Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Urol ; 24(1): 134, 2024 Jun 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38943111

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the predictive value of individual components of the R.E.N.A.L scoring system for Laparoscopic (LPN) and Robotic Partial Nephrectomy (RPN). METHODS: Patients that had undergone a Laparoscopic (LPN) or Robotic Partial Nephrectomy (RPN) between 2018 and 2023 were reviewed. Our data collection included Race, Ethnicity, Age, BMI, R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score, and complications. Cases that achieved trifecta outcomes were designated as "Group A" and cases that did not achieve trifecta were "Group B". All the data were collected using REDCap database. RESULTS: A total of 111 cases were included, Group A consisted of 82% of all cases, whereas Group B 18%. Radius score demonstrated significant distinction concerning trifecta attainment and was the most predictive component of the 5 scoring metrics of the nephrometry system. In a subgroup analysis, R-score of 3 or a renal mass measuring ≥ 7 cm, was a significant independent negative predictor for trifecta outcomes, as well as tumor size at presentation. CONCLUSION: Renal nephrometry score is predictive of trifecta outcomes for patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomy. Radius of mass was the most effective predictive component of the nephrometry score for trifecta prediction.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales , Laparoscopía , Nefrectomía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA