RESUMEN
Schizophrenia is ranked among the top 25 leading causes of disability worldwide in 2013 which resulting in social and economic burden. By observing patients with schizophrenia one year before and after switching from oral antipsychotics (OAPs) to once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M), we can better understand the change of total costs in schizophrenic patients, including direct costs and indirect costs, after switching treatment patterns.A total of 100 schizophrenic (ICD-10) patients from Shandong Mental Health Center were collected from December 2016 to June 2019. Treatment modalities, health care resource utilization and costs were compared before and after switching directly from oral antipsychotics to PP1M.Of the 82 patients included in the main analyses, treatment with PP1M resulted in an increase in direct costs of 31.92% (P < 0.01), an increase in medicine costs of approximately 142% (P < 0.01), and a reduction in hospital costs of 68.15% (P > 0.05). There was no significant increase in total costs (P = 0.25), while 31.92% increase in direct costs (P < 0.01), and 35.62% decrease in indirect costs (P < 0.01) after conversion to PP1M. Compared with before administration of PP1M, patients with ≥ 1 inpatient stay in 1 year Pre-PP1M treatment with OAPs (n = 32) had a 20.16% decrease in direct costs (P < 0.01), a 144% increase in medicine costs (P < 0.01), and a significant 72.02% decrease in hospital costs (P < 0.01). The observed reduction in the number of hospitalizations (t = 2.56, P ≤ 0.01) and inpatient stays (t = 1.73, P < 0.05) and after transition to PP1M resulted in a reduction in hospitalization costs (P < 0.01).Switching from OAPs to PP1M decreased the household workforce burden without increasing clinical healthcare costs. Direct costs were significantly reduced in patients with ≥ 1 inpatient stay in 1 year pre-PP1M treatment with OAPs after the switch, which decreased by improving adherence to therapy and reducing the number and length of hospital stays, suggesting that those patients may benefit after switching to PP1M.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Esquizofrenia , Administración Oral , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/uso terapéutico , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Medicaid , Palmitato de Paliperidona , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Previous evidence demonstrated that patients with schizophrenia consumed substantial healthcare resources in an integrated healthcare system. This study evaluated the impact of initiating once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) on healthcare resource utilization (HRU) among patients with schizophrenia treated in a US integrated healthcare system. METHODS: This retrospective study used electronic medical records from Atrium Health. Adults with at least two diagnoses of schizophrenia who received an initial PP1M dose between September 2009 and April 2019 (the corresponding date defined the index date) and at least one subsequent dose within 90 days were included. Additionally, patients were required to have received active care (at least one healthcare visit every 6 months) during 12-month pre- and post-index periods and at least one oral antipsychotic prescription during the 12-month pre-index period. Inpatient, emergency room (ER), and outpatient visits were compared over 12-month pre- versus post-index periods within the same cohort using McNemar's and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Findings were reported for all patients and separately in patients with at least one schizophrenia relapse (schizophrenia-related inpatient or ER visit) during the 12-month pre-index period. RESULTS: The study cohort included 210 patients (mean age 34.2 years, 69.5% male, 39.1% had Medicaid). From the 12-month pre- to post-index period, the proportion of patients with visits and mean number of visits reduced for all-cause inpatient (67.6% to 22.4%, 1.2 to 0.4), 30-day readmission (12.4% to 2.4%, 0.2 to 0.1), and ER (68.6% to 45.7%, 2.3 to 1.2) visits, whereas the mean number of outpatient visits increased (8.7 to 11.6) (all P < 0.05). Similar trends were observed for mental health- and schizophrenia-related HRU. The trends in HRU in patients with prior relapse were similar with a higher extent of reduction in inpatient and ER use compared to the overall cohort. CONCLUSION: Initiation of PP1M was associated with reduced acute HRU in patients with schizophrenia, indicating potential clinical and economic benefits, especially in patients with prior relapse.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Esquizofrenia , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Palmitato de Paliperidona/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia is associated with high health care resource utilization and treatment costs. OBJECTIVE: This study compared treatment patterns, health care resource utilization, and medical costs before and after a switch from oral antipsychotic drug (risperidone or paliperidone [RIS/PALI]) therapy to the long-acting injectable once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: Data for adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with at least 1 diagnosis of schizophrenia who initiated treatment with oral RIS/PALI ≥6 months before switching and had continuous health plan enrollment during the study period before and after the switch were extracted from the Veterans Health Administration database. Treatment patterns, health care resource utilization, and costs were compared between the period 6 or 12 months before and after switching directly from oral RIS/PALI to PP1M. RESULTS: The analysis included 676 and 493 patients in the 6-month and 12-month cohorts, respectively. Adherence to oral RIS/PALI during the 12 months preswitch was 11.0% and 22.1% as measured by proportion of days covered and medication possession ratio ≥80%, respectively. During the 12 months postswitch, adherence to PP1M was 27.0% and 35.9%, respectively. Among patients treated with oral RIS/PALI, from 12 months pre- to 12 months post-PP1M switch, fewer all-cause inpatient stays (2.2 vs 1.1, respectively; P < 0.05) and a shorter mean length of inpatient stay (28.1 and 14.0 days, respectively; P < 0.05) were observed. This pattern was similar for both the number of mental health- and schizophrenia-related inpatient stays and length of stay. Compared with 12 months pre-PP1M switch, significantly higher mean numbers of all-cause outpatient visits and pharmacy visits were observed at 12 months postswitch. In line with health care resource utilization findings, at 12 months pre- versus 12 months post-PP1M switch we observed decreases in all-cause inpatient stay costs ($41,886 vs $20,489; P < 0.05) and increases in outpatient visit costs ($22,005 vs $29,069; P < 0.05). Findings for the 6-month cohort followed a similar pattern. CONCLUSIONS: Post-PP1M switch, a decrease in total medical costs fully offset an increase in pharmacy costs, resulting in similar total costs. The findings suggest potential economic benefits of switching patients with schizophrenia from oral RIS/PALI to PP1M in the Veterans Health Administration.
RESUMEN
Background: Medication non-adherence is prevalent in patients with bipolar disorder (BD). Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIAs) are widely used to improve compliance with treatment. This study aimed to illustrate the effectiveness, compliance, and safety profile of once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M), a novel therapeutic LAIA, in the management of bipolar I disorder (BDI). Method: A prospective follow-up was arranged to 11 BDI patients who were prescribed PP1M as monotherapy or adjunctive treatment. Severity of symptoms, disturbing behavior, status of employment, 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) were evaluated at the baseline and the endpoint of follow-up. Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Disorder-Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-BP) and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS) were measured at each injection of PP1M. Compliance, relapse or switch, and new hospitalization were monitored through the period of follow-up. Results: The median duration of treatment was 14 months, ranging from 5 to 22 months. The scores (mean ± standard deviation) of HAMD-17, YMRS, and CGI-BP generally decreased from the baseline (16.1 ± 10.3, 30.9 ± 12.6, 5.3 ± 0.7) to the endpoint (7.4 ± 5.7, 3.7 ± 3.2, 2.3 ± 0.7). No disturbing behavior was detected at the endpoint. Neither new hospitalization nor manic/mixed episode occurred during treatment, whereas mild to moderate depressive episodes were reported in three cases. The status of employment of 10 participants (90.9%) was improved, and no new safety concern was detected. Conclusion: PP1M might offer a new valid treatment option in the long-term management of BDI, especially for those with poor compliance with oral medication. However, more studies are needed to further justify such role.
RESUMEN
Background: In this post hoc analysis in patients recently diagnosed (≤5 years) with schizophrenia, the effect on hospitalization risk after switching from oral antipsychotic to once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) was evaluated. Research design and methods: Change in hospitalization risk following PP1M initiation among patients switching from oral antipsychotics was assessed using prescription sequence symmetry analysis. Hospitalization risk was expressed as an adjusted sequence ratio (ASR) of the number of patients hospitalized prior to PP1M initiation/post PP1M initiation. Cumulative distribution of the time to hospitalization was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and symmetry of distribution was assessed using log-rank test. Hazard ratio and 95% CI were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model. Results: The number of patients hospitalized after switching to PP1M: no change, 203/300 (67.7%); increase, 18/300 (6.0%); and decrease, 79/300 (26.3%). Following PP1M initiation, ASR (95% CI) was 3.56 (2.67, 5.33) suggesting asymmetry and a significant decline in hospitalization risk. Asymmetry in distribution of hospitalization events with significant (p ≤ 0.001) delay in time to hospitalization was also observed. Conclusion: Switching to PP1M treatment from oral antipsychotics is likely to be associated with a significant reduction in hospitalization risk along with a delay in time to hospitalization and rehospitalization.