Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 19 de 19
Filtrar
2.
BMC Psychiatry ; 24(1): 10, 2024 01 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38166836

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy (LICBT) has been recommended as a primary intervention in the tiered care for mild to moderate generalised anxiety disorder. However, LICBT for generalised anxiety disorder are markedly diverse and efficacy data on various outcomes have not been systematically reviewed. This meta-analysis aimed to synthesise effect sizes of three NICE-recommended LICBT for generalised anxiety disorder: non-facilitated self-help, guided self-help, and psychoeducational groups. METHODS: A systematic literature review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining LICBT for generalised anxiety disorder in the last 23 years (2000-2023) was conducted. Efficacy data for anxiety, depression, and worry outcomes were separately meta-analysed. The study was reported following the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: The systematic review identified 12 RCTs out of 1205 papers. The three meta-analyses consisted of 12 (anxiety), 11 (depression), and 9 (worry) effect sizes respectively, including total sample sizes of 1201 (anxiety), 1164 (depression), and 908 (worry). The adjusted effect sizes for reductions in anxiety (g = -0.63), depression (g = -0.48), and worry (g = -0.64) were all in the medium range, favouring LICBT over control conditions. Between-study heterogeneity was significant on anxiety and worry, with no specific moderators identified by meta-regression. CONCLUSIONS: LICBT has shown promise as an effective and efficient treatment modality for individuals with generalised anxiety disorder. Future research comparing various LICBT subtypes and treatment components will further inform clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This systematic review protocol has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; record ID CRD42021285590).


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Humanos , Ansiedad/terapia , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto
3.
Epilepsy Behav ; 148: 109465, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37844441

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Benign Epilepsy with Centro-Temporal Spikes (BECTS) is a pediatric epilepsy with typically good seizure control. Although BECTS may increase patients' risk of developing neurological comorbidities, their clinical care and short-term outcomes are poorly quantified. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed adherence to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines relating to specialist referral, electroencephalogram (EEG) conduct and annual review in the care of patients with BECTS, and measured their seizure, neurodevelopmental and learning outcomes at three years post-diagnosis. RESULTS: Across ten centers in England, we identified 124 patients (74 male) diagnosed with BECTS between 2015 and 2017. Patients had a mean age at diagnosis of 8.0 (95% CI = 7.6-8.4) years. 24/95 (25%) patients were seen by a specialist within two weeks of presentation; 59/100 (59%) received an EEG within two weeks of request; and 59/114 (52%) were reviewed annually. At three years post-diagnosis, 32/114 (28%) experienced ongoing seizures; 26/114 (23%) had reported poor school progress; 15/114 (13%) were diagnosed with a neurodevelopmental disorder (six autism spectrum disorder, six attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder); and 10/114 (8.8%) were diagnosed with a learning difficulty (three processing deficit, three dyslexia). Center-level random effects models estimated neurodevelopmental diagnoses in 9% (95% CI: 2-16%) of patients and learning difficulty diagnoses in 7% (95% CI: 2-12%). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter work, we found variable adherence to NICE guidelines in the care of patients with BECTS and identified a notable level of neurological comorbidity. Patients with BECTS may benefit from enhanced cognitive and behavioral assessment and monitoring.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno del Espectro Autista , Epilepsia Rolándica , Humanos , Niño , Masculino , Epilepsia Rolándica/diagnóstico , Epilepsia Rolándica/epidemiología , Epilepsia Rolándica/psicología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/complicaciones , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/diagnóstico , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/epidemiología , Convulsiones , Electroencefalografía
4.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 48(9): 2345-2352, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35751401

