RESUMEN

Managing large nasal defects following Mohs surgery presents complex reconstructive challenges due to the nose's prominent and visible nature. These cases require a careful balance of preserving structural integrity, optimizing cosmetic outcomes, and maintaining vascular health. In situations where primary closure is impractical due to defect size and location, innovative techniques like the double rhomboid transposition flap offer versatile solutions, addressing both aesthetic concerns and functional requirements. The double rhomboid flap allows surgeons to achieve continuity of surrounding tissue, ensuring aesthetically pleasing texture, color, and thickness while minimizing complications like skin tension and potential airway issues. This case highlights the reconstructive challenges faced in managing large nasal defects following Mohs micrographic surgery for basal cell carcinoma. An 84-year-old male presented with a significant nasal defect following Mohs surgery that involved the dorsum, sidewall, tip, and ala, complicating primary closure due to skin tension and cosmetic concerns. Utilizing a double rhomboid transposition flap technique allowed for effective aesthetic and structural reconstruction, addressing skin tension and preserving nasal symmetry. This case emphasizes the importance of tailored reconstructive strategies to achieve optimal cosmetic and functional outcomes in complex nasal Mohs defects.

RESUMEN

Defects over 2.0 to 2.5 cm may often require repair with a multistaged forehead flap. However, in some such defects, other options may be available. In this article, the author will review some of these options.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The reliability of local intranasal flaps speaks to the robust vascularity of the nose, which these flaps are based on. The goals for lining replacement, as in any other area of head and neck reconstruction, is to use tissue that best matches the qualities of what is being replaced. The goal of this review is to describe the extent to which local tissues can be used and when to consider regional flaps when the extent of a local flap will not provide enough coverage.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Prosthetic nasal reconstruction provides a restorative option for patients with nasal defects, and these can be retained with a variety of methods including adhesives and implants. These prostheses can significantly improve appearance, self-esteem, and quality of life for patients and they restore many functions of the external nose. Traditional fabrication methods are often used by the skilled professionals who make these custom prostheses, but digital technology is improving the workflow for design and fabrication of silicone nasal prostheses. Nasal prosthetic reconstruction requires multidisciplinary coordination between surgeons, maxillofacial prosthodontists, anaplastologists, and other members of the healthcare team. Prosthetic treatment can be considered as an alternative to, or an addition to treatment with surgical reconstruction.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Auricular composite grafts hold great potential for reconstructing the nasal soft tissue triangle with desired aesthetic results because there is ample tissue available for sufficient nasal ala projection and the natural curvature of the helical rim matches that of the alar rim. The use of auricular composite grafts also results in positive functional outcomes because of the cartilaginous airway support provided to widen the external nasal valve. Composite graft survival is highly dependent on graft size, as larger sized grafts have a higher metabolic demand.To improve graft viability and reliability, hyperbaric oxygen therapy can be employed to accommodate the increased metabolic demand seen with larger composite grafts. Conclusions: This report presents the survival of a large skin and cartilage composite graft for nasal soft tissue triangle reconstruction in conjunction with hyperbaric oxygen therapy to improve graft viability.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The free helical rim (FHR) flap offers like-with-like reconstruction for full-thickness nasal defects. A case series of nasal reconstruction using an FHR flap was presented, detailing surgical steps and refinements, as well as functional and esthetic outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This is a retrospective cohort study of composite nasal defect reconstruction with FHR flap from August 2018 to March 2020. Descriptive data were analyzed by SPSS software. RESULTS: Six cases were recruited, four were unilateral alar defects, one was hemi-nose, and one was ala plus tip. The average size of the defect was 2.5 × 2.8 cm2. Three FHR flaps were designed with retrograde pedicles and three with anterograde pedicles. The facial artery and veins were the recipient vessels in all cases. Vascular grafts were used in all six cases. Descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral (DLCxF) artery and vein functioned as interposition vascular conduits in five cases. Superficial forearm vein grafts were used in one case. One patient needed flap re-exploration due to venous congestion. One patient had partial flap necrosis due to delayed infection, and one developed delayed wound dehiscence in the irradiated wound. The average follow-up was 18 months. CONCLUSION: The FHR flap has consistent vascular anatomy. It can be raised as an anterograde or retrograde flap for a contralateral or ipsilateral inset. FHR flap can be used in extensive composite nasal defects. This case series demonstrates that interposition vascular grafts are invariably needed and the possibility of using forearm vessels as grafts instead of DLCxF artery and vein.