RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little research has been done on the follow-up of patients in the active phase of treatment in primary care. This study aimed to build up a corpus of authentic clinical situations and carry out an inductive analysis of the data. METHOD: Research in two stages: case study and qualitative analysis of verbatims. The authors conducted individual interviews using an interview guide. The questions targeted their experiences, focusing on their relationship with their general practitioner. RESULTS: Six themes were identified. The announcement of the diagnosis was a key moment. Patients emphasised their general practitioner's responsiveness and coordination, and stressed his involvement. They consulted him regularly during the active phase of treatment, and asked for information. They felt confident. The need to facilitate access to the general practitioner was noted, particularly in the event of a real or perceived emergency. DISCUSSION: The increase in the prevalence and incidence of cancer means that general practitioners need to be heavily involved. The authorities are advocating a strengthening of the general practitioner's "pivotal role", without clearly defining it. A perceived lack of skills may be an obstacle to general practitioner involvement. Training in cancer during the 3rd cycle of general medical studies is inadequate. By compiling and analysing a corpus of cases, it would be possible to redefine the training objectives and list the skills required to manage cancer patients.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Physical activity is a major determinant in the prevention of chronic diseases, equally on the side effects of treatments and the consequences of the disease. It improves quality of life, but also reduces morbidity and mortality, and therefore health expenses. A sedentary lifestyle is the fourth cause of premature death in the world, in the context of chronic non-communicable diseases. In France, the prescription for adapted physical activity (APA) has been included in the law since 2016. With the development of "Maisons Sport santé", the Onco'sport program was developed to enable people affected by cancer to participate in adapted physical activity. The objective of our work is to explore the lived experience of cancer patients practicing adapted physical activity as part of the Onco'sport program. METHODS: This is a qualitative study of 10 semi-directed individual interviews with patients participating in the Onco'sport program, recruited from the "Maison Sport Santé" from Nîmes and the association "Les Roses du Gard". A phenomenological analysis was carried out with a semiopragmatic approach. RESULTS: For all participants, the APA through a program provides professional supervision of Physical Activity, influences adherence and builds confidence. This program is at the origin of changes in lifestyle habits and improves the relationship with illness and their cancer thanks to the physical and psychological benefits felt. Thus, APA appears as a full-fledged supportive care which requires informing patients and promoting it so that access is facilitated and becomes a standard. Health professionals including general practitioners do not currently have an important place in the promotion of APA, and patients most often obtain documentation on their own or through associations of patient. CONCLUSION: An APA program like Onco'sport is often the cause of a return to physical activity in patients, brings overall well-being and changes lifestyle habits. It seems important to promote physical activity to patients but also to the general population, given the benefits. This promotion involves easier access to this type of supervised program, financial support and better training of health professionals.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In Mayotte, cervical cancer represents the second cause of cancer mortality in women. Vaccination coverage against papillomavirus and screening rates are difficult to quantify but among the lowest in France. Added to this is an under-calibrated health system, which does not allow optimal treatment of cancers on site. The objective of the study was to study the elements that would increase papillomavirus vaccination among general practitioners. METHODS: We carried out a qualitative study of phenomenological inspiration using semi-directed open interviews. The target population was private general practitioners based in Mayotte. The analysis was done by coding verbatim statements, from which emerged general themes, to build a model. RESULTS: Twenty-two interviews were conducted. Vaccination was part of a context and was organized around the trio doctor-patient-institutions. The main pillar to vaccination was information, which could concern doctors or patients. The information delivered to patients through the media, campaigns in schools, and vaccination obligation were the main elements. The study revealed positive emotional dynamics of on-site HPV vaccination. CONCLUSION: This study made it possible to better understand the ecosystem in which papillomavirus vaccination takes place in Mayotte, and to identify elements of vaccination promotion. Vaccination school campaigns should keep going on to increase vaccination uptake.