RESUMEN

Background Increased high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) above the upper reference limit (URL) after noncardiac surgery identifies patients at risk for mortality. Prior studies have not analyzed hs-cTnT as a continuous variable or probed age- and sex-specific URLs. This study compared the prediction of 30-day mortality using continuous postoperative hs-cTnT levels to the use of the overall URL and age- and sex-specific URLs. Methods and Results Patients (876) >40 years of age who underwent noncardiac surgery were included. Hs-cTnT was measured on postoperative day 1. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare associations between 30-day mortality and using hs-cTnT as a continuous variable, or above the overall or age- and sex-specific URLs. Comparisons were performed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Mortality was 4.2%. For each 1 ng/L increase in postoperative hs-cTnT, there was a 0.3% increase in mortality (P<0.001). Patients with postoperative hs-cTnT >14 ng/L were 37% of the cohort, while those above age- and sex-specific URLs were 25.3%. Both manifested higher mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 3.19; 95% CI, 1.20-8.49; P=0.020) and (HR, 2.76; P=0.009) than those with normal levels. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.89 using hs-cTnT as a continuous variable, 0.87 for age- and sex-specific URLs, and 0.86 for the overall URL. Conclusions Hs-cTnT as a continuous variable was independently associated with 30-day mortality and had the highest accuracy. Hs-cTnT elevations using overall and/or age- and sex-specific URLs were also associated with higher mortality.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Various studies suggest that perioperative concentrations of high-sensitivity troponins are incremental and predictive factors of a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and all-cause mortality. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the predictive value of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) in the development of MACE and all-cause mortality, within 30-days and 1-year follow-up after noncardiac surgery. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we included men ≥ 45 years and women ≥ 55 years with ≥ 2 cardiovascular risk factors and undergoing intermediate or high-risk noncardiac surgery. Demographic and clinical information was collected from clinical charts. We measured baseline hs-cTnI 24 h before surgery, and its post-operative concentration 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: In the entire sample, 8 patients (8.6%) developed MACE at 30-days follow-up (4 deaths), 12 (12.9%) within the 1st year (7 deaths), and 17 (18.2%) after complete post-surgical follow-up (10 deaths). We observed higher baseline and post-operative concentrations in patients who presented MACE (12 pg/ml vs. 3.5 pg/ml; p = 0.001 and 18.3 pg/ml vs. 5.45 pg/ml; p = 0.009, respectively). The hazard ratios (HRs) calculated by Cox regression analysis between the hs-cTnI baseline concentration and the post-operative development of MACE at 30-days and 1-year were 5.70 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-29.40) with hs-cTnI > 6.2 pg/ml and 12.86 (95% CI, 1.42-116.34) with hs-cTnI > 3.3 pg/ml, respectively. The estimated post-operative HR death risk at 1-year was 14.43 (95% CI, 1.37-151.61) with hs-cTnI > 4.5 pg/ml. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative hs-cTnI was an independent predictive risk factor for MACE at 30-days and 1-year after noncardiac surgery and for all-cause mortality at 1-year after noncardiac surgery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Background: Various studies suggest that perioperative concentrations of high-sensitivity troponins are incremental and predictive factors of a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and all-cause mortality. Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the predictive value of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) in the development of MACE and all-cause mortality, within 30-days and 1-year follow-up after noncardiac surgery. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, we included men ≥ 45 years and women ≥ 55 years with ≥ 2 cardiovascular risk factors and undergoing intermediate or high-risk noncardiac surgery. Demographic and clinical information was collected from clinical charts. We measured baseline hs-cTnI 24 h before surgery, and its post-operative concentration 24 h after surgery. Results: In the entire sample, 8 patients (8.6%) developed MACE at 30-days follow-up (4 deaths), 12 (12.9%) within the 1st year (7 deaths), and 17 (18.2%) after complete post-surgical follow-up (10 deaths). We observed higher baseline and post-operative concentrations in patients who presented MACE (12 pg/ml vs. 3.5 pg/ml; p = 0.001 and 18.3 pg/ml vs. 5.45 pg/ml; p = 0.009, respectively). The hazard ratios (HRs) calculated by Cox regression analysis between the hs-cTnI baseline concentration and the post-operative development of MACE at 30-days and 1-year were 5.70 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-29.40) with hs-cTnI > 6.2 pg/ml and 12.86 (95% CI, 1.42-116.34) with hs-cTnI > 3.3 pg/ml, respectively. The estimated post-operative HR death risk at 1-year was 14.43 (95% CI, 1.37-151.61) with hs-cTnI > 4.5 pg/ml. Conclusions: Pre-operative hs-cTnI was an independent predictive risk factor for MACE at 30-days and 1-year after noncardiac surgery and for all-cause mortality at 1-year after noncardiac surgery.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Abstract Background: The goal directed hemodynamic therapy is an approach focused on the use of cardiac output and related parameters as end-points for fluids and drugs to optimize tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery. Primary aim: To determine the effects of intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy on postoperative complications rates. Methods: A meta-analysis was carried out of the effects of goal directed hemodynamic therapy in adult noncardiac surgery on postoperative complications and mortality using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology. A systematic search was performed in Medline PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (last update, October 2014). Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials in which intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy was compared to conventional fluid management in noncardiac surgery. Exclusion criteria were trauma and pediatric surgery studies and that using pulmonary artery catheter. End-points were postoperative complications (primary) and mortality (secondary). Those studies that fulfilled the entry criteria were examined in full and subjected to quantifiable analysis, predefined subgroup analysis (stratified by type of monitor, therapy, and hemodynamic goal), and predefined sensitivity analysis. Results: 51 RCTs were initially identified, 24 fulfilling the inclusion criteria. 5 randomized clinical trials were added by manual search, resulting in 29 randomized clinical trials in the final analysis, including 2654 patients. A significant reduction in complications for goal directed hemodynamic therapy was observed (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.62-0.79, p < 0.001). No significant decrease in mortality was achieved (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.45-1.28, p = 0.30). Quality sensitive analyses confirmed the main overall results. Conclusions: Intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy with minimally invasive monitoring decreases postoperative complications in noncardiac surgery, although it was not able to show a significant decrease in mortality rate.

