RESUMEN

Peritoneal carcinomatosis is an unavoidable development of ovarian cancer, from the first treatment to relapses, and is the main cause of patients death. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), is a hope for cure for patients with ovarian cancer. HIPEC is based on direct application of chemotherapy on the perioneum with high concentration of chemotherapy enhanced with specific effects of hyperthermia. Theoretically, HIPEC could be proposed at different steps of ovarian cancer development. But the hypothesis of efficiency of a new treatment must be assessed before being routinely applied. Numerous clinical series are already published about HIPEC used in primary treatment of ovarian cancer or for relapses. These series are mostly retrospectives and based on heterogeneous parameters as inclusion criteria of patients, intra peritoneal chemotherapy, concentration, temperature, duration of HIPEC. Taking into account this heterogeneity it is not possible to draw strong scientific conclusions about HIPEC efficiency to treat ovarian cancer patients. We proposed a review allowing a better understanding of current recommendations of the use of HIPEC in ovarian cancer patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The aim of this multicentre retrospective study was to compare the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy regimens both with and without oxaliplatin and tumor sidedness in stage IIB (pT4aN0) colon cancer patients. This study included patients with stage IIB colon cancer who underwent curative surgery and received adjuvant chemotherapy. The patients were divided into two groups (one with and one without oxaliplatin) to compare the overall survival (OS) in right- and left-sided tumors. The study population included 298 patients with stage IIB colon cancer (median age: 57) of whom 69.1% were male. Forty-four per cent of these patients (n = 131) were diagnosed with right-sided colon cancer. The median follow-up duration was 35.9 months. In the entire population, a median OS was not reached, and the five-year OS was 83%. The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 12 months. There was no significant difference in terms of the five-year OS between right- (82%) and left-sided (84%) colon tumors (p = 0.67). In addition, the five-year OS of patients treated with and without oxaliplatin were 76% and 89%, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.23). The five-year OS of the patients treated with and without oxaliplatin were 83% and 96.5%, respectively, (p = 0.8) in right-sided colon tumors, while it was 75% and 93% (p = 0.06), respectively, in left-sided colon tumors. Tumor sidedness and the addition of oxaliplatin to adjuvant chemotherapy were not found to be associated with the OS in stage IIB colon cancer patients in our study. Further large prospective studies that also include MSI, RAS and BRAF status data are warranted in colon cancer patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

NLRC3 (NLR family caspase recruitment domain containing 3) has been reported as a factor of inhibiting inflammatory responses. It's role in HCC (hepatocellular carcinoma) is still unknown. In this study we firstly used the GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) database and mIHC (multiple immunohistochemical analysis) with TMAs (tumor tissue microarrays) of HCC patients to evaluate NLRC3 levels. The tumor-bearing mouse models were also established with NLRC3 over-expressing and knock-down Hepal-6 cells to assess its effect. The data showed high NLRC3 expression was related with favorable overall survival (P=0.0386) and disease-free survival (P=0.0458). In addition, NLRC3 expression showed a positive correlation between CD8+ T cells infiltration. In vivo, NLRC3-overexpressing Hepal-6 tumors showed increased CD8+ T cell infiltration. NLRC3-knockdown Hepa1-6 tumors displayed decreased CD8+ T cell infiltration. At the same time, we also found the positive correlations between NLRC3 and CCL5 (C-C motif chemokine ligand 5, P<0.0001, R2 = 0.2372) as well as CXCL9 (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 9, P<0.0001, R2 = 0.2338) expressions. So NLRC3 high expression represents a novel predictor for positive survival outcomes in HCC patients, and NLRC3 is involved in CD8+ T cell infiltration, which is correlated with increased CCL5 and CXCL9 in TME (tumor microenvironment). This study implies that boosting NLRC3 is a promising treatment to enhance survival in HCC patients.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In radical radiochemotherapy (RCT) of inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) typical prognostic factors include T- and N-stage, while there are still conflicting data on the prognostic relevance of gross tumor volume (GTV) and particularly its changes during RCT. The NCT03055715 study of the Young DEGRO working group of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) evaluated the prognostic impact of GTV and its changes during RCT. METHODS: A total of 21 university centers for radiation oncology from five different European countries (Germany, Switzerland, Spain, Belgium, and Austria) participated in the study which evaluated n = 347 patients with confirmed (biopsy) inoperable NSCLC in UICC stage III A/B who received radical curative-intent RCT between 2010 and 2013. Patient and disease data were collected anonymously via electronic case report forms and entered into the multi-institutional RadPlanBio platform for central data analysis. GTV before RCT (initial planning CT, GTV1) and at 40-50 Gy (re-planning CT for radiation boost, GTV2) was delineated. Absolute GTV before/during RCT and relative GTV changes were correlated with overall survival