RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal administration of polymyxins for treating multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial (MDR-GNB) pneumonia remains unclear. This study aimed to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of three polymyxin-containing regimens by conducting a comprehensive network meta-analysis. METHODS: We comprehensively searched nine databases. Overall mortality was the primary outcome, whereas the secondary outcomes encompassed microbial eradication rate, clinical success, acute kidney injury, and incidence of bronchospasm. Extracted study data were analyzed by pairwise and network meta-analyses. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) assessment tool were used to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials and cohort studies, respectively. RESULTS: This study included 19 observational studies and 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), encompassing 3318 patients. Six studies with high risk of bias were excluded from the primary analysis. In the pairwise meta-analysis, compared to the intravenous (IV) polymyxin-containing regimen, the intravenous plus inhaled (IV + IH) polymyxin-containing regimen showed a significant decrease in overall mortality, while no statistically significant difference was found in the inhaled (IH) polymyxin-containing regimen. The network meta-analysis indicated that the IV + IH polymyxin-containing regimen had significantly lower overall mortality (OR 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.88), higher clinical success rate (OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.20-3.00), better microbial eradication rate (OR 2.70; 95% CI 1.90-3.90) than the IV polymyxin-containing regimen, and significantly better microbial eradication rate when compared with the IH polymyxin-containing regimen (OR 2.30; 95% CI 1.30-4.20). Furthermore, compared with IV + IH and IV polymyxin-containing regimens, the IH polymyxin-containing regimen showed a significant reduction in acute kidney injury. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that among the three administration regimens, the IV + IH polymyxin-containing regimen may be the most effective for treating MDR-GNB pneumonia, with a significantly lower overall mortality compared to the IV regimen and a considerably higher microbial eradication rate compared to the IH regimen. The IH regimen may be considered superior to the IV regimen due to its substantially lower incidence of acute kidney injury, even though the reduction in overall mortality was not significant.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are particularly susceptible to infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) and are often the first to be affected by an emerging resistant pathogen. Unfortunately, their prevalence and impact on morbidity and mortality according to the type of graft is not systematically reported from high-as well as from low and middle-income countries (HIC and LMIC). Thus, epidemiology on MDRO in SOT recipients could be subjected to reporting bias. In addition, screening practices and diagnostic resources may vary between countries, as well as the availability of new drugs. In this review, we aimed to depict the burden of main Gram-negative MDRO in SOT patients across HIC and LMIC and to provide an overview of current diagnostic and therapeutic resources.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This study evaluates whether random forest (RF) models are as effective as traditional Logistic Regression (LR) models in predicting multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial nosocomial infections. Data were collected from 541 patients with hospital-acquired Gram-negative bacterial infections at two tertiary-level hospitals in Urumqi, Xinjiang, China, from August 2022 to November 2023. Relevant literature informed the selection of significant predictors based on patients' pre-infection clinical information and medication history. The data were split into a training set of 379 cases and a validation set of 162 cases, adhering to a 7:3 ratio. Both RF and LR models were developed using the training set and subsequently evaluated on the validation set. The LR model achieved an accuracy of 84.57%, sensitivity of 82.89%, specificity of 80.10%, positive predictive value of 84%, negative predictive value of 85.06%, and a Yoden index of 0.69. In contrast, the RF model demonstrated superior performance with an accuracy of 89.51%, sensitivity of 90.79%, specificity of 88.37%, positive predictive value of 87.34%, negative predictive value of 91.57%, and a Yoden index of 0.79. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.91 for the LR model and 0.94 for the RF model. These findings indicate that the RF model surpasses the LR model in specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy in predicting hospital-acquired multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections, showcasing its greater potential for clinical application.