RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study was performed to investigate the convergent validity, discriminative validity, and reliability of the Brazilian version of the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score in a population with low educational and socioeconomic levels. METHODS: The LARS score was translated into the Portuguese language by forward- and back-translation procedures. In total, 127 patients from a public hospital in Brazil completed the questionnaires. The convergent validity was tested by comparing the LARS score with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core Module 30 (QLQ-C30) and with patients' self-reported quality of life. For the discriminative validity, we tested the ability of the score to differentiate among subgroups of patients regarding neoadjuvant radiotherapy, type of surgery, and tumor distance from the anal verge. The test-retest reliability was investigated in a subgroup of 36 patients who responded to the survey twice in 2 weeks. RESULTS: The LARS score demonstrated a strong correlation with 5 of 6 items from the EORTC QLQ-C30 (P<0.05) and good concordance with patients' self-reported quality of life (95.3%), confirming the convergent validity. The score was able to discriminate between subgroups of patients with different clinical characteristics related to LARS (P<0.001). The agreement between the test and retest showed that 86.1% of the patients remained in the same LARS category, and there was no significant difference between the LARS score numerical values (P=0.80), indicating good reliability overall. CONCLUSION: The Brazilian version of the LARS score is a valid and reliable instrument to assess postoperative bowel function in a population with low educational and socioeconomic levels.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is scarcity of trials about preventative strategies for low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in rectal cancer patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a pre- and post-surgical pelvic floor rehabilitation program on the bowel symptoms, pelvic floor function, and quality of life of rectal cancer patients. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial with parallel groups (pelvic floor rehabilitation versus control group), with a blinded evaluator. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: 56 stage I to III rectal cancer patients aged from 18 to 80 years old undergoing sphincter preservation surgery at Hospital del Salvador and who have a sufficient knowledge of Spanish. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ICIQ-B questionnaire for intestinal symptoms, high-resolution anorectal manometry (Alacer Multiplex 24-channel manometry equipment) for anorectal function, pelvic floor muscle strength test with Oxford Modified Scale, and a quality of life test with the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire. The evaluations will be carried out at five stages: before surgery, before and after the pelvic floor rehabilitation, and during a 3-month and 1-year follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: one pre-rehabilitation session and 9 to 12 sessions of pelvic floor rehabilitation, including patient education, pelvic floor muscle exercises, pelvic floor electromyography biofeedback, and capacitive and sensory rectal training with a balloon probe. Rehabilitation will begin 3-5 weeks before the ileostomy is removed (four sessions) and around 3 weeks after stoma removal (5-8 sessions). DISCUSSION: We expect the program to improve the bowel symptoms, pelvic floor function, and quality of life of rectal cancer patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Register ACTRN12620000040965 . Registered on 21 January 2020.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Resumen Introducción: Las cirugías con preservación de esfínter tienen como consecuencia el desarrollo de una disfunción defecatoria con diferentes grados, la cual es conocida como síndrome de resección anterior baja (LARS) y es medida con el cuestionario LARS Score. Objetivo: Determinar la asociación del cuestionario EuroQol-5 (calidad de vida) con los diferentes grados de LARS Score. Materiales y Método: Estudio de tipo transversal, aplicando el cuestionario LARS Score y EuroQol-5 a pacientes operados por cáncer de recto medio y bajo, durante el periodo 2004-2017. Se realiza análisis demográfico y del tipo de cirugía. Para determinar asociaciones entre variables se utilizan diferentes pruebas estadísticas, considerando significativo un valor de p < 0,05. Resultados: Se encuestó a 54 pacientes, 62,16% hombres, promedio de edad 58,44 años, el 37,03% presentó LARS Mayor. Los índices promedio de calidad de vida para pacientes No LARS es 0,75, para LARS Menor es 0,69 y para LARS Mayor es 0,61, la diferencia entre índices presenta un valor p = 0,246. 46,3% presenta problemas en actividades habituales. LARS Mayor presenta un Odd-Ratio de 3,8 y 4,7 para dolor/malestar y angustia/depresión respectivamente. 70% de los pacientes con LARS Mayor presentaron resección total del mesorrecto (TME) y el 45% corresponde a menores de 65 años. Discusión: No existe diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre los índices de calidad de vida según LARS Score. LARS Mayor tiene mayor posibilidad de desarrollar algún grado de dolor/malestar y angustia/depresión. El porcentaje de LARS Mayor es acorde a lo publicado y la TME es uno de los factores de mayor impacto en el desarrollo de LARS. Conclusiones: El LARS Score se relaciona de manera no significativa con el índice de calidad de vida entregado por el cuestionario EuroQol-5D, existiendo una tendencia a disminuir la calidad de vida a medida que empeora el LARS.

