RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial met its primary endpoint. Niraparib first-line maintenance significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (aOC) that responded to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status. Final overall survival (OS) results are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized 2:1 to niraparib or placebo, stratified by response to first-line treatment, receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and tumor HRD status. After reaching 60% target maturity, OS was evaluated via a stratified log-rank test using randomization stratification factors and summarized using Kaplan-Meier methodology. OS testing was hierarchical (overall population first, then the homologous recombination-deficient [HRd] population). Other secondary outcomes and long-term safety were assessed; an updated, ad hoc analysis of investigator-assessed PFS was also conducted (cutoff date, 08Apr2024). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 73.9 months. In the overall population, the OS hazard ratio (HR) was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.84-1.23; P= 0.8834) for niraparib (n= 487) versus placebo (n;= 246). In the HRd (n= 373) and homologous recombination-proficient (n= 249) populations, the OS HRs were 0.95 (95% CI, 0.71-1.29) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.69-1.26), respectively. Subsequent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy was received by 11.7% and 15.8% of niraparib patients and 37.8% and 48.4% of placebo patients in the overall and HRd populations, respectively. The 5-year PFS rate numerically favored niraparib in the overall (niraparib, 22%; placebo, 12%) and HRd populations (niraparib, 35%; placebo, 16%). Myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukemia incidence was <2.5% (niraparib, 2.3%; placebo, 1.6%). No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with newly diagnosed aOC at high risk of recurrence, there was no difference in OS between treatment arms. In the HRd population, patients alive at 5 years were twice as likely to be progression free with niraparib treatment than placebo. Long-term safety remained consistent with the established niraparib safety profile.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This retrospective real-world study compared overall survival (OS) between patients with BRCA wild-type (BRCAwt) recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) who received niraparib second-line maintenance (2LM) versus active surveillance (AS) using target trial emulation, cloning, inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) methodology to minimize immortal time bias. METHODS: Eligible patients from a United States-based, deidentified, electronic health record-derived database were diagnosed with epithelial OC (January 1, 2011-May 31, 2021), were BRCAwt, and completed second-line (2L) therapy (January 1, 2017-March 2, 2022). Patient data were cloned at index (2L last treatment date), assigned to niraparib 2LM and AS cohorts, and censored when treatment deviated from clone assignment. Follow-up was measured from index to earliest of study end (May 31, 2022), last activity, or death. Median OS (mOS) and hazard ratios were estimated from stabilized IPCW Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 199 patients received niraparib 2LM, and 707 had their care managed with AS. Key characteristics were balanced across cohorts after cloning and stabilized IPCW. Median follow-up was 15.6- and 9.3-months pre-cloning. IPCW mOS was 24.1 months (95% CI: 20.9-29.5) and 18.4 months (95% CI: 15.1-22.8) in niraparib 2LM and AS cohorts, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI: 0.66-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study provides supportive evidence of an OS benefit for patients with BRCAwt recurrent OC who received 2LM niraparib monotherapy compared with those whose care was managed with AS. The analytic strategies implemented were useful in minimizing immortal time bias and measured confounding.
Asunto(s)
Indazoles , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Humanos , Femenino , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/mortalidad , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Espera Vigilante , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Quimioterapia de Mantención/métodos , Bases de Datos FactualesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Niraparib first-line maintenance (1LM) therapy has demonstrated clinical benefit for patients with ovarian cancer (OC) in clinical trial and real-world settings, but data on factors associated with real-world patient outcomes remain limited. This analysis identified patient characteristics associated with time to next treatment (TTNT), a proxy for real-world progression-free survival, in patients with OC treated with 1LM niraparib monotherapy. METHODS: This retrospective observational study used a USA nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database and included adult patients diagnosed with OC who initiated 1LM niraparib monotherapy after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were followed until the earliest occurrence of last clinical activity, death, or end of study period. TTNT was measured from 1LM niraparib initiation to the start of second-line treatment or death. Cox proportional hazards models assessed univariable and multivariable associations between baseline characteristics and TTNT. RESULTS: Of 7872 patients diagnosed with OC, 526 met the eligibility criteria and were included in this analysis. Median (IQR) duration of follow-up was 14.1 (7.4-23.6) months. In univariable analyses, age, BRCA/homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status, socioeconomic status, stage at initial diagnosis, cytoreductive surgery type, and residual disease status were significantly associated with observed TTNT and were introduced into the multivariable model with other clinically relevant variables. In the multivariable analysis, BRCA/HRD status, cytoreductive surgery type, and residual disease status were significantly associated with observed TTNT after covariate adjustment. Conversely, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, disease stage, niraparib starting dose status, and first-line bevacizumab use were not associated with observed TTNT. CONCLUSION: This real-world, retrospective, observational analysis offers valuable insights on prognostic factors associated with TTNT in patients with OC treated with 1LM niraparib monotherapy after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Future studies are needed to examine how additional patient characteristics associated with clinical outcomes may guide treatment decisions and improve outcomes.
