RESUMEN
The post mortem assessment of brain edema is routinely performed during autopsy by forensic pathologists who evaluate the macroscopically visible signs. In this study, the suitability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for a differentiation between edematous and nonedematous brains was examined as an objective, noninvasive and quantitative rating method. In this study, 22 deceased underwent post mortem in situ MRI prior to regular autopsy. Acquired MRI sequences allowed the computation of the quantitative MRI parameters T1, T2, T2*, fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity for the cortex, white matter and deep gray matter separately. Beside the autopsy results, which represent the gold standard for rating brain edema, also the normalized cerebral weight (NCW) was determined by dividing the brain weight by the intracranial volume as developed by Bauer et al. [10]. For further examination of the relation of MRI parameters with the NCW, linear regression models were calculated. The results revealed highly significant correlations of the MRI parameters T2 and FA with the NCW in the cortex. These combinations additionally showed the best fitting results of the linear regression models. In conclusion, quantitative MRI is suitable for differentiating edematous from nonedematous brains by calculating T2 and FA in the cortex. A post mortem in situ MRI scan of the brain can, besides delivering morphological information, add relevant and objective information on the edema status of the brain prior to autopsy or when no autopsy is ordered.
Asunto(s)
Edema Encefálico , Sustancia Blanca , Autopsia/métodos , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/patología , Edema Encefálico/diagnóstico por imagen , Edema Encefálico/patología , Edema/diagnóstico por imagen , Edema/patología , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodosRESUMEN
The post mortem evaluation of a brain edema is routinely performed by pathologists based on the macroscopic signs during autopsy. This method represents the current gold standard, but is subjective and observer dependent. Therefore, three post mortem evaluation methods of brain samples were analyzed in this work: histology, wet-dry weight and normalized cerebral weight, which was described in 2020 by Bauer et al. Tissue samples from six different regions of 34 brains were collected and examined both by rating of histological slides and by measuring the water content by using a drying oven. The rating of the histological slides, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, was performed by two pathologists independently. For the water content, the wet weight and the dry weight of each sample were set in relation. The normalized cerebral weight was calculated by dividing the brain weight by the brain volume, which were both determined during autopsy and in computed tomography images, respectively. A fair to moderate interrater agreement was obtained for the histologic evaluation and a significant correlation was present between one rater and the wet-dry weight and the normalized cerebral weight method. When classifying according to the gold standard, a significant difference was detected between the edematous and nonedematous cases by using the wet-dry weight method in the cerebral cortex and by using the normalized cerebral weight method. However, the significant correlations and group differences were limited to the aforementioned results. In conclusion, both the histological and the wet-dry weight method show limited benefits for the classification of brain edema and the histology analysis is highly observer dependent. The normalized cerebral weight method, however, reveals a significant effect between the edematous and nonedematous cases when classifying according to the gold standard. Therefore, we suggest to apply this method for the assessment of brain edema since it is objective and rater independent. Nevertheless, the exact evaluation of brain edema remains a challenging task, especially due to the continuous transition between no edema and edema.
RESUMEN
While cerebral edema is a live-threatening condition in living persons, also an edema-like fluid redistribution can occur post mortem. In deceased, usually macroscopic signs are evaluated during autopsy in order to determine the presence or absence of cerebral edema. As a quantitative and objective classification is beneficial, an already existing method (Radojevic et al., 2017), which is based on a mathematical formula using the intracranial dimensions and the cerebral weight, was compared to the evaluation of macroscopic signs in 31 cases. The results showed an excellent agreement for the comparison between the raters as well as the measurement methods (at opened skull or in CT images). However, both measurement methods only poorly agree with the macroscopic edema evaluation. In order to find a more concordant method, the normalized cerebral weight, which puts the cerebral weight in relation to the intracranial volume, was calculated for 115 cases. This method resulted in an excellent agreement with the macroscopic rating and showed a clear numerical difference between the edematous and nonedematous group. While the influence of the post mortem time and the cooling time was found to be negligible, the age at death might confound the edema classification due to pre-existing cerebral atrophy leading to lower cerebral weights. In summary, the present study compared different assessment methods to classify cerebral edema and developed a rater independent, objective and quantitative classification method, which was as reliable as the rating of the forensic pathologists.