RESUMEN

A 20-year-old female patient with severe maxillary crowding and skeletal Class III malocclusion was successfully treated using an enhanced pendulum appliance. Camouflage treatment was chosen because the patient refused surgical intervention. Detailed examination and analysis revealed that labial inclination of the maxillary anterior teeth could provide the alignment space necessary after tooth extraction in the maxillary arch but it would not be beneficial esthetically and would increase the moment perpendicular to the tooth long axis as well as increase the risk of bone dehiscence. Therefore, lingual inclination of the mandibular anterior teeth was performed. To create space for aligning the maxillary arch, an enhanced pendulum appliance was utilized, in addition to premolar extraction. The enhanced pendulum appliance had one mesial and one distal helix on each spring, exerting opposing forces in the buccolingual direction and reducing the buccolingual inclination of the molars. In addition, miniscrews were integrated into the Nance arch of the enhanced pendulum appliance to provide skeletal anchorage, minimizing the reciprocal movement of anchorage teeth. This modification not only enhanced control over tooth movement but also improved treatment efficiency. During the entire treatment duration of 17 months, substantial improvement in facial and occlusal aspects were noted. Additionally, the patient retained these positive changes until the subsequent 2-year follow-up period.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the skeletal and dental changes after distalization with a pendulum appliance in growing patients with Class II malocclusion, focusing on the occlusal plane (OP). METHODS: The sample included 24 patients with Class II malocclusion (10 boys, 14 girls); their mean age was 12.1 years. All patients underwent molar distalization and had 2 serial cephalograms traced at baseline (T1) and after distalization (T2). Angular and linear dental changes were calculated by taking the sella-nasion (SN), palatal plane (PP), and pterygoid vertical as reference. OP inclination was compared with SN, PP, and mandibular plane. The collected data were computed for all the tested variables, and one-way paired t-test was used to assess the significance of the differences between the time points. α was set at 0.05. Multiple linear regressions were used to predict the OP changes. RESULTS: The mean total treatment time was 8±2 months to obtain a super Class I molar relationship. In T1-T2 interval, statistically significant incisor buccal tipping of 5°±3.6° (p<0.05), first molar distal tipping of 8.9°±8.3° (p<0.001), and second molar tipping of 8.2°±8.1° (p<0.001) were observed. The maxillary first and second molars moved significantly backward by 2.8±3.2 mm (p<0.05) and 3.7±2.7 mm (p<0.001), respectively. Only the premolars showed a statistically significant anchorage loss of 2.7±3.3 mm (p<0.05); overjet increased significantly at 1.3±1.2 mm (p<0.05). Regarding the OP, none of the tested variables showed any statistically significant changes between T1-T2. CONCLUSION: The pendulum appliance showed efficacy in distalizing the maxillary first and second molars at the expense of anterior anchorage loss. The OP did not show statistically significant changes after molar distalization.