RESUMEN
Background: Pre-clinical studies showed the anti-tumor mechanisms of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) and platinum have some crossover and overlap in the DNA damage repair pathway, patients who respond to platinum-based chemotherapy are also more likely to be sensitive to PARPi. This real-world study mainly aimed to evaluate whether TRAE (treatment-related adverse event) between platinum based chemotherapy (PBC) and niraparib are also associated. Methods: Patients received niraparib as maintenance treatment or salvage therapy for advanced ovarian cancer at the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University from January 2020 to August 2023 were included. Survival data of niraparib treatment and adverse events occurred during the last platinum-based chemotherapy cycle before starting niraparib treatment and during niraparib treatment are documented. Fisher's exact test were used for correlation analysis. Results: 1. 40 patients treated with niraparib were included in the analysis, including 31 patients treated with niraparib for 1st-line maintenance therapy, 6 patients for PSR (platinum-sensitive recurrence) maintenance therapy, and 3 patients for salvage therapy. The overall median follow-up time was 15.0 months (ranged from 2.2 months to 32.1 months). 2. Overall grade≥3 TRAE (40% vs 70%, p=0.012) including anemia (20% vs 45%, p=0.041) and neutrophil count decreased (17.5% vs 57.5%, p<0.001) was significantly lower during niraparib treatment compared to during chemotherapy. 3. Any grade TRAE (75% vs 100%, p=0.002) including white blood cell count decreased (47.5% vs 87.5%, p<0.001), red blood cell count decreased (57.5% vs 92.5%, p<0.001), anemia (55% vs 87.5%, p<0.001) and neutrophil count decreased (35% vs 85%, p<0.001) were also significantly lower in niraparib treatment group compared with chemotherapy group. No new safety signals were identified. Conclusion: 1. In this real-world practice, we observed that patients with advanced ovarian cancer who experienced any grade and grade ≥3 TRAE during chemotherapy were well tolerated when treated with niraparib, particularly the incidence of any grade and grade ≥3 anemia, and neutrophil count decreased during niraparib treatment were significantly lower compared with that during chemotherapy. 2. For patients with ovarian cancer who have experienced grade ≥3 hematological adverse reactions during prior platinum-based chemotherapy, greater attention should be paid to the monitoring and management of hematological adverse reactions during subsequent treatment with niraparib.
RESUMEN
Background: Niraparib, a poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), has been widely applied in the intervention of epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. Nevertheless, as of the present moment, there are limited instances demonstrating favorable outcomes stemming from niraparib therapy in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Case presentation: Here, we report a case of a 50-year-old patient with ccRCC who subsequently developed distant metastasis. The patient received monotherapy with pazopanib and combination therapy with axitinib and tislelizumab, demonstrating limited efficacy. Liquid biopsy revealed missense mutations in the CDK12 and RAD51C of the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway, suggesting potential sensitivity to PARPi. Following niraparib treatment, the patient's condition improved, with no significant side effects. Conclusion: In summary, patients with ccRCC harboring HRR pathway gene mutation may potentially benefit from niraparib. This will present more options for ccRCC patients with limited response to conventional treatments.
