RESUMEN
Over the last two years, global regulatory authorities have raised safety concerns on nitrosamine contamination in several drug classes, including angiotensin II receptor antagonists, histamine-2 receptor antagonists, antimicrobial agents, and antidiabetic drugs. To avoid carcinogenic and mutagenic effects in patients relying on these medications, authorities have established specific guidelines in risk assessment scenarios and proposed control limits for nitrosamine impurities in pharmaceuticals. In this review, nitrosation pathways and possible root causes of nitrosamine formation in pharmaceuticals are discussed. The control limits of nitrosamine impurities in pharmaceuticals proposed by national regulatory authorities are presented. Additionally, a practical and science-based strategy for implementing the well-established control limits is notably reviewed in terms of an alternative approach for drug product N-nitrosamines without published AI information from animal carcinogenicity testing. Finally, a novel risk evaluation strategy for predicting and investigating the possible nitrosation of amine precursors and amine pharmaceuticals as powerful prevention of nitrosamine contamination is addressed.
RESUMEN
Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and H2 blockers are commonly prescribed medications to treat ulcers in the stomach and the upper part of the small intestine and prescribed for some other common gastrointestinal complications such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophagitis, irritable bowel syndrome, and dyspepsia. Previous studies claimed that, apart from other side effects, these anti-ulcerant therapies significantly altered bone mineral density by interfering with intestinal reabsorption of minerals and vitamin B12, and the most widely prescribed PPIs were significantly associated with increased risks of hip and spine fractures. However, the potential skeletal side effects of these antiulcerants are unknown in Bangladesh. Methods: To examine safety concerns of anti-ulcer therapies and their impact on musculoskeletal health among patients in Bangladesh, the present work surveyed 200 patients in five different hospitals from December 2019 to February 2020. Results: The current study revealed that most respondents (95 %) received PPIs for gastrointestinal indications while the rest were taking H2 receptor antagonists for their gastric ailments. Most patients taking PPIs alone (> 3 years; 95 % of respondents) claimed some unusual musculoskeletal side effects, such as weakness, flank pain, spasm of hands and feet, muscle aches, numbness, and tremor. About 61 % of patients taking PPIs experienced low back pain whereas the respondents with neck pain and knee joint pain were 10 % and 7 %, respectively. However, few osteopenia and osteoporotic incidences have been also recorded. Although further studies are required to confirm the impact of these antiulcerants on the bone, these patient responses suggest that these musculoskeletal side effects might have some links with altered bone metabolism. Conclusions: It is possible that anti-ulcerant therapies may worsen the bone metabolism of patients suffering from osteoporosis or other bone disorders, and awareness and precautions should be raised among the patients and clinicians for the careful administration of PPIs to patients suffering from bone disorders.