RESUMEN

A 13-year-old female patient, presented with the chief complaint of forwardly placed upper front teeth. On examination and analysis of relevant records, she was diagnosed as an Angle's Class II malocclusion on a skeletal Class I base. It was decided to treat the patient with a nonextraction treatment approach with the help of maxillary molar distalization followed by fixed mechanotherapy.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the anchorage control and distalization of maxillary molars with the hybrid Pendulum appliance and to compare the results with a conventional Pendulum appliance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was carried out on the pre-(T0) and post-(T1) treatment lateral cephalograms and dental casts of 43 patients with Angle Class II molar relationships who were treated with conventional or hybrid Pendulum appliances. The hybrid Pendulum (HP) group consisted of 22 patients (14 females; eight males; mean age 14.3 ± 2.43 years) and treatment results were compared with a conventional Pendulum appliance (CP) group, which consisted of 21 patients (15 females; six males; mean age 14.6 ± 3.39 years). Intragroup comparisons were made with Wilcoxon test and intergroup comparisons were made with Mann-Whitney U-test (P < .05). RESULTS: The mean distalization duration was 0.70 ± 0.25 years in the HP group and 0.83 ± 0.4 years in the CP group. Maxillary first molars showed significant distal movement and tipping of 4.25 mm and 9.09° in the HP group, and 3.21 mm and 9.86° in the CP group. Loss of anchorage at the first premolars was significantly smaller in the HP appliance group compared to CP group. The second premolars distalized spontaneously in the HP group while they mesialized significantly in the CP group. Proclination and protrusion of maxillary incisors were greater with the CP appliance compared to the HP appliance. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary molar distalization was achieved with both appliances. Mesialization of the anchorage unit was controlled successfully with the hybrid Pendulum; however, the conventional Pendulum appliance caused anchorage loss.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare three-dimensional (3D) skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the Herbst and Pendulum appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment in growing patients. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: A sample of 35 adolescents with cone-beam computed tomography scans obtained prior to Herbst and Pendulum treatment (T1) and immediately after fixed appliance treatment (T2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with Class II malocclusion was assessed retrospectively and divided into two treatment groups: Herbst group (n = 17, age: 12.0 ± 1.6 years) and Pendulum group (n = 18, age: 12.1 ± 1.5 years), with a mean treatment duration of 2.8 ± 0.8 years and 2.5 ± 0.7 years, respectively. Reconstructions of the maxillomandibular and dentoalveolar regions and data in 3D were obtained relative to cranial base, maxillary and mandibular regional superimpositions. Treatment outcomes (T2-T1) were compared between both groups using t tests for independent samples (P<.05). RESULTS: Significant increase in mandibular length was observed in the Herbst group (7.3 ± 3.5 mm) relative to the Pendulum group (4.6 ± 4.5 mm). Inferior and anterior displacements of Pogonion were 2.2 mm and 1.6 mm greater in the Herbst group, respectively. The mesial displacement of the lower first molars was significantly greater in the Herbst group (1.9 mm). The upper first molars had contrasting results in sagittal displacement, with 0.6 ± 1.7 mm of distal displacement with the Pendulum and 1.4 ± 2.1 mm of mesial displacement with the Herbst. Lower incisor projection and proclination were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The Herbst and Pendulum appliances followed by comprehensive orthodontic treatment effectively corrected Class II malocclusion in growing patients, but with differing skeletal and dentoalveolar effects.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate distalizing effects from the Pendulum appliance on vertical component of craniofacial structures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 20 Patients who visited for orthodontic treatments are assigned to two groups. Group I, SN-MP > 37 degrees are showing hyperdivergent pattern. Group II, 29 < SN-MP < 37 degrees are showing mesocephalic pattern. Each group are consisted of 10 people. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Differences between skeletal classifications result in significant differences at labioversion of lower incisors and distalized amount, which is larger at Group I (P <.05). Group II has only shown significant distalized molars (P < .05). Labioversion of lower incisors has not shown significant change. Skeletal anchorage-assisted Pendulum appliance doesn't deteriorate vertical component nor significantly improve.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Mesial drifting of molar teeth in maxillary arch is corrected by movement of the molars distally. In addition to traditional distal movement techniques, such as extraoral force application and removable appliances, various intra-arch devices have been introduced since 1980s. These intra-arch appliances have nearly eliminated the need for patient cooperation. CASE REPORT: The purpose of this paper is to report a case of 10-year-old male patient with loss of space in maxillary molar teeth treated by intra-arch appliance-pendulum appliance by distalization of maxillary first permanent molar teeth. Distaliza-tion of the permanent molar teeth helped in proper eruption of second premolar teeth without any extensive treatment procedures. CONCLUSION: In the present case report, the treatment of developing malocclusion was corrected by utilizing the concept of interceptive orthodontics. Hence, correction of space loss in mixed dentition period using pendulum appliance can eliminate the fixed orthodontic therapy. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Paranna S, Shetty P, Anandakrishna L, Rawat A. Distalization of Maxillary First Permanent Molar by Pendulum Appliance in Mixed Dentition Period. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017;10(3):299-301.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare two molar distalization devices, the Pendulum appliance (PA) and the Jones Jig (JJ) in dental Class II patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pretreatment and postdistalization lateral cephalograms and study models of 20 subjects (6 males, 14 females) Class II malocclusion subjects were examined. PA and JJ group both consisted of 10 patients each with a mean pretreatment age of 12 years 1 month for females and 12 years 5 months for males. The PA and the JJ appliance were activated once in a month until Class II molar relationship was corrected to a super Class I molar relationship in both groups. Initial and final measurements and treatment changes were compared by means of Paired t-test. RESULTS: Maxillary first molar distalized an average of 3.85 mm in the PA and 2.75 mm in the JJ between T1 and T2; rate of molar distalization was 1.59 mm/month for PA, and the JJ appliance averaged 0.88 mm/month, distal molar tipping was greater in PA (6.2°) than in the JJ (3.9°). Average mesial movement of the premolars was 2.2 mm with PA and JJ both. JJ showed a greater rotation of first molars after distalization as compared to PA. The increase in vertical facial height was also greater for JJ as compared to PA. CONCLUSIONS: Both the appliances were effective in molar distalization with PA requiring less distalization time (16 days less than JJ). Some adverse effects were noted with both which one should strive to control.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of the present systematic review was to evaluate the quantitative effects of the pendulum appliance and modified pendulum appliances for maxillary molar distalization in Class II malocclusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our systematic search included MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Scopus and key journals and review articles; the date of the last search was 30 January 2017. We graded the methodological quality of the studies by means of the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies, developed for the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP). RESULTS: In total, 203 studies were identified for screening, and 25 studies were eligible. The quality assessment rated four (16%) of the study as being of strong quality and 21 (84%) of these studies as being of moderate quality. The pendulum appliances showed mean molar distalization of 2-6.4 mm, distal tipping of molars from 6.67° to 14.50° and anchorage loss with mean premolar and incisor mesial movement of 1.63-3.6 mm and 0.9-6.5 mm, respectively. The bone anchored pendulum appliances (BAPAs) showed mean molar distalization of 4.8-6.4 mm, distal tipping of molars from 9° to 11.3° and mean premolar distalization of 2.7-5.4 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Pendulum and modified pendulum appliances are effective in molar distalization. Pendulum appliance with K-loop modification, implant supported pendulum appliance and BAPA significantly reduced anchorage loss of the anterior teeth and distal tipping of the molar teeth.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Os propósitos destas pesquisas foram primeiramente avaliar as alterações esqueléticas, dento-alveolares e tegumentares obtidas com o aparelho pêndulo com ancoragem esquelética (BAPA) em pacientes com má oclusão Classe II e, posteriormente compará-los com os efeitos produzidos com o aparelho pêndulo com ancoragem convencional (CPA). A amostra composta de 18 pacientes (14 meninas;4 meninos) com idade média de 14.01 (D.P. 1.08) com má oclusão de Classe II tratados com BAPA como dispositivo distalizador antes do aparelho fixo, no Departamento de Ortodontia da Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Cidade de São Paulo. Telerradiografias laterais foram tomadas no início do tratamento (T0) e no final da distalização (T1), mensuradas e posteriormente analisadas estatisticamente. Apenas o período da distalização ativa foi avaliado. O grupo controle foi composto de 18 pacientes (14 meninas;4 meninos) com idade média de 13.61 (D.P. 1.24) com a mesma má oclusão tratados com CPA como dispositivo distalizador antes do aparelho fixo, no Departamento de Ortodontia da Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo. Para avaliar os efeitos desta amostra foi utilizada a mesma metodologia acima mencionada. Posteriormente, para comparar as alterações entre os grupos, a amostra tratada com CPA foi denominada Grupo 1 (G1), e a amostra tratada com BAPA denominada Grupo 2 (G2). O tempo médio de distalização foi 5.76 e 6.16 meses, no G1 e G2 respectivamente. Ambos os grupos foram compatibilizados em relação à idade inicial, tempo de tratamento, severidade da má oclusão de Classe II e características cefalométricas iniciais. A comparação intra-grupo foi realizada com teste t dependente, e a comparação intergrupos foi realizada com o teste t. Em G2 houve aumento significante da altura facial anteroinferior, distalização molar, inclinação distal e intrusão significante dos primeiros e segundos molares superiores. Os primeiros pré-molares apresentaram distalização e extrusão significantes. A sobremordida diminuiu e a relação molar melhoraram significativamente. Comparando as alterações do tratamento entre grupos, foram significativamente maiores a distalização, inclinação distal e intrusão dos primeiros molares no G2 comparados ao G1. Os incisivos superiores inclinaram para vestibular no G1, e ligeiramente retroinclinaram para lingual no G2, além disso os primeiros pré-molares foram distalizados no G2, porém foram mesializados no G1. O Grupo 1 apresentou aumento significativamente maior da sobressaliência, e menor correção da relação molar de Classe II do que G2. A distalização dos molares superiores foi obtida com sucesso em ambos os grupos, entretanto, utilizando o BAPA observou-se várias vantagens, tais como: Distalização exclusiva dos molares superiores; movimento distal espontâneo dos pré-molares superiores; sem efeitos colaterais indesejáveis nos incisivos superiores e nos lábios; e também o estabelecimento de uma relação molar de Classe I.(AU)