Introduction: Sphincter-sparing surgeries result in the development of a defecatory dysfunction with different degrees, which is known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and is measured with the LARS Score questionnaire. Objective: To determine the association of the EuroQol-5 questionnaire with the different degrees of LARS Score. Materials and Method: Crosssectional study, applying the LARS Score and EuroQol-5 questionnaire to patients operated with low and middle rectal cancer, during the period 2004-2017. Demographic analysis and type of surgery are performed. Different statistical tests are used to determine associations between variables, considering a significant p value < 0.05. Results: 54 patients were surveyed, 62.16% men, mean age 58.44 years, 37.03% presented Mayor-LARS. The average quality of life indices for Non-LARS patients is 0.75, for Minor-LARS is 0.69 and for Mayor-LARS is 0.61, the difference between indices presents a p value = 0.246. 46.3% present problems in habitual activities. LARS Mayor presents an Odd-Ratio of 3.8 and 4.7 for pain/discomfort and anguish/depression respectively. 70% of patients with LARS Mayor presented SMT and 45% corresponded to those under 65 years of age. Discussion: There is no statistically significant difference between the quality of life indices according to the LARS Score. Mayor-LARS is more likely to develop some degree of Pain/Discomfort and anguish/depression. The percentage of Mayor-LARS is according to what has been published and the TME is one of the factors with the greatest impact on the development of LARS. Conclusion: The LARS Score is non-significantly related to the quality of life index provided by the EuroQol-5D questionnaire, and there is a tendency to decrease quality of life as the LARS worsens.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Resumen Durante las últimas décadas los avances en técnicas quirúrgicas, radioterapia y quimioterapia han logrado de forma significativa aumentar la sobrevida y disminuir la recidiva local en el cáncer de recto evitando una colostomía definitiva; sin embargo, este trascendental progreso médico no ha ido acompañado de una mejoría en los resultados funcionales de los pacientes sometidos a una cirugía conservadora de esfínter, siendo el conjunto de síntomas defecatorios posterior a la resección rectal, conocido como síndrome de resección anterior baja (LARS), una secuela prácticamente inevitable, que generalmente se asocia a disfunción sexual, urinaria, dolor crónico, altos costos en rehabilitación y control sintomático, además de una alteración importante en la calidad de vida. En este artículo presentamos una revisión completa y actualizada de las características clínicas y alternativas de tratamiento del LARS, finalizando con una propuesta de manejo integral multidisciplinario que destaca la importancia de la prehabilitación, evaluación objetiva de los síntomas, educación e información adecuada del paciente y su familia, además del trabajo en equipo en unidades especializadas de rehabilitación de piso pélvico, requisito fundamental a la hora de manejar adecuadamente esta patología.

During the last decades, advances in surgical techniques, radiotherapy and chemotherapy have significantly increased survival and reduced local recurrence in rectal cancer, avoiding a definitive colostomy. However, this transcendental medical progress has not been accompanied by an improvement in the functional results of patients after sphincter-preserving rectal resection, being the set of defecatory symptoms after rectal resection, known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), a practically inevitable sequel, which is usually associated with sexual or urinary dysfunction, chronic pain, high costs and an important alteration in the quality of life. In this article, we will present a complete and updated review of the clinical and alternative characteristics of LARS treatment, ending with a proposal for multidisciplinary and integral management that highlights the importance of prehabilitation, objective evaluation of symptoms, education and adequate information of the patient and his family, in addition to teamwork in units specialized in pelvic floor rehabilitation, a fundamental requirement when properly managing this pathology.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

En los últimos 30 años el tratamiento del cáncer del recto ha mejorado significativamente gracias al manejo multidisciplinario y a la introducción del concepto de resección total del mesorrecto (RTM), logrando disminuir las tasas de recidiva local y aumentar la sobrevida. Si bien los avances oncológicos y técnicos en términos de tasas de conservación del esfínter anal son innegables, las secuelas funcionales son significativas, especialmente las relacionadas a la función intestinal, sexual y urinaria. Hasta un 90% de los pacientes sometidos a una RTM refiere secuelas intestinales cuyos síntomas se conocen como el síndrome de la resección anterior baja (SRAB). Recientemente se han diseñado sistemas de valoración específicos que han evidenciado su alta incidencia y prevalencia. En esta revisión se entrega una mirada actualizada de la fisiopatología, factores de riesgo, formas de presentación, evaluación clínica y las distintas alternativas de prevención y tratamiento del SRAB.