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Face is the most frequent localization for cutaneous carcinoma. The nose accounts for about 30% of these tumors. Nose tissue loss repair has to pursue 3 types of objectives: carcinologic, aesthetic and functional. The aim of this article is to identify a decision tree to guide the choice of surgical reconstruction technique based on localization and size of the defect. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis in Angers' CHU from 2013 to 2019 including 229 patients referred for cutaneous tumors excision in need of reconstruction. We analyzed the type of reconstruction, size of the tissue loss and localization of the defect in terms of nose aesthetic subunits. RESULTS: Among the 229 patients included, the most frequent localization was nose tip (32%). 44% of patients were reconstructed with skin grafts or composite graft, 56% with flaps (48% local flaps and 4% association of both methods). Limited central resections of nose tip were reconstructed with skingraft. The Rybka flap and bilobed flap were the preferred choice for lateral reconstruction of nose tip. Largest tip defects were reconstructed using Rieger flap or forehead flap. The dorsum was often reconstructed with local flap: glabellar on the upper part, Rieger on the lower part. Lateral side was perfectly reconstructed with island flap. Nose wings needed framework: composite graft was the judicious choice in case of limited tissue loss whereas forehead flap with framework or Schmid-Meyer flap were chosen for larger defects. CONCLUSION: Our past experience in nasal reconstruction has provided us with an original decision tree to guide surgeons in choosing the right reconstruction technique according to the size and localization of the defect.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Total nasal defects after injures or surgical interventions can negatively affect patient's quality of life. Maxillofacial prosthesis is a contemporarily and reliable solution. This method gives us opportunity to restore missing tissues and helps patients to overcome social and psychological difficulties. In this article we demonstrated advantages and disadvantages of the method in two clinical cases. The application of magnetic and adhesive retention in different cases is described. Also, we outlined clinical and technological steps of maxillofacial prosthesis manufacture. Modified procedure of impression obtaining is offered.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical application and effectiveness of a personalized tissue engineered cartilage with seed cells derived from ear or nasal septal cartilage and poly-glycolic acid (PGA)/poly-lactic acid (PLA) as scaffold in patients with nasal reconstruction. METHODS: Between March 2014 and October 2015, 4 cases of acquired nasal defects and 1 case of congenital nasal deformity were admitted. The patient with congenital nasal deformity was a 4-year-old boy, and the source of seed cells was nasal septal cartilage. The other 4 patients were 3 males and 1 female, aged 24-33 years, with an average of 28.5 years. They all had multiple nasal subunit defects caused by trauma and the source of seed cells was auricular cartilage. The tissue engineered cartilage framework was constructed in the shape of normal human nasal alar cartilage and L-shaped silicone prosthesis with seed cells from cartilage and PGA-PLA compound biodegradable scaffold. The boy underwent nasal deformity correction and silicone prosthesis implantation in the first stage, and the prosthesis was removed and implanted with tissue engineered cartilage in the second stage; the remaining 4 adult patients all used expanded forehead flaps for nasal reconstruction. All 5 patients underwent 1-4 nasal revisions. The implanted tissue engineered cartilage was observed during the operation and taken from 2 patients for histological examination. RESULTS: All the incisions healed by first intention after the tissue engineered cartilage implantation, and the expanded forehead flaps survived. Postoperative low fever occurred in 3 patients. No complications such as infection, obvious immune rejection response, and tissue engineered cartilage protrusion were found in all patients. All patients were followed up 9-74 months (mean，54.8 months). During follow-up, the patients had no obvious discomfort in the nose and the ventilation function were good. All patients were satisfied with the nasal contour. Early-stage histological examination showed the typical cartilage characteristics in 1 patient after the implantation of tissue engineered cartilage. Late-stage histological examination in 1 patient of tissue engineered cartilage showed the characteristics of fibrous connective tissue; and the other showed there was remaining cartilage. CONCLUSION: The safety of tissue engineered cartilage constructed in vitro for reconstruction is preliminarily confirmed, but the effectiveness still needs further verification.