RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Moderate secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) represents a subgroup of heart failure (HF) patients with treatment restricted to medical therapy. Outcomes in patients with moderate SMR treated with mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) are less well known. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of M-TEER in subjects with moderate SMR using the EXPANDed studies. METHODS: One-year outcomes in subjects from the EXPANDed studies (EXPAND [A Contemporary, Prospective Study Evaluating Real-world Experience of Performance and Safety for the Next Generation of MitraClip Devices] and EXPAND G4 [A Post-Market Study Assessment of the Safety and Performance of the MitraClip G4 System] MitraClip studies) with baseline moderate SMR (2+), per echocardiographic core laboratory (ECL) assessment, were compared with subjects with baseline severe SMR (≥3+). RESULTS: There were 335 subjects with moderate SMR and 525 with severe SMR at baseline per ECL review. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 subgroups. After treatment with M-TEER, significant MR reduction was achieved in both groups. Significant left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling was observed through 1 year, with a >20 mL decrease in LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes on average in the moderate SMR group. Significant 1-year improvements in NYHA functional class (>78% NYHA functional class I or II) and quality of life (>20 points on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Summary) were observed in subjects with moderate SMR. Similarly, low rates of major adverse events, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalizations were observed between the 2 subgroups through 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: In the EXPANDed studies, subjects with moderate SMR treated with M-TEER had improvements similar to subjects with severe SMR in quality of life and positive LV remodeling at 1 year. Future studies are needed to evaluate if M-TEER would be beneficial for HF patients with moderate SMR.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: For patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and symptomatic heart failure (HF), randomized trials of mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) have produced conflicting results. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the impact of M-TEER on hospitalization rates, and explore the effects of M-TEER on patients who did or did not have a history of recent HF hospitalizations before undergoing M-TEER. METHODS: RESHAPE-HF2 (Randomized Investigation of the MitraClip Device in Heart Failure: 2nd Trial in Patients with Clinically Significant Functional Mitral Regurgitation) included patients with symptomatic HF and moderate to severe FMR (mean effective regurgitant orifice area 0.25 cm2; 14% >0.40 cm2, 23% <0.20 cm2) and showed that M-TEER reduced recurrent HF hospitalizations with and without the addition of cardiovascular (CV) death and improved quality of life. We now report the results of prespecified analyses on hospitalization rates and for the subgroup of patients (n = 333) with a HF hospitalization in the 12 months before randomization. RESULTS: At 24 months, the time to first event of CV death or HF hospitalization (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.49-0.85; P = 0.002), the rate of recurrent CV hospitalizations (rate ratio [RR]: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.57-0.99; P = 0.046), the composite rate of recurrent CV hospitalizations and all-cause mortality (RR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.57-0.95; P = 0.017), and of recurrent CV death and CV hospitalizations (RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.58-0.99; P = 0.040), were all lower in the M-TEER group. The RR of recurrent hospitalizations for any cause was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.63-1.07; P = 0.15) for patients in the M-TEER group vs control group patients. Patients randomized to M-TEER lost fewer days due to death or HF hospitalization (13.9% [95% CI: 13.0%-14.8%] vs 17.4% [95% CI: 16.4%-18.4%] of follow-up time; P < 0.0001, and 1,067 vs 1,776 total days lost; P < 0.0001). Patients randomized to M-TEER also had better NYHA functional class at 30 days and at 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up (P < 0.0001). A history of HF hospitalizations before randomization was associated with worse outcomes and greater benefit with M-TEER on the rate of the composite of recurrent HF hospitalizations and CV death (Pinteraction = 0.03) and of recurrent HF hospitalizations within 24 months (Pinteraction = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that a broader application of M-TEER in addition to optimal guideline-directed medical therapy should be considered among patients with symptomatic HF and moderate to severe FMR, particularly in those with a history of a recent hospitalization for HF.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mitochondrial cardiomyopathy occurs when impaired mitochondrial energy production leads to myocardial dysfunction. Anesthetic management in such cases is challenging due to risks of circulatory depression associated with anesthesia and mitochondrial dysfunction induced by anesthetics. Although there are reports of anesthetic management for patients with mitochondrial diseases, there are few reports specifically addressing cardiac anesthesia for patients with mitochondrial cardiomyopathy. We present a case where percutaneous mitral valve repair with MitraClip™ was successfully performed under remimazolam anesthesia in a patient with mitochondrial cardiomyopathy who developed functional mitral valve regurgitation due to low cardiac function and cardiomegaly. CASE PRESENTATION: A 57-year-old woman was diagnosed with chronic cardiac failure, with a 10-year history of dilated cardiomyopathy. She was diagnosed with mitochondrial cardiomyopathy 8 years ago. Over the past 2 years, her cardiac failure worsened, and mitral valve regurgitation gradually developed. Surgical intervention was considered but deemed too risky due to her low cardiac function, with an ejection fraction of 26%. Therefore, percutaneous MitraClip™ implantation was selected. After securing radial artery and central venous catheterization under sedation with dexmedetomidine, anesthesia was induced with a low dose of remimazolam 4 mg/kg/h. Anesthesia was maintained with remimazolam 0.35-1.0 mg/kg/h and remifentanil 0.1 µg/kg/min. Noradrenaline and dobutamine were administered intraoperatively, and the procedure was completed successfully without circulatory collapse. The patient recovered smoothly from anesthesia and experienced no complications. She was discharged on the eighth day after surgery. CONCLUSION: Anesthesia management with remimazolam appears to be a safe and effective for MitraClip™ implantation in patients with mitochondrial cardiomyopathy.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: . Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (m-TEER) is a minimally invasive procedure for treating mitral regurgitation (MR). m-TEER is a highly technical procedure, and a steep learning curve needs to be overcome for operators to ensure optimal patient outcomes and minimise procedural complications. Training via online simulation and observation of procedures is not sufficient to establish operator confidence; thus, advanced hands-on training modalities need to be explored and developed. METHODS: . In this study, a novel anatomical simulator for m-TEER training was evaluated in comparison to a standard model. The proposed simulator resembled the anatomical features of the right and left atrium, left ventricle and mitral valve apparatus. Participants in the questionnaire (n = 18) were recruited across 4 centres in London with (n = 8) and without (n = 10) prior experience in m-TEER. Participants were asked to simulate procedures on both an idealised, routinely used simulator and the newly proposed anatomical model. The questionnaire was designed to assess (i) participants' confidence before and after training and (ii) the realism of the model in the context of the m-TEER procedure. The results of the questionnaires were collected, and statistical analysis (t-test) was performed. RESULTS: . Both models were equally beneficial in increasing operator confidence before and after the simulation of the intervention (P = 0.43). However, increased confidence after training with the anatomical model was recorded (P = 0.02). Participants with prior experience with m-TEER therapy were significantly more confident about the procedure after training with the anatomical model than participants who had no prior experience (P = 0.002). On average, all participants thought that the anatomical model was effective as a training simulator (P = 0.013) and should be integrated into routine training (P = 0.015)). Participants with experience thought that the anatomical model was more effective at reproducing the m-TEER procedure than the idealised model (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: . This study showed how a more realistic simulator can be used to improve the effectiveness of m-TEER procedural training. Such pilot results suggest planning future and large investigations to evaluate improvements in clinical practice.
RESUMEN
A 76-year-old female with a complicated medical history presented for Watchman (Boston Scientific) placement 2 months after mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). Preoperative workup before Watchman placement confirmed the presence of a thrombus in the left superior pulmonary vein. Post-procedure mitral valve TEER transesophageal echocardiogram showed no thrombus in the left atrium appendage or pulmonary veins. We believe the thrombus in the left superior pulmonary vein occurred secondarily due to epithelium damage during the mitral valve TEER.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral , Válvula Mitral , Venas Pulmonares , Trombosis de la Vena , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Venas Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Venas Pulmonares/cirugía , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/etiología , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Trombosis de la Vena/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagenAsunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral , Válvula Mitral , Anciano , Humanos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Mitral/instrumentación , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Mitral/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral regurgitation (MR) result in different patterns of left ventricular remodeling and hypertrophy. OBJECTIVES: We characterized left ventricular wall stress (LVWS) profiles in pressure and volume-overloaded systems, examined the relationship between baseline LVWS and cardiac remodeling, and assessed the acute effects of valve intervention on LVWS using invasive pressures combined with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging measures of left ventricular volumes/mass. METHODS: A total of 47 patients with severe AS undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and 15 patients with severe MR undergoing MitraClip (MC) underwent a 6-minute walk test (6MWT), transthoracic echocardiogram, and CMR before their procedures. Catheters in the left ventricle were used to record hemodynamic changes before and after valve/clip deployment. This was integrated with CMR data to calculate LVWS before and after intervention. RESULTS: The TAVR group demonstrated significant reductions in systolic LVWS post procedure (median 24.7 Pa [IQR: 14 Pa] pre vs median 17.3 Pa [IQR: 12 Pa] post; P < 0.001). The MC group demonstrated significant reductions in diastolic LVWS (median 6.4 Pa [IQR: 5 Pa] pre vs median 4.3 Pa [IQR: 4.1 Pa] post; P = 0.021) with no significant change in systolic LVWS (30.6 ±1.61 pre vs 33 ±2.47 Pa post; P = 0.16). There was an inverse correlation between baseline systolic LVWS and 6MWT in the TAVR group (r = -0.31; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: TAVR results in significant reductions in systolic LVWS acutely. MC results in significant reductions in diastolic LVWS. Higher baseline systolic LVWS in TAVR is associated with shorter 6MWT suggesting that in AS, LVWS may be a useful marker of early decompensation.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Remodelación Ventricular , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Remodelación Ventricular/fisiología , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética/métodos , Ecocardiografía , Ventrículos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Ventrículos Cardíacos/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
Study objective: Assessing if Transcatheter Edge to Edge Repair (TEER) with Mitraclip™ in patients with moderate to severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and cardiogenic shock (CS) improves outcomes compared to medical management alone. Design: A single-center, retrospective study was performed in an urban tertiary referral center. Setting: Rush University Medical Center, United States. Participants: Adult patients presenting with CS and moderate to severe MR between 2012 and 2021 were included. Interventions: Undergoing Mitral TEER with Mitraclip versus medical management alone. Main outcome measures: Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as cardiovascular death, heart failure admission, stroke, and myocardial infarction assessed at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year. The secondary outcome was a change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification at 30 days and 6 months. Results: There were 28 patients included in the medical management and 33 in the mitral valve TEER groups. There was a decreased MACE in the intervention group at 30 days (24.2 % vs. 46.4 %, p ≤0.001) and 6 months (27 % vs. 75 %, p = 0.002), though not at 1 year (29.4 % vs. 41.7 %, p = 0.42). At 30 days, more patients in the mitral valve TEER group improved to NYHA classes I/II compared to medical management alone (10 [35.7 %] vs. 16 [50 %], p = 0.043). There were no differences in NYHA classes I/II at 6 months (7 [43.7 %] vs. 13 [54.2 %], p = 0.63). Conclusion: Mitral valve TEER using the Mitraclip™ system improves mid-term cardiovascular compared to medical management alone in patients with CS but does not improve mortality.
