RESUMEN

Introdução: A lombalgia é uma condição prevalente e que apresenta importante impacto na capacidade funcional e na qualidade de vida, sendo a sua correta abordagem na Atenção Primária à Saúde fundamental para a identificação e o estabelecimento de um diagnóstico etiológico precoce de possíveis patologias que possam estar relacionadas a desfechos mórbidos e a graves limitações funcionais. Apresentação do caso: Paciente de 56 anos, sexo masculino, hipertenso, foi encaminhado para serviço especializado de reumatologia com histórico de lombalgia havia mais de 20 anos. Ao exame físico foi constatada presença de deformidades da coluna vertebral e extensa limitação de movimentos. Exames radiográficos mostravam esclerose de articulações sacroilíacas, osteopenia difusa e coluna vertebral em aspecto de "bambu". Conclusões: Constata-se a importância de que na abordagem das lombalgias na atenção primária se busque o reconhecimento de possíveis etiologias graves e potencialmente incapacitantes que possam estar subjacentes à queixa de dor lombar. Com esse objetivo, é fundamental o reconhecimento das chamadas red flags relacionadas às lombalgias, além de sua caracterização como mecânica ou inflamatória. Perante a atuação da atenção primária no oferecimento de um cuidado pautado na integralidade e na prevenção de agravos, reafirma-se a importância de uma avaliação clínica pormenorizada das lombalgias nesse nível de atenção à saúde.

Introduction: Low back pain is a prevalent condition that has an important impact on functional capacity and quality of life, and its correct approach in Primary Care is fundamental to the identification and establishment of an early etiological diagnosis of possible pathologies that may be related to outcomes morbid conditions and serious functional limitations. Case presentation: 56-year-old male patient, hypertensive, referred to a specialized rheumatology service with a history of low back pain for over 20 years. Physical examination revealed the presence of spinal deformities and extensive movement limitations. Radiographic examinations showing sclerosis of the sacro-iliac joints, diffuse osteopenia and a "bamboo" appearance of the spine. Conclusions: It is important that in the approach of low back pain in Primary Care, we seek to recognize possible serious and potentially disabling etiologies that may underlie the complaint of low back pain. For that, it is essential to recognize the so-called "red flags" related to low back pain, in addition to its characterization as mechanical or inflammatory. Given the role of Primary Care in offering care based on integrality and in the prevention of injuries, the importance of a detailed clinical assessment of low back pain at this level of health care is reaffirmed.

Introducción: La lumbalgia es una patología prevalente que tiene un impacto importante en la capacidad funcional y la calidad de vida, y su correcto abordaje en Atención Primaria de Salud es fundamental para la identificación y establecimiento de un diagnóstico etiológico precoz de posibles patologías que puedan estar relacionadas con los resultados, condiciones morbosas y limitaciones funcionales graves. Presentación del caso: Paciente masculino de 56 años, hipertenso, remitido a servicio especializado de reumatología con antecedentes de dolor lumbar de más de 20 años. El examen físico reveló la presencia de deformidades de la columna y amplias limitaciones de movimiento. Los exámenes radiológicos muestran esclerosis de las articulaciones sacroilíacas, osteopenia difusa y una apariencia de "bambú" de la columna. Conclusiones: Es importante que al abordar la lumbalgia en Atención Primaria de Salud busquemos reconocer las posibles etiologías graves y potencialmente incapacitantes que pueden subyacer a la queja de lumbalgia. Con este objetivo, es fundamental reconocer las llamadas "banderas rojas" relacionadas con la lumbalgia, además de su caracterización como mecánica o inflamatoria. Dado el papel de Atención Primaria de Salud a la hora de ofrecer una atención basada en la integralidad y prevención de enfermedades, se reafirma la importancia de una evaluación clínica detallada de la lumbalgia en este nivel de atención sanitaria.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Cognitive functional therapy (CFT) is a person-centered biopsychosocial physiotherapy intervention that has recently demonstrated large, durable effects in reducing pain and disability in people with chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, exploration of the treatment process from the patients' perspectives, including the process of gaining control and agency over CLBP, is relatively understudied in this patient population. This qualitative study explored the experiences of eight participants from the RESTORE trial through longitudinally following their experiences, including interviews during baseline, mid-treatment, end-treatment, and 12-month follow-up. Data were analyzed according to a narrative approach. Findings described the overarching narrative themes of "The Journey to Self-Management." Within this overarching narrative, four distinct narratives were identified, beginning with "Left High and Dry," capturing the experience of isolation and abandonment with CLBP before commencing CFT, and concluding with three narratives of the experience of CFT from the start of treatment through to the 12-month follow-up. These included "Plain, Smooth Sailing," describing a journey of relative ease and lack of obstacles; "Learning the Ropes and Gaining Sea Legs," capturing an iterative process of learning and negotiating setbacks; and "Sailing Through Headwinds," describing the experience of struggle to gain agency and control over CLBP through CFT. Clinicians treating individuals with CLBP can use these insights to more effectively facilitate self-management, and people living with CLBP may find resonance from the narrative themes to support their journeys.

RESUMEN

The smallest worthwhile effect (SWE) is the smallest beneficial effect of an intervention that justifies the costs, risks, and inconveniences. The objective is to establish the SWE of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) for the treatment of low back pain (LBP), and to gain insight into how different attributes of the treatment are traded among each other when choosing SMT. Part 1. A mixed-methods study will be conducted to establish and prioritize a list of attributes influencing choices for those who consider SMT for the treatment of LBP. Individual interviews and consensus groups with chiropractors, manual therapists, and osteopaths and their patients will be conducted. Interviews and consensus groups will be voice-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Part 2. A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) will be conducted among people with LBP who have limited to no experience with SMT. Participants will be recruited through an online independent panel company. The survey will consist of several choice sets with attributes and their levels established from Part 1. The DCE will be preceded by a short survey to understand the clinical aspects (i.e. presentation, history and previous treatment for LBP) as well as socio-demographic characteristics of the participants.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Low back pain is one of the most common reasons for loss of productivity. Herniated lumbar discs can often cause muscle weakness, reduced motor function, and change in walking capacity including foot drop and gait abnormalities like steppage gait. Case Report: Here, we present the case report of a 52-year-old shopkeeper who had been suffering from low back pain for 5 years along with a steppage gait since childhood, which had grossly affected his business as well as his quality of life. The patient did not want a surgical procedure. Conclusion: Given these conditions, we opined that minimally invasive pain and spine intervention procedures like transforaminal epidural neuroplasty along with cooled radiofrequency ablation of medial branches can be effective in managing back pain as well as improving the quality of life.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT) is recommended to provide risk-stratified care in low back pain (LBP), yet its predictive value is moderate for disability and low for pain severity. Assessment of human assumed central sensitisation (HACS) in conjunction with the SBT may improve its predictive accuracy. OBJECTIVES: To examine whether assessment of HACS in acute LBP improves the predictive accuracy of the SBT for LBP recovery at six months in people with acute non-specific LBP. DESIGN: A prospective longitudinal study. METHOD: Data were drawn from the UPWaRD study. One hundred and twenty people with acute non-specific LBP were recruited from the community. Baseline measures included SBT risk status, nociceptive flexor withdrawal reflex, pressure and heat pain thresholds and conditioned pain modulation. Primary outcome was the presence of LBP (pain numeric rating scale ≥1 and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire score ≥3) at six-month follow-up. Regression coefficients were penalised using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator technique to select predictor variables. Internal validation was performed using ten-fold cross-validation. RESULTS/FINDINGS: SBT risk status alone did not predict the presence of LBP at six months (area under receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.58). Adding measures of HACS to the SBT did not improve discrimination for whether LBP was present at six months (AUC = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the suboptimal predictive accuracy of the SBT, administered during acute LBP, for LBP recovery at six months. Assessment of HACS in acute LBP does not improve the predictive accuracy of the SBT.

