RESUMEN

PROBLEM/BACKGROUND: Midwifery retention is a global issue, but less is known regarding what motivates midwives' intention to stay or leave within individual organisations. In 2021, NHS England funded maternity organisations to employ retention midwives. To date, the impact of these roles has not been evaluated. AIM: To explore the views of midwives regarding their intentions to leave or stay within one English organisation and to provide insights into the perceived impact of the role of retention midwives. METHODS: An instrumental case study was carried out in one organisation. Data a mixed methods survey (n=67/91) and interview data (n=7). Quantitative data was analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics; qualitative data using thematic analysis. All data was synthesised together. FINDINGS: The three themes included 'Values-based tensions: The eroding role of the midwife'; 'Discerning differences: Intentions to leave or stay'; 'Retention midwives: Activities and impact'. DISCUSSION: We found that there was a clear link between midwives' intention to leave or stay and their workplace roles; specialist midwives were more likely to stay, report satisfaction, autonomy, and feel a sense of contribution or effectiveness in their role compared to those in other roles. The retention midwives were making a positive difference to midwives' experience of the workplace. CONCLUSION: Midwives working within the same organisation have different experiences of their role and job satisfaction. Future work should consider applying the positive elements of the specialist roles to the wider midwifery workforce to enhance retention. The retention midwife role shows promise, but further evaluation is required.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: There is a lack of evidence on the importance of pain or other aspects of clinical care in the overall patient experience and patient-centered outcomes in cesarean delivery. The purpose of this study was to discover patient priorities in cesarean delivery anesthesia experience, to compare patient and provider perspectives, and to explore attitudes on shared decision-making around anesthesia choices for cesarean delivery. Methods: Patients with recent cesarean deliveries and clinical care providers were approached using a purposeful sampling strategy for this prospective observational qualitative study. Patients were included if they were in the hospital within 72 hours of a cesarean delivery (scheduled or unscheduled), spoke English fluently, and had term gestation. Providers were included if they currently provide regular clinical care to patients having cesarean deliveries and have at least 3 years of practice experience. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using an interview guide. Interview transcripts were independently coded by three coders and qualitatively analyzed for major themes until thematic saturation was achieved. Results: A total of 42 participants (20 patients and 22 providers) completed interviews. Five major themes emerged reflecting patient attitudes and beliefs toward cesarean delivery experience: 1) effective communication, education, and respect; 2) emotional support by care team; 3) intraoperative pain or discomfort; 4) varying acceptability around pain therapies; 5) stigma surrounding cesarean delivery. Five major themes emerged reflecting provider attitudes and beliefs toward cesarean delivery priorities: 1) complexity of pain responses; 2) multiple pain control strategies; 3) effective communication during emergency cesarean delivery; 4) patient psychological well-being during cesarean delivery; 5) barriers to observing the patients' birth plans. Conclusions: Patients and providers alike prioritize pain management, psychological well-being, and effective communication during cesarean delivery experiences. Patients emphasize relationships and trust in their cesarean experience, while clinicians emphasize clinical complexities and physical treatments. Our results guide future research in patient perspectives in cesarean deliveries.

