RESUMEN

Background Mental health treatment, particularly through psychotropic medications, is becoming increasingly prominent worldwide. In Saudi Arabia, the acceptance and understanding of these treatments are shaped by unique cultural and social factors. Despite some awareness, there remains a need for deeper insights into the public's perceptions and knowledge of psychotropic medications. This study aims to examine the awareness levels of psychotropic medications among the Saudi population, their perceived benefits and risks, the prevalence of their use, and any demographic differences in these perceptions. Methods Employing a quantitative, cross-sectional design, this study collected data via an online questionnaire from Saudi residents aged 18 and above. The questionnaire, validated by experts, covered demographic details, awareness and knowledge of psychotropic medications, and personal or vicarious experiences with these medications. Data analysis was performed using SPSS (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), applying descriptive and inferential statistics to provide a comprehensive view of the current landscape. The study was conducted over four weeks, from May 1, 2024, to May 31, 2024. Results The study indicated a demographic skew towards younger individuals, with a significant predominance of female respondents (70.86%, n=1024). A notable 63.52% (n=922) of participants reported being aware of psychotropic medications. Regarding knowledge, 37.83% (n=549) of respondents were somewhat knowledgeable about the benefits, while 37.57% (n=545) were somewhat knowledgeable about the risks. The prevalence of use was reported by 41.92% (n=608) of respondents, mainly through acquaintances rather than personal use. Younger, predominantly female, and well-educated individuals demonstrated higher levels of awareness and acceptance of psychotropic medications. Significant variations in perceptions were observed based on age, gender, and educational level. Respondents aged 18-24 years (52.52%, n=762) were significantly more likely to be aware of psychotropic medications (p < 0.01), and female respondents showed a higher acceptance rate (p < 0.05). Educational level also played a crucial role, with college-educated individuals (63.38%, n=919) displaying greater acceptance and awareness compared to those with only a high school education (28.24%, n=409) (p < 0.01). The general opinion on the effectiveness and adequacy of public information about psychotropic medications was mixed, with 52.93% (n=768) acknowledging their benefits while 31.92% (n=463) expressed concerns about side effects, indicating a need for improved public education. Conclusion The study emphasizes the importance of enhancing public education and awareness initiatives to improve knowledge and acceptance of psychotropic medications in Saudi Arabia. This could lead to better mental health outcomes and broader acceptance of these treatment options.

RESUMEN

Background: Medication-related safety incidents (MSIs) are among the most frequent contributors to preventable harm in hospital patients. There is a paucity of research that explores the factors that contribute to MSIs across the departments of high-risk specialties such as surgery. Objectives: To characterize MSIs involving surgical patients across two secondary care sites at a University Health Board. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional convergent analysis of anonymous MSI reports extracted from the risk management system between 1st January 2017 and 31st October 2020 was undertaken. Methods: Incident reports contained categorical data pertaining to the type and nature of the incident as well as free-text reporter accounts. Categorical data were analyzed quantitatively, undergoing descriptive analysis using IBM SPSS Statistics © software (Version 26.0.01; 2019). Content analysis of free-text responses was undertaken using the Organizational Accident Causation model as the underpinning theoretical framework. Results: Of a total of 670 incidents, most MSIs did not result in harm (n = 495, 73.9%). Most MSIs occurred during administration (n = 439, 65.5%). Half of the incidents (n = 335, 50%) were related to one of three medication types: opioids, antimicrobials, and antithrombotic agents. Communication failures were the most frequent error-producing condition (n = 39, 5.8%) and drug omission was the most frequent active failure (n = 156, 23.3%). Conclusion: To the knowledge of the authors, this is the first study in the United Kingdom that reports the medications most frequently involved in MSI reports for surgical patients. Staff in the surgical setting should be informed of the high frequency of incidents involving opioids, antimicrobials, heparin, and other antithrombotic agents as they appear in half of MSI reports in the surgical setting. Further research should explore administration error reduction strategies as well as tools to improve communication between staff to mitigate the risk of medicines-related harm associated with key medications.