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this radiological/anatomical study was to evaluate the feasibility of a new endoscopic technique that uses the anterior pedicled lateral nasal flap (APLNW) for the endonasal lining in complex nasal reconstructions. STUDY DESIGN: An anatomical study was performed on 20 nasal fossae of cadaverous specimens to measure the area and lengths of the anterior pedicled nasal lateral wall flap. In addition, a radiological analysis with computed tomography was performed in 150 nostrils to determine the potential donor of the simple and extended flap in the nasal fossa floor. Complex nasal reconstruction with nasofrontal flap and internal lining using the lateral wall pedicled flap was performed in 3 patients. RESULTS: Complete reconstruction for the inner lining of the nasal tip and lateral nasal wall was achieved in the cadaveric study (10 specimens). The surface areas of the simple and extended APLNW flaps were 7.53 (standard deviation [SD] 1.25) cm2 and 24.6 (SD 3.14) cm2 , respectively. Using computed tomography scans, we determined that to reconstruct defects secondary to full-thickness nasal defects, the APLNW flap surface for the simple and extended versions was 7.90 (SD 1.68) cm2 and 23.64 (SD 4.7) cm2 . We present one case were the APLNW flap was used. CONCLUSIONS: The simple or expanded APLNW flap represents a feasible option to reconstruct the internal lining in complex nasal reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 131:E1462-E1467, 2021.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The nose represents the most common site for the presentation of cutaneous cancer, especially in sun-exposed areas: ala, dorsum, and tip. Even the smallest loss of substance can create aesthetic and psychosocial concerns for patients; therefore, surgeons who perform nasal reconstruction should be strictly confident with the pertinent surgical anatomy in order to tailor the procedure to the patient's condition and needs. Radical tumor excision and satisfactory aesthetic and functional results are primary targets. Restoring the original shape is the goal of any reconstruction: appropriate reshaping of three-dimensional geometry, proper establishment of symmetry, and excellent color and texture match to the adjacent structures are paramount features. Multiple options exist to re-establish functional and aesthetic integrity after surgical oncology; nevertheless, the management of nasal defects can be often challenging, and the gold standard is yet to be found. The current goal is to highlight some of the more common techniques used to reconstruct cutaneous defects of the nose with a specific focus on decision making based on the aesthetic subunit and defect size. The authors attempt to share common pitfalls and offer practical suggestions that they have found helpful in their clinical experience.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nasal skin defect closures are challenging because the nose is a complex anatomic structure with several subunits, and the nasal tip and ala represent particularly difficult subunits to reconstruct. The traditional full-thickness skin graft (FTSG) is an easy and well-established method, but often results in undesirable outcomes in terms of the nasal contour caused by a lack of dermal tissue. AIMS: The purpose of the study is to report the outcomes of the simultaneous application of the acellular dermal substitute (Matriderm® ) with FTSG in the treatment of nasal skin defects. PATIENTS/METHODS: Five patients with various nasal skin defects were treated with multilayered Matriderm grafts followed by FTSGs harvested from the pre- or postauricular region. Graft survival, scar quality, and patient satisfaction were evaluated and compared with 10 patients treated with conventional FTSGs. RESULTS: One-stage Matriderm-aided FTSGs were well-taken in all cases. Scar quality in the Matriderm group (8.0 ± 1.9) was statistically superior to that in the FTSG only group (10.8 ± 1.7). The Matriderm-aided graft was also superior in patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The multilayered application of Matriderm in combination with FTSG is a reliable method for covering nasal skin defects, especially in the thick skin zone of the tip and ala.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Due to the relatively higher tendency of postsurgery scars, insufficient cartilage support, and low surgical acceptability, nasal defect repair with forehead flap in Asian patients needs further study. OBJECTIVE: We aim to determine the necessity of tissue expansion, timing of pedicle division, and the importance of cartilage scaffold reinforcement and scar prevention at the donor site during nasal reconstruction in Asian patients with paramedian forehead flap. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent nasal reconstruction with forehead flap at our hospital from January 2013 to January 2018. The demographical information, surgery details, and postoperative complications of all patients were recorded. The reconstructed nose, scars, and eyebrow deformities were evaluated by digital photographs, and the overall satisfaction of the patients was documented. RESULTS: The study included 15 patients (7 males and 8 females). All nasal defects involved at least two aesthetic units and included seven full-thickness defects. Only one patient underwent two revision operations. Complications like hematoma, infection, and necrosis were not detected, except in one patient with partial necrosis of the flap. All patients were satisfied with the reconstructed nose and did not report any respiratory dysfunction. No obvious scars or eyebrow deformities were observed. CONCLUSION: Three-stage full-thickness forehead flap should be used to repair nasal defects in Asian patients, with immediate cartilage scaffold reconstruction at stage one and reinforcement at stage two. Botox injection into the forehead can refine the scar.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Reconstruction of nasal defect is difficult and challenging. A full-thickness defect of nose requires reconstruction of thin inner lining, middle skeletal (bony/cartilaginous) support, and outer skin layer cover. Large full-thickness defects of nose require complex multistage reconstruction to achieve good functional and aesthetic result. We present here a case of 12-year-old boy, a known case of xeroderma pigmentosa, who underwent wide local excision for squamous cell carcinoma of the nose, leaving a near total defect of the external nose. The reconstruction was done with a suprafascial, thin radial artery forearm free-flap for the external cover as well as the inner lining along with the septal cartilage graft for skeletal support in a single stage.