In the last 30 years, oncologic outcomes of rectal cancer treatment have been significantly improved due to multimodal management and the introduction of the concept of total mesorectum excision. Although the improvements in oncological treatment and surgical techniques are undeniable, multimodal treatment results in the onset of disorders of the intestinal, sexual and urinary function in a high proportion of these patients. Up to 90% of patients undergoing a low anterior resection refer bowel disorders such as fecal incontinence, urgency, increased frequency and fragmentation of defecation. These elements are included in an entity known as the low anterior resection syndrome and specific assessment tools have been designed recently, evidencing the high incidence and prevalence of this syndrome. In the present review, we update the pathophysiology, risk factors, clinical presentation, evaluation and the alternatives of prevention and treatment of low anterior resection syndrome.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Objective: The authors aim to perform a thorough translation with cultural adaptation of the patient reported outcome tool, Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) Score, to the Portuguese language (LARS-PT) in the Portuguese population with rectal cancer, after proctectomy with anastomosis. Methods: According to the current international recommendations, we designed this study encompassing three main phases: (i) cultural and linguistic validation to European Portuguese; (ii) feasibility and reliability tests of the version obtained in the previous phase; and (iii) validity tests to produce a final version. The questionnaire was completed by 154 patients from six Portuguese Colorectal Cancer Units, and 58 completed it twice. Results: Portuguese version of LARS score showed high construct validity. Regarding the test-retest, the global Intraclass Correlation showed very strong test-retest reliability. Looking at all five items, only items 3 and 5 present a moderate correlation. LARS score was able to discriminate symptoms showing worse quality of life, in patients submitted to preoperative radio and chemotherapy. Conclusions: LARS questionnaire has been properly translated into European Portuguese, demonstrating high construct validity and reliability. This is a precise, reproducible, simple, clear and user-friendly tool for evaluating bowel function in rectal cancer patients after sphincter saving operation.

RESUMO Objetivo: Os autores pretendem fazer uma tradução minuciosa e culturalmente adaptada para a língua portuguesa do escore da Síndrome de Ressecção Anterior Baixa (Low Anterior Resection Syndrome [LARS]), um instrumento de desfecho relatado pelo paciente, na população portuguesa com câncer retal após proctectomia com anastomose. Métodos: De acordo com as recomendações internacionais atuais, o estudo foi projetado abrangendo três fases principais: (i) validação cultural e linguística para o português europeu; (ii) testes de viabilidade e confiabilidade da versão obtida na fase anterior; e (iii) testes de validade para produzir a versão final. O questionário foi preenchido por 154 pacientes de seis unidades portuguesas de câncer colorretal e 58 pacientes completaram duas vezes. Resultados: A versão em português do escore LARS mostrou alta validade de construto. A correlação intra-classe global apresentou confiabilidade muito forte no teste-reteste. Considerando-se todos os cinco itens, apenas os itens 3 e 5 apresentam uma correlação moderada. O escore LARS foi capaz de discriminar sintomas com pior qualidade de vida em pacientes submetidos a radio- e quimioterapia pré-operatória. Conclusões: O questionário LARS foi traduzido corretamente para o português europeu, demonstrando alta validade de construto e confiabilidade. Trata-se de uma ferramenta precisa, reproduzível, simples, clara e fácil de usar para avaliar a função intestinal em pacientes com câncer retal após operações poupando o esfíncter.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introducción: El tratamiento en el cáncer de recto ha progresado en la última década. Hoy es factible ofrecer una cirugía con preservación de esfínteres, realizando anastomosis colorrectales bajas o anastomosis coloanales. Esto ha determinado que muchos pacientes desarrollen disfunción intestinal que puede llegar a ser severa, agrupando una serie de alteraciones que se conocen como síndrome de resección anterior baja. Objetivo: Efectuar una adaptación cultural de la versión 1.0 en español neutro del cuestionario acerca de la función intestinal o Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score (LARS Score), efectuando traducción, comparación de traducciones, traducción inversa y prueba piloto. Resultados: Los resultados obtenidos de la prueba piloto revelan que la población encuestada logró comprender el instrumento, por lo que no se realizaron modificaciones posteriores. Conclusión: Se cuenta con una versión adaptada del cuestionario LARS para ser usada en Chile, la cual puede someterse a procesos de validación y establecer las características psicométricas para ser usada en pacientes con cáncer de recto operados.