RESUMEN
Brain metastasis is a rare complication of ovarian cancer, always found at the advanced stage. Even though different multimodal approaches are available, including surgical intervention and radiotherapy, there are no official guidelines for handling this serious complication. Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are a group of medications initially used for maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Niraparib has shown some efficacy in patients with brain metastasis due to its unique properties of penetrating the blood-brain barrier. Here, we present the case of a 51-year-old patient with advanced ovarian cancer with no germline breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutations. Despite undergoing surgery and multiple rounds of chemotherapy, the patient's condition worsened, culminating in brain metastasis. Given her neurological issues, radiotherapy was not an option, prompting the initiation of a 300 mg dose of niraparib. To date, only sporadic case reports in the literature have described patients with ovarian cancer treated with niraparib and complicated by brain metastasis. Our case is unique because it is the first case of a patient with the endometrioid type of ovarian cancer.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To explore safety and tolerability parameters for the niraparib individualized starting dose (ISD) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer that responded to platinum-based chemotherapy who participated in the phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial (NCT02655016). METHODS: The PRIMA protocol was amended so newly enrolled patients received an ISD based on baseline body weight/platelet count. In this ad hoc analysis, the timing, duration, and resolution of the first occurrence of common any-grade hematologic (thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia) and nonhematologic (nausea, asthenia/fatigue, constipation, insomnia, hypertension) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated by treatment arm in the ISD safety population (data cutoff, November 17, 2021; median follow-up, 3.5 years). RESULTS: Of 733 randomized patients, 255 were enrolled after the ISD protocol amendment and received ≥ 1 dose of study treatment (niraparib, 169; placebo, 86). In the niraparib arm, median times to first events were 22.0-35.0 days for hematologic TEAEs and 7.0-56.0 days for nonhematologic TEAEs. First events resolved in ≥ 89.8% of patients for hematologic TEAEs; for nonhematologic TEAEs, resolution rates ranged from 55.3% (insomnia) to 86.0% (nausea). Median durations of first hematologic TEAEs were ≤ 16.0 days, but for first nonhematologic TEAEs ranged from 18.0 days (nausea) to 134.0 days (insomnia). CONCLUSION: The niraparib ISD was generally well tolerated and TEAEs were manageable. Common hematologic and nonhematologic TEAEs occurred early and first events of hematologic TEAEs had a short duration (≈ 2 weeks) and a high resolution rate. These findings support close monitoring immediately following niraparib initiation and may help inform patient expectations for niraparib safety.
Asunto(s)
Indazoles , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Humanos , Femenino , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Isoquinolinas/administración & dosificación , Isoquinolinas/efectos adversos , Isoquinolinas/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia de MantenciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials have demonstrated prolonged survival associated with niraparib first-line maintenance (1LM) therapy, compared with placebo, for patients with ovarian cancer (OC). However, data are limited on real-world 1LM niraparib monotherapy use, particularly as switch 1LM, following first-line (1L) combination chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. This real-world study aimed to describe patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes of patients with OC receiving 1LM niraparib monotherapy following 1L combination chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. METHODS: This retrospective observational study used data from a US-based nationwide database of deidentified, electronic health record-derived data. Patients diagnosed with OC during the study period (1 January 2011-30 November 2022, inclusive) were eligible if they received 1L chemotherapy plus bevacizumab treatment followed by 1LM niraparib monotherapy, initiated between 1 January 2017 (inclusive) and 2 September 2022. Patients were followed from index date (initiation of niraparib 1LM) until the first occurrence of death, end of follow-up, or end of study. Clinical outcomes were time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and time to next treatment (TTNT). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate TTD, TTNT, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Among 93 patients selected, median age at index was 67 years (interquartile range [IQR] 60-72 years). Most patients had BRCA wild-type/homologous recombination (HR)-proficient or BRCA wild-type/HR unknown disease (75.3%). In all, 18 (19.4%) patients had HR-deficient disease. Five (5.4%) patients had unknown test results for both BRCA and HR deficiency status. Median follow-up time was 16.3 months (IQR 8.7-25.4 months), and median time from end of 1L therapy to 1LM initiation was 35.0 days (IQR 25.0-53.9 days). Median TTD was 9.3 months (95% CI 6.1-11.3 months). Median TTNT was 12.9 months (95% CI 11.5-19.0 months). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study provided insights into switch maintenance with 1LM niraparib monotherapy, which may be a viable treatment option for patients with advanced OC.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Patterns of disease recurrence on poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor maintenance therapy are unclear and may affect subsequent treatment. This ad hoc subgroup analysis of the phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 study evaluated patterns of initial recurrence in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). METHODS: PRIMA included participants at high risk for disease progression. This ad hoc analysis only evaluated participants randomized to niraparib maintenance without evidence of disease at baseline. The number and site(s) of initial recurrent lesions at investigator-assessed progressive disease (PD) were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 314 niraparib-treated patients analyzed, 190 developed ≥1 new lesion (median number of new lesions, 1.0; interquartile range, 1-2). In total, 93.2% (177/190) of patients developed 1-3 lesions at first disease progression. The most common sites of recurrence were the peritoneum (30.0% [57/190]), lymph nodes (26.3% [50/190]), and liver (20.5% [39/190]). Similar results were observed when patients with PD were stratified by biomarker status, disease stage at diagnosis, and type of debulking surgery. Patients with homologous recombination-proficient tumors, stage III disease, or a history of primary debulking developed a median of 2.0 new lesions at first progression; patients with homologous recombination-deficient tumors, stage IV disease, or a history of interval debulking developed a median of 1.0 new lesion. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with AOC without lesions at first-line maintenance treatment initiation develop oligometastatic disease at first recurrence. Prospective evaluation is required to determine whether these patients have improved outcomes when local therapies are combined with continuous, systemic, targeted maintenance therapy.