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Palmitato de Paliperidona/uso terapéutico , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Adulto , Pueblo Asiatico , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Riesgo , Esquizofrenia/patologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Multiple real-world studies have reported potential cost savings associated with second-generation antipsychotic long-acting injectable therapies (SGA-LAIs), including once monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M). Yet, only about 12% of Medicaid patients with schizophrenia initiate SGA-LAIs, with poor adherence contributing to frequent relapse among patients on oral atypical antipsychotics (OAAs). The objective of this study was to project the economic impact when an incremental proportion of non-adherent patients with a recent relapse switched from OAAs to PP1M. METHODS: A 12 month decision-tree model was developed from a Medicaid payers' perspective. The target population was non-adherent OAA patients with a recent relapse. At equal adherence, risk of relapse was equal between PP1M and OAAs, and OAA patients remained non-adherent until treatment switch. Outcomes included number of relapses, relapse costs and pharmacy costs. RESULTS: Based on a hypothetical health plan of 1 million members, 3037 schizophrenia patients were non-adherent on OAAs with a recent relapse. Compared to continuing OAAs, switching 5% of patients (n = 152) to PP1M resulted in net schizophrenia-related cost savings of $674,975 at a plan level, $4445 per patient switched per year and $0.0562 per member per month, with a total of 92 avoided relapses over 12 months. Total annual plan level schizophrenia-related costs were $114.1 M when all patients switched to PP1M before any subsequent relapse (n = 3037), $123.4 M when patients switched to PP1M after a first subsequent relapse (n = 2631), and $127.6 M when all patients continued OAAs. Switching all patients to PP1M before any subsequent relapse averted 917 relapses, at a lower cost per patient switched ($37,559) compared to switching after a first subsequent relapse ($45,089) or continuing OAAs ($42,005). CONCLUSION: Over 12 months, pharmacy costs associated with switching patients from OAAs to PP1M were offset by reduced relapse rates and schizophrenia-related healthcare expenditures, with earlier use of PP1M projected to generate greater cost savings.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Medicaid , Palmitato de Paliperidona/uso terapéutico , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/economía , Ahorro de Costo , Femenino , Humanos , Medicaid/economía , Palmitato de Paliperidona/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Objective: To compare rehospitalizations in patients with schizophrenia treated with paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) vs oral atypical antipsychotics (OAAs), with a focus on young adults (18-35 years).Methods: The Premier Healthcare database (January 2009-December 2016) was used to identify hospitalizations of adults (≥18 years) with schizophrenia treated with PP1M or OAA between September 2009 and October 2016 (index hospitalizations). Rehospitalizations were assessed at 30, 60, and 90 days after each index hospitalization in young adults and in all patients. Proportions of index hospitalizations resulting in rehospitalization were reported and compared between groups using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results: A total of 8578 PP1M and 306,252 OAA index hospitalizations were included. Hospitalized young adults treated with PP1M (n = 3791) were more likely to be seen by a psychiatrist (94.0% vs 90.0%), and had a longer length of stay (12.5 vs 8.6 days) compared to hospitalized young adults treated with OAA (n = 96,502). Following their discharge, young adults receiving PP1M during an index hospitalization had a 25-27% lower odds of rehospitalization within 30, 60, and 90 days compared to young adults receiving OAAs (all p < .001). Similarly, when observing all patients, those receiving PP1M during an index hospitalization had 19-22% lower odds of rehospitalization within 30, 60, and 90 days compared to those receiving OAAs (all p < .001).Conclusions: Following a hospitalization for schizophrenia, PP1M treatment was associated with fewer 90-day rehospitalizations among young adults (18-35 years) relative to OAA treatment. This finding was also observed in other hospitalized adults with schizophrenia.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Palmitato de Paliperidona/uso terapéutico , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Alta del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of 3-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP3M) vs once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) treatment with regard to extrapyramidal symptom (EPS)-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in patients with schizophrenia, previously stabilized on PP1M treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on overall incidence, time to onset (TTO), and time to resolution (TTR) of EPS-related TEAEs (overall, subclasses such as dyskinesia, dystonia, hyperkinesia, parkinsonism, and tremor) from a randomized double-blind (DB) non-inferiority study were compared between PP3M and PP1M. Subgroup analysis was performed by age (18-25, 26-50, and 50+ years) and final open-label (OL) dose (50/75, 100, and 150 mg eq.). RESULTS: Overall incidence of spontaneously reported EPS-related TEAEs decreased from 12.6% (PP1M) in OL phase to 8.3% (PP3M) and 7.4% (PP1M) in the DB phase; overall median TTO and TTR values were comparable between both groups. Among patients with reported EPS-related TEAEs, the median TTO for all EPS-related TEAEs was 17 days (PP1M) in OL phase and 115 days (PP3M) and 98.5 days (PP1M) in DB phase; median TTR was 36.5 days (PP1M) in OL phase and 91 days (PP3M) and 85.5 days (PP1M) in DB phase. No clear dose- or age-related differences in TTO and TTR of EPS-related TEAEs were noted. CONCLUSION: Despite differences in apparent half-life and pharmacokinetic profiles (peak plasma exposure of PP3M formulation is 70% higher than that of PP1M formulation), both PP3M and PP1M formulations exhibited comparable incidence of EPS-related TEAEs, TTO, and TTR in patients with schizophrenia.