RESUMEN

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of a preeclampsia (PE) screening program using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline in pregnant Thai women. METHODS: A total of 2552 pregnancies received antenatal care and were delivered at Songklanagarind Hospital between November 2016 and April 2020. PE screening with the NICE guideline was used to identify mothers at risk. In cases of positive screening results, a daily dose of 81 mg aspirin was prescribed. Pregnancy outcomes were compared with 2783 participants who had maternity care before the implementation of the screening program. The effectiveness of aspirin prophylaxis following the NICE guideline was assessed by a logistic regression model to compare the risk of PE development between before and after guidance. RESULTS: The screening positive rate by NICE was 8.3%. Of these, 77.36% of the participants received aspirin prophylaxis according to the NICE recommendation. After the implementation of the PE screening program, the incidence of PE slightly decreased (from 4.31% to 3.72%, p = 0.274). The chance of PE in pregnancies who had high-risk factors was reduced after using low-dose aspirin prophylaxis, even though the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Screening with the NICE guidelines followed by prescription of low-dose aspirin (81 mg/day) was probably not an effective strategy for the prevention of PE in our population. Combining biophysical and biochemical markers to identify pregnant women who subsequently develop PE, concurrently with an increased dose of aspirin prophylaxis, may provide a better outcome in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Materna , Preeclampsia , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Preeclampsia/diagnóstico , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Tailandia
5.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 48(3): 533-540, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34838395

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate the impact of the national guideline on the prevalence and outcome in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) who had undergone inadvertent excisions. METHODS: A total of 2336 patients were referred to a tertiary sarcoma centre from six regions (North East, North West, East Midlands, West Midlands, Wales, and South West) in the United Kingdom with a diagnosis of STS between 1996 and 2016, of whom 561 patients (24.0%) had undergone inadvertent excisions. Patients were categorised into two groups of 10-year periods pre and post the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline implementation in 2006. RESULTS: The proportion of inadvertent excisions decreased after the NICE guideline implementation: 27.2% (pre-NICE) versus 19.8% (post-NICE) (p = 0.001). A substantial regional variation (17.4%-34.5%) in the proportion of inadvertent excisions in the pre-NICE era was reduced in the post-NICE era (14.3%-22.4%). The 5-year disease-specific survival was 77.7% (pre-NICE) versus 75.6% (post-NICE) (p = 0.961) and there was a trend toward lower incidence of local recurrence in the post-NICE era; 13.5% (pre-NICE) versus 10.5% (post-NICE) (p = 0.522). Multivariate analyses revealed that residual tumours in re-resection specimens were independently associated with an increased risk of disease-specific mortality (HR, 3.35; p < 0.001) and local recurrence (HR, 1.99; p = 0.017), which was significantly reduced after the NICE guideline implementation (53.2% versus 42.0%; p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: The NICE guideline implementation reduced the proportion of patients with STS who had undergone inadvertent excisions and residual tumour in re-resection specimens, indicating an improved pre-referral management of STSs.


Asunto(s)
Sarcoma , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos , Humanos , Neoplasia Residual/patología , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/diagnóstico , Sarcoma/epidemiología , Sarcoma/cirugía , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/epidemiología , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Reino Unido/epidemiología
6.
Bone Joint J ; 103-B(9): 1541-1549, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34465152

RESUMEN

AIMS: While a centralized system for the care of patients with a sarcoma has been advocated for decades, regional variations in survival remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate regional variations in survival and the impact of national policies in patients with a soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) in the UK. METHODS: The study included 1,775 patients with a STS who were referred to a tertiary sarcoma centre. The geographical variations in survival were evaluated according to the periods before and after the issue of guidance by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in 2006 and the relevant evolution of regional management. RESULTS: There had been a significant difference in survival between patients referred from the North East, North West, East Midlands, West Midlands, South West, and Wales in the pre-NICE era (five-year disease-specific survival (DSS); South West, 74% vs North East, 47% (p = 0.045) or West Midlands, 54% (p = 0.049)), which was most evident for patients with a high-grade STS. However, this variation disappeared in the post-NICE era, in which the overall DSS for high-grade STS improved from 47% to 68% at five years (p < 0.001). Variation in the size of the tumour closely correlated with the variation in DSS, and the overall size of the tumour and incidence of metastasis at the time of diagnosis also decreased after the national policies were issued. CONCLUSION: The survival of patients with a STS improved and regional variation corrected after the introduction of national policies, as a result of a decreasing size of tumour and incidence of metastasis at the time of diagnosis, particularly in patients with a high-grade STS. This highlights the positive impact of national guidelines on regional variation in the presentation, management, and outcome in patients with a STS. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(9):1541-1549.