RESUMEN

Introduction: During the COVID-19 Pandemic, the use of digital devices during work activities has increased with important re-percussions on the psychological and physical well-being of the employees. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of musculoskeletal and visual disorders related to the use of computers and home workstation. Methods: The study is a cross-sectional study. A checklist, from the National Institute of Health, was administered to white collar workers of a large international pharmaceutical company based in Italy. Results: Our study showed that postural breaks have a protective effect on neck/shoulder pain (OR 0.32, CI 0.16-0.62), back and lower extremity pain (OR 0.35, CI 0.18-0.69), and eye burning (OR 0.50, CI 0.27-0.94) of study participants. Conclusions: The research recommends that remote employees who often change their workstations should establish a suitable work environment and obtaining enough risk training from an occupational physician. This is essential for maintaining their mental and physical well-being.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Traditionally, a specific "core" exercise focus has been favoured for chronic low back pain (CLBP) which contrasts holistic exercise approaches. This study aims to explore the perceptions of exercise in people with CLBP and whether exercise itself can convey implicit messages regarding its use in CLBP management in the absence of a clinical narrative. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were asked about their CLBP history, views of exercise for CLBP, and current exercise behaviours through online semi-structured interviews. Then, participants watched the interviewer perform the deadlift, Jefferson curl, and bird dog and were asked if they thought each individual exercise was beneficial for CLBP, and why. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis through a critical realism and social constructivism lens. RESULTS: All participants (n = 16) viewed all exercises as beneficial for health and pain relief, but perceived efficacy varied. "Core" exercises were deemed crucial for CLBP relief, while spinal flexion and external load were often perceived as potentially injurious. Distrust towards healthcare practitioners also influenced exercise perceptions. CONCLUSION: People with CLBP perceive different exercises to either relieve pain or improve health. Healthcare practitioners can influence these perceptions, highlighting the need for consideration of exercise perceptions in clinical contexts.

Exercise itself can convey implicit messages to people with chronic low back pain irrespective of an accompanying clinical narrative.'Core' exercises are perceived as beneficial whereas exercises involving spinal flexion or loading may be perceived as dangerous.Exercise for reducing pain is perceived as distinctly different from gym related exercises or other exercises for improving health.Healthcare practitioners must consider their client's exercise perceptions when using exercise as an intervention for chronic low back pain.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a globally prevalent condition, often attributed to lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic discectomy (TPED) is a minimally invasive surgical approach for LDH, offering distinct advantages. This study aimed to assess the progression of pain in patients who underwent TPED in Kenya, with a focus on the impact of pre-existing factors. METHODS: This retrospective study included 610 patients from the Mediheal Group of Hospitals who underwent TPED between January 2018 and December 2022. Data were collected from medical records, direct patient interactions, and telephone interviews. Statistical analyses, including repeated measures analysis of variance, correlation coefficients, and t tests, were used to examine pain progression and factors influencing outcomes. RESULTS: Among the 610 included patients, all reported LBP and 87.9% reported leg pain. TPED resulted in significant pain reduction (P < 0.001) for both LBP and leg pain, with sustained improvement over 1 year. Factors such as age, body mass index, and duration of pain correlated with pain outcomes. No significant impact of comorbidities on pre- or postoperative pain was observed. Its retrospective design and the absence of a control group limit the strength of causal inferences. CONCLUSIONS: TPED is an effective treatment for LBP and leg pain in Kenyan patients with LDH. Pain improvement was sustained over 1 year after performing TPED, and pre-existing factors influenced outcomes. This study provides valuable insights into TPED outcomes, contributing to the understanding of LDH management in diverse populations.

RESUMEN

We present a case report of a patient suffering from chronic low back pain (CLBP) and chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP), both of which were caused and complicated by a physically demanding occupation, a history of mixed martial arts, and lumbar scoliosis. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and radiographic findings were observed following conservative spine rehabilitation. The patient, a 34-year-old male, had experienced chronic spine pain, particularly CLBP and CNSNP, for several years. He reported severe pain and increasing disability after a recent neck injury sustained while practicing jiu-jitsu. Radicular pain, along with numbness and tingling, was noted in the right upper extremity, extending to the first three digits, and there were also altered sensations and temperature changes in both feet. He described sharp, pinching mid-back pain and worsening disability due to the persistent pain, which led him to seek manual manipulative chiropractic spine therapy, though he reported little benefit from it. The patient had relied on over-the-counter pain medications for many years without achieving long-term pain and disability relief, and these medications were no longer used following treatment. Chiropractic BioPhysics® (CBP®) spinal structural rehabilitation protocols were used to improve coronal and sagittal balance, as well as paraspinal muscular strength, addressing posture, mobility, and related aspects. These protocols include postural exercises, postural Mirror Image® traction, and postural spinal manipulative therapy. All PROs improved, with a near resolution of all initial symptoms of chronic spine pain. Outcomes measured included disability indices and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) indicators. Radiographic parameter improvements were significant, demonstrating improved coronal and sagittal balance as a result of the treatment. Following 30 in-office treatments, administered three times per week for 10 weeks, initial outcomes were reassessed. The patient then received 13 in-office treatments periodically over one year, and all initial outcomes were repeated. The improvements remained stable over time. A 26-month follow-up found that the improvements were sustained over a very long period without additional treatment after the 13-month examination. Chronic spine pain, specifically CLBP and CNSNP, is a significant source of suffering and contributes substantially to the global burden of disease. Improvement in HRQoLs, PROs, and objective spine parameters are desirable clinical outcomes. Our case report documents objective improvement in lumbar scoliosis and spine pain, which is rare in conservative studies. This successful treatment of chronic pain with long-term follow-up contributes to the growing evidence supporting conservative, non-surgical treatments for CNSNP and CLBP. Successful management of chronic spine pain was observed in a patient undergoing CBP® treatment. The treatment was designed to address abnormal sagittal and coronal postural balance and radiographic abnormalities indicating spinal misalignment and reassess progress in PROs, as well as objective and subjective HRQoL measures, both following treatment and 13 months later. However, larger studies are needed to draw firm conclusions regarding the efficacy of this treatment for chronic pain.