Asunto(s)
Indazoles , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Humanos , Femenino , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Quimioterapia de Mantención/métodos , Adulto , Ftalazinas/administración & dosificación , Ftalazinas/efectos adversos , Ftalazinas/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the ovary represents a rare and malignant extrahepatic tumor that shares morphological and immunophenotypic similarities with hepatocellular carcinoma. Due to the ambiguous histomorphology and aggressive behavior, the diagnosis and management of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the ovary present unique challenges. Here, we present a 67-year-old woman with massive ascites and disseminated peritoneal implants at initial diagnosis. She was treated with six cycles of neoadjuvant therapy (albumin-bound paclitaxel + nedaplatin + bevacizumab) and a debulking surgery, followed by eight cycles of postoperative adjuvant therapy (albumin-bound paclitaxel + carboplatin + bevacizumab). Elaborate pathology workup found significant involvement of angiogenesis in the tumor and confirmed the diagnosis via immunohistochemistry. Further molecular characterization of the tumor by whole-exome sequencing (WES) revealed a novel heterozygous germline mutation (NM_000057.2, c.1290_1291delinsATCAGGCCTCCATAG, p.Y430fs1) in gene BLM, likely pathogenic, suggesting a potential candidate for Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. For the maintenance therapy, she received a combination of the PARP inhibitor niraparib and the antiangiogenic anlotinib. As of now, the patient has achieved a partial response, with no apparent evidence of disease progression observed nearly 30 months. Our study sheds light on the WES-based profiling in rare cancers to screen for any treatable targets with otherwise no standard therapeutic options. The promising results with the niraparib-anlotinib combination suggest its potential as a maintenance therapy option for hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the ovary, which warrants validation in future larger cohort.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are a novel option to treat patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP) is indicated for BRCA1/2 mutation-positive mCRPC. Niraparib plus AAP demonstrated safety and efficacy in the phase 3 MAGNITUDE trial (NCT03748641). In the absence of head-to-head studies comparing PARPi regimens, the feasibility of conducting indirect treatment comparisons (ITC) to inform decisions for patients with first-line BRCA1/2 mutation-positive mCRPC has been explored. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify evidence from randomized controlled trials on relevant comparators to inform the feasibility of conducting ITCs via network meta-analysis (NMA) or population-adjusted indirect comparisons (PAIC). Feasibility was assessed based on network connectivity, data availability in the BRCA1/2 mutation-positive population, and degree of within- and between-study heterogeneity or bias. RESULTS: NMAs between niraparib plus AAP and other PARPi regimens (olaparib monotherapy, olaparib plus AAP, and talazoparib plus enzalutamide) were inappropriate due to the disconnected network, differences in trial populations related to effect modifiers, or imbalances within BRCA1/2 mutation-positive subgroups. The latter issue, coupled with the lack of a common comparator (except for olaparib plus AAP), also rendered anchored PAICs infeasible. Unanchored PAICs were either inappropriate due to lack of population overlap (vs. olaparib monotherapy) or were restricted by unmeasured confounders and small sample size (vs. olaparib plus AAP). PAIC versus talazoparib plus enzalutamide was not possible due to lack of published arm-level baseline characteristics and sufficient efficacy outcome data in the relevant population. CONCLUSION: The current randomized controlled trial evidence network does not permit robust comparisons between niraparib plus AAP and other PARPi regimens for patients with 1L BRCA-positive mCRPC. Decision-makers should scrutinize any ITC results in light of their limitations. Real-world evidence combined with clinical experience should inform treatment recommendations in this indication.