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Performance of active screening for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) and administration of targeted antibiotic prophylaxis (TAP) in colonized patients undergoing liver (LT) and/or kidney transplantation (KT) are controversial issues. METHODS: Self-administered electronic cross-sectional survey disseminated from January to February 2022. Questionnaire consisted of four parts: hospital/transplant program characteristics, standard screening and antibiotic prophylaxis, clinical vignettes asking for TAP in patients undergoing LT and KT with prior infection/colonization with four different MDR-GNB (extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales [ESCR-E], carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales [CRE], multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa [MDR-Pa], and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii [CRAb]). RESULTS: Fifty-five respondents participated from 14 countries, mostly infectious disease specialists (69%) with active transplant programs (>100 procedures/year for 34.5% KT and 23.6% LT), and heterogeneous local MDR-GNB prevalence from <15% (30.9%), 15%-30% (43.6%) to >30% (16.4%). The frequency of screening for ESCR-E, CRE, MDR-Pa, and CRAb was 22%, 54%, 17%, and 24% for LT, respectively, and 18%, 36%, 16%, and 11% for KT. Screening time-points were mainly at transplantation 100%, only one-third following transplantation. Screening was always based on rectal swab cultures (100%); multi-site sampling was reported in 40% of KT and 35% of LT. In LT clinical cases, 84%, 58%, 84%, and 40% of respondents reported TAP for prior infection/colonization with ESCR-E, CRE, MDR-Pa, and CRAb, respectively. In KT clinical cases, 55%, 39%, 87%, and 42% of respondents reported TAP use for prior infection/colonization with ESCR-E, CRE, MDR-Pa, and CRAb, respectively. CONCLUSION: There is a large heterogeneity in screening and management of MDR-GNB carriage in LT and KT.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with haematological malignancies (HM patients) are at high risk of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB). MDR-GNB intestinal colonisation is associated with MDR-GNB infections. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis on HM patients was to pool the prevalence of and risk factors for intestinal colonisation by MDR-GNB, including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales, reported in previous studies. METHODS: This study was conducted according to the protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022374425). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE(R) ALL and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 25 October 2022. Observational studies reporting CRE and/or ESBL intestinal colonisation in HM patients were included. Subgroup analyses were conducted by study region. RESULTS: A total of 21 402 HM patients from 32 studies were analysed. The pooled CRE and ESBL colonisation rates were 21.7% [95% confidence interval (95%CI) 18.7-24.8] and 19.2% (95%CI 13.9-24.5), respectively. Prior exposure to tigecycline [odds ratio (OR) 3.99, 95%CI 2.08-7.68], carbapenem (OR 1.84, 95%CI 1.13-2.97) or penicillin (OR 1.72, 95%CI 1.05-2.83), as well as chemotherapy (OR 2.45, 95%CI 1.05-5.73), neutropenia (OR 1.88, 95%CI 1.08-3.26) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML; OR 1.86, 95%CI 1.33-2.61), were risk factors for CRE colonisation in HM patients. Prior antibiotic exposure was a risk factor for ESBL colonisation in HM patients (OR 4.90, 95%CI 2.76-8.70). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the high prevalence of MDR-GNB (CRE and ESBL) colonisation in HM patients and explains associated factors for the colonisation. The results provide evidence for MDR-GNB infection control in HM management.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In December 2022,ESCMID/EUCIC jointly issued the Clinical Practice Guidelines for perioperative antimi-crobial prophylaxis in patients colonized with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria(MDR-GNB).The guideline was based on systematically evaluating of published studies on perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients colonized with MDR-GNB.The guideline elaborated on the necessity and timing of screening for MDR-GNB colonization,perioperative antimicrobial prophy-laxis selection,and the timing of dosing,and it provided evidence-based recommendations based on existing studies.This paper in-terpreted the guidelines based on the latest research progress at home and abroad,aiming to reduce the occurrence of surgical site infections in patients colonized with MDR-GNB and benefit patients.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We investigated the associations between the different doses of tigecycline, its efficacy and safety, and the role of tigecycline therapeutic drug monitoring for patients in the intensive care unit. METHODS: This study was a single-center cohort including patients infected with multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDR-AB) and multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (MDR-KP) causing pulmonary infections. The steady-state plasma concentration after tigecycline administration was determined by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) in patients admitted to the ICU between October 2020 and December 2021. Multivariate analyses of tigecycline's clinical efficacy and safety were performed to control confounding factors. RESULTS: For this study, we included 45 patients and 45 blood samples to determine steady-state trough concentrations of tigecycline. All patients were divided into the High Dose (HD) and Standard Dose (SD) groups. The median trough concentration of tigecycline was 0.56 µg/mL in the HD group, which was higher than in the SD group (0,21 µg/mL), p = 0.000. There was no significant difference between the two groups of patients in terms of bacterial eradication rate, mortality rate, and clinical efficacy. Multiple regression analysis showed that the ICU days were correlated with mortality OR 1.030(1.005-1.056), p = 0.017. APACHE II was significantly associated with clinical efficacy OR 0.870(0.755-1.002), p = 0.045. The level of fibrinogen decline in the HD group was significantly higher than in the SD group (-3.05 ± 1.67 vs -1.75 ± 1.90), p = 0.038. We identified that age and tigecycline treatment duration influenced fibrinogen decline. CONCLUSIONS: Tigecycline plasma concentrations are significantly increased when using a high dose. However, the plasma concentration of tigecycline is not correlated with clinical efficacy and adverse reactions. Fibrinogen decline appears to be related to the patient's age and days of tigecycline. Large sample data are still needed to confirm the clinical guidance significance of tigecycline TDM.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The present study aims to determine the rectoanal colonization rate and risk factors for the colonization of present multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRBs). In addition, the relationship between MDRB colonization and surgical site infection (SSI) following hemorrhoidectomy was explored. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Colorectal Surgery of two hospitals. Patients with hemorrhoid disease, who underwent hemorrhoidectomy, were included. The pre-surgical screening of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) colonization was performed using rectal swabs on the day of admission. Then, the MDRB colonization rate was determined through the rectal swab. Logistic regression models were established to determine the risk factors for MDRB colonization and SSI after hemorrhoidectomy. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 432 patients met the inclusion criteria, and the MDRB colonization prevalence was 21.06% (91/432). The independent risk factors for MDRB colonization were as follows: patients who received ≥ 2 categories of antibiotic treatment within 3 months (odds ratio (OR): 3.714, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.436-9.605, p = 0.007), patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD; OR: 6.746, 95% CI: 2.361-19.608, p < 0.001), and patients with high serum uric acid (OR: 1.006, 95% CI: 1.001-1.010, p = 0.017). Furthermore, 41.57% (37/89) of MDRB carriers and 1.81% (6/332) of non-carriers developed SSIs, with a total incidence of 10.21% (43/421). Based on the multivariable model, the rectoanal colonization of MDRBs (OR: 32.087, 95% CI: 12.052-85.424, p < 0.001) and hemoglobin < 100 g/L (OR: 4.130, 95% CI: 1.556-10.960, p = 0.004) were independently associated with SSI after hemorrhoidectomy. CONCLUSION: The rectoanal colonization rate of MDRBs in hemorrhoid patients is high, and this was identified as an independent risk factor for SSI after hemorrhoidectomy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria-related infectious diseases have caused an increase in the public health burden and mortality. Moreover, the formation of biofilms makes these bacteria difficult to control. Therefore, developing novel interventions to combat MDR gram-negative bacteria and their biofilms-related infections are urgently needed. The purpose of this study was to develop a multifunctional nanoassembly (IRNB) based on IR-780 and N, N'-di-sec-butyl-N, N'- dinitroso-1,4-phenylenediamine (BNN6) for synergistic effect on the infected wounds and subcutaneous abscesses caused by gram-negative bacteria. Methods: The characterization and bacteria-targeting ability of IRNB were investigated. The bactericidal efficacy of IRNB against gram-negative bacteria and their biofilms was demonstrated by crystal violet staining assay, plate counting method and live/dead staining in vitro. The antibacterial efficiency of IRNB was examined on a subcutaneous abscess and cutaneous infected wound model in vivo. A cell counting kit-8 assay, Calcein/PI cytotoxicity assay, hemolysis assay and intravenous injection assay were performed to detect the biocompatibility of IRNB in vitro and in vivo. Results: Herein, we successfully developed a multifunctional nanoassembly IRNB based on IR-780 and BNN6 for synergistic photothermal therapy (PTT), photodynamic therapy (PDT) and nitric oxide (NO) effect triggered by an 808 nm laser. This nanoassembly could accumulate specifically at the infected sites of MDR gram-negative bacteria and their biofilms via the covalent coupling effect. Upon irradiation with an 808 nm laser, IRNB was activated and produced both reactive oxygen species (ROS) and hyperthermia. The local hyperthermia could induce NO generation, which further reacted with ROS to generate ONOO-, leading to the enhancement of bactericidal efficacy. Furthermore, NO and ONOO- could disrupt the cell membrane, which converts bacteria to an extremely susceptible state and further enhances the photothermal effect. In this study, IRNB showed a superior photothermal-photodynamic-chemo (NO) synergistic therapeutic effect on the infected wounds and subcutaneous abscesses caused by gram-negative bacteria. This resulted in effective control of associated infections, relief of inflammation, promotion of re-epithelization and collagen deposition, and regulation of angiogenesis during wound healing. Moreover, IRNB exhibited excellent biocompatibility, both in vitro and in vivo. Conclusions: The present research suggests that IRNB can be considered a promising alternative for treating infections caused by MDR gram-negative bacteria and their biofilms.

RESUMEN

Purpose: Infections induced by multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens are one of the most common and serious complications in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients. However, there is currently little research about "ECMO and MDR bacteria". The purpose of our study was to clarify the epidemiological characteristics of MDR bacteria and provide references for empiric antibiotic treatments according to the drug susceptibility tests for ECMO patients. Patients and Methods: There were 104 patients admitted to our department and receiving ECMO treatments between January 2014 and December 2022. Altogether, 61 veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) and 29 veno-venous ECMO (VV-ECMO) patients enrolled. The data on other intensive care unit (ICU) patients in our department in the same period are summarized. Results: A total of 82 MDR bacteria were detected from ECMO patients, and most of these were MDR Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB). There were also 5559 MDR-GNB collected from other patients in our department in the same period. We found that the distribution of MDR-GNB in ECMO patients was different from other critical patients. The proportion of Klebsiella pneumoniae (MDR-KP) in VV-ECMO patients was higher than other critical patients (35.1% and 21.3%, respectively). Moreover, the proportions of MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (MDR-AB) of VA-ECMO and VV-ECMO were higher than other critical patients (54.6%, 43.2% and 30.5%, respectively). In addition, MDR-AB and MDR-KP in ECMO patients exhibited higher percentages of drug resistance to possibly appropriate antibiotics for other critical patients, but showed better sensitivity to colistin. Conclusion: Infections induced by MDR-GNB in ECMO patients were serious and exhibited higher degrees of drug resistance compared with other ICU patients. Colistin might be an option to consider if there is no medical contraindication. However, widespread use of broad spectrum antibiotics is something that should be discouraged, and alternative options are being explored.

RESUMEN

The increase in infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units over recent years is alarming. MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii have constituted the main causes of the MDR Gram-negative bacteria problem. The implementation of infection control measures such as hand hygiene, cohorting of patients, contact precautions, active surveillance and environmental cleaning could diminish their spread. Recently, water safety has been identified as a major component of infection control policies. The aim of the current review is to highlight the effectiveness of these infection control measures in managing outbreaks caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units and highlight future perspectives on the topic.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Appropriate antibiotic treatment for critically ill patients with serious Gram-negative infections in the intensive care unit is crucial to minimize morbidity and mortality. Several new antibiotics have shown in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and difficult-to-treat resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cefiderocol is the first approved siderophore beta-lactam antibiotic with potent activity against multidrug-resistant, carbapenem-resistant, difficult-to-treat or extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, which have limited treatment options. The spectrum of activity of cefiderocol includes drug-resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii, P. aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Achromobacter spp. and Burkholderia spp. and CRE that produce serine- and/or metallo-carbapenemases. Phase 1 studies established that cefiderocol achieves adequate concentration in the epithelial lining fluid in the lung and requires dosing adjustment for renal function, including patients with augmented renal clearance and continuous renal-replacement therapy (CRRT); no clinically significant drug-drug interactions are expected. The non-inferiority of cefiderocol versus high-dose, extended-infusion meropenem in all-cause mortality (ACM) rates at day 14 was demonstrated in the randomized, double-blind APEKS-NP Phase 3 clinical study in patients with nosocomial pneumonia caused by suspected or confirmed Gram-negative bacteria. Furthermore, the efficacy of cefiderocol was investigated in the randomized, open-label, pathogen-focused, descriptive CREDIBLE-CR Phase 3 clinical study in its target patient population with serious carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections, including hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia, bloodstream infection/sepsis, or complicated urinary tract infections. However, a numerically greater ACM rate with cefiderocol compared with BAT led to the inclusion of a warning in US and European prescribing information. Cefiderocol susceptibility results obtained with commercial tests should be carefully evaluated due to current issues regarding their accuracy and reliability. Since its approval, real-world evidence in patients with multidrug-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections suggests that cefiderocol can be efficacious in certain critically ill patient groups, such as those requiring mechanical ventilation for COVID-19 pneumonia with subsequently acquired Gram-negative bacterial superinfection, and patients with CRRT and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In this article, we review the microbiological spectrum, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety profiles and real-world evidence for cefiderocol, and look at future considerations for its role in the treatment of critically ill patients with challenging Gram-negative bacterial infections.