RESUMEN

Purpose: To explore the combined effects of sleep disorders and depression on chronic low back pain (CLBP) in American adults. Material and methods: In this cross-sectional study, the data of all participants were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NAHNES) between 2009 and 2010. CLBP was defined as persistent LBP for a consecutive three-month period. Sleep disorders were self-reported and were diagnosed by a doctor before. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) was used to assess depressive symptoms by trained personnel. Potential covariates were selected using weighted univariate logistic regression models. Weighted univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate the separate and combined effects of sleep disorders and depression on CLBP, respectively. Results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Associations were further explored in the subgroups of age, chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes, and having pain outside the low back. Results: A total of 5275 participants were included. Among them, 542 (10.28%) had CLBP. The mean age of all participants was 47.19 (0.53), and 50.65% (n=2668) were female. Sleep disorder (OR=1.52, 95% CI: 1.17-1.98) or depressive symptoms (OR=3.06, 95% CI: 2.41-3.88) were associated with higher odds of CLBP. Compared to participants without sleep disorders and depression symptoms, participants in both conditions had an increased risk of CLBP (OR=3.95, 95% CI: 2.58-6.05, P for trend <0.001). The combined effects of sleep disorders and depressive symptoms were also found in the population aged <45 years, ≥45 years, with and without CKD, with and without diabetes, and no pain outside the low back. Conclusion: Sleep disorders and depressive symptoms may increase the odds of reporting CLBP. Further research is necessary to explore the effectiveness of multidisciplinary interventions targeting sleep disorders, depressive symptoms, and CLBP.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Global policy and guidelines for low back pain (LBP) management promote physical activity and self-management yet adherence is poor and a decline in outcomes is common following discharge from treatment. Health coaching is effective at improving exercise adherence, self-efficacy, and social support in individuals with chronic conditions, and may be an acceptable, cost-effective way to support people in the community following discharge from treatment for LBP. AIM: This qualitative study aimed to understand which aspects of a community over-the-phone health-coaching program, were liked and disliked by patients as well as their perceived outcomes of the service after being discharged from LBP treatment. METHODS: A purposive sampling approach was used to recruit 12 participants with chronic LBP, from a large randomised controlled trial, who were randomly allocated to receive a health coaching program from the Get Healthy Service® in Australia. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and a general inductive thematic analysis approach was taken. RESULTS: The main themes uncovered regarding the intervention included the positive and negative aspects of the health coaching service and the relationship between the participant and health coach. Specifically, the participants spoke of the importance of the health coach, the value of goal setting, the quality of the advice received, the benefits of feeling supported, the format of the coaching service, and LBP-specific knowledge. They also reported the health coach and the coaching relationship to be the primary factors influencing the program outcomes and the qualities of the coaching relationship they valued most were connection, communication, care, and competence. The sub-themes uncovered regarding the outcomes of the intervention included positive impacts (a greater capacity to cope, increased confidence, increased motivation and increased satisfaction) and negative impacts (receiving no personal benefit). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In an environment where self-management and self-care are becoming increasingly important, understanding the patient's experience as part of a coaching program is likely to lead to improved quality of health coaching care, more tailored service delivery and potentially more effective and cost-effective community-based care for individuals with chronic LBP in the community after being discharged from treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The GBTH trial was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620000889954) on 10/9/2020. Ethical approval was prospectively granted by the Western Sydney Local Health District Human Research and Ethics Committee (2020/ETH00115). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The relevant sponsor has reviewed the study protocol and consent form.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Lumbar facet joint arthropathy (LFJA) is a major cause of low back pain (LBP), with current treatments offering limited long-term benefits. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) show promise due to their immunomodulatory and trophic effects, potentially addressing underlying degenerative processes in LFJA. Objectives: This initial report describes the outcomes of the first treated patient in an ongoing mutidisciplinary phase 1 clinical trial evaluating the safety and feasibility of intra-articular allogeneic BM-MSCs for painful LFJA. Methods: Following enrollment in our IRB-approved protocol, symptomatic LFJA was confirmed through double blocks on L4 and L5 medial branches. Two 1-mL syringes, each containing 10 million BM-MSCs, were prepared in the cGMP facility and administered bilaterally to the patient's L4-L5 lumbar facet joints. The patient underwent standardized follow-ups, including clinical examinations and functional and imaging assessments for 2 years, utilizing patient-reported outcomes measurement information system-computer adaptive tests (PROMIS CATs), visual analogue scale, Oswestry disability index, work functional status and opioid pain medication use, and MR imaging Fenton-Czervionke score. Results: The patient tolerated the procedure well, with no drug-related adverse events during the study period. Pain, spine function, and work functional status improved at multiple follow-ups. This patient also reported improvements in mental and social health, along with a notable improvement in the grade of facet synovitis observed at the one-year follow-up MRI evaluation. Conclusions: This case report suggests the safety and feasibility of administering intra-articular allogeneic BM-MSCs, offering therapeutic benefits for pain management and functional activities.