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Internal medicine departments manage patients referred by emergency departments or private practitioners. Considering the overcrowding of emergency departments and lack of beds for inpatients, this specialty must be part of an "ambulatory shift", particularly by strengthening the links between community and hospital medicine. Our objective was to evaluate a new care pathway in internal medicine at Nîmes university hospital. METHODS: Our department has developed the RAPIDO project (Réseau d'Aide à la PrIse en Charge Diagnostique et d'Orientation). The referring general practitioner contacts a senior internist on a dedicated phone line. After careful evaluation, he may offer a consultation within 15 days. A summary report is then given to the patient. RESULTS: Between November 2020 and November 2021, 254 patients were seen via RAPIDO. The average call-consultation time period was 6.4 (±4.5) days, for symptoms lasting for 2 weeks to 3 months in 43% (n=109) of cases. The reason for the call was a suspicion of systemic disease in 28% of cases (n=84), or a dysfunction of an organ in 16%. A diagnosis was made in 89% of cases. The budget of the whole procedure was balanced. CONCLUSION: A quick internal medicine consultation pathway for general practitioners seems to be a relevant, feasible and economically viable healthcare trajectory, which can be transposed to any type of healthcare institution, as soon as sufficient human resources are dedicated.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) affect 5 to 15% of the population. Improved management largely depends on early detection in primary care. A screening tool was developed by an expert consensus and its use has been recommended since 2019. This tool has never been evaluated to date. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and factors associated with the identification of neurodevelopmental disorders in primary care in children aged 6 months to 5 years. METHOD: This work is a multicentric observational study carried out in general practice in two regions of France: Île-de-France and Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with the presence of abnormal signs on the grid. RESULTS: Five hundred and sixty-four (564) children aged 6 months to 4 years were included. The prevalence of children identified on the grid was 3.9%. The factors associated with the neurodevelopmental disorders identified in multivariate analysis were: low socio-professional status of the mother, male gender and parental concern about the child's neurodevelopment. Factors associated with identifying a developmental trajectory gap were male gender (OR = 2.10 (1.22-3.62)) and low socio-professional status of the mother (OR = 2.23 [1.05-4.70]). CONCLUSION: This original work allowed us to carry out first-line testing of a tool for the identification of NDD in primary care and to evaluate the prevalence of identification of these disorders. A complementary cohort study will be necessary to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of this identification tool.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in France, and the second regarding mortality with almost 17,100 deaths each year. When screened at an early stage, the five-year survival is around 90 %. Since 2008, a screening program has been introduced in France with the fecal occult blood test. Ten years later, the targeted participation for the screening program is at least 45 % when the actual French average participation is around 30,2 %. We tried to find an efficient way to help general practitioners to recognise patients that did not do the test with a pop-up alert in their informatics files. We built our prospective study in a health center in Val d'Oise (France). We randomized 2230 patients in two equal groups, one control at one with the alert in files. We controlled the patients' status each month for 6 months. At the end of study, 152 (13,6 %) patients did the test in the control group and 179 (16 %) in the intervention group. In intention to treat, we found no difference between the two groups (P=0.11). Multivariate analysis proved that consulting their general practitioner enhanced participation (P=0.02). We showed the positive influence of a consultation with the general practitioner who can improve participation for this screening program. Our study was certainly too short in time and with a too small sample to prove a significant difference, and more investigation could confirm our hypothesis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this work is to assess the impact of a simulation session on the ability of pharmacy and medicine students in general practice to communicate in the resolution of patient-facing situations. METHODS: The evaluation of the impact of the session on the representation of the professions used a questionnaire to be completed before and after the session by the students. The evaluation of the impact of the session on the perception of communication and associated skills was based on an audio recording of the debriefings, which, after transcription and thematic analysis, was used as a preliminary analysis for the drafting of a questionnaire proposed the following year. This questionnaire focused on the issues of interprofessional communication and on the seminar process. RESULTS: During the 2018 and 2019 seminars, 518 students attended, 39% were pharmacy students (n=201) and 61% were medical students (n=317). The majority of medical students initially responded that physician-pharmacist communication was confraternal and rare. More pharmacy students felt that the quality of the physician-pharmacist relationship was poor. However, there was a marked improvement for all students on this aspect of communication after the seminar. Both groups also generally agreed that this relationship could be improved. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation shows that an interprofessional simulation program improves the ability of pharmacy and general practice students to communicate in patient-facing situations.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to assess the level of stigmatisation of psychiatric patients by medical interns specialising in general practice (GP), and to assess the influencing factors of stigmatisation. METHODS: A national survey was carried out among interns in general practice (GP) contacted through their local associations from December 10, 2019 to March 9, 2020. An online questionnaire was diffused. The validated French version of the Mental Illness Clinicians' Attitudes (MICA) was used to measure stigmatising attitudes towards psychiatry and persons with psychiatric disorder by the interns. This 16-item scale is designed to measure attitudes of health care professionals towards people with mental illness with scores ranging from 16 to 96 (the most stigmatizing). Several covariates were collected: socio-demographics, personal experiences with mental health, and mental health trainings during medical studies. All questionnaires were strictly anonymized. Comparative analyses of the MICA score by group were performed using Student's tests. RESULTS: A total of 389 interns responded. The majority of respondents were female (n=277; 71%) and the mean age was 27years [standard deviation (SD)±2.39]. The mean MICA rate was 40.64 (SD±8.09) for a neutral score of 56, reflecting low overall stigmatizing attitudes. MICA scores were significantly lower among female interns (40.11 vs. 41.95; P=0.042), those who had benefited from personal psychological or psychiatric support (38.70 vs. 41.61; P=0.001), and those who had completed a psychiatric externship (39.47 vs. 42.16; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: GP interns had an attitude that is generally not very stigmatizing even if its improvement should still be sought. This is particularly verified among those who have completed a psychiatric internship during their externship. This suggested association should be supported by other studies. The stakes are high for the future management of patients since stigmatisation by a physician is strongly implied in the worse healthcare management of patients with psychiatric disorders, leading them to a shorter lifespan.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The general practitioner (GP) might offer a good alternative for the management of certain ophthalmologic emergencies in his or her practice, given the increasing demand for ophthalmological care and difficulties with access to ophthalmologists. The main objective of the study was to describe ophthalmological complaints and their management in general emergency departments compared to ophthalmological emergency departments in order to assess which pathologies can be treated by the GP. This was a single-center retrospective study at the University Hospital of Reims, based on consultation data from the general and ophthalmological emergency departments for all adult patients presenting for an ophthalmological problem in September 2019 and September 2020. Consultations where patients were brought back following a first emergency consultation and consultations for another non-ophthalmological reason were excluded. Out of 1360 consultations recorded, 16% of patients had initially consulted their GP. The 4 most frequent diagnoses were: "ocular trauma," "conjunctivitis," "eye pain" and "visual impairment." A prescription for medication was issued in 77% of cases, 37% of which were for antibiotics. Only 29% of consultations carried out in general emergency departments led to a request for a complementary ophthalmology consultation. The GP might therefore be able to manage certain ophthalmological emergencies in his or her practice as a first line and refer certain ophthalmologic emergencies. However, the training of GPs in this specialty must be reinforced in collaboration with ophthalmologists.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In 2015, the French Association of Urology, by the male lower urinary tract symptoms Committee, published a practices guideline for the management of prostatic hyperplasia in general practice. Five years after the publication of these recommendation, our objective is to assess their dissemination and their impact in general practice. MATERIAL: A specially designed questionnaire was distributed online via the departmental councils of the order and to all regional unions of liberal doctors. The distribution to general practitioners was at the discretion of each organisation depending on local policies. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty responses were collected. Fifty-five percent of the population was female. 83 % of the general practitioners did not report having knowledge of the practice guideline. 77 % of doctors stated that they had not received training or information on prostatic hyperplasia in the past 5 years. Among the notable results, 51 % of general practitioners declared performing a digital rectal examination. 44 % prescribed an endorectal ultrasound. Only 7 % of doctors were aware of the existence of minimally invasive surgical techniques. CONCLUSION: The practices guideline for the management of prostatic hyperplasia in general practice proposed in 2015 by the male lower urinary tract symptoms Committee seems to be little known by general practitioners. Dissemination of these recommendations solely through publication in Progrès en Urologie seems ill-suited to consideration by general practitioners, and it seems necessary to consider other modes of dissemination. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4, grade C.