RESUMEN

In this research is presented a new method for determining the weights of criteria called simple weight calculation (SIWEC) method. The steps of this method are presented in the practical example of determining the importance of criteria for the needs of sales of agricultural products in the Semberija region. During the presentation of this method two methods are elaborated the simple SIWEC method which includes numerical ratings and the fuzzy SIWEC method which includes ratings in the form of linguistic value. In the selected example is presented how to use this method in order to determine the importance of criteria and in both cases the criterion of sales reliability is given the greatest weight. The contribution SIWEC method is reflected in its simplicity, which facilitates decision-making.•The method presented in this research apart from others is that it uses the evaluation of the criteria by decision makers, so the criteria should not be ranked and compared, but simply evaluated.•Unlike similar methods, the presented method uses the adjusted steps of the method for ranking the alternatives, and decision makers are given a different importance in the decision-making.

RESUMEN

A biometric system is essential in improving security and authentication processes across a variety of fields. Due to multiple criteria and alternatives, selecting the most suitable biometric system is a complex decision. We employ a hybrid approach in this study, combining the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) with the Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP). Biometric technologies are ranked using the TOPSIS method according to the relative weights that AHP determines. By applying the neutrosophic set theory, this approach effectively handles the ambiguity and vagueness inherent in decision-making. Fingerprint, face, Iris, Voice, Hand Veins, Hand geometry and signature are the seven biometric technologies that are incorporated in the framework. Seven essential characteristics are accuracy, security, acceptability, speed and efficiency, ease of collection, universality, distinctiveness used to evaluate these technologies. The model seeks to determine which biometric technology is best suited for a particular application or situation by taking these factors into account. This technique may be applied in other domains in the future.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In response to the intensely competitive bidding environment in Taiwan's construction industry, this study innovates with a spherical fuzzy extension of the modified CRITIC method (SFmCRITIC), a pioneering approach crafted to refine the decision-making process. The research centers on the pivotal role of accurately weighting various significant factors, such as financial stability, market insight, and specialized expertise, to optimize bid success rates. The SFmCRITIC method stands out by quantitatively incorporating the uncertainty and subjectivity typically encountered in bid evaluation. The findings from this methodological application demonstrate a clear hierarchy of influencing factors, offering a nuanced view of strategic priorities for construction firms. This hierarchical understanding not only aids firms in targeted resource distribution and strategic development but also holds promise for adaptation in diverse industry contexts beyond Taiwan, potentially revolutionizing bidding strategies at a global scale.

RESUMEN

The environmental impact of the construction industry is very heavy. Therefore, the global community is further developing green building assessment tools in order to enhance their efficiency in matching sustainability goals and being more environmentally friendly. An analysis approach by means of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) was carried out to examine the degree of response of different green building tools utilized in Europe, namely (Innovazione e Trasparenza degli Appalti e la Compatibilità Ambientale ITACA, Deutsches Guetsiegel Nachhaltiges Bauen (DGNB), Haute Qualité Environnementale (HQE) and Sustainable Building Tool (SBTool), to the eight criteria of the European Green Deal (EGD), a roadmap elaborated by the European Commission to enhance sustainability deployment in the region. The first phase of the analysis consisted of a Boolean MCDM aiming to define to which criterion of the EGD each indicator in the tools checklists is linked. These data obtained were later examined by means of Fuzzy Logic to obtain comparable results showing how much each tool helps more following the European roadmap towards sustainability. This work intends to compare the efficiency of the most used tools in Europe for building sustainability evaluation while being based on a particular specified reference and not only the sustainable goals in general. This work also shows the efficiency of combining two MCDCM techniques to obtain better analyzing output. The result of this study shows that the DGNB is the most effective method for connecting all EGD criteria in a balanced manner. The HQE tool demonstrated a strong ability to effectively integrate the objectives of the EGD, except for the energy evaluation aspect. For the ITACA tool, it closely aligned DGNB in its response to the EGD, although it had an absent focus on the smart and sustainable shift of mobility. SBTool demonstrated average performance when compared to other protocols. This was expected since SBTool was the basis on which ITACA, DGNB, and HQE were constructed.

RESUMEN

Irrigation dams and irrigation suitability analysis is important for optimal water management, crop selection and productivity, water conservation, environmental sustainability, and economic viability in agriculture arena. Thus, the main objectives of this study were to identify a suitable dam site and irrigation area in the Gedeb River, Ethiopia, using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making analysis and 3D Visualization techniques. To identify a suitable dam site, various parametrs such as rainfall, runoff, stream flow, mineral site, faulting areas, landslide site, rock types, elevation points, relief features, soil types were used while to identify a suitable irrigation area, different parametrs such as altitude, slope, soil, geological structure, distance, and land use land cover datasets were used. The necessary dataset which were used to identify a suitable dam site and irrigation area collected from Ethiopian Mapping Authority (EMA), Ethiopian irrigation and energy ministry freely. In addition, for the final irrigation dam site selection and suitable irrigation area in the Gedeb watershed, multi-criteria decision-making method with expert judgment were applied respectively. Based on the study's findings, a suitable irrigation water reservoir dam covering an area of 1886 ha, with a potential water holding capacity of 2,961,145,697 cubic meters was identified. The results also revealed a highly suitable area of 18,362.05 ha, a moderately suitable area of 19,204.05 ha, a marginally suitable area of 2095.25 ha, and a not suitable area of 2.89 ha for the aforementioned purpose. The methodological approach and research findings presented in this study can greatly assist government and non-governmental organization planners and decision-makers in the development of irrigation projects.

RESUMEN

The conical stem tibial design of total ankle replacement (TAR) has high implant-bone micromotion. This may lead to aseptic loosening which can be avoided by improving the tibial design. The objective was to propose the best stem design parameters to reduce implant-bone micromotion along with minimizing stress shielding using an integrated Finite Element-Multi Criteria Decision Making (FE-MCDM) approach. FE models of implanted tibia bones were prepared by changing the height of the stem, the diameter of the stem, and the slant of the stem. Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS), Technique for Order of Preference by Similarities to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS), and VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) MCDM techniques with equal weights for micromotion and stress shielding were considered. The micromotion and stress shielding were greater when the height of the stem was increased. Whereas, the increase in diameter and slant affected them marginally. The best-performing design was the Model with stem height 6 mm (diameter 6.4 mm and slant 4°) and after that was the Model with stem height 8 mm (diameter 6.4 mm and slant 4°), and then the Model with stem height 10 mm (diameter 6.4 mm and slant 4°). The height of the stem is the most important stem design parameter. Shorter height, moderate thickness, and moderate slanting stem designs are recommended.

RESUMEN

Various research endeavours are designed to identify ecosystem services, assess their spatial distribution, and prioritize them in a given forest landscape. The Turkish State Forest Organization has introduced an ecosystem-based multiple-use forest management philosophy since 2008, which emphasizes the need for identifying and allocating ecosystem services to each forest planning unit. This paper aims to investigate the use of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques and explores their effectiveness and suitability in identifying and allocating ecosystem services to forest units, considering scientific suitability, stakeholder engagement and the sustainability concept in the context of ecosystem-based forest management decision-making processes in a case study area of Turkey. We propose a framework that entails an iterative process comprising various stages, starting from identifying ecosystem services (ES) to allocating them to forest stands with a participatory approach. We employed the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Delphi method to determine stakeholder preferences and allocate ecosystem services to forest stands. This was achieved through an equation newly developed using scientific suitability, stakeholder preferences, and the sustainability concept. The landscape percentage allocated primarily to ES was as follows: water regulation (55.44%), soil protection (16.47%), biodiversity conservation (14.03%), wood production (13.08%), and aesthetic-recreation (0.84%). Notably, no allocations were made for national defence and climate regulation services. In conclusion, the stratification of Posof forests into zones was efficiently achieved a priori, considering both scientific-technical and socio-cultural criteria through MCDA techniques based on stakeholder preferences. This study streamlines the decision-making process involved in spatially allocating ecosystem services and provides crucial information instrumental in determining management objectives and optimal forest activities.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Construction and demolition waste (C&DW) represents a pressing concern within the European Union, underscoring the urgent need for effective waste management strategies. The selection of these solutions constitutes a complex task, entailing the identification of efficient C&DW management strategies that balance appropriate practices, regulatory compliance, resource conservation, economic feasibility, and environmental considerations. LCA is widely utilized to assess environmental impact, yet the economic aspect has not been adequately incorporated into the LCA process in the field of C&DW management. The life cycle costing (LCC) methodology has been tailored to assess economic performance in conjunction with LCA. The selection of an appropriate multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method is vital for the C&DW system. This study proposes a novel framework for C&DW management by integrating LCA and LCC outcomes into MCDM, using AHP for weight determination, and applying TOPSIS to identify the favorable alternative. Four waste management alternatives were examined in the Lombardy region of Italy, namely (i) landfill; (ii) recycling for concrete production and road construction, incineration with energy recovery; (iii) recycling for road construction; (iv) recycling for concrete production and road construction. We determine that, with the implementation of various scenarios, the most suitable scenario emerges to be recycled for concrete production and road construction, with a score of 0.711/1; recycling for road construction with final score 0.291/1, ranks second; recycling for concrete production and road construction, incineration with energy recovery scores 0.002/1, ranks third; and landfill (scores: 0/1) is the worst choice, signifying it has the highest environmental impacts and the least economic benefits. Lastly, recommendations were formulated to enhance the environmental performance of the system.