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to identify prognostic factors, encompassing biomedical and psychosocial variables, linked to outcome of fusion surgery for chronic low back pain (CLBP) in single or two-level lumbar degenerative spinal disorders. Identifying these factors is crucial for decision making and therefore long-term treatment outcome. METHODS: A systematic search (PROSPERO ID: CRD4202018927) from January 2010 to October 2022 was conducted, utilizing Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR, CENTRAL). Prognostic factors associated with various outcomes, including functional status, back and leg pain, health-related quality of life, complications, return to work, and analgesic use, were assessed. Risk of bias was determined using QUIPS, and the quality of evidence was evaluated using GRADE approach. RESULTS: Of the 9852 initially screened studies, eleven studies (n = 16,482) were included in the analysis. In total, 161 associations were identified, with 67 prognostic factors showing statistical significance (P < 0.05). Thirty associations were supported by two or more studies, and only eight associations were eligible for meta-analyses: female gender remained statistically significant associated with decreased postoperative back pain, but negatively associated with complication rates and functional status, and smoking with increased postoperative back pain. CONCLUSION: Only female gender and smoking were consistently associated with outcome of fusion for CLBP. Most of the included studies exhibited low to moderate methodological quality, which may explain the relatively weak associations identified for the assessed prognostic factors.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Low back pain (LBP) is a widespread health problem that poses a severe economic burden on both affected patients and their societies. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between depression and low back pain among patients seen at an orthopedic clinic and examine the association with physical disability. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out in the orthopedic clinics of AlBadaya General Hospital in the Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia. All patients with LBP seen in the clinic between April and June 2024 were included in the study. A questionnaire was administered that collected demographic information, asked about medical history and behaviors, and administered the Arabic-validated version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; depression). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify correlates of depression. RESULTS: A total of 365 patients were included in the study. Age ranged between 18 and 85 years, with a mean of 47.9 years (55.6% female). The overall prevalence of depression was 56.2%, with 40.3% being mild, 13.2% being moderate, and 2.7% being moderately severe or severe. Patients with moderately severe/severe depression had the highest disability score, while those with no depression had the lowest disability score. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that with each unit increase in disability score, there was a 20% increase in depression (adjusted odds ratio = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.14-1.26, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Depression, although mostly mild, was common in this clinic sample of orthopedic patients with chronic LBP and was frequently associated with disability. Disability can be a serious complication of chronic LBP and is often closely linked with depression. As a result, patients with chronic LBP seen at orthopedic clinics in Saudi Arabia (and likely other Middle Eastern countries) should be screened for depression and managed appropriately.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between childhood physical activity enjoyment and current kinesiophobia among individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP), considering the mediating influence of adult physical activity. METHODS: We recruited 648 adults (474 males, 174 females) with CLBP through an online platform. Of these, 99.1% (n = 642) were aged 18-60 years, and 0.9% (n = 6) were older than 60 years. Childhood physical activity enjoyment was retrospectively assessed using a single-item question to gauge participants' enjoyment during primary school. Kinesiophobia was measured with the 11-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11), and physical activity was assessed focusing on walking, moderate, and vigorous physical activities. Age, sex, education, and income served as control variables in the analysis. RESULTS: A significant negative association was found between childhood physical activity enjoyment and adult kinesiophobia. Additionally, childhood physical activity enjoyment was positively associated with adult physical activity across the three types of physical activities. In the adjusted mediation model, walking was identified as the only statistically significant partial mediator. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight the long-term protective role of childhood physical activity enjoyment against the development of kinesiophobia in adulthood. Walking, in particular, holds unique therapeutic potential, emphasizing the importance of fostering physical activity enjoyment early in life for sustained physical activity and reduced risk of kinesiophobia among CLBP patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: The flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) is characterized by suddenly reduced paraspinal muscle activity during full flexion. Previous studies showed significant differences in FRP and flexion angles in chronic low back pain (cLBP) patients compared to individuals without back pain (no-BP). However, the relationship between FRP and flexion angles remains insufficiently understood in older populations. Thus, this study investigated the relationship between FRP and flexion angles concerning to the age and presence of cLBP. Methods: Forty no-BP subjects (20m/20f; mean age 41.5 years) and thirty-eight cLBP patients (19m/19f; mean age 43.52 years) performed maximum full upper body flexion task. Electromyographic (EMG) measurements were conducted to assess the activity of lumbar erector spinae (ESL), thoracic erector spinae (EST), and multifidus (MF). Lumbar, thoracic, and pelvic angles at the onset (OnsetL/T/P) and offset of the FRP (OffsetL/T/P) and maximum trunk inclination (MaxL/T/P) were calculated. The FRP was evaluated using a flexion relaxation ratio (FRR). Results: cLBP patients showed smaller FRR in MF and right ESL compared to no-BP individuals (p < 0.05), while no differences were found in flexion angles between two groups. Subjects over 40 showed smaller FRR in MF and ESL, and smaller flexion angles on OffsetL and MaxL (p < 0.05). Age-related analysis in the cLBP group revealed that patients over 40, compared to younger ones, had smaller FRR in MF and ESL, and smaller values in all thoracic and lumbar flexion angles (p < 0.05). While in no-BP group, significant larger flexion angles in OnsetL and OffsetT (p < 0.05) were observed in participants over 40. Pain-related analysis in the older group revealed that the cLBP patients, compared to no-BP individuals, had smaller FRR in right MF and right ESL, and smaller values in all lumbar and thoracic flexion angles (p < 0.05), while in younger group, there were no significant pain-related differences in FRR, with larger values in all lumbar flexion angles (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Our findings indicate a reduction or absence of FRP in cLBP patients compared to no-BP individuals, with age being a significant factor as those over 40 showed smaller FRP and flexion angles compared to younger individuals.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether somatisation, depression, anxiety, fatigue, coping dimensions, pain, physical and social function, or sociodemographic characteristics can differentiate fibromyalgia from low back pain in a cross-sectional cohort setting of our Zurzach Interdisciplinary Pain Programme. METHODS: Fibromyalgia and low back pain (not fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia) were compared using the Symptom Checklist-90R (SCL-90R) Somatisation scale, the Quantification Inventory for Somatoform Syndromes (QUISS) Number of somatoform symptoms, and other standardised instruments. Standardised mean differences (SMDs) quantified the score differences, and binomial logistic regression modelling with various co-variates differentiated fibromyalgia from low back pain. RESULTS: The largest differences indicating worse health in fibromyalgia (n = 131) were in somatisation (SCL-90R: SMD=-0.971, QUISS: SMD=-0.960), followed by affective health, pain and coping (SMDs between -0.632 and -0.280). Physical and social functioning were comparable in the two conditions (n = 262 low back pain). The two somatisation scales both with odds ratios (OR)=0.966 (p≤ 0.002) plus female sex (OR = 3.396, p< 0.001) predicted 74.3% of the cases correctly (accuracy) with a positive predictive value of 65.3% and a specificity of 87.0% for fibromyalgia. In the female subsample (n = 280), the model remained stable with an accuracy of 71.9%. CONCLUSION: Somatisation stood out from all other somatic, psychosocial, and coping dimensions and sociodemographics as the one significant specific predictor distinguishing fibromyalgia from low back pain. The fibromyalgia phenotype is characterised by the generalisation of painful loci but equally prominently by generalised somatoform symptoms. Assessment of somatisation is recommended to ensure accurate identification and understanding of the multifaceted syndrome of fibromyalgia.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and readability of the answers generated by large language model (LLM)-chatbots to common patient questions about low back pain (LBP). METHODS: This cross-sectional study analysed responses to 30 LBP-related questions, covering self-management, risk factors and treatment. The questions were developed by experienced clinicians and researchers and were piloted with a group of consumer representatives with lived experience of LBP. The inquiries were inputted in prompt form into ChatGPT 3.5, Bing, Bard (Gemini) and ChatGPT 4.0. Responses were evaluated in relation to their accuracy, readability and presence of disclaimers about health advice. The accuracy was assessed by comparing the recommendations generated with the main guidelines for LBP. The responses were analysed by two independent reviewers and classified as accurate, inaccurate or unclear. Readability was measured with the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES). RESULTS: Out of 120 responses yielding 1069 recommendations, 55.8% were accurate, 42.1% inaccurate and 1.9% unclear. Treatment and self-management domains showed the highest accuracy while risk factors had the most inaccuracies. Overall, LLM-chatbots provided answers that were 'reasonably difficult' to read, with a mean (SD) FRES score of 50.94 (3.06). Disclaimer about health advice was present around 70%-100% of the responses produced. CONCLUSIONS: The use of LLM-chatbots as tools for patient education and counselling in LBP shows promising but variable results. These chatbots generally provide moderately accurate recommendations. However, the accuracy may vary depending on the topic of each question. The reliability level of the answers was inadequate, potentially affecting the patient's ability to comprehend the information.