Introduction: The treatment of rectal cancer has progressed in the past decade. Nowadays, it's feasible to provide sphincter sparing surgery with low colorectal anastomosis or coloanal anastomosis. This has determined that many patients develop intestinal dysfunctions that can become severe, grouping a number of disorders known as low anterior resection syndrome. Objective: To perform a cultural adaptation of the version 1.0 questionnaire about bowel function or Low Resection Syndrome Score (LARS Score) in neutral Spanish, making a translation, comparing translations, back translation and pilot test. Results: The results of the pilot test showed that the population surveyed understood the instrument, so that no further modifications were made. Conclusion: We now have an adapted version of the LARS questionnaire for use in Chile, which can undergo validation processes to establish the psychometric characteristics for use in patients with rectal cancer surgery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objetivo: Cuantificar el grado de severidad del síndrome de resección anterior baja (SRAB) en pacientes postoperados de cirugía preservadora de esfínteres (CPE). Sede: Unidad de Coloproctología del Hospital General de México ''Dr. Eduardo Liceaga''. Diseño: Estudio descriptivo de cohorte transversal. Análisis estadístico: Porcentajes como medida de resumen para variables cualitativas. Pacientes y métodos: Se incluyeron 30 pacientes tratados con cirugía preservadora de esfínteres, de enero 2007 a diciembre del 2011. A dichos pacientes se les evaluó por medio de la escala de síndrome de resección anterior baja del Hospital Universitario de Aarhus, en Dinamarca, de cinco parámetros. Se evaluó la prevalencia del síndrome de resección anterior baja, intensidad con base en el tiempo y la distancia del tumor al margen anal. Resultados: El 60% de los pacientes se encontró con síndrome de resección anterior baja, con un seguimiento promedio de 20 meses. La incontinencia a líquidos estuvo presente en el 48%, fraccionamiento de defecación 21%, urgencia defecatoria 17%; los otros dos parámetros evaluados prácticamente no se presentaron. El grado más severo de síndrome de resección anterior baja se observó en los primeros 8 meses posteriores a la cirugía y sólo un paciente, después de 24 meses de operado, continuó con sintomatología severa. Los pacientes con tumores entre 7 y 10 cm del margen del ano no desarrollaron las alteraciones evaluadas o éstas fueron leves. Todos los pacientes con un tumor menor de 7 cm desarrollaron alteraciones severas. Conclusión: Las alteraciones más frecuentemente encontradas fueron la incontinencia fecal a líquidos, fraccionamiento de la defecación y urgencia defecatoria. Las alteraciones valoradas mediante la escala de síndrome de resección anterior baja fueron severas en los primeros meses posteriores a la cirugía y cuando el tumor se encontraba más cerca del margen anal.

Objective: To assess the degree of severity of the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in patients after sphincter preserving surgery (SPS). Setting: Coloproctology unit of the General Hospital of Mexico ''Dr. Eduardo Liceaga'' (Third level health care hospital). Design: Cross-sectional cohort descriptive study. Statistical analysis: Percentages as summary measure for qualitative variables. Patients and methods: The study included 20 patients subjected to sphincter preserving surgery, from January 2007 to December 2011. These patients were evaluated according to the five-parameter LARS scale of the Aarhus University Hospital, in Denmark. We assessed prevalence of low anterior resection syndrome, intensity based on time and distance of the tumor from the anal margin. Results: Of the patients, 60% coursed with the low anterior resection syndrome with an average follow-up of 20 months. Incontinence to liquids was present in 48%, fragmented defecation in 21%, urgency to defecate in 17%; the other two assessed parameters were practically inexistent. The most severe degree of low anterior resection syndrome was seen in the first 8 months after surgery and only one patient, after 24 months of the surgery, continued with severe symptoms. Patients with tumors between 7 and 10 cm from the anal margin did not develop the assessed alterations or they were very mild. All patients with a tumor at less than 7 cm developed severe alterations. Conclusion: The most frequently found alterations were fecal incontinence to liquids, fragmented defecation, and urgency to defecate. The alterations assessed by the LARS scale were severe during the first months after surgery and when the tumor was closer to the anal margin.