The purposes of these investigations were firstly to evaluate the dentoalveolar, skeletal and soft tissue effects obtained with the bone-anchored pendulum appliance (BAPA) in patients with Class II malocclusion and secondly, to compare these effects with the conventional pendulum appliance (CPA). A sample of 18 patients (14 females; 4 males) with a mean age of 14.01 years (S.D 1.08) with Class II malocclusion treated with BAPA as distalizer device before fixed appliance in Orthodontic Department at the Dental School, University of São Paulo City. Lateral headfilms were taken at the beginning of treatment (T0) and at the end of distalization period (T1), measured and then statistically analyzed. Only the active distalization period was evaluated. The comparison group was composed by 18 patients (14 females; 4 males) with a mean age of 13.61 years (S.D 1.24) with the same malocclusion treated with CPA before fixed appliance in Orthodontic Department at Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo. To evaluate the effects in this sample was used the same methodology abovementioned. Then, to compare changes between groups, the sample treated with CPA was named Group 1 (G1), and the sample treated with BAPA was named Group 2 (G2). The average distalization period was 5.76 and 6.16 months, respectively for G1 and G2. Both groups were compatibilized regarding initial age, treatment time, severity of Class II malocclusion and initial cephalometric characteristics. Intragroup comparisons were performed using dependent t tests and intergroup comparisons were performed using t tests. In G2 there was significant increase in the lower anterior face height, molar distalization, distal tipping and intrusion of the first and second maxillary molars. The first premolars had significant distalization and extrusion. Overbite significantly decreased and molar relationship was significantly improved. Comparing the groups, there were significantly greater maxillary first molar distalization, distal tipping and intrusion in G2 compared to G1. The maxillary incisors were labially tipped in G1 and lingually tipped in G2. The first premolars were distalized in G2 while were mesialized in G1. G1 showed a significantly greater overjet increase and smaller Class II molar relationship correction than G2. Distalization of the maxillary molars was successfully achieved in both groups, but using the BAPA several advantages were observed including exclusive maxillary molars distalization, spontaneous distal movement of the maxillary premolars, no undesirable side effects in the maxillary incisors and lips and establishment of a Class I molar relationship.(AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Among several intraoral distalizing devices,the pendulum appliance is one of the most commonly used noncompliance appli-ances.It is widely used to correct Class Ⅱ molar relationship.More healthy teeth can be preserved with the using of pendulum appliance in the tooth extraction of borderline cases.The pendulum appliance was modified and used in clinic.Long-term observasion showed that the modified pendulum appliace is effective in orthodontic treatment.

