RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Outdoor social participation in the school playground is crucial for children's socio-emotional and cognitive development. Yet, many children with disabilities in mainstream educational settings are not socially included within their peer group. We examined whether loose-parts-play (LPP), a common and cost-effective intervention that changes the playground play environment to enhance child-led free play, can promote social participation for children with and without disabilities. METHOD: Forty-two primary school children, out of whom three had hearing loss or autism, were assessed for two baseline and four intervention sessions. We applied a mixed-method design, combining advanced sensors methodology, observations, peer nominations, self-reports, qualitative field notes and an interview with the playground teachers. RESULTS: Findings indicated for all children a decrease during the intervention in social interactions and social play and no change in network centrality. Children without disabilities displayed also an increase in solitude play and in the diversity of interacting partners. Enjoyment of LPP was high for all children, yet children with disabilities did not benefit socially from the intervention and became even more isolated compared with baseline level. CONCLUSIONS: Social participation in the schoolyard of children with and without disabilities did not improve during LPP in a mainstream setting. Findings emphasize the need to consider the social needs of children with disabilities when designing playground interventions and to re-think about LPP philosophy and practices to adapt them to inclusive settings and goals.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This study evaluated the effects of Precision Teaching in improving typically developing students' mathematical skills when delivered via teleconferencing in India. Four students received Precision Teaching, while nine acted as control participants. Precision teaching involved instruction in three mathematical skills; two prerequisite skills and the primary skill of mixed addition and subtraction facts. Instruction included untimed practice, timed practice, goal-setting, graphing, and a token economy. Participants who received Precision Teaching received ten practice sessions for the prerequisite skills and 55 sessions for the primary skill. The results demonstrated improvements in the prerequisite skills of varied magnitude and considerable improvements in the primary skill, which were maintained above baseline performance levels. In addition, those who received Precision Teaching were below the 15th percentile rank at the initial assessment and above the 65th percentile at the post-intervention assessment in the math fluency subtest of the Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement-Third Edition. Control participants did not demonstrate similar improvements. Results suggest that Precision Teaching could produce accelerated outcomes even when delivered via teleconferencing. Therefore, it could be a valuable system for helping students ameliorate potential learning losses resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESUMEN

LAY ABSTRACT: Today, children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are placed in mainstream or special education settings somewhat arbitrarily with no clear clinical recommendations. Here, we compared changes in core ASD symptoms, as measured by the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, 2nd edition (ADOS-2) clinical assessment, across ASD preschool children placed in special or mainstream education. Longitudinal changes in ADOS-2 scores did not differ significantly across settings over a 1- to 2-year period. While some children improved in core ASD symptoms, others deteriorated in both settings. This highlights the need to identify specific criteria for establishing meaningful placement recommendations.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

LAY ABSTRACT: Autistic young people may struggle in mainstream schools and feel disconnected from their peers and their school. We know that autistic adults can benefit from spending time with other autistic people, but we don't know if this is the case for younger autistic people. We conducted interviews with 13 autistic young adults in the United Kingdom who recently left mainstream schooling. We asked them if they would have been interested in being involved in autistic peer support when they were at school, and if so, what that peer support should look like. Results indicated that autistic young people were enthusiastic about the idea of peer support. They thought it was important that peer support was flexible to suit their needs at different times, as well as inclusive, positive, and embracing neurodiversity. They also discussed the potential benefits and difficulties of having a peer support system within a school setting. This adds to the growing body of research on the potential benefits of autistic-autistic interactions on autistic people's well-being and sense of belonging. Findings can be used to help design pilot peer support projects in schools that can be tested to see how effective they are.