Asunto(s)
Acetato de Abiraterona , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Estudios de Factibilidad , Indazoles , Piperidinas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/genética , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Acetato de Abiraterona/uso terapéutico , Mutación , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Ftalazinas/uso terapéutico , Ftalazinas/administración & dosificación , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Metaanálisis en RedRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the effect of Niraparib in combination with an Anti-GD2 Antibody on osteosarcoma cells. METHODS: Scratch test was utilized to assess cell migration capacity, while the Transwell experiment was utilized to evaluate cell invasion potential. Cell proliferation was measured using the CCK8 experiment. The affinity between the anti-GD2 antibody and its antigen was determined via ELISA. Tumor growth was evaluated through animal experiments. Western blotting, QRT-PCR, and histological analysis were conducted to examine the expression of relevant proteins and mRNAs. RESULTS: MG63 cell line was used for an example. The scratch test showed that the migration rate of osteosarcoma cells in Niraparib + Anti-GD2 group was 1.07 ± 0.04 after 48 h, and 0.34 ± 0.04 in the Control group. Transwell experiment showed that the invasion ability of osteosarcoma cells in Niraparib + Anti-GD2 group was 21.0 ± 1.5, and that in Control group was 87.7 ± 2.9. CCK8 experiment showed that the absorbance value of Niraparib + Anti-GD2 group was 0.16 ± 0.10 on day 5, and that of the Control group was 0.76 ± 0.09. Western blotting showed that the expression levels of BALP and CICP in Niraparib + Anti-GD2 group were 0.751 ± 0.135 and 1.086 ± 0.115, respectively, and those in Control group were 1.025 ± 0.143 and 1.216 ± 0.168, respectively. QRT-PCR results showed that the absorbance values of Niraparib + Anti-GD2 group were 0.173 ± 0.065 and 0.170 ± 0.078 on day 14. The results of animal experiments showed that on day 5, the tumor volume of the Control group was 2433 ± 391, and that of the Niraparib + Anti-GD2 group was 1137 ± 148. Histological analysis showed that the mean density values of Niraparib + Anti-GD2 group were 0.19 ± 0.08 and 0.22 ± 0.07, and those of Control group were 0.26 ± 0.09 and 0.29 ± 0.10. CONCLUSION: The combination of Niraparib and Anti-GD2 antibody significantly inhibits Osteosarcoma cells.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Niraparib is a poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitor approved for the maintenance treatment of advanced ovarian cancer (OC). Niraparib was originally approved in recurrent OC at a fixed starting dose (FSD) of 300 mg once daily (QD). This analysis characterized the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of niraparib and evaluated the relationships between exposure, efficacy, and safety to support clinical use of an individualized dosing strategy, in which the starting dose of niraparib was adjusted based on patient characteristics to improve the benefit-risk profile. METHODS: A population PK model was developed by pooling data from four niraparib clinical trials (PN001 [n = 104], QUADRA [n = 455], NOVA [n = 403], and PRIMA [n = 480]) in patients with solid tumors, including OC. Exposure-response analyses were conducted to explore the relationships of niraparib exposure with progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events in the PRIMA study. A multivariate logistic regression model was also developed to estimate the probability of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia, using data from patients enrolled in PRIMA and NOVA. The impact of an individualized starting dose (ISD) regimen (200 mg QD in patients with body weight [BW] <77 kg or platelet count [PLT] <150,000/µL, or 300 mg QD in patients with BW ≥77 kg and PLT ≥150,000/µL) on systemic exposure, efficacy, and safety was assessed. FINDINGS: Niraparib disposition was best described by a 3-compartment model with linear elimination. Key covariates included baseline creatinine clearance, BW, albumin, and age, all of which had minor effects on niraparib exposure. Comparable model-predicted exposure up to the time of disease progression/death or censoring in the 300-mg FSD and 200-/300-mg ISD groups was consistent with the lower rate of dose reduction in the ISD groups. No consistent niraparib exposure-response relationship was observed for efficacy in all PRIMA patients (first-line OC), and no statistically significant difference was seen in PFS curves for patients receiving a niraparib dose of 200 mg versus 300 mg. In the multivariate regression model, performed using combined data from PRIMA and NOVA, higher niraparib exposure (area under the concentration-time curve at steady-state [AUCss]), lower BW, and lower PLT were associated with an increased risk of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia. IMPLICATIONS: Population PK and exposure-response analyses support use of an ISD to improve the safety profile of niraparib, including reducing the rate of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia, without compromising efficacy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01847274 (NOVA), NCT00749502 (PN001), NCT02655016 (PRIMA), NCT02354586 (QUADRA), www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.