RESUMEN

An extraction case was planned for non-extraction treatment using pendulum appliance and the effect of appliance was evaluated in a 14-year-old girl with a severe maxillary and mandibular crowding followed by non-extraction fixed appliance preadjusted edgewise appliance mechanotherapy. Total treatment time was for 22 months. The obtuse nasolabial angle was maintained intact. Correction of crowding, co-ordinated arch forms was achieved with molar distalization. The impetus on soft-tissue paradigm is stressed in this case report and pendulum appliance can indeed boost our clinical acumen and swing our priorities toward non-extraction treatment.

RESUMEN

Adult patients have many preexisting conditions like tooth loss, severe skeletal dysplasia, periodontal disease, and various temporomandibular dysfunctions. In such adult patients, an interdisciplinary treatment approach is followed by customizing orthodontic treatment for the individual patient. This article shows a case that is managed in an interdisciplinary method of treatment approach.

RESUMEN

Introducción: este estudio pretende comparar clínica y radiográficamente los efectos producidos por el distalizador péndulo en dos formas de anclaje: esquelético y dentoalveolar, en pacientes con maloclusiones clase II de la Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad de Antioquia. Métodos: se hizo un estudio preexperimental comparativo. Se utilizó una muestra de 19 pacientes con edades entre los 15y 26 años, divididos en dos grupos: 9 pacientes tratados con péndulo de anclaje esquelético y 10 con péndulo de anclaje dentoalveolar. A todos los pacientes se les tomaron radiografías cefálicas laterales y modelos de estudio, al inicio y al final del tiempo de evaluación (6 meses). Resultados: los resultados clínicos y radiográficos muestran diferencias significativas en los efectos producidos a nivel de incisivos y molares. El péndulo con anclaje dentoalveolar presentó en promedio proinclinación de los incisivos de 4°, mientras que el péndulo conanclaje esquelético no mostró variación. En cuanto al efecto producido en los molares se observó mayor cantidad de distalación por inclinación (14,1°) en el péndulo con anclaje dentoalveolar que en el péndulo con anclaje esquelético (7,34°). Conclusiones: el péndulobajo las dos modalidades de anclaje mostró ser un dispositivo eficaz para distalar molares, sin embargo es importante tener en cuenta el efecto que se quiere producir sobre los incisivos, pues cada uno produce resultados diferentes.

Introduction: This study seeks to clinically and radiographically compare the effects produced by the distalization pendulum in both skeletal and dentoalveolar anchorage, in patients with Class II malocclusions at the Universidad de Antioquia’s School of Dentistry. Methods: a pre-experimental comparative study was carried out on a sample of 19 patients aged 15-26 years, divided into two groups:9 patients treated with bone anchorage pendulum and 10 with dentoalveolar anchorage pendulum. Lateral cephalic radiographs of each patient were taken and study models were done at the beginning and the end of evaluation period (6 months). Results: both clinical and radiographic results show significant differences in the effects produced at the incisors and molars. The pendulum with dentoalveolar anchorage presented an average incisor proclination of 4°, while the pendulum with skeletal anchorage showed no variation. Concerning the effect produced in molars, a greater amount of distalization as a result of inclination was observed in the pendulum with dentoalveolar anchorage (14.1°) in comparison to the one with skeletal anchorage (7.34°). Conclusions: with both modalities, the pendulum provedto be effective for molar distalization; nevertheless, it is important to bear in mind the desired effect on the incisors, as each technique produces different results.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar, por meio das radiografias panorâmicas, o comportamento longitudinal da inclinação axial mesiodistal dos molares superiores decorridos cinco anos após o tratamento realizado com o aparelho Pendulum seguido de aparelhagem ortodôntica fixa e comparar os resultados com os valores médios normais. A amostra consistiu de 20 pacientes (14 do gênero feminino e 6, do masculino) com má oclusão de Classe II tratada por meio da distalização dos molares superiores. A média da idade, ao início do tratamento (T1), foi de 14,27 ± 1,62 anos, ao final do tratamento (T2), 18,59 ± 1,82 anos, e, cinco anos pós-tratamento (T3), 23,77 ± 2,04 anos. A média do tempo de tratamento foi de 4,36 ± 0,79 anos e de avaliação pós-tratamento foi de 5,18 ± 1,14 anos. Como grupo controle, utilizou-se os valores angulares médios normais de molares superiores obtidos por Ursi (1989), sendo que essa obtenção partiu de radiografias panorâmicas de indivíduos com oclusão normal apresentando idades entre 12 e 17 anos. Para a análise estatística, utilizaram-se os traçados das radiografias panorâmicas nas 3 fases (T1, T2 e T3). Os dados obtidos foram analisados estatisticamente pelo teste ANOVA dependente seguido do teste de Tukey. As médias das inclinações axiais mesiodistais nas fases T1, T2 e T3 foram comparadas com os valores médios normais pelo teste t independente. Os resultados apontaram que os primeiros molares superiores, ao término do tratamento ortodôntico, estavam mais inclinados para a distal, porém, cinco anos após, tenderam a verticalizarem-se naturalmente, voltando a ocupar uma posição próxima ao inicial. Quando comparados com os valores normais, somente o primeiro molar superior esquerdo apresentou, no período T2, valor estatisticamente significante diferente do normal. Os valores correspondentes para os segundos molares superiores não apresentaram estatisticamente significantes quando comparados entre si, nem quando comparados com os...