Asunto(s)
Extremidades , Política de Salud , Sarcoma/mortalidad , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/mortalidad , Neoplasias Torácicas/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Características de la Residencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medicina Estatal , Tasa de Supervivencia , Reino Unido/epidemiología
7.
Kampo Medicine ; : 302-306, 2021.
Artículo en Japonés | WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) | ID: wpr-936786

RESUMEN

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common complaints of Japanese citizens, and is a symptom for which acupuncture has been applied since ancient times. We empirically recognize that acupuncture is effective for LBP, but in recent years, it became necessary to show evidence regarding its efficacy and effectiveness.Currently, to elucidate the effect of a medical intervention, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard and outcomes of RCTs are integrated as a systematic review (SR), and these are used to establish the degree of recommendation in the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Eventually, practitioners make their clinical decisions according to the recommendations in CPGs.In this report, the author compared CPGs of acupuncture for LBP between those of the United Kingdom (UK) and United States of America (USA). The NICE guideline development group of the UK did not fully understand Japanese-style acupuncture, and they considered clinical trials with placebo/sham as a control to be the most important, leading to underestimating the effect of acupuncture. On the other hand, the ACP guideline of the USA considers clinical trials with conventional treatment as a control to be more important, and accordingly the effect of acupuncture was evaluated realistically.

8.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 56(4): 566-571, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32304623

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: There has been an unprecedented fall in the rate of stillbirth in twin pregnancy in the UK. It is contested whether implementation of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance on the antenatal management of uncomplicated twin pregnancies has contributed to this change. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the implementation of NICE guidance was associated with a reduction in the rate of stillbirth in twin pregnancies delivered in a large UK hospital. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study including all twin pregnancies delivered at St George's Hospital, London, UK, between 2000 and 2018. Data were analyzed according to two time periods: before implementation of the NICE guidance on twins (before June 2013; pre-NICE) and after its implementation (after June 2013; post-NICE). The exclusion criteria were higher-order multiple gestations, pregnancies of unknown chorionicity, pregnancies complicated by miscarriage, those that underwent termination and those diagnosed with vanishing twin. The main outcome was stillbirth. Other outcomes included neonatal death (NND), admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and emergency Cesarean section. We planned a priori a sensitivity analysis according to chorionicity. The chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U-test were used to compare outcomes between the study groups. RESULTS: We included in the analysis 1666 twin pregnancies (3332 fetuses), of which 1114 pregnancies (2228 fetuses) were delivered before and 552 pregnancies (1104 fetuses) after June 2013. Of those, 1299 were dichorionic and 354 were monochorionic diamniotic. The incidence of stillbirth was significantly lower in the post-NICE than in the pre-NICE group (3.6 per 1000 births vs 13.5 per 1000 births; P = 0.008). The reduction in stillbirth rate was from 8.5 to 3.6 per 1000 births (P = 0.161) in dichorionic and from 33.6 to 3.8 per 1000 births (P = 0.011) in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. There was no significant difference in the rates of NND (P = 0.625), NICU admission (P = 0.506) or emergency Cesarean section (P = 0.820) between the two groups. The median gestational age at delivery was significantly lower in the post-NICE than in the pre-NICE group (median 36.3 vs 36.9 weeks; P < 0.001), as a consequence of a significant increase in preterm birth between 34 and 37 weeks' gestation (39.3% vs 27.0%; P = 0.002), but not before 34 weeks (P = 0.473). CONCLUSIONS: A significant reduction of > 70% in the stillbirth rate in twin pregnancies was noted after implementation of the NICE guidance. This reduction was statistically significant in monochorionic, but not dichorionic, twin pregnancies. The improvement in twin pregnancy outcome was achieved without a concomitant increase in NND, admission to the NICU or emergency Cesarean section. © 2020 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Implementación de Plan de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo Gemelar/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Prenatal/normas , Mortinato/epidemiología , Adulto , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Muerte Perinatal , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Reino Unido/epidemiología
9.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed ; 105(6): 581-586, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32170032