Asunto(s)
Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Indazoles , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Indazoles/farmacocinética , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas/farmacocinética , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/farmacocinética , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Trombocitopenia/inducido químicamente , Ensayos Clínicos como AsuntoRESUMEN
Niraparib was recently funded in Canada for the maintenance treatment of ovarian cancer following platinum-based chemotherapy. However, the drug's safety profile in the real world remains uncertain. We conducted a cohort study to describe the patient population using niraparib and the proportion that experienced adverse events between June 2019 and December 2022 in four Canadian provinces (Ontario, Alberta, British Columbia [BC], and Quebec). We used administrative data and electronic medical records from Ontario Health, Alberta Health Services, and BC Cancer, and registry data from Exactis Innovation. We summarized baseline characteristics using descriptive statistics and reported safety outcomes using cumulative incidence. We identified 514 patients receiving niraparib. Mean age was 67 years and most were initiated on a daily dose of 100 or 200 mg/day. Grade 3/4 anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 11-16% of the cohort. In Ontario, the three-month cumulative incidence of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was 11.6% (95% CI, 8.3-15.4%), neutropenia was 7.1% (95% CI, 4.6-10.4%), and anemia was 11.3% (95% CI, 8.0-15.2%). Cumulative incidences in the remaining provinces were similar. Initial daily dose and proportions of hematological adverse events were low in the real world and may be related to cautious prescribing and close monitoring by clinicians.
Asunto(s)
Indazoles , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Anciano , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Canadá , Estudios de Cohortes , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Piperazinas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of age on the efficacy and safety of niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer with a complete/partial response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of the phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 study (NCT02655016). Patients in the intent-to-treat population were categorized according to age at baseline (<65 years vs ≥65 years), and progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were evaluated for each age subgroup (clinical cutoff date, May 17, 2019). Safety findings were also evaluated according to a fixed starting dose (FSD) or an individualized starting dose (ISD). RESULTS: Of 733 randomized patients, 289 (39.4%) were ≥65 years (190 niraparib, 99 placebo) at baseline. Median PFS (niraparib vs placebo) and hazard ratios (95% CI) were similar in patients aged <65 years (13.9 vs 8.2 months; HR, 0.61 [0.47-0.81]) and ≥65 years (13.7 vs 8.1 months; HR, 0.53 [0.39-0.74]). The incidences of any-grade and grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar across age subgroups; in the niraparib arm, TEAEs leading to dose discontinuation occurred in 7.8% of patients <65 years and 18.4% of patients ≥65 years. ISD use lowered the incidence of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia events in niraparib-treated patients compared with the FSD (<65 years: 42.8% vs 18.0%; ≥65 years 57.0% vs 26.1%). HRQOL was comparable across age subgroups. CONCLUSION: Niraparib efficacy, safety, and HRQOL were generally comparable across age subgroups, although patients ≥65 years had a higher rate of discontinuations due to TEAEs. ISD use reduced grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia events regardless of age.
Asunto(s)
Indazoles , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Edad , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia de Mantención/métodosRESUMEN
Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) plays an important role in the DNA repair process and has become an attractive target for cancer therapy in recent years. Given that niraparib has good clinical efficacy as a PARP inhibitor, this study aimed to develop radiolabeled niraparib derivatives for tumor imaging to detect PARP expression and improve the accuracy of stratified patient therapy. The niraparib isonitrile derivative (CNPN) was designed, synthesized, and radiolabeled to obtain the [99mTc]Tc-CNPN complex with high radiochemical purity (>95%). It was lipophilic and stable in vitro. In HeLa cell experiments, the uptake of [99mTc]Tc-CNPN was effectively inhibited by the ligand CNPN, indicating the binding affinity for PARP. According to the biodistribution studies of HeLa tumor-bearing mice, [99mTc]Tc-CNPN has moderate tumor uptake and can be effectively inhibited, demonstrating its specificity for targeting PARP. The SPECT imaging results showed that [99mTc]Tc-CNPN had tumor uptake at 2 h postinjection. All of the results of this study indicated that [99mTc]Tc-CNPN is a promising tumor imaging agent that targets PARP.