The objective of this study was to evaluate, through panoramic radiographs, the longitudinal conduct of mesiodistal inclination in maxillary molars five years after the treatment performed with the Pendulum device followed by fixed appliance and compare the results with normal mean values. The sample consisted of 20 patients (14 female and 6 male) with Class II malocclusion treated with molar distalization. The average age at pretreatment (T1) was 14.27 ± 1.62 years, at posttreatment (T2), 18.59 ± 1.82 years and at the long-term posttreatment (T3) 23.77 ± 2.04 years. The average length of time of the treatment was 4.36 ± 0.79 years and the evaluation of the long-term posttreatment was 5.18 ± 1.14 years. As a control, it was used the normal mean angular values of molar obtained by Ursi (1989), and this achievement came from panoramic radiographs of subjects with normal occlusion ranging in age from 12 to 17 years. Panoramic radiographs were taken for statistic analysis in all 3 stages (T1, T2, T3). The obtained data were statistically analysed through ANOVA Test dependent followed by Tukey test. The mean mesiodistal axial inclinations stages T1, T2, T3 were compared with normal mean values by the independent t test. The results showed that the first molars were more inclined to distal at posttreatment but five years later they tended to upright naturally, occupying the previous position, close to the original. When compared with normal values, only the left first maxillary molar showed in T2 a statistically different value to the normal. The correspondent values for the second maxillary molars did not show to be statistically significant when compared with each other, nor when compared with normal values. The treatment with the Pendulum, together with the orthodontic appliance, fosters an inclination of the molars to the distal, but tends to upright in the long-term posttreatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Orthodontic therapies involving no compliance from patients are the mainstay of modern orthodontics. Class II division 1 malocclusions constitute the bulk of cases requiring extractions to facilitate space gain to correct it. The Pendulum Appliance is an effective and reliable method for distalizing maxillary molars. Its major advantages are minimal dependence on patient compliance, ease of fabrication, one-time activation, adjustment of the springs if necessary to correct minor transverse and vertical molar positions and patient-acceptance. Simple laboratory procedure for fabrication and relatively low cost make it an excellent appliance to be incorporated into regular practice.

RESUMEN

objective: To evaluate the effects of the pendulum appliance on arch length, arch width, overbite and overjet. Methods: Pendulum appliances were applied for distalization of maxillary molars in 37 patients whith class Ⅱ malocclusion and 1-Ⅱ degree crowded dentition in upper dental arch. Pretreatment and posttreatment model analysis was conducted. Results: 37 patients treated for 18.2?4.5 weeks with pendulum appliance were accomplished . The increase of arch arc length between the maxillary first molars was (17.36?4.38) mm, the decrease of anterior arch width (-3.04?1.59) mm, and the decrease of posterior arch width (-1.29?2.01) mm . Differences between the pretreatment and posttreatment were significant, including arch arc length between the maxillary first molars ( P