RESUMEN

Objectives: This study examines the relationship between integrated, person-centered maternity care (PCMC), the provision of postpartum family planning (PPFP) services, and postpartum contraceptive use among women delivering at health facilities in Ethiopia. Study design: We analyze 2019-2021 longitudinal data from a representative sample of pregnant and recently postpartum women in Ethiopia. This study examines baseline, 6-week, and 6-month survey data collected from women who delivered at a health facility. Results: Maternity patients who reported more person-centered care were more likely to be counseled on postpartum contraceptive methods before discharge. Overall, 27.5% of women delivering in a health facility received family planning counseling before discharge, ranging from 15.2% in the lowest PCMC quintile to 36.3% in the highest PCMC quintile. The receipt of PPFP counseling was associated with increased odds of postpartum contraceptive use. Conclusions: Findings suggest dimensions of quality care are interlinked, and person-centered care is associated with greater integration of recommended PPFP services into predischarge procedures. However, even among women who report relatively high levels of person-centered care, our results highlight that family planning is not routinely discussed prior to discharge from delivery, and very few women receive a contraceptive method or referral prior to discharge. Implications: While most postpartum women report they wish to limit or space future pregnancies, the uptake of modern contraceptive methods in the postpartum period is low. As women increasingly opt to deliver in health facilities, further integration of family planning services into predischarge procedures within maternity care can improve contraceptive access. Data statement: The data used in these analyses were collected as part of the PMA Ethiopia study. Data are publicly available at https://www.pmadata.org/data/request-access-datasets.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Rural women and their babies experience poorer perinatal outcomes than their urban counterparts and this inequity has existed for decades. This study explored the barriers and enablers that exist for rural women in Australia in accessing perinatal care. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive design, using reflexive thematic analysis, was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2023 with women who had recently given birth in rural Victoria, Australia (n=19). A purposive sampling strategy was used, recruiting women via social media platforms from rural communities across the state. The Socioecological Model (SEM) was used as a framework to organise the findings. RESULTS: Study participants reported multilevel barriers and enablers to accessing perinatal care in their own communities. Intrapersonal factors included financial resources, transportation, self-advocacy, health literacy, rural stoicism, personal agency, and cost of care. Interpersonal factors included factors such as ineffective relationships, poor communication, and care provider accessibility. Organisational factors included inequitable distribution of services, under-resourcing of perinatal services in rural areas, technology-enabled care models and access to continuity of care. Community factors included effective or ineffective interprofessional or interorganisational collaboration. Policy factors included centralisation of perinatal care, lack of funded homebirth and midwifery care pathways and access to free perinatal care. CONCLUSION: Participants in this study articulated several key barriers influencing access to perinatal care in rural areas. These factors impede help-seeking behaviour and engagement with care providers, compounding the impact of rurality and isolation on perinatal outcomes and experience of care. Key enablers to accessing perinatal care in rural communities were also identified and included personal agency, health literacy, social capital, effective collaboration and communication between clinicians and services, technology enabled care and free perinatal care.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There has been a growing concern regarding research waste and the mismatch between conducted research and the research needs of knowledge users. The Needs Led Research (NLR) approach is proposed as an effective method to ensure that research address actual evidence gaps that are relevant to the users of the knowledge. By search and reviewing literature and involving knowledge users, NLR aims to identify, verify, and prioritize research needs. This paper describes and compares the implementation of the NLR approach in two separate PhD projects within maternity care, and addresses the challenges encountered throughout the processes, aiming to offer valuable insights for future NLR initiatives. METHODS: The NLR processes consisted of four phases: (1) defining the scope (2) identifying and verifying research needs (3) prioritizing research needs and (4) designing the PhD projects. Literature searches were conducted during Phase 2, while knowledge user involvement took place in Phases 2 and 3. The knowledge user involvement, at a co-thinker and advocatory level, included knowledge user groups and surveys. Project groups, who were responsible for all decision-making, conducted Phases 1 and 4. The scopes of the PhD projects were labor induction (NLR-LINO) and fetal monitoring in low-risk deliveries (NLR-LISTEN). RESULTS: In NLR-LINO, 17 research needs were identified and verified as actual evidence gaps relevant for the knowledge users. Among these, ten were rated as "very important" by a majority of the 322 survey respondents. The aim of the PhD LINO project was defined as "To investigate whether outpatient induction of labor is beneficial in a Norwegian setting." In NLR-LISTEN, seven research needs were identified and verified as actual evidence gaps relevant for the knowledge users. These were prioritized by 466 survey respondents, and the aim of the PhD LISTEN project was defined as "To investigate the methods used for fetal monitoring in low-risk deliveries in Norway and evaluate adherence to evidence-based practice while also exploring potential reasons for any deviations." CONCLUSIONS: This paper shows that the NLR is a viable approach for prioritizing research. The findings highlight the impact of the initial scope on subsequent phases and emphasize the importance of pragmatic decision-making throughout the process. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that NLR requires dedicated resources, and if integrated into PhD projects, additional time and training should be allocated accordingly.