RESUMEN

Nanomaterials are widely used in several biomedical and environmental applications, due to their ideal properties. However, the synthetic and characterization procedure requires significant costs and has a negative environmental impact. Various methods are available in order to control the pre-synthesis design of the produced materials, predicting their behavior and minimizing the series of experiments. Multi-Criteria Decision-Making is proposed in this study in order to determine the best combination of the physicochemical parameters and to define the best alternative among fifteen different samples of nanostructured titanium dioxide. In particular, the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method was applied to achieve a final ranking of the available alternatives by avoiding several of the trials that would follow testing the biological effect and the photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. Thus, this approach helps us to stay environmentally and ethically correct, saving time, money, and energy and also providing an optimization of the nanomaterials that are developed.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This study was carried out with the aim of applying Condorcet and Borda scoring algorithms based on Game Theory (GT) to determine flood points and Flood Susceptibility Mapping (FSM) based on Machine Learning Algorithms (MLA) including Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) in the Cheshmeh-Kileh watershed, Iran. Therefore, first, FS conditioning factors including Aspect (As), Elevation (El), Euclidean distance (Euc), Forest (F), NDVI, Precipitation (P), Plan Curvature (PlC), Profile Curvature (PrC), Residential (Re), Rangeland (Rl), Slope (Sl), Stream Power Index (SPI), Topographic Position Index (TPI), and Topographic Wetness Index (TWI) were quantified in each Sub-Watershed (SW). Based on this, flood and non-flood points were identified based on both GT algorithms. In the following, MLAs including Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) were used for the distributional mapping of FS. Finally, based on optimal conjunct approaches, FS maps were presented in the study watershed. Based on the results, among the conjunct algorithms in FS classification, RF-Condorcet and RF-Borda models were selected as the most optimal MLA-GT hybrid models. The upstream SWs were highly susceptible. Also, the effectiveness of NDVI and forest conditioning factors in each classification approach was high. The similarity of SW prioritization based on Condorcet algorithm with RF-Condorcet algorithm was about 86.70%. Meanwhile, the degree of similarity in RF-Borda conjunct algorithm was around 73.33%. These results showed that Condorcet algorithm had an optimal classification compared to Borda scoring algorithm.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Dhaka ranks among the world's most densely populated cities, with built-up areas expanding to accommodate the demands of a growing population. The rapid urbanization has reduced green space and exacerbated urban heat and pollution in the city. In the quest for a greener and healthier urban environment, rooftop agriculture has emerged as a promising solution, offering opportunities for the restoration of the environment and safe food production. Despite its potential, limited studies have explored the viability of this alternative greening solution for Dhaka. Therefore, this study aims to assess the suitability of rooftops for agricultural activities employing Geographic Information System (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques. First, seven criteria were selected based on the literature, such as building age, height, rooftop size, building utility, property value, sunlight, and water availability. Second, an expert opinion survey was conducted using the Best Worst Method (BWM) to calculate the criteria's weights. Finally, the suitability map for Dhaka was derived by combining the criteria layers and was subsequently validated. Rooftop area and property value were identified as the most and least important criteria. Approximately 9% (6.27 km2), 68% (46.59 km2), 22% (15.15 km2), and a negligible portion (0.1 km2) of Dhaka city has been classified as highly suitable, suitable, moderately suitable, and not suitable, respectively, for rooftop agriculture. By identifying and promoting the most suitable locations for rooftop agriculture and highlighting existing opportunities, this research will help to initiate and expand sustainable agriculture practices that can contribute to climate change adaptation and urban resilience.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This study comprehensively evaluates Jordan's municipal solid waste (MSW) management sector from 2022 to 2030, in alignment with Jordan Vision 2030. This study introduces new sustainability indicators and innovative waste management alternatives to address the challenges of rapid industrialization and population growth. Four strategic scenarios-1) recycling, composting, and sanitary landfilling; 2) recycling, anaerobic digestion, and sanitary landfilling; 3) incineration and sanitary landfilling; and 4) sanitary landfilling alone-were assessed against the business-as-usual scenario. Using multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) and sensitivity analysis, this study evaluates net greenhouse gas emissions, annual operating expenses, revenue streams, and employment rates to measure environmental, economic, and social sustainability. The results indicate that Scenario 1 is the optimal scenario for integrating a material recovery facility (MRF) with a composting plant and sanitary landfill, achieving the lowest greenhouse gas emissions, annual costs, and employment opportunities. This study offers practical and sustainable solutions to Jordan's waste management challenges, provides novel insights through the developed MCDA and sensitivity analysis, and significantly contributes to sustainability research.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Droughts are classified as the most expensive climate disasters as they leave long-term and chronic impacts on the ecosystem, agriculture, and human society. The intensity, frequency, and duration of drought events have increased in the past and are expected to continue rising at global, continental, and regional scales. Nature-based solutions (NBS) are highlighted as effective solutions to cope with the future impacts of these events. Despite this, there has been limited comprehensive research on the effectiveness of NBS for drought mitigation, and existing suitability mapping frameworks often overlook drought-specific criteria. To address this gap, a new framework is proposed to identify areas suitable for two drought-coping NBS types at a regional scale: detention basins and managed aquifer recharge. Two multi-criteria decision-making techniques (MCDM), i.e. Boolean logic and Analytic- Hierarchy Process (AHP), were used to map suitable large-scale NBS. The new framework accounts for unique criteria to specifically address drought conditions. By incorporating climate change scenarios for both surface and groundwater, recharge, and different groundwater characteristics, it identifies suitable and sustainable locations capable of managing extreme drought events. Executed through Boolean logic at a regional scale in Flanders (Belgium), the framework's strict approach yields significant potential areas for detention basins (298.7 km²) and managed aquifer recharge (867.5 km²). Incorporating AHP with the same criteria introduces a higher degree of flexibility for decision-makers. This approach shows a notable expansion across Flanders, varying with the level of suitability. The results underscore the highly suitable potential for detention basins (2552.2 km²) and managed aquifer recharge (2538.7 km²), emphasizing the adaptability and scalability of the framework for addressing drought in the region. The comparison between potential recharge volume due to detention basin and groundwater use in the region indicated that the detention basins could partially compensate for the high water demand. Therefore, creating a framework targeting drought is vital for the sustainable management of water scarcity scenarios.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