RESUMEN

The adverse events related to sodium colistimethate have had variability regarding the prevalence of nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and less frequent respiratory depression. In recent years, its use has been relevant due to the increase of multidrug-resistant bacteria since it is considered the last-line drug, being its main adverse event and reason for discrepancies between authors' nephrotoxicity. The indiscriminate use of antibiotic therapy has generated multiple mechanisms of resistance, the most common being related to Colistin, the bactericidal escape effect. Based on the search criteria, no randomized clinical trials were identified showing safety and efficacy with the use of Colistin, inferring that the application of the appropriate dose is governed by expert opinion and retrospective and prospective observational studies, which confounding factors such as the severity of the patient and the predisposition to develop acute renal failure are constant. In this review, we focus on identifying the mechanism of nephrotoxicity and bacterial resistance, where much remains to be known.

RESUMEN

(1) Background: Since 2013, weekly screening for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative (MDRGN) bacteria has been performed in German neonatal intensive care units (NICU). National guidelines recommend considering these colonization analyses for antibiotic treatment regimens. Our retrospective single center study provides insight into the clinical dichotomy of bacterial colonization and infection rates in neonates. (2) Methods: We analyzed microbiological data of neonates admitted to our tertiary level NICU over nine years. Colonization with MDRGN/Serratia marcescens (SERMA) was compared to microbiological findings in sepsis and pneumonia. (3) Results: We analyzed 917 blood and 1799 tracheal aspirate samples. After applying criteria from the Nosocomial Infection Surveillance for Neonates (NEO-KISS), we included 52 and 55 cases of sepsis and pneumonia, respectively; 19.2% of sepsis patients and 34.5% of pneumonia patients had a prior colonization with MDRGN bacteria or SERMA. In these patients, sepsis was not attributable to MDRGN bacteria yet one SERMA, while in pneumonias, ten MDRGN bacteria and one SERMA were identified. We identified late-onset pneumonia and cesarean section as risk factors for MDRGN/SERMA acquisition. (4) Conclusions: Colonization screening is a useful tool for hygiene surveillance. However, our data suggest that consideration of colonization with MDRGN/SERMA might promote extensive use of last resort antibiotics in neonates.

RESUMEN

BackgroundSince the beginning of the war in Ukraine in February 2022, Ukrainians have been seeking shelter in other European countries.AimWe aimed to investigate the prevalence and the molecular epidemiology of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative (MDRGN) bacteria and meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Ukrainian patients at admittance to the University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany.MethodsWe performed screening and observational analysis of all patients from March until June 2022. Genomes of MDRGN isolates were analysed for antimicrobial resistance, virulence genes and phylogenetic relatedness.ResultsWe included 103 patients (median age: 39 ±â€¯23.7 years), 57 of whom were female (55.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 45.2-5.1). Patients were most frequently admitted to the Department of Paediatrics (29/103; 28.2%; 95% CI: 19.7-37.9). We found 34 MDRGN isolates in 17 of 103 patients (16.5%; 95% CI: 9.9-25.1). Ten patients carried 21 carbapenem-resistant (CR) bacteria, five of them more than one CR isolate. Four of six patients with war-related injuries carried eight CR isolates. In six of 10 patients, CR isolates caused infections. Genomic characterisation revealed that the CR isolates harboured at least one carbapenemase gene, bla NDM-1 being the most frequent (n = 10). Core genome and plasmid analysis revealed no epidemiological connection between most of these isolates. Hypervirulence marker genes were found in five of six Klebsiella pneumoniae CR isolates. No MRSA was found.ConclusionHospitals should consider infection control strategies to cover the elevated prevalence of MDRGN bacteria in Ukrainian patients with war-related injuries and/or hospital pre-treatment and to prevent the spread of hypervirulent CR isolates.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The growing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance poses a grave threat to human health. Among the most difficult bacterial infections to treat are those caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative pathogens because few effective regimens are available. One approach to this problem is to find ways to increase the activity of old antimicrobials that had seen limited application. Bicyclomycin, an inhibitor of transcription termination, is an example in which the additional inhibition of protein or RNA synthesis increases bicyclomycin-mediated lethality against Gram-negative bacteria. To examine the potential of bicyclomycin for the treatment of MDR bacterial pathogens, we first measured the MICs of bicyclomycin and other widely used antimicrobials against more than 100 multidrug-resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates. Bicyclomycin showed good coverage of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and