Introduction: Errors with medications not only often happen in hospitals but also have the potential to cause great harm to patients. They can occur at any time, from prescribing a patient the correct dose of medication to finally administering them the correct medication. Reducing the risk of errors is particularly crucial for surgical patients, where medication-related safety incidents can complicate the safety of surgical procedures. This study looked at the types of medication incidents reported by staff for patients who were having surgery. Methods: We reviewed the incident reports involving medications for patients on surgical wards and in theatres, as reported by staff. These included reports from between 1st January 2017 and 31st October 2020 from two university hospitals in Wales. Results: A total of 670 incidents were reported by staff, most of which did not result in any harm (n = 495, 73.9%). Half of the incidents that were reported involved at least one of three types of medications: opioids, antimicrobials and blood thinning medication. Communication failures were attributed to be the most common factor leading to errors occurring, whilst a failure to give the medication was the most common error reported. Conclusion: Staff that are working with patients on surgical wards and in theatres should be alerted to the high frequency of incidents involving opioids, antimicrobials and blood thinning medication. Moreover, strategies that improve staff communication should be employed to avoid medication-related safety incidents.

Types of medicines-related errors occurring in patients undergoing surgery.

RESUMEN

Purpose: Our study aimed to explore the current status of patient participation in medication safety from the perspectives of general practitioners (GPs), pharmacists, and outpatients in Beijing, China. Patients and Methods: A qualitative study using semi-structured in-depth individual interviews with GPs, pharmacists, and outpatients. Subjects were identified by purposive sampling until code saturation. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with GPs, pharmacists, and patients from community health service centers in three urban districts of Beijing, China. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and the text was analysed using thematic analysis techniques including familiarising with data, generating initial codes, searching for themes, reviewing themes, defining and naming themes, and producing the report. Results: A total of eight GPs, seven pharmacists, and 18 outpatients were interviewed. Data analysis led to the generation of five key themes: (1) mutual trust between patient and GP, (2) communication with healthcare professionals, (3) acquisition of knowledge about medication safety, (4) implementation of medication self-management at home, and (5) different attitudes toward participation in medication decisions. Patients participated in medication safety in multiple ways. However, insufficient knowledge about medication safety, lack of awareness of the patient's role in ensuring medication safety, shortage of consultation lengths, and being misled by some information were problems with patient participation in medication safety. Conclusion: This exploratory study contributes to our initial understanding of patient participation in medication safety. There were still many issues and barriers in the process of patient participation. Appropriate policies and measures, such as providing various forms of patient education, ensuring sufficient physician-patient communication, giving full play to the role of pharmacists, and making judicious use of digital health tools should be taken to improve medication safety by fully utilising the role of patients.

Medication safety is a significant concern around the world. Patient participation in the medication process is effective in reducing the incidence of medication errors and improving medication safety. However, the role of outpatients with chronic conditions in ensuring medication safety is often neglected. This study aims to explore the perspectives and experiences of GPs, pharmacists, and outpatients by qualitative interviews in Beijing, China. The study involved a series of interviews with eight GPs, seven pharmacists, and 18 outpatients living with noncommunicable diseases. The interview revealed five themes: (1) mutual trust between patient and GP, (2) communication with healthcare professionals, (3) acquisition of knowledge about medication safety, (4) implementation of medication self-management at home, and (5) different attitudes toward participation in medication decisions. The findings might help propose suggestions for patient participation in medication safety. Integrating these findings into future studies can help healthcare professionals formulate interventions and better support patients in participating in the medication process.