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: It is uncertain whether dermal regeneration templates (DRTs) are helpful to reconstruct nasal defects. The aim of this study was to assess whether the aesthetic subunits determine the outcome. METHODS: In this unicentric, retrospective study, the surgical procedures and outcomes of patients who received DRTs to reconstruct nasal defects were assessed and compared with the involved aesthetic subunits. RESULTS: DRTs were used for reconstruction of 36 nasal defects in 35 patients with involvement of 76 aesthetic subunits: nasal sidewall (n = 21), nasal ala (n = 13), nasal tip/columella (n = 12, n = 1, respectively), nasal dorsum (n = 12), and extranasal aesthetic areas (n = 17). Fifty-eight nasal and 8 extranasal aesthetic subunits were reconstructed with DRTs, 10 subunits with a flap. Twenty-nine of 36 defects healed without any complications (80.5%). All reconstructed nasal tips/columella and the nasal dorsa healed without any complications. Region-specific complications were retraction of the ala rim (4/12; 33.3% of the patients with involvement of the nasal ala) and the formation of a fistula in the nasal sidewall (1/21; 4.8%). Region-specific complications of extranasal subunits were the development of an ectropium (2/3; 66.7% of the patients with involvement of the lower lid). CONCLUSIONS: DRTs can be helpful to reconstruct nasal defects. However, if the defect involves the aesthetic subunits nasal ala or the infraorbital region, different techniques should be preferred.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A forehead frontal flap is the treatment of choice for complex nasal defects. However, in patients with contra indications for such frontal flaps, few alternatives are available. METHODS: We developed a three-stage, nasal reconstruction procedure using a bipedicled, propeller perforator flap based on the modiolus perforators. Here, we describe the flap, the harvesting thereof, and the 6-month outcomes after placement. RESULTS: The flap did not exhibit any sign of necrosis or congestion. Six months after reconstruction, the patient had not suffered any esthetic or functional sequela. CONCLUSION: Although the indications for our new flap are less numerous than those for a frontal flap, our flap is a useful alternative when frontal flap placement is not feasible (or the patient refuses such a flap) and when placement of a free flap is too risky.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective A database of normal people's external nose was established through 3D measurement. This database was used to customize the external nose for patients with nasal defects and to assist the operator to carry out the whole nose reconstruction surgery, so as to carry out the postoperative evaluation.Methods 3D scanning of the subject's face, measurement of relevant indexes of the nose and establishment of a database, the operator used normal nose database to customize the customized external nose for 17 patients with nasal defects, assisted them in the whole nose reconstruction surgery, and used independent sample t test for data statistics to evaluate the expected effect of surgery. Results There was no statistically significant differences between the postoperative actual data and the preoperative personalized data (P> 0.05) in right root wing distance, left root wing distance, nose length, nasal base width, nose width, right side vertical bisect nasal line, left side vertical bisect nasal line, nose height, medial malleolus spacing, face width, mouth split width, facial height, nasal width index, nasal width index, interondylar-nasal width index and nasal high index. The actual data of nasal deep was statistically different from preoperative personalized data (P < 0.05). Conclusions Analysis showed no significant difference between the actual data nasal surgery and preoperative customization data. 3D measurement of normal human external nasal establishment database to customize the external nose for patients with nasal defects, can assist the surgeon to perform total nasal reconstruction surgery and improve predictability and make surgery more precise. Postoperative assessments can also be performed to compare preoperative and postoperative outcomes.

RESUMEN

Objective To investigate the clinical effect of retrograde nasolabial fold flap pedicled with angular artery in the repair of inferior nasal defect .Methods According to the location and size of inferior nasal defect ,the reverse island flap or axial flap pedicled with the inner canthus artery was de-signed to repair the defect at the nasolabial fold of the affected side .Results Eighteen patients were followed up for 6-36 months ,of which 2 cases had partial necrosis at the distal part of the flap ,healed by dressing change ,and the rest of the flaps survived .The flaps were not bulky and the color and tex-ture were similar to those of the surrounding skin .All patients were satisfied with the appearance im -provement .Conclusions The blood supply of the retrograde nasolabial fold flap pedicled with the in-ner canthus artery is reliable ,using flaps from the nasolabial sulcus is surgically convenient ,flexible in design and covert in donor site .It is one of the ideal methods for the repair of inferior nasal defects .It is worthy of clinical application .