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment patterns and Medicaid spending between schizophrenia patients initiating once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) and oral atypical antipsychotics (OAAs) within four comorbid populations: cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes, hypertension and obesity. METHODS: Five-state Medicaid data identified comorbid adults with schizophrenia initiating PP1M or OAAs (index) from September 2009 balanced with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Chi-squared and t-tests compared index antipsychotic (AP) exposure (no gap >90 days) duration, AP polypharmacy, and index AP adherence (proportion of days covered ≥80%) and persistence (no gap ≥60 days) at 12 months post-index. Linear models with a non-parametric bootstrap procedure compared costs. RESULTS: PP1M patients consistently had longer index AP exposure (e.g. CVD: 244 vs. 189 days; p < .001) and less AP polypharmacy (e.g. CVD: 21.1% vs. 28.1%; p < .001) versus OAA patients. Relative to OAA patients, adherence was more likely in PP1M patients with CVD or obesity (e.g. CVD: 28.6% vs. 22.1%; p < .001) and less likely for patients with diabetes (22.0% vs. 24.4%; p = .031). Persistence was consistently more likely for PP1M versus OAA patients (e.g. CVD: 49.9% vs. 27.4%; p < .001). Total costs were not significantly different between PP1M and OAA patients for any comorbidity. PP1M patients with diabetes, hypertension or obesity had higher pharmacy and lower medical costs (all p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with PP1M versus OAAs may reduce AP polypharmacy and increase AP persistence in comorbid patients with schizophrenia, without increasing total healthcare costs. Comorbidities are a highly prevalent driver of excess mortality in this vulnerable population; thus, future studies should specifically address the real-world effectiveness of therapies, including long acting injectable therapies (LAIs), for these patients.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Medicaid/economía , Palmitato de Paliperidona/administración & dosificación , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Adulto , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
AIM: Compare medication utilization, costs and healthcare resource use in schizophrenia patients with substance-related disorders initiated on once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) or an oral atypical antipsychotic (OAA). MATERIALS & METHODS: Data from six Medicaid states (07/2009-03/2015) were used to compare outcomes between PP1M and OAA patients. RESULTS: PP1M patients had higher 12-month antipsychotic adherence and persistence than OAA patients. PP1M patients had lower medical (mean monthly cost difference [MMCD] = US$-191, p = 0.020), higher pharmacy (MMCD = US$250, p < 0.001) and similar total costs (MMCD = US$59, p = 0.517) during the overall follow-up. PP1M patients had lower rates of outpatient visits and inpatient days but higher rates of mental health-related utilization. CONCLUSION: PP1M was associated with higher antipsychotic adherence and persistence, and similar total costs versus OAA.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Palmitato de Paliperidona/administración & dosificación , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Diagnóstico Dual (Psiquiatría) , Esquema de Medicación , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/economía , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Palmitato de Paliperidona/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esquizofrenia/complicaciones , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/complicaciones , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Short-term studies focused on once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP) at doses of 25 mg eq, 50 mg eq, 75 mg eq, 100 mg eq, or 150 mg eq have shown its efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of schizophrenia patients. However, few open-label and long-term studies are available regarding this new pharmacological formulation. Thus, our main aim was to review the scientific evidence on efficacy, safety, tolerability, and preference of PP in these populations. METHOD: Electronic searches were conducted by using PubMed and ISI Web of Knowledge databases. All relevant studies published from 2009 until January 2015 were included without any language restriction if patients met diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia, and adequate information on efficacy, safety, and tolerability of once-monthly PP was available. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were identified irrespective of the study design and duration of the follow-up period. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials found that schizophrenia patients receiving PP showed a significant improvement in psychotic symptoms and similar adverse events compared to placebo and suggested that all doses of PP were efficacious and well tolerated. Other studies demonstrated noninferiority of PP compared to risperidone long-acting injectable in recently diagnosed schizophrenia patients, chronically ill patients, as well as in acute and nonacute symptomatic schizophrenia patients, and a similar proportion of treatment-emergent adverse events between both groups were also noted. CONCLUSION: Several studies have demonstrated that schizophrenia patients treated with PP show higher rates of improvement of psychotic symptoms compared to placebo, and similar efficacy and tolerability outcomes were noted when comparing PP to risperidone long-acting injectable or oral, paliperidone extended release.