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the management recommendations of the Kaiser Permanente neonatal early-onset sepsis risk calculator (SRC) with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline CG149 in infants ≥34 weeks' gestation who developed early-onset sepsis (EOS). DESIGN: Retrospective multicentre study. SETTING: Five maternity services in South West of England and Wales. PATIENTS: 70 infants with EOS (<72 hours) confirmed on blood or cerebrospinal fluid culture. METHODS: Retrospective virtual application of NICE and SRC through review of maternal and neonatal notes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The number of infants recommended antibiotics by 4 hours of birth. RESULTS: The incidence of EOS ≥34 weeks was 0.5/1000 live births. Within 4 hours of birth, antibiotics were recommended for 39 infants (55.7%) with NICE, compared with 27 (38.6%) with SRC. The 12 infants advised early treatment by NICE but not SRC remained well, only one showing transient mild symptoms after 4 hours. Another four babies received antibiotics by 4 hours outside NICE and SRC guidance. The remaining 27 infants (38.6%) received antibiotics when symptomatic after 4 hours. Only one infant who was unwell from birth, died. Eighty-one per cent of all EOS infants were treated for clinical reasons rather than for risk factors alone. CONCLUSION: While both tools were poor in identifying EOS within 4 hours, NICE was superior to SRC in identifying asymptomatic cases. Currently, four out of five EOS have symptoms at first identification, the majority of whom present within 24 hours of birth. Antibiotic stewardship programmes using SRC should include enhanced observation for infants currently treated within NICE guidance.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades del Prematuro/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Prematuro/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis Neonatal/diagnóstico , Sepsis Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Diagnóstico Precoz , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reino Unido , Estados Unidos
11.
Paediatr Respir Rev ; 31: 12-14, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30962150

RESUMEN

NICE produced a guideline for the diagnosis and management of CF (NG78) in October 2017. This paper describes the process of producing the guideline and highlights some of the areas covered by it, including ideas for further research and tools that can be used by purchasers to help improve CF care.


Asunto(s)
Fibrosis Quística/diagnóstico , Fibrosis Quística/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Óseas Metabólicas/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Expectorantes/uso terapéutico , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Terapia Respiratoria , Reino Unido
12.
Front Pharmacol ; 9: 1370, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30564117

RESUMEN

Background: Major orthopedic surgery, such as elective total hip replacement (eTHR) and elective total knee replacement (eTKR), are associated with a higher risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) than other surgical procedures. Little is known, however, about the cost-effectiveness of VTE prophylaxis strategies in people undergoing these procedures. Aim: The aim of this work was to assess the cost-effectiveness of these strategies from the English National Health Service perspective to inform NICE guideline (NG89) recommendations. Materials and Methods: Cost-utility analysis, using decision modeling, was undertaken to compare 15 VTE prophylaxis strategies for eTHR and 12 for eTKR, in addition to "no prophylaxis" strategy. The analysis complied with the NICE Reference Case. Structure and assumptions were agreed with the guideline committee. Incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) was calculated, vs. the model comparator (LMWH+ antiembolism stockings), at a threshold of £20,000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. The model was run probabilistically. Deterministic sensitivity analyses (SAs) were undertaken to assess the robustness of the results. Results: The most cost-effective strategies were LMWH for 10 days followed by aspirin for 28 days (INMB = £530 [95% CI: -£784 to £1,103], probability of being most cost-effective = 72%) for eTHR, and foot pump (INMB = £353 [95% CI: -£101 to £665]; probability of being most cost-effective = 18%) for eTKR. There was considerable uncertainty regarding the cost-effectiveness ranking in the eTKR analysis. The results were robust to change in all SAs. Conclusions: For eTHR, LMWH (standard dose) for 10 days followed by aspirin for 28 days is the most cost-effective VTE prophylaxis strategy. For eTKR, the results are highly uncertain but foot pump appeared to be the most cost-effective strategy, followed closely by aspirin (low dose). Future research should focus on assessing cost-effectiveness of VTE prophylaxis in the eTKR population.