This paper addresses the issue of research waste and the mismatch between conducted research and the actual needs of the users of the knowledge. The Needs Led Research (NLR) approach is proposed as an effective method for identifying and prioritizing research needs that are relevant to knowledge users and have not been adequately addressed by existing research. The paper specifically examines the implementation of the NLR approach in two separate PhD projects within the field of maternity care, aiming to provide valuable insights for future NLR initiatives. The NLR process consists of four phases: defining the scope, identifying and verifying research needs, prioritizing those needs, and designing the PhD projects. Literature searches were conducted during Phase 2 to identify existing evidence gaps in the research literature. Knowledge users were involved in both the identification and prioritization of research needs in Phases 2 and 3 through surveys and group discussions. In conclusion, this paper shows that NLR is a viable approach for prioritizing research and ensuring its relevance to the users of the knowledge. It emphasizes the importance of defining a clear scope and making pragmatic decisions throughout the process. However, it also highlights the need for dedicated resources and additional time and training when integrating the NLR approach into PhD projects.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Women in the sex trade encounter significant challenges in obtaining reproductive healthcare. Reports of reproductive healthcare for women in the sex trade center on the prevention and termination of pregnancies, yet most women in the sex trade globally experience full term pregnancies and bear children. This study aimed to explore barriers and enabling factors to providing reproductive healthcare for women in the sex trade in Israel. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study utilizing a grounded theory method. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, conducted between June 2021 and July 2022. Interviews were conducted with practitioners in healthcare settings (n = 20), practitioners in social services settings (n = 15), and women in the sex trade who received reproductive health care-related medical services (n = 13) in Israel. The interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. RESULTS: The findings indicated a multilayered structure of healthcare system-related factors and women-related factors. Stigma was noted as a multidimensional barrier, reflected in service providers' attitude towards women in the sex trade, impairing the patient-provider relationship and impeding women's help-seeking. However, the creation of a relationship of trust between the women and healthcare providers enabled better health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings, we propose recommendations for designing and implementing reproductive healthcare services for women in the sex trade. The recommendations offer to (a) include women with lived experiences in planning and providing reproductive healthcare services, (b) adopt a trauma-informed approach, (c) emphasize nonjudgmental care, (d) train healthcare providers to reduce stigma and bias, and (e) enhance the affordability of health services for women experiencing marginalization.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2018, the Dutch government initiated the Solid Start program to provide each child with the best start in life. Key program elements are a biopsychosocial perspective on pregnancy and children's development and stimulating local collaborations between social and health domains, with a specific focus on (future) families in vulnerable situations. Two programs for interprofessional collaboration between maternity and social care professionals to optimize care for pregnant women in vulnerable situations were developed and implemented, in Groningen in 2017 and in South Limburg in 2021. This paper describes the extent of implementation of these programs and the perceptions of involved professionals about determinants that influence program implementation. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study in 2021 and 2022 in two Dutch regions, Groningen and South Limburg. Questionnaires were sent to primary care midwives, hospital-based midwives, obstetricians (i.e. maternity care professionals), (coordinating) youth health care nurses and social workers (i.e. social care professionals), involved in the execution of the programs. Semi-structured interviews were held with involved professionals to enrich the quantitative data. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected and analyzed using Fleuren's implementation model. RESULTS: The findings of the questionnaire (n = 60) and interviews (n = 28) indicate that professionals in both regions are generally positive about the implemented programs. However, there was limited knowledge and use of the program in Groningen. Promoting factors for implementation were mentioned on the determinants for the innovation and the user. Maternity care professionals prefer a general, conversational way to identify vulnerabilities that connects to midwives' daily practice. Low-threshold, personal contact with clear agreements for referral and consultation between professionals contributes to implementation. Professionals agree that properly identifying vulnerabilities and referring women to appropriate care is an important task and contributes to better care. On the determinants of the organization, professionals indicate some preconditions for successful implementation, such as clearly described roles and responsibilities, interprofessional training, time and financial resources. CONCLUSIONS: Areas for improvement for the implementation of interprofessional collaboration between maternity care and social care focus mainly on determinants of the organization, which should be addressed both regionally and nationally. In addition, sustainable implementation requires continuous awareness of influencing factors and a process of evaluation, adaptation and support of the target group.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: By addressing physical and psychosocial needs, group care (GC) improves health-related behaviours, peer support, parent-provider interactions and may improve birth outcomes. Hence, global implementation of GC is encouraged. Context analyses prior to implementation are vital to elucidate which local factors may support or hinder implementation. METHODS: Contextual analyses conducted in the Netherlands and Suriname were compared to identify the factors relevant to the implementability of GC as perceived by healthcare professionals (HCPs). 32 semi-structured interviews were conducted with Dutch and Surinamese healthcare professionals. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and coded using the Framework approach. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided the development of the interview guide and of the coding tree. RESULTS: Outer setting: Concerns regarding funding surfaced in both countries. Due to limited health insurance coverage, additional fees would limit accessibility in Suriname. In the Netherlands, midwives dreaded lower revenue due to reimbursement policies that favour one-on-one care. Inner setting: Appropriate space for GC was absent in one Dutch and three Surinamese facilities. Role division regarding GC implementation was clearer in the Netherlands than in Suriname. INNOVATION: HCPs from both countries expected increased social support, health knowledge among women, and continuity of care(r). Individuals/innovation deliverers: Self-efficacy and motivation emerged as intertwined determinants to GC implementation in both countries. Individuals/innovation recipients: Competing demands can potentially lower acceptability of GC in both countries. While Dutch HCPs prioritised an open dialogue with mothers, Surinamese HCPs encouraged the inclusion of partners. PROCESS: Campaigns to raise awareness of GC were proposed. Language barriers were a concern for Dutch but not for Surinamese HCPs. CONCLUSIONS: While the most striking differences between both countries were found in the outer setting, they trickle down and affect all layers of context. Ultimately, at a later stage, the process evaluation will show if those outer setting barriers we identified prior to implementation actually hindered GC implementation. Changes to the health care systems would ensure sustained implementation in both countries, and this conclusion feeds into a more general discussion: how to proceed when contextual analyses reveal barriers that cannot be addressed with the time and resources available.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Mothers with eating disorders can face additional challenges with infant feeding, and there is evidence they are likely to cease breastfeeding earlier than intended. However, there is little research exploring this. The present study used interpretative phenomenological analysis to explore the lived experience of infant feeding for mothers suffering from or recovering from an eating disorder. Semistructured interviews were conducted with six women-five who had breastfed and one who formula-fed. The women experienced two incompatible worlds-motherhood and an eating disorder. Tensions were sometimes resolved by reducing eating disordered behaviour alongside immersion in motherhood. Two participants did not find infant feeding particularly important for their journey into motherhood. Four recounted a positive shift in their relationship to their body through breastfeeding and felt their embodied experience of mothering provided a route out of eating disordered behaviour. However, doubts about their mothering and infant feeding capabilities could be amplified by feeling mistrusted by others and by the relative silence around eating disorders within maternity care services. Respectful dialogue with health care professionals was particularly valued where this occurred. Although long-term outcomes for the participants are unknown, the study suggests women with a history of eating disorders can form successful breastfeeding relationships and may be motivated to engage in collaborative risk assessment. However, they need support in managing emotional challenges. Training around eating disorders for maternity care professionals is likely to be useful for enhancing confidence in engaging mothers proactively to share concerns about eating, weight and body shape.