RESUMEN
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a progressive disease characterized by a degeneration of the spinal cord motor neurons. Many clinical trials - planned, in progress, or completed - have chosen motor function as the primary or secondary outcome because motor function assessment tools appeared to be more reliable than quantitative muscle testing in monitoring the course of the disease. Reliable, valid, and responsive outcome measures are needed to be able to capture the effectiveness of the therapeutic approach during clinical trials. Medical staff involved in neuromuscular diseases is faced with increasing pressure regarding the complex issue of choosing the right outcome measure for the objectives they have to assess. This paper provides a narrative literature review of available and validated motor function assessment tools in SMA population based on SMA subtypes, age and ambulant status. © 2020 French Society of Pediatrics. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Asunto(s)
Desempeño Psicomotor , Atrofias Musculares Espinales de la Infancia/diagnóstico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Atrofias Musculares Espinales de la Infancia/fisiopatología , Atrofias Musculares Espinales de la Infancia/terapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Potential therapies are currently under development for two congenital muscular dystrophy (CMD) subtypes: collagen VI-related muscular dystrophy (COL6-RD) and laminin alpha 2-related dystrophy (LAMA2-RD). However, appropriate clinical outcome measures to be used in clinical trials have not been validated in CMDs. We conducted a two-year pilot study to evaluate feasibility, reliability, and validity of various outcome measures, particularly the Motor Function Measure 32, in 33 subjects with COL6-RD and LAMA2-RD. In the first year, outcome measures tested included: Motor Function Measure 32 (MFM32), forced vital capacity (FVC) percent predicted sitting, myometry, goniometry, 10-meter walk, Egen Klassification 2, and PedsQL(TM) Generic and Neuromuscular Cores. In the second year, we added the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA), Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale (HFMS), timed functional tests, Measure of Activity Limitations (ACTIVLIM), Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) fatigue subscale. The MFM32 showed strong inter-rater (0.92) and internal consistency (0.96) reliabilities. Concurrent validity for the MFM32 was supported by large correlations (range 0.623-0.936) with the following: FVC, NSAA, HFMS, timed functional tests, ACTIVLIM, and QUEST. Significant correlations of the MFM32 were also found with select myometry measurements, mainly of the proximal extremities and domains of the PedsQL(TM) scales focusing on physical health and neuromuscular disease. Goniometry measurements were less reliable. The Motor Function Measure is reliable and valid in the two specific subtypes of CMD evaluated, COL6-RD and LAMA2-RD. The NSAA is useful as a complementary outcome measure in ambulatory individuals. Preliminary concurrent validity of several other clinical outcome measures was also demonstrated for these subtypes.