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of the practices and knowledge of general practitioners in the south of France regarding the diagnosis and management of endometriosis. METHOD: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among general practitioners in the south of France from November 14, 2021 to February 14, 2022. A questionnaire was developed in consultation with and validated by two university endometriosis reference services of the AP-HM and was sent to general practitioners practicing in the south of France. It was distributed via professional emails, care networks and the south of France's medical order. The questionnaire was divided into three parts: the first simply collected demographic and epidemiological data, the second assessed knowledge of the disease, and the last assessed individual practices. The primary endpoint was the percentage of practitioners with>75% correct responses. RESULTS: 133 general practitioners responded to the questionnaire (133/407, 32.1%). 60.2% performed more than one gynecological consultation per week. 61.7% obtained a rate of correct answers>75%. The general practitioners with the best response rates were more aware of the latest HAS guidelines (P=0.027) and performed gynecological consultations more regularly in the office (P=0.025). Intense dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain and deep dyspareunia were considered as evocative by 98.1%, 95.5% and 95.5% of respondents respectively. On the other hand, uro-digestive disorders were not often mentioned. In case of suspicion of endometriosis on questioning, 54.9% of general practitioners performed a clinical gynaecological examination. 76.7% prescribed an imaging test and 32.3% introduced hormonal treatment during the consultation. Referral of patients to specialists was made by the general practitioner as soon as clinical suspicion arose for 36.8%. CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggest that the knowledge and practices of general practitioners, performing gynecology consultations in the south of France, is perfectible. In the context of the announcement of a regional reorganization of endometriosis-related care, other similar studies should be conducted regularly in order to assess the evolution of general practitioner's practices.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Respiratory rehabilitation (RR) is a global and interdisciplinary approach designed to improve quality of life of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In France, however it is prescribed in only 10 % of eligible cases. The aim of this study was to find out why general practitioners so seldom include RR in their patient care. METHODS: Semi-structured and individual interviews were conducted between April and July 2018 with general practitioners working in the Upper-Rhine region (France). Verbatims were coded using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen interviews were conducted. Lack of expert knowledge, available time, and adequate means emerged as the main reasons for not including RR in patient care. General practitioners also described complicated emotional relationships with COPD patients, and admitted to an occasional sense of fatalism or powerlessness. At times they projected these feelings onto their patients, perceiving them as devoid of motivation or compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Negative perceptions of patients and their disease represent an obstacle to optimal COPD management, especially when referring them to RR. Improved medical expertise and comprehension of patients' coping mechanisms would enable general practitioners to better adapt their management, of which motivational interviewing could become a key component.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Nearly 800,000 people die by suicide each year worldwide. Up to 75% of suicidal patients consulted their general practitioner in the months preceding their attempt. A study, conducted among 167 practitioners in Champagne-Ardenne in 2016-2017, aims to evaluate the practices of general practitioners in the management of suicidal crisis, particularly according to the age of the patient. It provides elements for reflection on their role in suicide prevention.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: General practitioners are the first prescribers of speech therapy in France, a country in which speech therapists can practice only on medical prescription. The objective of this study was to measure general practioner's knowledge on means of prescribing speech therapy. METHOD: Cross-sectional study by self-questionnaires for general practitioners and residents in general practice in France. The test assessed five types of knowledge conducive to correct prescription of speech therapy: requirements for prescription, indications, prescription wording, ages of treatment eligibility, and reimbursement. The questionnaires were tested on an expert population, whose median score was used as a cut-off to separate doctors who knew the modalities of speech therapy prescription from those whose knowledge was insufficient. The characteristics differentiating the two groups were compared by multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Five hundred and three general practitioners and five hundred and two residents in general medicine were included; 82.3% of the physicians having written a thesis and 86.2% of the residents had insufficient knowledge of the modalities of speech therapy prescription. Age, number of years since acquisition of a medical diploma and urban practice all had a negative impact on general practitioners' knowledge of speech therapy. CONCLUSION: French general practitioners' knowledge of speech therapy prescription seems insufficient. It is consequently necessary to improve the initial and continuing training of doctors. Collaborative work between general practitioners and speech therapists should be carried on, developed and strengthened.