action in Munich, Germany (March-July 2021). The automatic systems (hardware plus identification algorithms) were compared with manual Hirst-type traps. Measurements were aggregated into 3-hourly or daily values to allow comparison across all devices. We report results for total pollen as well as for Betula, Fraxinus, Poaceae, and Quercus, for all instruments that provided these data. The results for daily averages compared better with Hirst observations than the 3-hourly values. For total pollen, there was a considerable spread among systems, with some reaching R2 > 0.6 (3 h) and R2 > 0.75 (daily) compared with Hirst-type traps, whilst other systems were not suitable to sample total pollen efficiently (R2 < 0.3). For individual pollen types, results similar to the Hirst were frequently shown by a small group of systems. For Betula, almost all systems performed well (R2 > 0.75 for 9 systems for 3-hourly data). Results for Fraxinus and Quercus were not as good for most systems, while for Poaceae (with some exceptions), the performance was weakest. For all pollen types and for most measurement systems, false positive classifications were observed outside of the main pollen season. Different algorithms applied to the same device also showed different results, highlighting the importance of this aspect of the measurement system. Overall, given the 30 % error on daily concentrations that is currently accepted for Hirst-type traps, several automatic systems are currently capable of being used operationally to provide real-time observations at high temporal resolutions. They provide distinct advantages compared to the manual Hirst-type measurements.
Asunto(s)
Alérgenos , Hipersensibilidad , Humanos , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Polen , Estaciones del Año , Poaceae , BetulaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Training a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) for automatic image classification requires a large database with images of labeled samples. However, in some applications such as biology and medicine only a few experts can correctly categorize each sample. Experts are able to identify small changes in shape and texture which go unnoticed by untrained people, as well as distinguish between objects in the same class that present drastically different shapes and textures. This means that currently available databases are too small and not suitable to train deep learning models from scratch. To deal with this problem, data augmentation techniques are commonly used to increase the dataset size. However, typical data augmentation methods introduce artifacts or apply distortions to the original image, which instead of creating new realistic samples, obtain basic spatial variations of the original ones. METHODS: We propose a novel data augmentation procedure which generates new realistic samples, by combining two samples that belong to the same class. Although the idea behind the method described in this paper is to mimic the variations that diatoms experience in different stages of their life cycle, it has also been demonstrated in glomeruli and pollen identification problems. This new data augmentation procedure is based on morphing and image registration methods that perform diffeomorphic transformations. RESULTS: The proposed technique achieves an increase in accuracy over existing techniques of 0.47%, 1.47%, and 0.23% for diatom, glomeruli and pollen problems respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For the Diatom dataset, the method is able to simulate the shape changes in different diatom life cycle stages, and thus, images generated resemble newly acquired samples with intermediate shapes. In fact, the other methods compared obtained worse results than those which were not using data augmentation. For the Glomeruli dataset, the method is able to add new samples with different shapes and degrees of sclerosis (through different textures). This is the case where our proposed DA method is more beneficial, when objects highly differ in both shape and texture. Finally, for the Pollen dataset, since there are only small variations between samples in a few classes and this dataset has other features such as noise which are likely to benefit other existing DA techniques, the method still shows an improvement of the results.