RESUMEN

Background and Aims: Medication errors (MEs) are a significant source of preventable harm in patient care. Voluntary incident reporting and ME reporting systems are essential for managing medication safety. Analyzing aggregated ME reports instead of individual reports can reveal organizational risks. Organizational culture influences reporting activity and the effectiveness of safety improvements depends on their system-focus. This study uses aggregated ME reports to investigate the ME management process and reporting culture in medication safety. It aims to create a hierarchy for ME improvement actions and analyze their strength and management flow in aggregated reports. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted to review improvement proposals and actions of ME reports in a Finnish tertiary hospital in 2017-2021. The improvement proposals and actions were categorized into strength classes during three stages: reporter proposals, manager proposals, and documented actions. The report management flow was analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the characteristics and the chi-squared test for categorical variables in the statistical analysis. Results: A new strength classification hierarchy was created with three classes and corresponding numerical values: "strong (3)," "medium (2)," and "weak (1)" Additionally, categories for "no action (0)" and "vague (0)" were included. Out of 5463 ME reports analyzed, improvement proposals and actions were predominantly weak, ranging from 23.4% to 54.2% across different stages of the management process. A significant proportion had no action included (20.5-49.1%) or were vague (4.2-20.6%). Conclusion: Analyzing the strength of improvement proposals and actions in aggregated ME reports provides new insights into reporting culture and the ME management. The new combined strength classification hierarchy is a suitable tool for this analysis.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Over 95% of penicillin allergy labels are inaccurate and may be addressed in low-risk patients using direct oral penicillin challenge (DPC). This study explored the behaviour, attitudes and acceptability of patients, healthcare professionals (HCPs) and managers of using DPC in low-risk patients. METHODS: Mixed-method, investigation involving patient interviews and staff focus groups at three NHS acute hospitals. Transcripts were coded using inductive and deductive thematic analysis informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. FINDINGS: Analysis of 43 patient interviews and three focus groups (28 HCPs: clinicians and managers) highlighted themes of 'knowledge', 'beliefs about capabilities and consequences', 'environmental context', 'resources', 'social influences', 'professional role and identity', 'behavioural regulation and reinforcement' and a cross-cutting theme of digital systems. Overall, study participants supported the DPC intervention. Patients expressed reassurance about being in a monitored, hospital setting. HCPs acknowledged the need for robust governance structures for ensuring clarity of roles and responsibilities and confidence. CONCLUSION: There were high levels of acceptability among patients and HCPs. HCPs recognised the importance of DPC. Complexities of penicillin allergy (de)labelling were highlighted, and issues of knowledge, risk, governance and workforce were identified as key determinants. These should be considered in future planning and adoption strategies for DPC.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study will pilot-test the mobile app, Medication Safety @HOME-Meds@HOME intervention to improve medication administration accuracy, reduce preventable adverse drug events, and ultimately improve chronic care management for children with medical complexity (CMC). The Meds@HOME app was co-designed with CMC families, secondary caregivers (SCGs), and health professionals to support medication management for primary caregivers (PCGs) and SCGs of CMC. We hypothesize that Meds@HOME will improve caregivers' medication administration accuracy, reduce preventable adverse drug events, and ultimately improve chronic care management. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Meds@HOME on medication administration accuracy for PCGs and SCGs. METHODS: This study will recruit up to 152 PCGs and 304 SCGs of CMC who are prescribed at least 1 scheduled high-risk medication and receive care at the University of Wisconsin American Family Children's Hospital. PCGs will be randomly assigned, for the 6-month trial, to either the control group (not trialing Meds@HOME) or the intervention group (trialing Meds@HOME) using 1:1 ratio. The Meds@HOME app allows caregivers to create a child profile, store medication and care instructions, and receive reminders for upcoming and overdue care routines and medication refills. Surveys completed both at the start and end of the trial measure demographics, medication delivery knowledge, confidence in the CMC's caregiving network, and comfort with medical information. Univariate and multivariate generalized estimation equations will be used for primary statistical analysis. The primary outcome is the PCG's rate of medication administration accuracy measured as correct identification of each of the following for a randomly selected high-risk medication: indication, formulation, dose, frequency, and route at baseline and after 6 months. Secondary outcomes include SCG medication administration accuracy (indication, formulation, dose, frequency, and route), count of University of Wisconsin hospital and emergency department encounters, PCG-reported medication adherence, count of deaths, and PCG medication confidence and understanding. RESULTS: Recruitment for this study began on November 29, 2023. As of May 15, 2024, we have enrolled 94/152 (62%) PCGs. We expect recruitment to end by August 1, 2024, and the final participant will complete the study by January 28, 2025, at which point we will start analyzing the complete responses. We expect publication of results at the end of 2025. CONCLUSIONS: The Meds@HOME mobile app provides a promising strategy for improving PCG medication safety for CMC who take high-risk medications. In addition, this protocol highlights novel procedures for recruiting SCGs of CMC. In the future, this app could be used more broadly across diverse caregiving networks to navigate complex medication routines and promote medication safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05816590; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05816590. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/60621.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objectives: To assess the prevalence of self-medication in urban Indian medical students and explore possible factors associated with this practice. Methods: After obtaining institutional ethics approval, 180 medical students from six medical colleges in Mumbai were recruited to participate via social media. They were administered a pre-validated questionnaire that assessed self-medication as a practice, along with the perceived stress scale (PSS-10) online. Anonymity and confidentiality were maintained. Results: The prevalence of self-medication in medical students was found to be 83.9%, with no significant difference between genders or between academic years of medical education. The most used source of information for self-medicating was older prescriptions, and for procuring drugs was pharmacist stores. Common cold was the most cited indication. Anti-pyretics and anti-inflammatory drugs were the most commonly self-medicated drugs. It was found that 73.3% of medical students had self-medicated with non-over-the-counter (OTC) drugs. It was observed that 6.1% of medical students had experienced adverse drug reactions, and alarmingly, 0.6% of medical students continued self-medicating despite experiencing adverse drug reactions. Conclusions: Most of the study participants admitted to having practised self-medication. It was alarming to find that an appreciable fraction of the study population had uncontrolled access to non-OTC drugs. Thus, there needs to be a greater emphasis on the education of medical students with respect to the problems encountered by self-medicating and a need to enforce stricter regulations, as well as to establish a more watertight monitoring system, to curb this hazardous practice.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medications are commonly found in every household. In Syria, where healthcare infrastructure faces significant challenges, improper storage can lead to reduced medication efficacy and increased health risks. Additionally, inappropriate disposal practices pose serious environmental concerns, especially in a region already grappling with environmental degradation. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, and practices of Syrian individuals regarding the appropriate storage and disposal of home medications. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted from September 22 to October 20, 2023, using an online survey distributed via social media apps (WhatsApp, Facebook, and Telegram) in Syria. The questionnaire, adapted from a similar study in Saudi Arabia, was translated to Arabic using the forward-backward translation technique. A convenience sampling technique was used. Inclusion criteria were participants over eighteen with expired or unused medications at home. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, and binary logistic regression analysis were performed using SPSS version 27, with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 2,217 responses were analyzed, with the majority of participants being female (79%) and aged between 21-30 years (56%). The study found that 90.7% of respondents dispose of expired medications in the garbage, while 95% keep medications in their original containers. Additionally, 30% consult pharmacists for storage instructions, and 64% read storage information on medication leaflets. Logistic regression analysis revealed that males were less likely to check expiration dates before use (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.40-0.84) and periodically (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.54-0.85). Participants aged 31-40 years were less likely to check expiration dates periodically (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.31-0.68), while those with children under six years old were more likely to do so (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.01-1.67). Males were also less likely to read storage instructions (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.50-0.76) but more likely to ask pharmacists about them (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.01-1.57). There was no significant difference in these practices between medical professionals and the general population. CONCLUSION: This study reveals gaps in the practices related to the storage and disposal of medications among the Syrian public. The findings suggest a need for targeted public education and awareness programs to improve these practices and reduce the associated health and environmental risks.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The objective of this project was to develop a standardized list of renally eliminated and potentially nephrotoxic drugs that will help inform initiatives to improve medication safety. Several available lists of medications from the published literature including original research articles and reviews, and from regulatory agencies, tertiary references, and clinical decision support systems were compiled, consolidated, and compared. Only systemically administered medications were included. Medication combinations were included if at least 1 active ingredient was considered renally dosed or potentially nephrotoxic. The medication list was reviewed for completeness and clinical appropriateness by a multidisciplinary team of individuals with expertise in critical care, nephrology, and pharmacy. An initial list of renally dosed and nephrotoxic drugs was created. After reconciliation and consensus from clinical experts, a standardized list of 681 drugs is proposed. The proposed evidence-based standardized list of renally dosed and potentially nephrotoxic drugs will be useful to harmonize epidemiologic and medication quality improvement studies. In addition, the list can be used for clinical purposes with surveillance in nephrotoxin stewardship programs. We suggest an iterative re-evaluation of the list with emerging literature and new medications on an approximately annual basis.

RESUMEN

Apixaban is a widely used direct oral anticoagulant that is recommended over warfarin therapy for many clinical indications. In patients with atrial fibrillation, dose reductions are recommended for patients with advanced age (≥80 years), low weight (≤60 kg) or elevated serum creatinine (≥1.5 mg/dL), but there is no routine laboratory monitoring necessary for long term-use. Furthermore, apixaban dose reductions due to renal dysfunction are not recommended when treating acute venous thromboembolism. Apixaban-calibrated anti-Xa assays are readily available at some medical centres, and they may be of clinical utility in certain circumstances such as in patients with renal insufficiency, medication adherence assessment, periprocedural planning, extremes in body weight and advanced age. Here, we describe the case of an elderly patient with chronic kidney disease taking apixaban for acute pulmonary embolism. The patient had an unanticipated prolonged apixaban half-life, with detectable apixaban-calibrated anti-Xa levels for >10 days after the last administered dose, which delayed a necessary surgical intervention by >1 week. This case is an example of appropriately using apixaban-calibrated anti-Xa levels to guide therapeutic decision making in perioperative planning.

RESUMEN

Background: Transitions of care (TOC) are important to best practices as they are at times prone to medication errors. The intensive care unit (ICU) is an essential location needing effective TOC due to many reasons, but an important one being that certain medications are only indicated there. One example is antipsychotics used for agitation, delirium, and sedation. Objective: To design, implement, and analyze the benefit of a pharmacist intervention on inappropriate antipsychotic continuation from the ICU to another point in care at a small community hospital. Secondary outcomes include patients discharged from the hospital on antipsychotics inappropriately and accepted pharmacist interventions. Methods: This standard of care, prospective with historical control study included adult patients who were ordered a formulary antipsychotic for delirium, agitation, or sedation during their ICU-level of care admission at SSM Health: St. Clare Hospital- Fenton. Results: There were 33 patients in the historical period and 24 in the intervention period. Those in the intervention period were less likely to have a continuation of antipsychotics beyond 72 hours compared to patients in the historical period (16.7% vs 57.6%, P = 0.002). In addition, patients in the intervention period were less likely to have continuation of antipsychotics when discharged to home (12.5% vs 36.4%, P = 0.04). Conclusions: A pharmacist-driven intervention led to a significant decrease in patients continuing antipsychotics upon ICU discharge. This decrease was seen at both 72 hours from patients leaving the ICU and at hospital discharge.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Medication errors have a significant impact on patient safety and professional practice. The widespread under-reporting of errors by clinicians indicates the critical need for behavioral change. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesize qualitative evidence on factors influencing clinicians' reporting of medication errors. AREAS COVERED: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Scopus, PubMed, and Embase were searched until March 2023 for studies on factors influencing clinicians' reporting of medication errors. Two independent reviewers conducted the screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal. Using framework synthesis approach, the identified themes were mapped to Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). EXPERT OPINION: The review analyzed fourteen high-quality studies across various regions. Facilitators of reporting were identified in the TDF domains of beliefs about consequences knowledge and social/professional role and identity. More themes emerged as barriers, mapped to the domains of beliefs about consequences, emotions, environmental context and resources and knowledge. The review suggests aligning these barriers with key behavior change techniques, such as emphasizing the risks of non-reporting, promoting emotional well-being, improving accessibility of reporting systems and advancing knowledge through educational programs. Future work should focus on developing these behavior change techniques into practical interventions.