RESUMEN
Background/Objectives: Previous trials reported comparable results with PASCAL and earlier MitraClip generations. Limited comparative data exist for more contemporary MitraClip generations, particularly the large MitraClip XT(R/W). We aimed to evaluate acute and 30-day outcomes in patients undergoing mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) with one of the large devices, either PASCAL P10 or MitraClip XT(R/W) (3rd/4th generation). Methods: A total of 309 PASCAL-treated patients were matched by propensity score to 253 MitraClip-treated patients, resulting in 200 adequately balanced pairs. Procedural, clinical, and echocardiographic outcomes were collected for up to 30 days, including subgroup analysis for mitral regurgitation (MR) etiologies. Results: PASCAL and MitraClip patients were comparable regarding age (80 vs. 79 years), sex (female: 45.5% vs. 50.5%), and MR etiology (degenerative MR: n = 94, functional MR [FMR]: n = 96, mixed MR: n = 10 in each group). Technical success rates were comparable (96.5% vs. 96.0%; p > 0.999). At discharge, the mean gradient was higher (3.3 mmHg vs. 3.0 mmHg; p = 0.038), and the residual mitral valve orifice area was smaller in MitraClip patients (3.0 cm2 vs. 2.3 cm2; p < 0.001). At discharge, the reduction to MR ≤ 2+ was comparable (92.4% vs. 87.8%; p = 0.132). However, reduction to MR ≤ 1+ was more frequently observed in PASCAL patients (67.7% vs. 56.6%; p = 0.029), driven by the FMR subgroup (74.0% vs. 60.0%; p = 0.046). No difference was observed in 30-day mortality (p = 0.204) or reduction in NYHA-FC to ≤II (p > 0.999). Conclusions: Both M-TEER devices exhibited high and comparable rates of technical success and MR reduction to ≤2+. PASCAL may be advantageous in achieving MR reduction to ≤1+ in patients with FMR.
RESUMEN
Background: Ventricular functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is a common morbidity in patients with heart failure (HF). In addition to guideline-directed medical therapy, mitral valve (MV) repair or replacement has become an option for such patients. However, the impact of different treatments on cardiac remodeling, function, and clinical outcomes remains unclear. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Clinical Trials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials with search terms related to mitral regurgitation, mitral valve repair, surgical mitral valve replacement, mitral annuloplasty device, and MitraClip. The outcomes were left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular (LV) remodeling, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and HF hospitalization. Sensitivity analysis was performed by removing high-bias risk studies. The analysis was done by Review Manager 5.4 Analyzer and MedCalc Statistical Software version 19.2.6. Results: This meta-analysis included 10 studies with a total of 2533 patients (567 with transcatheter MitraClip, 823 with surgical MV repair, 651 with surgical MV replacement, and 492 with medical therapy). Our meta-analysis revealed that surgical MV repair had significant improvement in LVEF compared to the surgical MV replacement (mean differences (MD) 2.32, [95% CI 0.39, 4.25]), while transcatheter MitraClip treatment was associated with LVEF reduction (MD -4.82, [95% CI -7.29, -2.34]). In terms of LV remodeling, transcatheter MitraClip treatment was associated with improvement in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (MD -10.36, [95% CI -18.74, -1.99]). Furthermore, compared to surgical MV replacement, surgical MV repair was not associated with a reduction of all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.83, [95% CI 0.61, 1.13]) and cardiovascular death (RR 0.95, [95% CI 0.56, 1.62]), while transcatheter MitraClip was associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.87, [95% CI 0.78, 0.98]). Conclusions: Surgical MV repair was associated with significant improvement in LVEF but had no significant effect on all-cause mortality compared to surgical MV replacement. Transcatheter MitraClip was associated with better long-term survival than the non-MitraClip group, thus, transcatheter MitraClip could be considered an alternative treatment in patients with HF-complicated ventricular FMR.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Remoción de Dispositivos , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Masculino , Recuperación de la Función , Diseño de Prótesis , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Ecocardiografía TransesofágicaRESUMEN