As found in behavioral decision theory, venture capitalists (VCs) rely on heuristics and bias, owing to their bounded rationality, either by limited alternatives or information and resources. India's booming startup scene challenges VCs in decision-making owing to information overload from numerous evolving ventures, which hinders informed judgment. VC investment behavior, due diligence, and cognitive factors related to decision-making have always drawn the attention of researchers. We provide an alternative approach for an optimal decision by VCs by identifying the attributes that influence investment or funding decisions at an early stage of a venture in tech-based industries. Through a literature review, we identify eight attributes, both on internal and external criteria, that venture investors consider when making investment decisions. Based on interviews with 20 experts, we further identify eight key tech-based sectors. Using grey system theory, we then determine the rankings of eight tech startups for investors' early-stage investment decisions. This study presents a linguistic variable-based approach of grey numbers to decide weights and ratings, the grey possibility degree to compare and rank different tech startups, and based on the results, suggests the ideal tech startup. We find that agritech ranks first; thus, investors should prefer venturing into such startups for early-stage investment. E-commerce and edutech ranked second and third, respectively, followed by electric vehicle infrastructure, insurtech, fintech, space tech, and software as a service.

RESUMEN

Malaysia's excessive energy consumption has led to the depletion of traditional energy reserves such as oil and natural gas. Although Malaysia has implemented multiple policies to achieve sustainable national energy development, the current results are unsatisfactory. As of 2022, only 2% of the country's electricity supply comes from renewable energy, which accounts for less than 30% of the energy structure. Malaysia must ensure energy security and diversified energy supply while ensuring sustainable energy development. This article uses the fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making(MCDM) method based on cumulative prospect theory to help decision-makers choose the most suitable renewable energy for sustainable development in Malaysia from four dimensions of technology, economy, society, and environment. The results show that solar power is the most suitable renewable energy for sustainable development, followed by biomass, wind, and hydropower, but the optimal alternative is sensitive to the prospect parameters. Finally, it was analyzed that efficiency, payback period, employment creation, and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions are the most critical factors affecting the development of renewable energy in Malaysia under the four dimensions. Reasonable suggestions are proposed from policy review, green finance, public awareness, engineering education, and future energy. This research provides insightful information that can help Malaysian decision-makers scientifically formulate Sustainable development paths for renewable energy, analyze the problems encountered in the current stage of renewable energy development, and provide recommendations for Malaysia's future renewable energy transition and sustainable development.