Resumo Justificativa: A terapia hemodinâmica alvo-dirigida (THAD) é uma abordagem focada no uso do débito cardíaco (DC) e parâmetros relacionados, como desfechos para fluidos e medicamentos para aprimorar a perfusão tecidual e o fornecimento de oxigênio. Objetivo primário: determinar os efeitos da THAD sobre as taxas de complicações no pós-operatório. Métodos: Metanálise dos efeitos da THAD em cirurgias não cardíacas de adultos sobre as complicações pós-operatórias e mortalidade, com a metodologia PRISMA. Uma busca sistemática foi feita no Medline PubMed, Embase e Biblioteca Cochrane (última atualização, outubro de 2014). Os critérios de inclusão foram estudos clínicos randômicos (ECRs) nos quais a THAD no intraoperatório foi comparada com a terapia convencional de reposição de líquidos em cirurgia não cardíaca. Os critérios de exclusão foram traumatismo e estudos de cirurgia pediátrica e aqueles que usaram cateter de artéria pulmonar. Os desfechos, primário e secundário, foram complicações pós-operatórias e mortalidade, respectivamente. Os estudos que atenderam aos critérios de inclusão foram examinados na íntegra e submetidos à análise quantitativa, análise de subgrupo pré-definido (estratificada por tipo de monitor, terapia e objetivo hemodinâmico) e análise de sensibilidade pré-definida. Resultados: 51 ECRs foram identificados inicialmente, 24 atenderam aos critérios de inclusão. Cinco ECRs foram adicionados por busca manual, resultando em 29 ECRs para análise final, incluindo 2.654 pacientes. Uma redução significativa das complicações para a THAD (RR: 0,70, IC de 95%: 0,62-0,79, p < 0,001). Nenhuma diminuição significativa na mortalidade foi observada (RR: 0,76, IC de 95%: 0,45-1,28, p = 0,30). Análises de sensibilidade qualitativa confirmaram os principais resultados gerais. Conclusões: THAD no intraoperatório com monitoração minimamente invasiva diminui as complicações no pós-operatório de cirurgia não cardíaca, embora não tenha mostrado uma redução significativa da taxa de mortalidade.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The goal directed hemodynamic therapy is an approach focused on the use of cardiac output and related parameters as end-points for fluids and drugs to optimize tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery. Primary aim: To determine the effects of intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy on postoperative complications rates. METHODS: A meta-analysis was carried out of the effects of goal directed hemodynamic therapy in adult noncardiac surgery on postoperative complications and mortality using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology. A systematic search was performed in Medline PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (last update, October 2014). Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials in which intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy was compared to conventional fluid management in noncardiac surgery. Exclusion criteria were trauma and pediatric surgery studies and that using pulmonary artery catheter. End-points were postoperative complications (primary) and mortality (secondary). Those studies that fulfilled the entry criteria were examined in full and subjected to quantifiable analysis, predefined subgroup analysis (stratified by type of monitor, therapy, and hemodynamic goal), and predefined sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: 51 RCTs were initially identified, 24 fulfilling the inclusion criteria. 5 randomized clinical trials were added by manual search, resulting in 29 randomized clinical trials in the final analysis, including 2654 patients. A significant reduction in complications for goal directed hemodynamic therapy was observed (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.62-0.79, p<0.001). No significant decrease in mortality was achieved (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.45-1.28, p=0.30). Quality sensitive analyses confirmed the main overall results. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy with minimally invasive monitoring decreases postoperative complications in noncardiac surgery, although it was not able to show a significant decrease in mortality rate.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The goal directed hemodynamic therapy is an approach focused on the use of cardiac output and related parameters as end-points for fluids and drugs to optimize tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery. Primary aim: To determine the effects of intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy on postoperative complications rates. METHODS: A meta-analysis was carried out of the effects of goal directed hemodynamic therapy in adult noncardiac surgery on postoperative complications and mortality using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology. A systematic search was performed in Medline PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (last update, October 2014). Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials in which intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy was compared to conventional fluid management in noncardiac surgery. Exclusion criteria were trauma and pediatric surgery studies and that using pulmonary artery catheter. End-points were postoperative complications (primary) and mortality (secondary). Those studies that fulfilled the entry criteria were examined in full and subjected to quantifiable analysis, predefined subgroup analysis (stratified by type of monitor, therapy, and hemodynamic goal), and predefined sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: 51 RCTs were initially identified, 24 fulfilling the inclusion criteria. 5 randomized clinical trials were added by manual search, resulting in 29 randomized clinical trials in the final analysis, including 2654 patients. A significant reduction in complications for goal directed hemodynamic therapy was observed (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.62-0.79, p<0.001). No significant decrease in mortality was achieved (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.45-1.28, p=0.30). Quality sensitive analyses confirmed the main overall results. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy with minimally invasive monitoring decreases postoperative complications in noncardiac surgery, although it was not able to show a significant decrease in mortality rate.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: É crescente o número de pacientes em uso de aspirina que serão submetidos a procedimentos cirúrgicos, situação que contribui para o dilema entre suspensão ou manutenção da medicação. Se por um lado a manutenção da aspirina durante o perioperatório está associada a um aumento no número de complicações hemorrágicas, por outro a sua interrupção está associada a graves complicações trombóticas. O objetivo deste estudo foi revisar de forma não sistemática as bases de dados Medline, Cochrane, Google Scholar e LILACS quanto aos efeitos da suspensão ou manutenção da aspirina no perioperatório de operações não cardíacas.CONTEÚDO: Os pacientes em uso de aspirina devem ser avaliados individualmente e a antiga recomendação de suspender a medicação de 7 a 10 dias antes de todo procedimento cirúrgico deve ser revista em razão dos comprovados efeitos prejudiciais. A aspirina deve ser mantida naqueles pacientes em prevenção secundária na maioria das situações, com exceção das cirurgias em cavidades fechadas e da prostatectomia transuretral, onde os riscos associados ao sangramento mostraram-se elevados. Os pacientes com stent coronariano também devem manter o uso da aspirina indefinidamente e a realização de procedimentos cirúrgicos eletivos deve ser postergada enquanto o uso concomitante do clopidogrel estiver indicado. CONCLUSÃO: A decisão sobre a manutenção da aspirina no perioperatório deve levar em conta riscos aterotrombóticos associados à sua suspensão e riscos de sangramento inerentes ao procedimento cirúrgico proposto. As evidências disponíveis apontam a favor de uma relação risco-benefício favoráveis à manutenção da aspirina na maioria das situações, embora estudos mais definitivos sejam necessários.(AU)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The number of patients taking aspirin who will undergo invasive surgical procedures is increasing. This clinical situation contributes to the dilemma between maintaining or withdraws the medication. In one hand, the maintenance during the perioperative periodis associated with an increased number of bleeding complications;on the other its discontinuation is associated with severe thrombotic complications. The purpose of this article was a non-systematic review of databases Medline, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and LILACS as to the effects of the suspension or maintenance of aspirin perioperatively in noncardiac operations. CONTENTS: Patients taking aspirin must be evaluated individually and the former recommendation to discontinue the medication 7-10 days prior to any procedure should be reviewed because of the proven harmful effects. Aspirin should be maintained in patients in secondary prevention in most situations, except in closed space surgeries and transurethral prostatectomy, situations where the risk of bleeding appeared to be high. Patients with coronary stenting should also keep aspirin indefinitely and the holding of elective surgeries must be postponed while the concomitant use of clopidogrel is indicated. CONCLUSION: The decision on the maintenance of aspirin in the perioperative period should consider the atherothrombotic risks associated with suspension and bleeding risks inherent of the proposed surgical procedure. The available evidence points in favor of a risk-benefit ratio favorable to the maintenance of aspirin in most situations, although more definitive studies are needed.(AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity C-reactive protein predicts cardiovascular events in a wide range of clinical contexts. However, the role of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein as a predictive marker for perioperative acute myocardial infarction during noncardiac surgery is not yet clear. The present study investigated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels as predictors of acute myocardial infarction risk in patients undergoing high-risk noncardiac surgery. METHODS: This concurrent cohort study included patients aged >50 years referred for high-risk noncardiac surgery according to American Heart Association/ACC 2002 criteria. Patients with infections were excluded. Electrocardiograms were performed, and biomarkers (Troponin I or T) and/or total creatine phosphokinase and the MB fraction (CPK-T/MB) were evaluated on the first and fourth days after surgery. Patients were followed until discharge. Baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels were compared between patients with and without acute myocardial infarction. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, including 33 vascular procedures (17 aortic and 16 peripheral artery revascularizations), were studied. Sixty of the patients were men, and their mean age was 66 years. Baseline levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were higher in the group with perioperative acute myocardial infarction than in the group with non-acute myocardial infarction patients (mean 48.02 vs. 4.50, p = 0.005). All five acute myocardial infarction cases occurred in vascular surgery patients with high CRP levels. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing high-risk noncardiac surgery, especially vascular surgery, and presenting elevated baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels are at increased risk for perioperative acute myocardial infarction.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)