Heart failure (HF) and moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation (MR) with residual elevations in left atrial pressure (LAP) after MitraClip may remain symptomatic and experience subsequent HF readmissions. The V-Wave interatrial shunt system is a permanent interatrial septal implant that shunts blood from the left-to-right atrium and serves to continuously unload the left atrium. Although the V-Wave shunt has previously been studied in patients with HF, the safety and feasibility of its deployment at the time of the MitraClip procedure is unknown. The V-Wave Shunt MitraClip Study (NCT04729933) is an early feasibility study that aims to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of implantation of the V-Wave shunt device at the time of MitraClip procedure. Patients with moderate-to-severe secondary MR with left ventricular ejection fraction 20% to 50% and New York Heart Association functional class III/IV symptoms despite optimal medical therapy, residual mean LAP ≥20 mm Hg after MitraClip, and mean LAP-right atrial pressure difference ≥5 mm Hg are included. The primary safety end point is a composite outcome of all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction device embolization, cardiac tamponade, or device-related re-intervention or surgery at 30 days. Patients will be followed up to 5 years. Enrollment is ongoing, with 30-day results expected by the end of 2024. The V-Wave Shunt Mitraclip Study aims to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the implantation of the V-Wave interatrial shunt device at the time of index MitraClip placement which may serve as an adjunctive method by which continuous left atrial unloading may be achieved.
Asunto(s)
Estudios de Factibilidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral , Humanos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Presión Atrial/fisiología , Femenino , Masculino , Diseño de Prótesis , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodosRESUMEN
The COAPT 5-year data demonstrate that compared with medical treatment transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) with the MitraClip in symptomatic patients with Grade 3+/Grade 4+ secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) reduced by nearly half the annualized hospitalization risk (33 vs. 57%), by almost 30% the death rate (57 vs. 67%) and achieved significant and durable SMR reduction in 95% of patients. Control patients who crossed over to TEER at 2 years had better prognosis, but nearly half of them died before reaching crossover eligibility. Death or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) occurred in 73.6% of TEER patients and 91.5% of controls within 5 years, pointing to a need for further study to address left ventricle (LV) dysfunction, the underlying cause of patient's disease. MTRA-FR targeted SMR using the same device and did not improve the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or HHF at 12 months. Possible reasons for the discrepancy include enrolment of patients with more severe MR and less-advanced LV disease (dilation/dysfunction), less-procedural complications, and higher success in reducing MR in COAPT compared with MITRA-FR. Thus, the ideal patient for MitraClip treatment would be one with severe MR, but with no too severe LV dilation/dysfunction, which is what differentiates COAPT patients from those in MITRA-FR.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The COAPT Trial was the first ever to demonstrate a survival benefit in treating functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). That was achieved through transcatheter mitral repair in selected patients. The exact proportion of patients fulfilling COAPT selection criteria in the real-world is unknown. AIMS: To assess the applicability of COAPT criteria in real world and its impact on patients' survival. METHODS: We assessed the clinical data and follow-up results of all consecutive patients admitted for FMR at our Department between January 2016 and May 2021 according to COAPT eligibility. COAPT eligibility was retrospectively assessed by a cardiac surgeon and a cardiologist. RESULTS: Among 394 patients, 56 (14%) were COAPT eligible. The most frequent reasons for exclusion were MR ≤ 2 (22%), LVEF < 20% or >50% (19%), and non-optimized GDMT (21.3%). Among Non-COAPT patients, weighted 4-year survival was higher in patients who received MitraClip compared to those who were left in optimized medical therapy (91.5% confidence interval [CI: 0.864, 0.96] vs. 71.8% [CI: 0.509, 0.926], respectively, p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Only a minority (14%) of real-world patients with FMR referred to a tertiary hospital fulfilled the COAPT selection criteria. Among Non-COAPT patients, weighted 4-year survival was higher in patients who received MitraClip compared to those who were left in optimized medical therapy (91.5% [0.864, 0.96] vs. 71.8% [0.509, 0.926], respectively, p = 0.027).