RESUMEN

The multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) field has long sought tools capable of adeptly capturing the intricacies of human decision-making amidst uncertainty. Hesitant fuzzy sets (HFS) have become a cornerstone in the MCDM field due to their ability to capture the intricacies of human decision-making under uncertainty. Nonetheless, we identified a significant gap in traditional HFS formulations, which often fail to fully harness the nuanced and implicit preferences of decision-makers (DMs). This shortcoming can lead to suboptimal decision outcomes in complex and uncertain environments. We introduce the normal wiggly hesitant fuzzy set (NWHFS), a novel construct that encapsulates both explicit and implicit preferences within a more representative framework. This study pioneers the development of new correlation coefficients for NWHFSs, offering a robust quantitative measure to elucidate the intricate relationships between variables. Our findings demonstrate that NWHFSs significantly enhance the MCDM process, providing a nuanced perspective that traditional HFS models cannot match. The proposed correlation coefficients not only reveal the concealed preferences of DMs but also broaden the decision-making spectrum, offering a more profound understanding of the relationships between alternatives and criteria. We illustrate the superiority of our approach through comparative analysis with existing methods, highlighting its ability to discern subtleties that other models overlook. Moreover, we integrate NWHFSs into clustering analysis, showcasing their potential to classify data sources with shared attributes effectively. This integration is particularly noteworthy for its ability to navigate complex datasets, offering a new dimension in data mining and resource retrieval. In essence, our study redefines the MCDM paradigm by introducing NWHFSs and their correlation coefficients, setting a new standard for decision-making accuracy and insight. The implications of our work extend beyond theory, offering practical solutions to real-world decision-making challenges.

RESUMEN

Background and Aims: Considering the increasing use of information technology (IT) and the need of the implementation of related projects, the lack of IT specialists in the health system is one of the major challenges that require planning and foreseeing. This study was conducted with the aim of predicting the number of required IT personnel in hospitals of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences based on the modeling of identified and weighed influential factors in 2023. Method: First, Delphi method and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) using the Expository Posthaste Effective Resemblant Tool (ExPERT) were conducted to identify and weigh the components that affect IT staff's workload in hospitals. Then, the model for predicting the required number of IT personnel for the involved hospitals was developed. In all stages, the obtained information and results were checked and confirmed using experts' opinions in Focus Group Discussions. Results: Twenty-one hospitals (57%) out of 37 hospitals are facing a shortage of IT personnel. This varies from 0.5 to 1.6 personnel in different hospitals. Thirteen hospitals (35%) were reported to have adequate IT staffing and three hospitals (8%) had excess IT staffing. Conclusion: This study provided a predictive model for required IT staff in hospitals using MCDM through ExPERT which can be used in cases where the use of workload-based methods such as Workload Indicators of Staffing Need is complex or time-consuming.

RESUMEN

This article uses the Aczel-Alsina t-norm and t-conorm to make several new linguistic interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. First, we devised some rules for how linguistic interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers should work. Then, using these rules as a guide, we created a set of operators, such as linguistic interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Aczel-Alsina weighted averaging (LIVIFAAWA) operator, linguistic interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Aczel-Alsina weighted geometric (LIVIFAAWG) operator, linguistic interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Aczel-Alsina ordered weighted averaging (LIVIFAAOWA) operator, linguistic interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Aczel-Alsina ordered weighted geometric (LIVIFAAOWG) operator, linguistic interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Aczel-Alsina hybrid weighted averaging (LIVIFAAHWA) operator and linguistic interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Aczel-Alsina hybrid weighted geometric (LIVIFAAHWG) operators are created. Several desirable qualities of the newly created operators are thoroughly studied. Moreover, a multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) method is proposed based on the developed operators. The proposed operators are then applied to real-world decision-making situations to demonstrate their applicability and validity to the reader. Finally, the suggested model is contrasted with the currently employed method of operation.

RESUMEN

In this study, the application of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods in determining the most appropriate stormwater management strategy is examined using different areas in Rize. The determination of the most appropriate stormwater management practices for the Rize coastal park and Güneysu-Rize connection highway with TOPSIS is presented in detail within this study. In this context, commonly used applications suitable for urban areas are discussed. The criteria and their weights used for the evaluation of the selected applications were determined by consulting expert opinions from leading researchers. The most suitable applications in different scenarios such as changes in the cost or the amount of precipitation for Rize coastal park and Güneysu-Rize connection road were determined by the TOPSIS method. The TOPSIS analyses' ranking of the ideal solutions matches the results of the SWMM simulations one to one. SWMM results confirm that the outcomes of TOPSIS are the alternatives that provide maximum decrease in surface runoff.

Asunto(s)