Asunto(s)
Indazoles , Piperidinas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Animales , Humanos , Ratones , Piperidinas/química , Piperidinas/farmacocinética , Indazoles/química , Indazoles/farmacocinética , Células HeLa , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/farmacocinética , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/farmacología , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/química , Distribución Tisular , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón Único/métodos , Radiofármacos/farmacocinética , Radiofármacos/química , Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasa-1/metabolismo , Femenino , Tecnecio/química , Nitrilos/química , Nitrilos/farmacocinética , Ratones Desnudos , Ratones Endogámicos BALB CRESUMEN
PURPOSE: With the development of immunotherapy research, the role of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in the treatment of cervical cancer has been emphasized, but many patients still can't receive long-term benefits from ICB. Poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) has been proved to exert significant antitumor effects in multiple solid tumors. Whether cervical cancer patients obtain better benefits from the treatment regimen of PARPi combined with ICB remains unclear. METHODS: The alteration of PD-L1 expression induced by niraparib in cervical cancer cells and its underlying mechanism were assessed by western blot and immunofluorescence and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR).The regulation of PTEN by KDM5A was confirmed using Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay and RNA interference. Analyzing the relationship between PD-L1 and immune effector molecules through searching online databases. Therapeutic efficacy of niraparib, PD-L1 blockade or combination was assessed in syngeneic tumor model. The changes of immune cells and cytokines in vivo was detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and qRT-PCR. RESULTS: We found that niraparib upregulated PD-L1 expression and potentiated the antitumor effects of PD-L1 blockade in a murine cervical cancer model. Niraparib inhibited the Pten expression by increasing the abundance of KDM5A, which expanded PD-L1 abundance through activating the PI3K-AKT-S6K1 pathway. PD-L1 was positively correlated with immune effector molecules including TNF-α, IFN-γ, granzyme A and granzyme B based on biological information analysis. Niraparib increased the infiltration of CD8+ T cells and the level of IFN-γ, granzyme B in vivo. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrates the regulation of niraparib on local immune microenvironment of cervical cancer, and provides theoretical basis for supporting the combination of PARPi and PD-L1 blockade as a potential treatment for cervical cancer.
Asunto(s)
Antígeno B7-H1 , Indazoles , Piperidinas , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/inmunología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Animales , Piperidinas/farmacología , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Antígeno B7-H1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Indazoles/farmacología , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Ratones , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/farmacología , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/farmacología , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Línea Celular TumoralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Maintenance therapy with niraparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, has been shown to extend progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer who responded to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of biomarker status. However, there are limited data on niraparib's efficacy and safety in the neoadjuvant setting. The objective of Cohort C of the OPAL trial (OPAL-C) is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of neoadjuvant niraparib treatment compared with neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer with confirmed homologous recombination-deficient tumors. METHODS: OPAL is an ongoing global, multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial. In OPAL-C, patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive three 21-day cycles of either neoadjuvant niraparib or platinum-taxane doublet neoadjuvant chemotherapy per standard of care. Patients with a complete or partial response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) will then undergo interval debulking surgery; patients with stable disease may proceed to interval debulking surgery or alternative therapy at the investigator's discretion. Patients with disease progression will exit the study treatment and proceed to alternative therapy at the investigator's discretion. After interval debulking surgery, all patients will receive up to three 21-day cycles of platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy followed by niraparib maintenance therapy for up to 36 months. Adult patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer eligible to receive neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery may be enrolled. Patients must have tumors that are homologous recombination-deficient. The primary endpoint is the pre-interval debulking surgery unconfirmed overall response rate, defined as the investigator-assessed percentage of patients with unconfirmed complete or partial response on study treatment before interval debulking surgery per RECIST v1.1. DISCUSSION: OPAL-C explores the use of niraparib in the neoadjuvant setting as an alternative to neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy to improve postsurgical residual disease outcomes for patients with ovarian cancer with homologous recombination-deficient tumors. Positive findings from this approach could significantly impact preoperative ovarian cancer therapy, particularly for patients who are ineligible for primary debulking surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03574779. Registered on February 28, 2022.