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency and determinants of medical interventions during childbirth without women's consent at the population level. METHODS: The nationwide cross-sectional Enquête Nationale Périnatale 2021 provided a representative sample of women who delivered in metropolitan France with a 2-month postpartum follow-up (n = 7394). Rates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of interventions during childbirth (oxytocin administration, episiotomy or emergency cesarean section) without consent were calculated. Associations with maternal, obstetric, and organizational characteristics were assessed using robust variance Poisson regressions, after multiple imputation for missing covariates, and weighted to account for 2-month attrition. RESULTS: Women reporting failure to seek consent were 44.7% (CI: 42.6-47.0) for oxytocin administration, 60.2% (CI: 55.4-65.0) for episiotomy, and 36.6% (CI: 33.3-40.0) for emergency cesarean birth. Lack of consent for oxytocin was associated with maternal birth abroad (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] 1.20; 95% CI: 1.06-1.36), low education level, and increased cervical dilation at oxytocin initiation, whereas women with a birth plan reported less frequently lack of consent (aPR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.68-0.92). Delivery assisted by an obstetrician was more often associated with lack of consent for episiotomy (aPR 1.46; 95% CI: 1.11-1.94 for spontaneous delivery and aPR 1.39; 95% CI: 1.13-1.72 for instrumental delivery, reference: spontaneous delivery with a midwife). Cesarean for fetal distress was associated with failure to ask for consent for emergency cesarean delivery (aPR 1.58; 95% CI: 1.28-1.96). CONCLUSION: Women frequently reported that perinatal professionals failed to seek consent for interventions during childbirth. Reorganization of care, particularly in emergency contexts, training focusing on adequate communication and promotion of birth plans are necessary to improve women's involvement in decision making during childbirth.

RESUMEN

PROBLEM: There is an increasing awareness of the prevalence of obstetric violence within maternity care and that some women and birthing people are at greater risk of experiencing violence and harm. BACKGROUND: Supporting self-agency for women and birthing people in maternity care may be a way of addressing the disparities in vulnerability to violence and harm. AIM: To explore researchers' perspectives of self-agency for women from different backgrounds, what inhibits and prevents self-agency, and how self-agency can be enabled. METHODS: A qualitative research design was undertaken underpinned by a reproductive justice framework. Group interviews were held with researchers working with perinatal women/birthing people with histories and experiences of violence and abuse. Reflexive thematic analysis using Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory was undertaken. FINDINGS: 12 participants took part in two group interviews. Two themes were developed: 'defining self-agency' and 'ecological influences on self-agency'. DISCUSSION: The findings identify how self-agency should not be perceived as an intrinsic attribute, but rather is underpinned by exogenous and endogenous influences. Whether and how self-agency is enacted is determined by interacting factors that operate on a micro, meso and macro level perspective. Self-agency is undermined by factors including immigration policies and sociocultural perspectives that can lead to under-resourced and judgemental care, other intersectional factors can also lead to some individuals being more vulnerable to violence and harm. CONCLUSION: Implications from this work include strategies that emphasise woman-centred care, staff training and meaningful organisational change to optimise positive health and wellbeing.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) in maternity care involves women actively in decisions, thereby reducing decisional conflicts and enhancing satisfaction with care. AIM: To investigate SDM and the factors associated with it, and its correlation with respect in maternity care in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A comprehensive, nationwide online questionnaire-based study was conducted between January to May 2023, involving women aged 18 years and above who were either pregnant or had experienced pregnancy/childbirth in the past 12 months. The Mothers' Autonomy in Decision-Making (MADM) scale and the Mothers of Respect Index (MORi) were used. Low to very low SDM was defined as a score of ≤ 24 on the MADM and low to very low respected was defined as a score of ≤ 49 on the MORi. RESULTS: A total of 505 women completed the survey. Low to very low SDM was reported by 137 (34.1 %, 95 confidence interval (CI), 29.6 % - 38.9 %) women. Factors significantly associated with low to very low SDM included seeing different obstetricians of different gender at each visit (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.0, 95 % CI, 1.0 - 3.9), not meeting the same obstetrician throughout the pregnancy (AOR 2.6, 95 % CI, 1.2 - 5.6) and having an instrumental vaginal birth (AOR 6.67, 95 % CI, 1.6 - 28.1). There was a positive association between low to very SDM and feeling of low to very low respect ((χ2 = 83.8173, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: More than one-third of women experienced low to very low SDM in maternity care. This should alert healthcare providers to the importance of continuity of care in Saudi Arabia.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women with obesity face heightened focus on weight during pregnancy due to greater risk of medical complications. Closer follow-up in maternety care may contribute to reduce risk and promote health in these women. The aim of this study was to gain a deeper insight in how pregnant women with obesity experience encounters with healthcare providers in maternity care. How is the received maternity care affected by their weight, and how do they describe the way healthcare providers express attitudes towards obesity in pregnancy? METHODS: We conducted in-depth interviews with 14 women in Trøndelag county in Norway with pre-pregnancy BMI of ≥ 30 kg/m2, between 3 and 12 months postpartum. The study sample was strategic regarding age, relationship status, education level, obesity class, and parity. Themes were developed using reflexive thematic analysis. The analysis was informed by contextual information from a prior study, describing the same participants' weight history from childhood to motherhood along with their perceptions of childhood quality. RESULTS: This study comprised of an overarching theme supported by three main themes. The overarching theme, Being pregnant with a high BMI: a vulnerable condition, reflected the challenge of entering maternity care with obesity, especially for women unprepared to be seen as "outside the norm". Women who had grown up with body criticism and childhood bullying were more prepared to have their weight addressed in maternity care. The first theme, Loaded conversations: a balancing act, emphasizes how pregnant women with a history of body criticism or obesity-related otherness proactively protect their integrity against weight bias, stigma and shame. The women also described how some healthcare providers balance or avoid weight and risk conversations for the same reasons. Dehumanization: an unintended drawback of standardized care makes apparent the pitfalls of prioritizing standardization over person-centered care. Finally, the third theme, The ambivalence of discussing weight and lifestyle, represent women's underlying ambivalence towards current weight practices in maternity care. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that standardized weight and risk monitoring, along with lifestyle guidance in maternity care, can place the pregnant women with obesity in a vulnerable position, contrasting with the emotionally supportive care that women with obesity report needing. Learning from these women's experiences and their urge for an unloaded communication to protect their integrity highlights the importance of focusing on patient-centered practices instead of standardized care to create a safe space for health promotion.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Midwifery continuity of carer (MCoC) is a model of care in which the same midwife or small team of midwives supports women throughout pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period. The model has been prioritised by policy makers in a number of high-income countries, but widespread implementation and sustainability has proved challenging. METHODS: In this narrative review and synthesis of the global literature on the implementation and sustainability of midwifery continuity of carer, we identify barriers to, and facilitators of, this model of delivering maternity care. By mapping existing research evidence onto the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we identify factors for organisations to consider when planning and implementing midwifery continuity of carer as well as gaps in the current research evidence. RESULTS: Analysing international evidence using the CFIR shows that evidence around midwifery continuity of carer implementation is patchy and fragmented, and that the impetus for change is not critically examined. Existing literature pays insufficient attention to core aspects of the innovation such as the centrality of on call working arrangements and alignment with the professional values of midwifery. There is also limited attention to the political and structural contexts into which midwifery continuity of carer is introduced. CONCLUSIONS: By synthesizing international research evidence with the CFIR, we identify factors for organisations to consider when planning and implementing midwifery continuity of carer. We also call for more systematic and contextual evidence to aid understanding of the implementation or non-implementation of midwifery continuity of carer. Existing evidence should be critically evaluated and used more cautiously in support of claims about the model of care and its implementation, especially when implementation is occurring in different settings and contexts to the research being cited.