Escherichia coli (MIC50/MIC90 of 25/50 µg/mL for both bacteria) and moderate activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae (MIC50/MIC90 of 50/200 µg/mL). Bicyclomycin also exhibited synergy (e.g., fractional inhibitory concentration [FIC] index of <0.5) with doxycycline for the inhibition of bacterial growth by a checkerboard assay. Although bicyclomycin exhibited very weak lethality by itself, it showed synthetic lethality with doxycycline against K. pneumoniae: the combination killed 100- to 1,000-fold more bacteria than either agent alone. In a murine model of infection, the bicyclomycin-doxycycline combination showed better efficacy than either agent alone, and the combination treatment largely eliminated histopathological manifestations caused by infection. Thus, bicyclomycin, which has largely been limited to the treatment of Gram-negative digestive tract infections, can now be considered for the combination treatment of systemic multidrug-resistant infections caused by CRE, E. coli, and K. pneumoniae. IMPORTANCE As antimicrobial resistance continues to increase, options for effectively treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative infections are declining. Finding ways to enhance the lethality of old agents that have unique molecular targets is important because developing new antimicrobials is becoming increasingly difficult. The present work showed that the old antibiotic bicyclomycin has good bacteriostatic activity against multiple clinical isolates of three significant types of MDR Gram-negative pathogens frequently encountered in hospital infections, as required for the consideration of expanded indications. More significant is the synergistic growth-inhibitory effect and the enhancement of killing by the additional presence of doxycycline since this increases the in vivo efficacy. These data demonstrate that bicyclomycin-containing regimens have potential as new treatment options for MDR Gram-negative infections such as those caused by CRE, E. coli, and K. pneumoniae.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

SCOPE: The aim of the guidelines is to provide recommendations on perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) in adult inpatients who are carriers of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) before surgery. METHODS: These evidence-based guidelines were developed after a systematic review of published studies on PAP targeting the following MDR-GNB: extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), aminoglycoside-resistant Enterobacterales, fluoroquinolone-resistant Enterobacterales, cotrimoxazole-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), extremely drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, colistin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, and pan-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. The critical outcomes were the occurrence of surgical site infections (SSIs) caused by any bacteria and/or by the colonizing MDR-GNB, and SSI-attributable mortality. Important outcomes included the occurrence of any type of postsurgical infectious complication, all-cause mortality, and adverse events of PAP, including development of resistance to targeted (culture-based) PAP after surgery and incidence of Clostridioides difficile infections. The last search of all databases was performed until April 30, 2022. The level of evidence and strength of each recommendation were defined according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Consensus of a multidisciplinary expert panel was reached for the final list of recommendations. Antimicrobial stewardship considerations were included in the recommendation development. RECOMMENDATIONS: The guideline panel reviewed the evidence, per bacteria, of the risk of SSIs in patients colonized with MDR-GNB before surgery and critically appraised the existing studies. Significant knowledge gaps were identified, and most questions were addressed by observational studies. Moderate to high risk of bias was identified in the retrieved studies, and the majority of the recommendations were supported by low level of evidence. The panel conditionally recommends rectal screening and targeted PAP for fluoroquinolone-resistant Enterobacterales before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy and for extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales in patients undergoing colorectal surgery and solid organ transplantation. Screening for CRE and CRAB is suggested before transplant surgery after assessment of the local epidemiology. Careful consideration of the laboratory workload and involvement of antimicrobial stewardship teams before implementing the screening procedures or performing changes in PAP are warranted. High-quality prospective studies to assess the impact of PAP among CRE and CRAB carriers performing high-risk surgeries are advocated. Future well-designed clinical trials should assess the effectiveness of targeted PAP, including the monitoring of MDR-GNB colonization through postoperative cultures using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing clinical breakpoints.