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Medical opinion leaders represent a marketing tool whose effectiveness is well documented in France and worldwide. They are less distrusted than pharmaceutical representatives, but this trust declines when they declare their ties. In France, the public database "Transparence-Santé" presents the financial ties of each professional with the health industries since 2012. These ties must be declared at the beginning of any public intervention since 2002 to improve the transparency of healthcare stakeholders. OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the compliance with the obligation to disclose conflicts of interests at the Congress of General Medicine France 2020. Its secondary objective was to assess the financial ties of French physicians attending the congress using the data listed in "Transparence-Santé" through the Eurosfordocs project. METHOD: Prospective cross-sectional observational study of all the interventions available on the congress' internet platform. All speakers, making either an oral or a written and commented presentation, who must declare their conflicts of interest, were included. A descriptive analysis of "Transparence-Santé" data was carried out for the doctors attending the congress. RESULTS: Among 253 interventions, 34% complied with the disclosure requirement. The doctors participating in symposiums links of interests represented 92% of the global amount of congress' links of interests, with an average of 11,2k€/year, significantly higher than the 126€/year of other physicians. CONCLUSION: The legal obligation to declare one's conflict of interest at congresses is little respected in France. Involvement of the organizers and using pre-established disclosure formats would improve transparency. It is necessary to develop the independence of speakers to improve research and medical expertise.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Involuntary psychiatric hospitalization (IPH) is a heavy and complex psychiatric exception measure. In the Seine-Saint-Denis department (low medical density), the evaluation of the patient in psychiatric decompensation is the responsibility of the out-of-hours general practitioners (GP) mandated by the call center. Their feeling is the non-achievement of the procedure once the patient arrives at the emergency room. We aimed to evaluate the outcome of patients following a request for IPH from these GP. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study based on all requests for IPH received during 2016 at the Seine-Saint-Denis emergency medical call center. The characteristics of the call and the patient, as well as the decisions of the regulator and the GP were collected. The decision of hospitalization in the emergency room was sought for patients referred for IPH. RESULTS: Of the 7541 calls for decompensation, 539 were for an IPH. These calls occurred during non-working hours in 55 % of cases. A GP was involved in more than two-thirds of the cases and requested an IPH for 240/304 (79 %) patients. Patients were male in 56 % of cases with an average age of 40 (±16) years. IPH was confirmed for 132 (61 %) patients. This rate did not differ from the 65 % reported in the literature (Z-test, P=0.26). Voluntary hospitalization was performed for 37 (17 %) other patients. DISCUSSION: The IPH rate for patients referred by GP mandated by the call center was comparable to that following the requests of the attending physicians, validating their intervention in this critical context.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Inhaled drug delivery is the cornerstone treatment for asthma. General practitioners (GPs) have a key role for educating patient about how to use their inhalers. The purpose of this study was to find out whether GPs know how to use the inhalers they usually prescribe. METHOD: This was a descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study among GPs from the Paris metropolitan area. GPs had to choose the inhalers they usually prescribe and then demonstrate their use. The technique of use was assessed using a scale specific to each type of inhaler. Overall success was defined by the use of prescribed inhalers without critical errors. RESULTS: Thirty-seven GPs were recruited between July 2018 and July 2019. Nineteen GPs (51.4%) were able to use the inhalers they prescribed without critical errors. The success rate without critical error was better with the pressurized metered dose inhalers with spacer than with other inhalers. The overall success rate was better among GPs who had previously used an inhaler on a personal basis (OR 7.58 95%CI [1.86, 37.02]) or who had prescribed only one type of inhaler (OR 4,8 95%CI [1.21, 22.41]). CONCLUSION: Half of the GPs in our study did not know how to use the inhalers they prescribe and therefore may have difficulty educating their patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Faced with an aging French population, the demand for unscheduled care is growing. In order to avoid referring elderly patients to emergency departments, which are unsuitable for them, the Regional Health Agencies have created telephone hot lines dedicated to geriatrics. They are exclusively accessible to general practitioners in order to obtain advice or a place in a geriatric hospital. General practitioners are rarely asked about the value of this tool in their practice.

Asunto(s)