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This study examined the factors associated with social-communicative outcomes for children on the autism spectrum receiving early intervention in inclusive versus specialised early childhood education programmes. Fifty-eight preschool-aged children randomly assigned to receive the Group-Early Start Denver Model (G-ESDM) in either inclusive or specialised (i.e., autism-specific) classrooms across one calendar year showed similar outcomes at group mean-level across measures of communication and social behaviour. We examined factors moderating outcomes across settings. Novel moderation analyses revealed that higher baseline social interest and nonverbal cognitive skills were associated with increased social communication gains for children in the inclusive classrooms, but not for those in specialised settings. Children who spend more time paying attention to people and have higher cognitive skills might benefit from receiving early intervention in inclusive settings, whilst these factors might be less relevant for children educated in specialised settings.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In many countries, parents can place autism spectrum disorder (ASD) children in either mainstream or special education settings, which differ in their ability to provide structured early intervention programs. There are no clear guidelines for how to make initial placement decisions and ongoing debate about the benefits and drawbacks of each educational setting. Previous studies have mostly examined placement of school-age children and reported that those with poorer cognitive abilities and more severe ASD symptoms tend to be placed in special education. The placement of younger children has rarely been studied. Here, we utilized the database at the National Autism Research Center of Israel to examine whether ASD severity, cognitive abilities, and parent education influenced the placement of 242 children. We performed the analyses separately for 1-3-year-old children who were placed in daycare centers and 3-5-year-old children who were placed in pre-school kindergartens. Our analyses revealed surprisingly small differences across special and mainstream education settings, particularly in daycare centers. Cognitive scores and parent education were significantly higher in ASD children placed in mainstream education, but these differences were of moderate effect size and explained a relatively small percentage of the variability in placement choices (<15%). Indeed, we found considerable overlap in the characteristics of ASD children across educational settings, which suggests that initial placement decisions are performed with little regard to the children's abilities. Given the importance of optimal early intervention, further studies are warranted to determine whether children with specific abilities and needs benefit more from placement in either educational setting. LAY SUMMARY: Currently, there are no clear recommendations for placing young children with ASD in special versus mainstream education settings. We examined the influence of ASD severity, cognitive abilities, and parent education on the initial placement of 242 children. While we found significantly higher cognitive scores and parental education in children placed in mainstream education, there was a remarkable overlap in the characteristics of children across both settings, suggesting that initial placement is performed with limited regard to the children's abilities. Autism Res 2021, 14: 699-708. © 2020 International Society for Autism Research and Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the quality of life (QoL) of children with hearing loss (HL) and children with normal hearing (NH) and to examine how the QoL of children with HL changes over time, considering language skills, type of hearing device, degree of HL, and type of education. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This longitudinal study included 62 children with HL and their parents. Developmental outcome data were collected at two time points, when the mean ages of the children were 4 and 11 years. The Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL™) questionnaire, which includes assessments of Physical, Emotional, Social, and School functioning, was completed by parents at both time points and by the children with HL at the second time point. Receptive and expressive language skills at 4 years were assessed by the Reynell Developmental Language Scale. Results were compared with a Dutch normative sample. RESULTS: The QoL of children with HL was similar to that of children with NH at both time points on two of the four QoL scales, Emotional and Physical functioning. On the other two scales, Social and School functioning, children with HL who attended special education and children who switched to mainstream education showed lower scores than children with HL who were consistently in mainstream education and lower scores than children with NH. The School QoL of children with HL decreased over time, as did the School QoL of children with NH. Social QoL of children with cochlear implants decreased over time, but this was not the case in children with hearing aids. Language skills and the degree of HL did not clinically improve the QoL over time of preschool children with HL. CONCLUSIONS: The QoL of children with HL in mainstream education and the Physical and Emotional QoL of all children with HL were satisfactory. It is essential to develop specific guidance regarding school activities for children with HL in special education and for children with HL who switch to mainstream education in order to increase their social QoL.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In Belgium the majority of children with CI's are being educated in mainstream schools. In mainstream schools difficult listening situations occur (e.g. due to background noise) which may result in educational risks for children with CI's. A tool that identifies potential listening difficulties, the English Listen inventory for Education Revised (LIFE-R), was translated and validated into Dutch for elementary and secondary schools (LIFE-NL, LIFE2-NL respectively). METHODS: Two forward-backward translations were performed followed by a linguistic evaluation and validation by a multidisciplinary committee. The LIFE-NL was further validated on content by pre-testing the questionnaire in 5 students with hearing loss (8-13 years). After minor cross-cultural adaptations normative data were assembled from 187 normal-hearing (NH) students enrolled in mainstream secondary education (1st to 4th grade). The normative data were further analysed based on grade and school type. Additionally, the internal consistency was evaluated by calculating Cronbach's alpha for 3 different scales of the LIFE2-NL: the LIFE total (situation 1-15), LIFE class (situation 1-10: listening situations in classroom) and LIFE social (situation 11-15: social listening situations in school). RESULTS: NH students scored on average 72.0 (SD = 19.9%) on the LIFE2-NL, indicating they experience some difficulties in secondary mainstream schools. The most difficult listening situations were those where fellow students are noisy or when students have to listen in large classrooms. NH students scored significantly higher on the LIFE class compared to the LIFE social (84.1 ±â€¯14.7% vs. 68.1 ±â€¯19.0%, p < .000). Moreover the LIFE social tend to decrease from the 3rd grade on. The different subscales of the LIFE2-NL showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.86, 0.89 and 0.75 for LIFE total, LIFE class and LIFE social respectively). CONCLUSION: The LIFE-NL and LIFE2-NL are valid Dutch translations of the original LIFE-R and are fully comprehensible for students with hearing loss. The normative data of the LIFE2-NL provide a representative framework for interpreting the results of mainstreamed students with hearing loss in secondary schools.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Resumo:OBJETIVO:verificar o desempenho comunicativo e lexical expressivo de crianças com Síndrome de Down e refletir sobre como a compreensão de fatores interferentes no processo de aprendizagem pode contribuir para uma melhor adaptação dessas crianças no ambiente escolar.MÉTODOS:a amostra proposta foi de 60 crianças, porém, após análise dos critérios de inclusão, participaram 20 crianças, 10 com Síndrome de Down e 10 com neurodesenvolvimento típico, de idade entre 36 a 62 meses, pareadas quanto ao gênero, idade cronológica e nível socioeconômico. Procedimentos: entrevista com familiares, Observação do Comportamento Comunicativo e Teste de Linguagem Infantil ABFW-Vocabulário Parte B. A análise dos dados foi realizada por meio de estatística descritiva e aplicação do Teste "t" Student (p≤ 0,05).RESULTADOS:indicaram diferença estatisticamente significante para produção de palavras e frases, narrativa, tempo de atenção, designação verbal usual e não designação. Para processos de substituição a análise estatística não acusou diferença estatisticamente significante. Apenas para profissões e locais, nesta categoria, houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre os grupos. Como são avaliados nove campos conceituais, este dado não interferiu na análise estatística da somatória dos valores de todos os campos.CONCLUSÃO:o desempenho comunicativo e lexical expressivo de crianças com Síndrome de Down é inferior quando comparado com crianças com neurodesenvolvimento típico. A escola tem importante papel em proporcionar um ambiente estimulador, por meio de práticas pedagógicas adequadas às necessidades de aprendizagem destas crianças.

Abstract:PURPOSE:to investigate the expressive lexical and communicative performance of children with Down syndrome and reflect on how the understanding of factors interfering in the learning process can contribute to a better adaptation of these children at school.METHODS:the proposed sample was comprised of 60 children, but after an analysis of the inclusion criteria, the participants were 20 children, 10 with Down syndrome and 10 with typical neurodevelopment, aged between 36 and 62 months, paired according to gender, chronological age and socioeconomic status. Procedures: interview with family members, Observation of the Communicative Behavior and ABFW Child Language Test - Vocabulary Part B. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and by the application of the Student`s t test (p ≤ 0.05).RESULTS:there was a statistically significant difference for the production of words and phrases, narrative, attention span, usual verbal designation and no designation. For substitution processes, the statistical analysis showed no statistically significant difference. In this category, there was a statistically significant difference between groups only for occupations and places. As nine conceptual fields were evaluated, this data did not affect the statistical analysis of the sum of the values of all the fields.CONCLUSION:the expressive lexical and communicative performance of children with Down syndrome is lower compared to children with typical neurodevelopment. The school plays an important role in providing a stimulating setting through teaching practices that are appropriate to the learning needs of these children.