as the primary endpoint. Hazard ratios (HR) of survival analysis were estimated by means of adjusted Cox regression models. RESULTS: GTV1 was found to have a mean of 154.4 ml (95%CI: 1.5-877) and GTV2 of 106.2 ml (95% CI: 0.5-589.5), resulting in an estimated reduction of 48.2 ml (p < 0.001). Median overall survival (OS) was 18.8 months with a median of 22.1, 20.9, and 12.6 months for patients with high, intermediate, and low GTV before RT. Considering all patients, in one survival model of overall mortality, GTV2 (2.75 (1.12-6.75, p = 0.03) was found to be a stronger survival predictor than GTV1 (1.34 (0.9-2, p > 0.05). In patients with available data on both GTV1 and GTV2, absolute GTV1 before RT was not significantly associated with survival (HR 0-69, 0.32-1.49, p > 0.05) but GTV2 significantly predicted OS in a model adjusted for age, T stage, and chemotherapy, with an HR of 3.7 (1.01-13.53, p = 0.04) per 300 ml. The absolute decrease from GTV1 to GTV2 was correlated to survival, where every decrease by 50 ml reduced the HR by 0.8 (CI 0.64-0.99, p = 0.04). There was no evidence for a survival effect of the relative change between GTV1 and GTV2. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that independently of T stage, the re-planning GTV during RCT is a significant and superior survival predictor compared to baseline GTV before RT. Patients with a high absolute (rather than relative) change in GTV during RT show a superior survival outcome after RCT.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective To determine the relative and independent risk factors of survival in patients with non-hepatitis B and non-hepatitis C hepatocellular carcinoma (NBNC-HCC).Methods The clinical records of 109 patients who underwent surgical resection for NBNC-HCC at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital between January 2010 and January 2013 were retrospectively analyzed.The risk factors influencing disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were used as primary outcome measures.Univariate analysis was conducted to determine the relative risk factor predicting prognosis of NBNC-HCC,and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine independent risk factors of DFS and OS.Results For the 109 NBNC-HCC patients,the 1-,2-,3-year overall survival rates were 90.8％,78.0％ and 65.1％,respectively.The compounding disease-free survival rates were 74.0％,63.3％ and 55.8％,respectively.Univariate analysis showed the AFP level,ascites,and TNM staging were the risk factors of OS (all P ＜ O.05).The AFP level,ascites,BCLC stage,TNM staging were related with DFS (all P ＜ 0.05).Multivariate analysis demonstrated AFP and ascites to be the independent risk factors of OS and DFS.Conclusions AFP and ascites were independent risk factors of OS and DFS.For the NBNC-HCC patients,a strong positive AFP with ascites indicated poor prognosis.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It remains a matter of debate whether colorectal cancer resection in an emergency setting negatively impacts on survival. Our objective was therefore to assess the impact of urgent versus elective operation on overall and disease-free survival in patients undergoing resection for colorectal cancer by using propensity score adjusted analysis. METHODS: In a single-center study patients operated for colorectal cancer between 1989 and 2013 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Median follow-up was 44 months. Patients with neoadjuvant treatment were excluded. The impact of urgent operation on overall and disease-free survival was assessed using both Cox regression and propensity score analyses. RESULTS: Of 747 patients with colorectal cancer, 84 (11%) had urgent and 663 elective cancer resection. The propensity score revealed strongly biased patient characteristics (0.22 ± 0.16 vs. 0.10 ± 0.09; P < 0.001). In unadjusted analysis urgent operation was associated with a 35% increased risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio(HR) of death = 1.35, 95% confidence interval(CI):1.02-1.78, P = 0.045). In risk-adjusted Cox regression analysis urgent operation was not associated with poor overall (HR = 1.08, 95%CI:0.79-1.48; P = 0.629) or disease-free survival (HR = 1.02, 95%CI:0.76-1.38; P = 0.877). Similarly in propensity score analysis urgent operation did not influence overall (HR = 0.98, 95% CI:0.74-1.29), P = 0.872) and disease-free survival (HR = 0.89, 95%CI:0.68 to 1.16, P = 0.387). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that worse oncologic outcomes after urgent operation for colorectal cancer are caused by clinical circumstances and not due to the urgent operation itself. Urgent operation is not a risk factor for colorectal cancer resection.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Sixty - eight cancer patients were treated with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes transferred by local injection (local group) , in vein injecition (vein group) and in vein + local injection (vein + local group) respectively. We have analysed the anticancer efficacy and one year survival rate of patients with different transfer ways. It showed that the anticancer efficacy of the local group (85. 7%) was higher than that of vein group (48. 6%), but the one year survival rate of local group (66%) was lower than that of the vein group (80%). Comparative studies on circulating lymphocytes of cancer patients demonstrated that the increase of CD3+, CD8+, CD4+ T lymphocytes of vein group were higer than that of local group, but not different from that of vein + local group. These results suggest the possibility that in vein transfer of TILs could induce immuno -activation of cellular immunity to enhance the one year survial rate.