13.
J Clin Virol ; 105: 84-87, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29909244

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Viral bronchiolitis is one of the most common causes of hospitalisation in young infants. It has previously been shown that many United Kingdom (UK) hospital Trusts were not compliant with many aspects of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) bronchiolitis guideline prior to its publication. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate changes in the management of bronchiolitis by hospital Trusts between 2015 (before NICE guideline publication) and 2017, after publication. STUDY DESIGN: We prospectively surveyed paediatricians at UK hospital Trusts on the management of bronchiolitis before (March to May 2015) and after (January to May 2017) the NICE bronchiolitis guideline publication in June 2015, using an electronic, structured questionnaire. RESULTS: In 2015 111 Trusts were represented and in 2017 100 Trusts. Significant improvements were seen in the use of nebulised bronchodilators and hypertonic saline and provision of parental written guidance. However, full compliance with the guideline did not change with 18% of Trusts compliant before publication of the guideline in 2015 and 19% fully compliant with the guideline in 2017. CONCLUSIONS: Overall there were modest but important improvements in the reported management of bronchiolitis after the publication of the NICE guideline.


Asunto(s)
Bronquiolitis Viral/epidemiología , Bronquiolitis Viral/terapia , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Broncodilatadores , Adhesión a Directriz , Hospitalización , Humanos , Lactante , Programas Nacionales de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatras , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino Unido/epidemiología
14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28513234

RESUMEN

The care of people with motor neuron disease/amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is often complex and involves a wide multidisciplinary team approach. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the UK has produced an evidence based guideline for the management of patients. This has made recommendations, based on clear evidence or consensus discussion. The evidence is often limited and areas for further research are suggested.


Asunto(s)
Academias e Institutos/normas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Enfermedad de la Neurona Motora/epidemiología , Enfermedad de la Neurona Motora/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Academias e Institutos/tendencias , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/tendencias , Humanos , Enfermedad de la Neurona Motora/diagnóstico , Desarrollo de Programa/métodos , Desarrollo de Programa/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/tendencias , Reino Unido/epidemiología
17.
Hum Reprod ; 31(6): 1141-6, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27076499

RESUMEN

The advent of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has contributed to a significant growth in the delivery of assisted conception technique, such that IVF/ICSI procedures are now recommended over other interventions. Even the UK National Institute for Health Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines controversially recommends against intrauterine insemination (IUI) procedures in favour of IVF. We reflect on some of the clinical, economic, financial and ethical realities that have been used to selectively promote IVF over IUI, which is less intrusive and more patient friendly, obviates the need for embryo storage and has a global application. The evidence strongly favours IUI over IVF in selected couples and national funding strategies should include IUI treatment options. IUI, practised optimally as a first line treatment in up to six cycles, would also ease the pressures on public funds to allow the provision of up to three IVF cycles for couple who need it. Fertility clinics should also strive towards ISO15189 accreditation standards for basic semen diagnosis for male infertility used to triage ICSI treatment, to reduce the over-diagnosis of severe male factor infertility. Importantly, there is a need to develop global guidelines on inclusion policies for IVF/ICSI procedures. These suggestions are an ethically sound basis for constructing the provision of publicly funded fertility treatments.


Asunto(s)
Infertilidad/terapia , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/economía , Adulto , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/ética
18.
China Oncology ; (12): 849-853, 2015.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) | ID: wpr-483524

RESUMEN

It is important for patients with colorectal cancer to receive standard and reasonable treatment. There are many clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer. However, the most influential guidelines are NCCN, ESMO and NICE guidelines. NCCN guidelines are the most world-renowned guidelines from National Comprehensive Cancer Network of the United States; ESMO guidelines are promulgated by the European Society for Medical Oncology; NICE guidelines are guidance of diagnosis and management for colorectal cancer issued by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence of the United Kingdom. They are very similar in case management and treatment principles. However, there are still some differences in indications for drugs, treatment of hereditary colorectal cancer, laparoscopy indication and management of ileus. Here we discuss some of these differences and provide a reference for standardization of colorectal cancer treatment in China.

19.
Nurs Stand ; 28(52): 42-8, 2014 Sep 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25159976

RESUMEN

This article discusses the development of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines, the contribution made by nurses to the guidelines and the importance of continuing to take an active role in this work. The challenges nurses face and the support provided to nurses involved in this work by the Royal College of Nursing are outlined. It is intended the article will stimulate interest and encourage nurses to contribute to guideline development.


Asunto(s)
Directrices para la Planificación en Salud , Rol de la Enfermera , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/métodos , Humanos , Reino Unido
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA