RESUMEN

Primary bone sarcomas are rare tumours, comprising approximately 1-2% of adult and around 13-15% of all paediatric cancers. Limb salvage surgery is a challenge in complex musculoskeletal tumours. Young age adds to its complexity, since the growth potential of the reconstruct has to be considered to have optimal function of the salvaged limb. An observational retrospective study performed on 52 paediatric patients between Jan 2011 and Dec 2018 with malignant bone tumour of lower limbs had been assessed for postoperative functional outcomes with questionnaires and clinico-radiological examination for functional and oncological outcome. Out of 52 patients, 44 (85%) were diagnosed with osteosarcoma and the rest (15%) were diagnosed with Ewing sarcoma. Mean age was 12.88 years. Three-year overall survival rate was found to be 61.73%. Fifteen patients (28%) had metastasis at the time of presentation; non-metastasis patients (56.33 months) had a higher mean survival time, as compared to metastasis patient (29.06 months). Overall survival in group of patients undergoing biological, prosthesis and amputation surgeries were found to be similar. Mean MSTS score at final follow-up was 24.05 (80.1%), and in our study, 3.85% (2 out of 52) had local recurrence, and local recurrence free rate was found to be 96.15% (50 out of 52). The present study had excellent functional and oncological outcome at final follow-up which is comparable to the world literature. Complete surgical resection, if feasible, remains essential for cure.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Bone tumors around the elbow are rare, with frequently delayed diagnosis. The current study aimed to assess the functional and oncological outcomes of limb salvage surgery for primary benign aggressive or malignant bone tumors around the elbow. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with primary aggressive benign and malignant bone tumors around the elbow treated with limb salvage surgery between 1995 and 2020 at a single musculoskeletal oncology center. The minimum follow-up period was 24 months. Functional results were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system at the last follow-up visit. Local recurrence, chest metastasis, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: This study included 30 patients, 19 males and 11 females, with a mean age of 25.4 ± 14.2 years. The tumor location was the distal humerus (n = 21), proximal radius (n = 5), and proximal ulna (n = 4). Reconstruction was done by elbow fusion using fibular graft (n = 10), mobile endoprosthesis (n = 9), excision arthroplasty (n = 7), and extracorporeal freezing and reimplantation (n = 4). The mean follow-up period was 36.2 ± 21.3 months. The median follow-up MSTS score was 27 [Interquartile range (IQR): 26-30]. Skeletally immature patients had a significantly higher MSTS score. The rate of postoperative complications was 26.7%. CONCLUSION: Limb salvage surgery with different reconstructive options for benign aggressive and malignant bone tumors around the elbow can achieve good functional and oncological outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To achieve clear margins in rare malignant clavicular neoplasms, claviculectomy may become necessary. This study aimed to review clinical, functional, and oncologic outcomes following partial or total claviculectomy without reconstruction. METHODS: This study retrospectively included 15 patients from 2 tertiary sarcoma centers (mean age, 42.6 ± 20.3 years; 66.7% male patients). The median length of clinical and oncologic follow-up was 48.0 months (interquartile range [IQR], 24.0-83.5 months). Functional follow-up (Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score and QuickDASH score [short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire]) was available in 9 patients at a median of 36.0 months (IQR, 20.0-100.0 months). RESULTS: Of the 15 patients, 7 underwent total claviculectomy; 5, partial lateral claviculectomy; and 3, partial medial claviculectomy. No postoperative complications emerged. The median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society and QuickDASH scores at latest follow-up amounted to 26.0 points (IQR, 24.0-29.0 points) and 18.0 points (IQR, 11.0-22.0 points), respectively. Notably, scores tended to be lower in patients who underwent total claviculectomy (n = 2) in comparison to partial claviculectomy (n = 7). CONCLUSION: Satisfactory clinical and functional results can be achieved following partial or total claviculectomy without reconstruction, with a low complication rate and acceptable mid- to long-term function.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Denosumab enables joint-sparing surgery (curettage) and surgical downstaging in patients with giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB), where joint preservation is not possible. However, denosumab treatment causes osteosclerosis of the lesion, making it difficult to curet the lesion, leaving the tumour behind, and increasing the local recurrence rate. We performed a three-centre retrospective study to investigate the postoperative local re-recurrence rate, joint preservation status, and functional outcomes of locally recurrent lesions after preoperative denosumab treatment and curettage in patients with difficult joint preservation. METHODS: We included 38 of 142 patients with primary GCTB of the extremities who underwent preoperative denosumab and curettage between 2009 and 2021 with local recurrence. Preoperative denosumab was indicated in patients with minimal residual periarticular and subchondral bones, large extraosseous lesions (Campanacci stage 3), and pathological fractures that made joint preservation difficult. RESULTS: Local re-recurrence occurred in 6 (15.8%) of the 38 patients. In 29 patients who underwent re-curettage, local re-recurrence occurred in six patients (20.7%); however, in nine patients who underwent en bloc resection, no local re-recurrence was observed. The joint preservation rate was 63.2% (24 of 38 patients), with a median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score of 28 (interquartile range: 26.8-29.0). The median follow-up period after surgery for local recurrence was 63.5 months (interquartile range: 42.5-82.4). CONCLUSION: Since the local re-recurrence rate after re-curettage for local recurrence was low, and the joint preservation rate and affected limb function were good, preoperative denosumab administration may be considered in patients who require downstaging to maintain good limb function (joint preservation).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIMS: Osteoarticular reconstruction of the distal femur in childhood has the advantage of preserving the tibial physis. However, due to the small size of the distal femur, matching the host bone with an osteoarticular allograft is challenging. In this study, we compared the outcomes and complications of a resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composite (rAPC) with those of an osteoarticular allograft to reconstruct the distal femur in children. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 33 skeletally immature children with a malignant tumour of the distal femur, who underwent resection and reconstruction with a rAPC (n = 15) or osteoarticular allograft (n = 18), was conducted. The median age of the patients was ten years (interquartile range (IQR) 9 to 11) in the osteoarticular allograft group and nine years (IQR 8 to 10) in the rAPC group (p = 0.781). The median follow-up of the patients was seven years (IQR 4 to 8) in the osteoarticular allograft group and six years (IQR 3 to 7) in the rAPC group (p = 0.483). Limb function was evaluated using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score. RESULTS: At final follow-up, the knee was unstable in 9/18 patients (50%) in the osteoarticular allograft group and 2/15 patients (13%) in the rAPC group (p = 0.026). The median range of motion (ROM) of the knee was 117° (IQR 115° to 120°) in the osteoarticular allograft group and 100° (IQR 95° to 105°) in the rAPC group (p < 0.001). The median MSTS score was 25 (IQR 23 to 26) in the osteoarticular allograft group and 28 (IQR 26 to 29) in the rAPC group (p = 0.007). Osteoarthritic change was detected in 11/18 patients (61%) in the osteoarticular allograft group and in 4/15 (26%) patients in the rAPC group (p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: In our series, a resurfaced allograft-prosthesis composite provided better knee stability and function, with a lower rate of osteoarthritis; an osteoarticular allograft was associated with better knee ROM.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(10):1174-1179.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

En bloc resection is typically performed to treat giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB), particularly when curettage can be challenging owing to extensive bone cortex destruction with soft tissue extension. Few reports have addressed the clinical outcomes after reoperation for local recurrence in patients with GCTB who underwent en bloc resection. In this multicenter retrospective study, we investigated local recurrence, distant metastasis, malignant transformation, mortality, and limb function in patients treated for local recurrence following en bloc resection for GCTB. Among 205 patients who underwent en bloc resection for GCTB of the extremities between 1980 and 2021, we included 29 with local recurrence. En bloc resection was performed for large tumors with soft tissue extension, pathological fractures with joint invasion, complex fractures, and dispensable bones, such as the proximal fibula and distal ulna. Local re-recurrence, distant metastasis, malignant transformation, and mortality rates were 41.4% (12/29), 34.5% (10/29), 6.9% (2/29), and 6.9% (2/29), respectively. The median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 26 (interquartile range, 23-28). The median follow-up period after surgery for local recurrence was 70.1 months (interquartile range, 40.5-123.8 months). Local recurrence following en bloc resection for GCTB could indicate an aggressive GCTB, necessitating careful follow-up.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIMS: Giant cell tumours (GCTs) of the proximal femur are rare, and there is no consensus about the best method of filling the defect left by curettage. In this study, we compared the outcome of using a fibular strut allograft and bone cement to reconstruct the bone defect after extended curettage of a GCT of the proximal femur. METHODS: In a retrospective study, we reviewed 26 patients with a GCT of the proximal femur in whom the bone defect had been filled with either a fibular strut allograft (n = 12) or bone cement (n = 14). Their demographic details and oncological and nononcological complications were retrieved from their medical records. Limb function was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 116 months (SD 59.2; 48 to 240) for the fibular strut allograft group and 113 months (SD 43.7; 60 to 192) for the bone cement group (p = 0.391). The rate of recurrence was not significantly different between the two groups (25% vs 21.4%). The rate of nononcological complications was 16.7% in the strut allograft group and 42.8% in the bone cement group. Degenerative joint disease was the most frequent nononcological complication in the cement group. The mean MSTS score of the patients was 92.4% (SD 11.5%; 73.3% to 100.0%) in the fibular strut allograft group and 74.2% (SD 10.5%; 66.7% to 96.7%) in the bone cement group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Given the similar rate of recurrence and a lower rate of nononcological complications, fibular strut grafting could be recommended as a method of reconstructing the bone defect left by curettage of a GCT of the proximal femur. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(2):297-301.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIMS: The primary objective of this study was to compare the postoperative infection rate between negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and conventional dressings for closed incisions following soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) surgery. Secondary objectives were to compare rates of adverse wound events and functional scores. METHODS: In this prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled trial (RCT), patients were randomized to either NPWT or conventional sterile occlusive dressings. A total of 17 patients, with a mean age of 54 years (21 to 81), were successfully recruited and none were lost to follow-up. Wound reviews were undertaken to identify any surgical site infection (SSI) or adverse wound events within 30 days. The Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score were recorded as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). RESULTS: There were two out of seven patients in the control group (28.6%), and two out of ten patients in the intervention group (20%) who were diagnosed with a SSI (p > 0.999), while one additional adverse wound event was identified in the control group (p = 0.593). No significant differences in PROMs were identified between the groups at either 30 days (TESS, p = 0.987; MSTS, p = 0.951) or six-month (TESS, p = 0.400) follow-up. However, neoadjuvant radiotherapy was significantly associated with a SSI within 30 days of surgery, across all patients (p = 0.029). The mean preoperative modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) was also significantly higher among patients who developed a postoperative adverse wound event (p = 0.028), including a SSI (p = 0.008), across both groups. CONCLUSION: This is the first RCT comparing NPWT with conventional dressings following musculoskeletal tumour surgery. Postoperative wound complications are common in this group of patients and we observed an overall SSI rate of 23.5%. We propose proceeding to a multicentre trial, which will help more clearly define the role of closed incision NPWT in STS surgery. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(12):1049-1056.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Primary soft tissue malignancies of the forearm constitute up to 24% of soft tissue extremity malignancies and present a difficult problem when attempting to preserve both life and forearm function. As described by Enneking, recurrence and metastasis are the two largest contributors to morbidity and mortality and therefore, the primary consideration must be to excise the entire tumor. However, since limb salvage is the preferred treatment over amputation in 95% of cases, many physicians elect to perform marginal resections over wide resections in the attempt to increase functional outcomes. Our study aimed to compare recurrence rates and forearm functional outcomes between these groups to better guide clinical decision making. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the difference in recurrence rates between wide resection of the tumor and marginal resection? (2) Between wide and marginal resection groups, what is the functional difference as measured by MSTS functional outcome scores? The purpose of our study was to answer these two questions and better understand if marginal resection yielded better results compared to wide resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Following IRB approval, we conducted a retrospective case series between 1999 and 2019. Included in the study were patients with a primary malignancy in the predetermined borders of the forearm with a minimum of two-year follow up post-operatively. All patients in the study were operated on by physicians in the Southern California Kaiser Permanente system. Thirty-one patients met criteria for the study. Recurrence rates and metastatic disease was determined through serial history and physical examination, with patients undergoing magnetic resonance (MRI) imaging of the affected area and computed tomography (CT) of the chest every 6 months for the first 2 years, and every 12 months for the following 3 years. MSTS scores were obtained in subsequent follow-ups following the guidelines set by the MSTS scoring system. RESULTS: Of the 31 patients evaluated, 4 (12.9%) had recurrence and 2 (6.5%) had signs of metastasis. Between the marginal excision and wide excision groups, all 4 recurrences happened in the marginal excision group and none occurred in the wide excision group. In addition, in the pathology report, excisions with 0.1 cm margins or less on any side had 3 instances of recurrence (31%) whereas there was only 1 recurrence (4.8%) outside of this group. MSTS scores for both wide excision and marginal excision were within 1 point with average scores being 26 and 26.9, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the literature, our study found that closer surgical margins lead to higher rates of recurrence due to the increased likelihood of aberrant tumor. However, when looking at functional outcome scores, we found minimal benefit in marginal resections compared to wide resections. The lack of MSTS score difference between both groups highlighted that the perceived benefit of choosing a marginal resection over wide excision may be nominal at best. Therefore, we recommend performing an additional intraoperative resection on narrow margins to reduce the chance of recurrence. Of note, clinical discernment in the form of preserving valuable neurovascular structures such as the median nerve should still be an important consideration.

RESUMEN

Amputation still considered as primary choice of malignancy treatment in distal tibia. Bone recycling with liquid nitrogen for reconstruction following resection of malignant bone tumours offers many advantages. We presented four patients with osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, adamantinoma and recurrent giant cell tumour over distal tibia. All of the patients underwent wide excision and bone recycling using liquid nitrogen as bone reconstruction. The mean functional Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 75% with no infection and local recurrent. The reconstruction provides good local control and functional outcome.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the survival rate and functional outcome of skeletal stabilisation in patients with metastatic bone disease. METHODS: The retrospective study was conducted at Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, and comprised data of patients with non-spinal metastatic bone disease managed surgically from January 2002 to December 2010. All patients had been managed by experienced orthopaedic, oncology and multidisciplinary teams. Patients managed by non-oncologic orthopaedic surgeons were excluded. The prognostic influence of clinical, pathological and treatment variables on Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score, range of motion, local complications and death rate were measured. SPSS 19 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Of the 49 patients whose records were included in the study, 21(42.9%) males and 28(57.1%) females with an overall median age of 59 years. Most common primary tumour site was breast in 15(3.8%) followed by lungs in 11(22.4%), Open reduction and internal fixation was the mpst commonly used procedure in 18(36.7%) patients. Mean duration of follow-up was 30.20±29.2 SD months (range: 10-48 months). The median patient survival was 23 months. 23% patients have superficial surgical site infection. Mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 23.73±14.3 SD. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm the principle that surgery for metastatic disease is done primarily to improve quality of life and ambulation status, and to alleviate pain.