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PROBLEM: Midwifery Continuity of Care (MCoC) remains inaccessible for most Australian women; this is especially true in rural and regional areas. BACKGROUND: Strong evidence demonstrates MCoC models improve experiences for women and their babies and are also shown to improve midwifery workforce wellbeing. However, implementation and upscale remains limited. AIM: To explore the views and experiences of implementing MCoC for both staff and women, understanding their experiences, concerns and solutions in a regional context. METHODS: Qualitative data was collected via focus groups with women and healthcare staff, at six and twelve month post implementation. Data was thematically analysed using Braun and Clarke six step process. FINDINGS: The findings support that 'women love it' and midwives working in the new MCoC model 'loved their job'. The major concern was that not all women could access the model and disconnected communication was problematic during implementation. 'Sharing stories' was a solution to overcoming these issues and promoting the positive impact of MCoC - in particular ways of working and adaption to an all-risk midwifery group practice. DISCUSSION: This study supports widespread evidence that MCoC is valued by both women and staff. In a regional context it is important to recognise challenges faced during implementation and identifying solutions that other maternity services could consider when implementing MCoC. CONCLUSION: The study offers strong recommendation for regional areas to consider MGP to maintain safe, quality local maternity services.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patient autonomy is central to the provision of respectful maternity care. Enabling women to make decisions free of discrimination and coercion, and respecting their privacy and confidentiality can contribute to positive childbirth experiences. This study aimed to deepen the understanding of how patient autonomy is reflected through social practices during intrapartum care in Benin. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with women and midwives, a focus-group discussion with women's birth companions, and non-participant observations in the delivery room were conducted within the frame of the ALERT research project. This study analysed data through a reflexive thematic analysis approach, in line with Braun and Clarke. RESULTS: We identified two themes and five sub-themes. Patient autonomy was systemically suppressed over the course of birth as a result of the conditions of care provision, various forms of coercion and women's surrendering of their autonomy. Women used other care practices, such as alternative medicine and spiritual care, to counteract experiences of limited autonomy during intrapartum care. CONCLUSIONS: The results pointed to women's experiences of limited patient autonomy and their use of alternative and spiritual care practices to reclaim their patient autonomy. This study identified spiritual autonomy as an emergent dimension of patient autonomy. Increasing women's autonomy during childbirth may improve their experiences of childbirth, and the provision of quality and respectful maternity care.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify discrimination in maternity care experienced by Roma women in Hungary, due to ethnic and socio-economic factors. METHODS: We used data from the Cohort'18 Hungarian Birth Cohort Study, covering births in 2018-2019 (n = 7805). Face-to-face interviews were conducted by health visitors during pregnancy and six months postpartum. Differences in obstetric care were tested using Welch's ANOVA. Logistic regression models estimated the influence of Roma ethnicity on birth position, adjusting for socio-economic variables. Odds ratios with 95 % confidence intervals and adjusted predictions were calculated. RESULTS: Roma mothers had a lower rate of caesarean section due to fewer planned interventions (13.3% vs. 19.1% for non-Roma mothers). Roma women were less likely than non-Roma women to have a birth attended by a private obstetrician (15% vs. 52.6%) and less likely to have a family member present at the birth (40% vs. 65.5%). For vaginal births, 61.3% of Roma women had their birth position dictated by hospital staff, compared with 40.6% of non-Roma women. Ethnic background significantly influenced the choice of birth position, but these associations were attenuated after adjustment for socio-economic and territorial factors. Variables such as the presence of a private obstetrician, family support, and residence in Central Hungary reduced the likelihood of giving birth in a fixed position. CONCLUSION: Roma women face significant disadvantages in maternity care in Hungary. Ethnic background has a negative impact on the quality of care, but it is also significantly influenced by adverse socio-economic and regional factors.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Health disparities among ethnic minority and migrant women can lead to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. This study explores the maternity care experiences of South Asian women in Hong Kong, providing insights for woman-centred and culturally responsive care in the East Asia. OBJECTIVE: To understand South Asian women's views and experiences regarding maternity care services in Hong Kong. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted with 20 English-speaking South Asian women who had used maternity care services in Hong Kong within the past 5 years. Data were analysed by thematic analysis. FINDINGS: Four themes were identified: 1) Comparing maternity care services in their home country versus Hong Kong; birth location, mode of birth and care. 2) Navigating Hong Kong maternal medical care system; including private public dual care and learning information from other South Asians. 3) The discrepancy in perception of optimum care; including a preferring for assistance with daily tasks, epidural anaesthesia, doctor-led care, and priority to infants' health. 4) The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternity care experiences, including the cancellation of translation services and limited visiting hours. DISCUSSION: South Asian appreciate Hong Kong's public maternity services due to its perceived greater cost-effectiveness. The major incongruence between expectations and services provided being women-staff communication. CONCLUSION: The quality of healthcare in Hong Kong is appreciated. Individualized care should be offered to cater to diverse needs. Improvements in staff attitude and provision of detailed information should help alleviate feelings of differential treatment.

RESUMEN

Background: Respectful maternity care (RMC) refers to the humane and dignified treatment of a childbearing woman throughout her pregnancy, childbirth and immediate postpartum period. Disrespect and abuse of women during labour, childbirth and immediate postpartum period in health facilities is one of the reasons which deter them from further utilizing maternal healthcare services. The present study was thus undertaken to determine to what extent RMC practices are being followed in a health facility in Manipur. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from May 2022 to August 2022 in a Health facility among women coming for institutional delivery along with direct observations of the labour room. The study tool comprises a semistructured questionnaire related to respectful maternity care which was adapted from the Person-Centered Maternity Care Scale, a validated instrument. The direct observation method was carried out using a checklist adapted from a standardized tool developed by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Descriptive statistics were generated and approval of the study was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee. Results: A total of 336 (99.1%) women reported at least one form of disrespect or abuse during childbirth. Maximum abuse (91.4%) was reported in the facility and environment domain. Direct observation done on 22 deliveries in the labour room found that 72.7% of the women experienced at least one form of disrespect and abuse. Two (9.1%) women were observed to face physical force or abusive behaviour. Conclusion: Almost all the women reported at least one form of disrespect or abuse during childbirth. There is a need to improve the health facilities and women need to be treated with dignity and respect as it is being violated according to the findings in many studies as with ours.

RESUMEN

In the Netherlands adverse perinatal outcomes are also associated with non-medical factors which vary across geographical locations. This study analyses the presence of non-medical vulnerabilities in pregnant women in two regions with high numbers of psychosocial adversity using the same definition for vulnerability in both regions. A register study was performed in 2 regions. Files from women in midwife-led care were analyzed using a standardized case report form addressing non-medical vulnerability based on the Rotterdam definition for vulnerability: measurement A in Groningen (n = 500), measurement B in South-Limburg (n = 538). Only in South-Limburg a second measurement was done after implementing an identification tool for vulnerability (C (n = 375)). In both regions about 10% of pregnant women had one or more urgent vulnerabilities and almost all of these women had an accumulation of several urgent and non-urgent vulnerabilities. Another 10% of women had an accumulation of three or more non-urgent vulnerabilities. This study showed that by using the Rotterdam definition of vulnerability in both regions about 20% of pregnant women seem to live in such a vulnerable situation that they may need psychosocial support. The definition seems a good tool to determine vulnerability. However, without considering protective factors it is difficult to establish precisely women's vulnerability. Research should reveal whether relevant women receive support and whether this approach contributes to better perinatal and child outcomes.

Asunto(s)