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate measures of patient work system factors in medication management that may be modifiable for improvement during the care transition from hospital to home among older adults. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Measures were developed and evaluated in a multisite prospective observational study of older adults (≥65 years) discharged home from medical units of two US hospitals from August 2018 to July 2019. MAIN MEASURES: Patient work system factors for managing medications were assessed during hospital stays using six capacity indicators, four task indicators and three medication management practice indicators. Main outcomes were assessed at participants' homes approximately a week after discharge for (1) Medication discrepancies between the medications taken at home and those listed in the medical record, and (2) Patient experiences with new medication regimens. RESULTS: 274 of the 376 recruited participants completed home assessment (72.8%). Among capacity indicators, most older adults (80.6%) managed medications during transition without a caregiver, 41.2% expressed low self-efficacy in managing medications and 18.3% were not able to complete basic medication administration tasks. Among task indicators, more than half (57.7%) had more than 10 discharge medications and most (94.7%) had medication regimen changes. Having more than 10 discharge medications, more than two medication regimen changes and low self-efficacy in medication management increased the risk of feeling overwhelmed (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.08 to 6.38, OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.29 to 7.74 and OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.25 to 5.26, respectively). Low transportation independence, not having a home caregiver, low medication administration skills and more than 10 discharge medications increased the risk of medication discrepancies (incidence rate ratio 1.39, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.91, incidence rate ratio 1.73, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.66, incidence rate ratio 1.99, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.89 and incidence rate ratio 1.91, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.93, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patient work system factors could be assessed before discharge with indicators for increased risk of poor patient experience and medication discrepancies during older adults' care transition from hospital to home.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Thrombolysis is recommended in the setting of massive pulmonary embolism (PE) for reperfusion of vessels but carries a serious concern for increased bleed risk. In October 2022, our institution adopted tenecteplase as the formulary thrombolytic. Previous literature is unclear regarding the bleed risk of tenecteplase in massive PE, and no study has yet compared safety outcomes with the current standard of care, alteplase. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the incidence of bleeding with tenecteplase versus alteplase in massive PE patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study that included adults who received tenecteplase or alteplase for massive PE. The primary outcome was major bleeding as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH). Secondary outcomes included incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), in-hospital mortality, administration of reversal agents, and length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients met inclusion criteria with 20 patients in the alteplase cohort and 24 in the tenecteplase cohort. Seventeen percent of tenecteplase patients compared with 5% of alteplase patients experienced bleeding. The mortality rate was 83% vs 75%, respectively. In addition, 1 patient in the tenecteplase cohort experienced a symptomatic ICH and 2 patients required initiation of massive transfusion protocol. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Although this study was limited in sample size, these results suggest that there may be reason for concern of higher bleeding rates in patients treated with tenecteplase in the setting of massive PE.