RESUMEN

Studies reported the existence of instability catch (IC) during trunk flexion in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, different movement speeds can cause different neuromuscular demands resulting in altered kinematic patterns. In addition, kinematic characterization corresponding to clinical observation of IC is still limited. Therefore, this study aimed to determine (1) the association between movement speed and kinematic parameters representing IC during trunk flexion and (2) the differences in kinematic parameters between individuals with and without CLBP. Fifteen no low back pain (NoLBP) and 15 CLBP individuals were recruited. Inertial measurement units (IMU) were attached to T3, L1, and S2 spinous processes. Participants performed active trunk flexion while IMU data were simultaneously collected. Total trunk, lumbar, and pelvic mean angular velocity (T_MV, L_MV, and P_MV), as well as number of zero-crossings, peak-to-peak, and area of sudden deceleration and acceleration (Num, P2P, and Area), were derived. Pearson's correlation tests were used to determine the association between T_MV and L_MV, P_MV, Num, P2P, and Area. An ANCOVA was performed to determine the difference in kinematic parameters between groups using movement speed as a covariate. Significant associations (P < 0.05) were found between movement speed and other kinematic parameters, except for Area. Results showed that L_MV significantly differed from the P_MV (P = 0.002) in the CLBP group, while a significant between-group difference (P = 0.037) was found in the P_MV. Additionally, significant between-group differences (P < 0.05) in P2P and Area were observed. The associations between movement speed and kinematic parameters suggest that movement speed changes can alter kinematic patterns. Therefore, clinicians may challenge lumbopelvic neuromuscular control by modifying movement speed to elicit greater change in kinematic patterns. In addition, the NoLBP group used shared lumbar and pelvic contributions, while the CLBP group used less pelvic contribution. Finally, P2P and Area appeared to offer the greatest sensitivity to differentiate between the groups. Overall, these findings may enhance the understanding of the mechanism underlying IC in CLBP.

Asunto(s)