RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Osseointegrated auditory devices are hearing gadgets that use the bone conduction of sound to produce hearing improvement. The mechanisms and factors that contribute to this sound transmission have been widely studied, however, there are other aspects that remain unknown, for instance, the influence of the processor power output. The aim of this study was to know if there is any relationship between the power output created by the devices and the hearing improvement that they achieve. MATERIALS Y METHODS: 44 patients were implanted with a percutaneous Baha® 5 model. Hearing thresholds in pure tone audiometry, free-field audiometry, and speech recognition (in quiet and in noise) were measured pre and postoperatively in each patient. The direct bone conduction thresholds and the power output values from the processors were also obtained. RESULTS: The pure tone average threshold in free field was 39.29 dB (SD = 9.15), so that the mean gain was 29.18 dB (SD = 10.13) with the device. This involved an air-bone gap closure in 63.64% of patients. The pure tone average threshold in direct bone conduction was 27.6 dB (SD = 10.91), which was 8.4 dB better than the pure tone average threshold via bone conduction. The mean gain in speech recognition was 39.15% (SD = 23.98) at 40 dB and 36.66% (SD = 26.76) at 60 dB. The mean gain in the signal-to-noise ratio was -5.9 dB (SD = 4.32). On the other hand, the mean power output values were 27.95 dB µN (SD = 6.51) in G40 and 26.22 dB µN (SD = 6.49) in G60. When analysing the relationship between bone conduction thresholds and G40 and G60 values, a correlation from the frequency of 1000 Hz was observed. However, no statistically significant association between power output, functional gain or speech recognition gain was found. CONCLUSIONS: The osseointegrated auditory devices generate hearing improvement in tonal thresholds and speech recognition, even in noise. Most patients closed the air-bone gap with the device. There is a direct relationship between the bone conduction threshold and the power output values from the processor, but only in mid and high frequencies. However, the relationship between power output and gain in speech recognition is weaker. Further investigation of contributing factors is necessary.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Antecedentes y objetivos: Los dispositivos auditivos osteointegrados utilizan la transmisión del sonido por vía ósea para producir una mejoría auditiva. Los mecanismos y factores que intervienen en esta transmisión han sido ampliamente estudiados, sin embargo, existen otros aspectos que no conocemos, por ejemplo, la influencia que tiene la potencia de salida del procesador. El objetivo principal de este estudio fue conocer si existe alguna relación entre la potencia que emiten estos dispositivos y la mejoría auditiva que producen. Materiales y métodos: Hemos realizado un estudio en 44 pacientes portadores de un Baha® 5 percutáneo. De cada paciente se obtuvieron los umbrales de vía aérea y ósea en audiometría tonal liminar, en audiometría en campo libre, y en audiometría verbal en silencio y con ruido de fondo, tanto previa como posteriormente a la implantación. También se recogieron los umbrales de conducción ósea directa a través del procesador y los valores de ganancia en la potencia de salida del procesador. (AU)

Background and objective: Osseointegrated auditory devices are hearing gadgets that use the bone conduction of sound to produce hearing improvement. The mechanisms and factors that contribute to this sound transmission have been widely studied, however, there are other aspects that remain unknown, for instance, the influence of the processor power output. The aim of this study was to know if there is any relationship between the power output created by the devices and the hearing improvement that they achieve. Materials and methods: Forty-four patients were implanted with a percutaneous Baha® 5 model. Hearing thresholds in pure tone audiometry, free-field audiometry, and speech recognition (in quiet and in noise) were measured pre and postoperatively in each patient. The direct bone conduction thresholds and the power output values from the processors were also obtained. (AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Osseointegrated auditory devices are hearing gadgets that use the bone conduction of sound to produce hearing improvement. The mechanisms and factors that contribute to this sound transmission have been widely studied, however, there are other aspects that remain unknown, for instance, the influence of the processor power output. The aim of this study was to know if there is any relationship between the power output created by the devices and the hearing improvement that they achieve. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients were implanted with a percutaneous Baha® 5 model. Hearing thresholds in pure tone audiometry, free-field audiometry, and speech recognition (in quiet and in noise) were measured pre and postoperatively in each patient .The direct bone conduction thresholds and the power output values from the processors were also obtained. RESULTS: The pure tone average threshold in free field was 39.29dB (SD 9.15), so that the mean gain was 29.18dB (SD 10.13) with the device. This involved an air-bone gap closure in 63.64% of patients. The pure tone average threshold in direct bone conduction was 27.6dB (SD 10.91), which was 8.4dB better than the pure tone average threshold via bone conduction. The mean gain in speech recognition was 39.15% (SD 23.98) at 40dB and 36.66% (SD 26.76) at 60dB. The mean gain in the signal-to-noise ratio was -5.9dB (SD 4.32). On the other hand, the mean power output values were 27.95dB µN (SD 6.51) in G40 and 26.22dB µN (SD 6.49) in G60. When analysing the relationship between bone conduction thresholds and G40 and G60 values, a correlation from the frequency of 1,000Hz was observed. However, no statistically significant association between power output, functional gain or speech recognition gain was found. CONCLUSIONS: The osseointegrated auditory devices generate hearing improvement in tonal thresholds and speech recognition, even in noise. Most patients closed the air-bone gap with the device. There is a direct relationship between the bone conduction threshold and the power output values from the processor, but only in mid and high frequencies. However, the relationship between power output and gain in speech recognition is weaker. Further investigation of contributing factors is necessary.