RESUMEN

Reports suggest possible risks of adverse cardiovascular reactions, including heart failure, associated with non-ergot dopamine agonist (DA) use in Parkinson's disease (PD). The objectives of our review were to evaluate the risk of heart failure and other adverse cardiovascular reactions in PD patients who received a non-ergot DA compared with other anti-PD pharmacological interventions, placebo, or no intervention. Studies were identified via searches of six bibliographic databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRS) were eligible for study inclusion. Random-effect meta-analyses were performed to estimate adverse cardiovascular reaction risks. Quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. In total, forty-four studies (thirty-six RCTs and eight NRS) satisfied our inclusion criteria. A single RCT found no significant difference in the risk of heart failure with ropinirole compared with bromocriptine (odds ratio (OR) 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 2.04; low certainty). Conversely, three case-control studies reported a risk of heart failure with non-ergot DA treatment. The quality of evidence for the risk of heart failure was judged as low or very low. Findings suggest that non-ergot DA use may be associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, including heart failure. Studies are needed to better understand cardiovascular risks associated with PD treatment.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous research and safety advocacy groups have proposed various behaviors for older adults to actively engage in medication safety. However, little is known about how older adults perceive the importance and reasonableness of these behaviors in ambulatory settings. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess older adults' perceptions of the importance and reasonableness of 8 medication safety behaviors in ambulatory settings and compare their responses with those of younger adults. METHODS: We conducted a survey of 1222 adults in the United States using crowdsourcing to evaluate patient behaviors that may enhance medication safety in community settings. A total of 8 safety behaviors were identified based on the literature, such as bringing medications to office visits, confirming medications at home, managing medication refills, using patient portals, organizing medications, checking medications, getting help, and knowing medications. Respondents were asked about their perception of the importance and reasonableness of these behaviors on a 5-point Likert rating scale in the context of collaboration with primary care providers. We assessed the relative ranking of behaviors in terms of importance and reasonableness and examined the association between these dimensions across age groups using statistical tests. RESULTS: Of 1222 adult participants, 125 (10.2%) were aged 65 years or older. Most participants were White, college-educated, and had chronic conditions. Older adults rated all 8 behaviors significantly higher in both importance and reasonableness than did younger adults (P<.001 for combined behaviors). Confirming medications ranked highest in importance (mean score=3.78) for both age groups while knowing medications ranked highest in reasonableness (mean score=3.68). Using patient portals was ranked lowest in importance (mean score=3.53) and reasonableness (mean score=3.49). There was a significant correlation between the perceived importance and reasonableness of the identified behaviors, with coefficients ranging from 0.436 to 0.543 (all P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Older adults perceived the identified safety behaviors as more important and reasonable than younger adults. However, both age groups considered a behavior highly recommended by professionals as the least important and reasonable. Patient engagement strategies, common and specific to age groups, should be considered to improve medication safety in ambulatory settings.

RESUMEN

DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: Prospective medication order review by a clinical pharmacist is uncommon in many South and Central American countries. Voluntary error reporting and analysis are similarly uncommon. This paper describes the results of pharmacist prospective order review, medication error reporting, and quality improvement activities in a Latin American hospital. METHODS: On January 1, 2020, the hospital initiated prospective review of all medication orders in both the hospital and clinic setting by pharmacists. Health professionals were encouraged to report errors identified to the hospital's voluntary reporting program. Data collected included the medication name and dose, stage of the medication use process, error severity, and error cause. Error reports were periodically reviewed by pharmacy staff. RESULTS: In the 402,100 orders reviewed, errors were found in 605 inpatient orders and 405 clinic orders (0.25%). Most errors were identified before they reached the patient (69.9% of inpatient errors and 81.0% of clinic errors). The prescribing phase was associated with the highest proportion of errors (50.8% of inpatient errors and 41.7% of clinic errors). The most common reasons for prescribing errors were confusing orders and wrong doses. Analgesics (22.7%) and antibiotics (21.3%) were the medication classes most frequently identified. After aggregated review, pharmacists generated 19 clinical alerts leading to system changes and staff education. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the impact of prospective order review by pharmacists on patient safety. In addition to preventing errors from reaching the patient, voluntary error reporting and evaluation led to system changes intended to reduce the likelihood that similar errors would occur again.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the association between antibiotic prophylaxis and adverse outcomes following tooth extraction within the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing dental extractions in 2015-2019. The primary exposure was antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome was post-extraction complication within 7 days (e.g., alveolar osteitis and surgical site infection); the secondary outcome was subsequent medical care relating to a post-extraction oral complication within 7 days. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the independent effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on each outcome. RESULTS: Of 385,880 visits with a dental extraction, 122,810 (31.8%) received antibiotic prophylaxis. Overall, 3387 (0.9%) experienced a post-extraction complication and 350 (0.09%) received medical care relating to a post-extraction oral complication within 7 days. In multivariable regression, diabetes was a statistically significant (p = 0.01) effect modifier of the association between antibiotic prophylaxis and post-extraction complication. Among visits for patients without diabetes, antibiotic prophylaxis was significantly associated with an increased odds of post-extraction complication (odds ratio [OR] = 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-1.38), but among visits for patients with diabetes no significant effect was observed (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.92-1.15). Antibiotic prophylaxis was not significantly associated with post-extraction medical care (OR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.83-1.30). CONCLUSIONS: In this large retrospective cohort, we observed no significant protective effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on post-extraction complications or subsequent medical care utilization in a setting with low complication rates. These data suggest that use of antibiotic prophylaxis in similar settings may need to be re-evaluated to minimize unnecessary antibiotic use.