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) cause serious infections and aggravate disease progression. Last resort antibiotics are effective against MDR-GNB and are reimbursed by flat rates based on German diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG). From a hospital management perspective, this analysis compared hospital reimbursement for last resort antibiotics with their acquisition costs to outline potential funding gaps. Retrospective analyses based on medical charts and real-life reimbursement data included patients with pneumonia due to MDR-GNB treated in intensive care units (ICU) of a German tertiary care hospital (University Hospital Cologne) between January 2017 and December 2020. Drug-associated hospital reimbursement of G-DRG was compared with drug acquisition costs based on preliminarily approved last resort antibiotics (cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam) according to label. Funding gaps were determined for the treatment of Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and mixed infections, respectively. Most of the 31 patients were infected with Enterobacterales (n = 15; 48.4%) and P. aeruginosa (n = 13; 41.9%). Drug-associated G-DRG reimbursement varied from 44.50 EUR (mixed infection of P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales) to 2265.27 EUR (P. aeruginosa; mixed infection of P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales). Drug acquisition costs ranged from 3284.40 EUR in ceftazidime-avibactam (minimum duration) to 15,827.01 EUR for imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam (maximum duration). Underfunding was found for all MDR-GNB, reaching from 1019.13 EUR (P. aeruginosa; mixed infection of P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales) to 14,591.24 EUR (Enterobacterales). This analysis revealed the underfunding of last resort antibiotics in German hospital treatment. Insufficient reimbursement implies less research in this field, leading to a more frequent use of inappropriate antibiotics. The cycle closes as this contributes to the development of multi-drug resistant bacteria.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) have become a major global public health threat. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a newer combination of ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor, with activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). The aim of this review is to describe the recent real-world experience of CAZ-AVI for the infections due to MDR-GNB. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar for clinical application in CAZ-AVI for MDR-GNB infections. Reference lists were reviewed and synthesized for narrative review. RESULTS: MDRGNB infections are associated with higher mortality significantly comparing to drug-susceptible bacterial infections. Fortunately, CAZ-AVI shows significant benefits for infections due to KPC or OXA-48 CRE, comparing to colistin, carbapenem, aminoglycoside and other older agents, even in those with immunocompromised status. The efficacy of CAZ-AVI varies in different infection sites due to CRE, which is lower in pneumonia. Early use is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Noteworthy, when adopted as salvage therapy, CAZ-AVI is still superior to other GNB active antibiotics. CAZ-AVI plus aztreonam is recommended as the first line of MBL-CRE infections. However, for infections caused by KPC- and OXA-48-producing isolates, further investigations are needed to demonstrate the benefit of combination therapy. Besides CRE, CAZ-AVI is also active to MDR-PA. However, the development of resistance in CRE and MDR-PA against CAZ-AVI is alarming, and more investigations and studies are needed to prevent, diagnose, and treat infections due to CAZ-AVI-resistant pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: CAZ-AVI appears to be a valuable therapeutic option in MDR-GNB infections. Using CAZ-AVI appropriately to improve efficacy and decrease the emergence of resistance is important.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Only a few studies about polymyxin B (PMB) against multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDR GNB) infection were conducted in liver transplantation recipients (LTRs). The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of PMB in the treatment of MDR-GNB in liver transplant recipients and to determine the risk factors affecting clinical cure and 30-day all-cause mortality. METHODS: Data of LTRs receiving PMB from January 2016 to February 2020 were collected. Clinical cure and 30-day all-cause mortality were the main efficacy outcomes, while the incidence of nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and hyperpigmentation of PMB was the main safety outcome. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Data of 42 LTRs were included. Clinical cure with PMB was observed in 27 recipients (64.3%), and the 30-day all-cause mortality rate was 31.0% (13/42). The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), neurotoxicity, and hyperpigmentation was 57.1% (16/28), 4.8% (2/42), and 16.7% (7/42), respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed that Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (OR, 1.203; 95% CI, 1.016-1.423, p = 0.032) was an independent risk factor for 30-day all-cause mortality, whereas renal replacement therapy (OR, 0.128; 95% CI, 0.019-0.860, p = 0.034) was an independent risk factor for clinical cure with PMB. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the application of PMB in LTRs. If there were no better therapeutic options left for LTRs other than PMB, it can be used against MDR GNB infection in LTRs. We should closely observe adverse events or reactions, and adjust the dose based on the balance of efficacy and safety.

Asunto(s)