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Determinación de la Elegibilidad , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral , Válvula Mitral , Selección de Paciente , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Tiempo , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/mortalidad , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/mortalidad , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Factores de Riesgo , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Recuperación de la Función , Medición de Riesgo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Función Ventricular IzquierdaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several repair strategies emerged as possible treatment for severe mitral regurgitation (MR). A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare the different percutaneous mitral valve repair approaches. METHODS: PubMed and Scopus electronic databases were scanned for eligible studies until December 11th, 2023. Clinical efficacy endpoints were all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, and post-procedural NYHA functional class <3; the echocardiographic efficacy endpoint was a post-intervention residual MR less than moderate. Safety endpoints and procedural outcome measures were also assessed. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included: 8 [N = 1662 patients, mean follow-up (FUP) 294 days] compared MitraClip® vs Pascal® device, 2 (N = 195 patients) MitraClip® vs Carillon® and 1 study (N = 186 patients) evaluated MitraClip® against Cardioband®. The Pascal®-treated group had lower MR degree compared to the MitraClip®-treated group, without difference in post-intervention mean trans-mitral gradient and in clinical and safety endpoints. A longer procedure time was observed in the Pascal® group, albeit with a lower average number of implanted devices per procedure. The two studies comparing MitraClip® and Carillon® were inconsistent in terms of both efficacy and safety outcomes, while the study evaluating MitraClip® vs Cardioband® showed that the latter might confer a significant clinical benefit, with a similar reduction in MR. CONCLUSIONS: Pascal® is as safe and clinically effective as MitraClip® in treating patients with MR, with an apparent greater reduction in the magnitude of residual valve insufficiency over the long term. Data on Cardioband® and Carillon® are not robust enough to draw conclusions from the use of such devices.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversosAsunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral , Válvula Mitral , Humanos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/etiología , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Mitral/instrumentación , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Mitral/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Ecocardiografía Doppler en Color , Prótesis Valvulares CardíacasRESUMEN
AIM: The RESHAPE-HF2 trial is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of the MitraClip device system for the treatment of clinically important functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) in patients with heart failure (HF). This report describes the baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in the RESHAPE-HF2 trial compared to those enrolled in the COAPT and MITRA-FR trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: The RESHAPE-HF2 study is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, multicentre trial including patients with symptomatic HF, a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between 20% and 50% with moderate-to-severe or severe FMR, for whom isolated mitral valve surgery was not recommended. Patients were randomized 1:1 to a strategy of delivering or withholding MitraClip. Of 506 patients randomized, the mean age of the patients was 70 ± 10 years, and 99 of them (20%) were women. The median EuroSCORE II was 5.3 (2.8-9.0) and median plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was 2745 (1407-5385) pg/ml. Most patients were prescribed beta-blockers (96%), diuretics (96%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (82%) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (82%). The use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors was rare (7%). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices had been previously implanted in 29% of patients. Mean LVEF, left ventricular end-diastolic volume and effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) were 31 ± 8%, 211 ± 76 ml and 0.25 ± 0.08 cm2, respectively, whereas 44% of patients had mitral regurgitation severity of grade 4+. Compared to patients enrolled in COAPT and MITRA-FR, those enrolled in RESHAPE-HF2 were less likely to have mitral regurgitation grade 4+ and, on average, HAD lower EROA, and plasma NT-proBNP and higher estimated glomerular filtration rate, but otherwise had similar age, comorbidities, CRT therapy and LVEF. CONCLUSION: Patients enrolled in RESHAPE-HF2 represent a third distinct population where MitraClip was tested in, that is one mainly comprising of patients with moderate-to-severe FMR instead of only severe FMR, as enrolled in the COAPT and MITRA-FR trials. The results of RESHAPE-HF2 will provide crucial insights regarding broader application of the transcatheter edge-to-edge repair procedure in clinical practice.