RESUMEN

Objective: To determine the most appropriate phenobarbital dosing regimen by evaluating the safety and efficacy of the drug when specifically used in alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). Data sources: A comprehensive literary search was conducted using PubMed and bibliographic mining in October 2023. Study selection and data extraction: An established monotherapy phenobarbital regimen needed to be established within the article to be included in analysis. Location of implementation was not a deterrent to evaluation, nor was the route of phenobarbital administration. Data synthesis: Six publications were evaluated in this review, and two main phenobarbital dosing regimens emerged. While fix-based dosing strategies and weight-based dosing strategies resulted, the dosing within the regimens resulted in the same or relatively similar doses employed, respectively. Each of the studies had a statistically significant decrease in their primary outcome being studied, and the use of phenobarbital as monotherapy was proven to improve AWS symptoms, significantly decrease intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, decrease the use of adjunctive medications, decrease the use of a ventilator, and prevent seizures. Conclusions: Despite benzodiazepines having been the clinical first-line therapy for AWS, research shows that the pharmacokinetic stability and clinical benefits of phenobarbital are in support creation of phenobarbital protocols, as monotherapy, in hospitals or institutions for patients with AWS.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: It is perceived by many pharmacists that inadequate training and the resulting lack of confidence hinder participation in medical emergencies. There is insufficient information detailing training programs for pharmacists responding to pediatric medical emergencies. The primary objective of this study was to compare competency scores pre and post participation in the pediatric medical emergency training (PedMET) program. The secondary objectives included comparing confidence and knowledge for participation in pediatric medical emergencies, knowledge of resources and error prevention tools, description of the median time to prepare medications, and the most common errors that occurred during simulation. METHODS: A comprehensive didactic lecture and simulation-based training were designed and contained pre- and post-competencies to assess pharmacists' knowledge related to pediatric medical emergencies. Self-assessments were included to determine pharmacists' confidence levels in knowledge and preparation of medications. Feedback was solicited from participants to identify areas of improvement for the program. Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) 2.0 was used to report findings. RESULTS: Twenty-nine pharmacists of diverse training (e.g., residency vs nonresidency) and experience levels completed the program between July 2021 and March 2023. Competency scores improved from a median of 86% to 97% (p value < 0.001). Significant improvement was detected in pharmacists' confidence in their ability to prepare complex medications during medical emergencies (p value = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Following the implementation of didactic and simulation-based training, pharmacists' knowledge and confidence increased. Departments of pharmacy should consider implementing pharmacist--specific training programs for all pharmacists who respond to pediatric medical emergencies.