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Indazoles , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Recombinación Homóloga , Hidrocarburos Aromáticos con Puentes/administración & dosificación , Hidrocarburos Aromáticos con Puentes/uso terapéutico , Hidrocarburos Aromáticos con Puentes/efectos adversos , Piperazinas/efectos adversos , Piperazinas/administración & dosificación , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
The recent use of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in the maintenance treatment of ovarian tumor has significantly improved the survival rates of cancer patients. However, the current oral administration of PARP inhibitors fails to realize optimal therapeutic effects due to the low bioavailability in cancerous tissues, and often leads to a range of systemic adverse effects including hematologic toxicities, digestive system reactions, and neurotoxicities. Therefore, the demand for an advanced drug delivery system that can ensure effective drug administration while minimizing these unfavorable reactions is pressing. Injectable hydrogel emerges as a promising solution for local administration with the capability of sustainable drug release. In this study, we developed an injectable hydrogel made from aminated hyaluronic acid and aldehyde-functionalized pluronic127 via Schiff base reaction. This hydrogel exhibits excellent injectability with short gelation time and remarkable self-healing ability, and is applied to load niraparib. The drug-loaded hydrogel (HP@Nir hydrogel) releases drugs sustainably as tested in vitro as well as displays significant anti-proliferation and anti-migratory properties on human epithelial ovarian cancer cell line. Notably, HP@Nir hydrogel effectively suppresses the growth of ovarian cancer, without significant adverse reactions as demonstrated in animal studies. Additionally, the developed hydrogel is gradually degraded in vivo for around 20 d, while maintaining good biocompatibility. Overall, the injectable hydrogel loaded with niraparib provides a secure and efficient strategy for the treatment and management of ovarian cancer.
Asunto(s)
Ácido Hialurónico , Hidrogeles , Neoplasias Ováricas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Femenino , Hidrogeles/química , Ácido Hialurónico/química , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/farmacología , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/química , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Humanos , Animales , Línea Celular Tumoral , Ratones , Portadores de Fármacos/química , Liberación de Fármacos , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Inyecciones , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antineoplásicos/química , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Movimiento Celular/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) represents one of the most common sarcoma histotypes, demonstrating an overall dismal prognosis. Previous studies reported uLMS to carry recurrent somatic BRCA2 homozygous deletions, related to significant clinical benefits from the use of PARP inhibitors. METHODS: To investigate the prevalence in uLMS of genomic alterations (alt) in BRCA2 and other homologous recombination (HR) and DNA damage response (DDR) genes, cBioPortal was accessed and data were retrieved from studies including pan-sarcoma histologies. HR-/DDR-genes included BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, BARD1, BRIP1, CHEK1, CHEK2, FANCA, FANCB, FANCC, FANCD2, FANCE, FANCF, FANCG, FANCI, FANCL, FANCM, NBN, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, RAD50, and ATR. Only oncogenic/likely oncogenic alterations were included according to OncoKB. CLINICAL REPORT AND RESULTS: We reported a clinical case of a patient affected by a highly pretreated uLMS discussed at the European Institute of Oncology Molecular Tumor Board. A targeted next-generation sequencing panel demonstrated a somatic BRCA2 homozygous deletion (homDel). Upon access to Niraparib, a remarkable response of 15 months was observed before experiencing disease progression. In the genomic query, among 2393 cases, uLMS (nâ =â 193) displayed 9 of all 31 BRCA2alt observed, representing the only sarcoma histotype showing an enrichment in BRCA2alt (4.66%; qâ <â 0.001). All of 9 BRCA2alt were represented by homDel, which related to a high fraction of genome altered. CONCLUSION: uLMS displays a significant frequency of somatic BRCA2alt homDel. Considering their dismal prognosis, further investigation is warranted to test the use of PARPi in uLMS, and particularly in the setting of BRCA1/2 alterations.