RESUMEN

A man in his 70s with a history of mitral valve replacement (MVR) and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) presented with effort angina. Coronary angiography revealed severe stenosis of the left main coronary artery (LMCA). As it was an emergent case, PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention) was selected for treatment. Intravascular ultrasonography revealed no atherosclerotic lesions in the LMCA. The LMCA was effectively dilated by the drug-eluting stent. No elevation in intracardiac pressure was observed in cardiac catheterization after PCI. Computed tomography scan indicated potential compression of the LMCA by the surrounding structures. In cases of long-standing persistent AF and an enlarged atrium after MVR, the possibility of LMCA stenosis due to anatomical changes should be considered. Learning Objectives: ◾Peri-valvular regurgitation and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation can potentially cause atrial enlargement.◾Coronary artery stenosis without atherosclerosis can occur due to compression from surrounding structures or shifting of the coronary artery.◾Stent therapy provides a temporary solution and coronary artery bypass grafting or switching should be considered if re-stenosis occurs.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of atrial fibrillation (AF) persistence for predicting poor outcomes after catheter ablation of long-standing AF (LsAF) and the best ablation strategy for these patients remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the impact of the duration of AF persistence on outcomes after catheter ablation of AF. METHODS: We analyzed the Efficacy of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (EARNEST-PVI) trial data comparing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone (PVI-alone) with additional linear ablation or defragmentation (PVI-plus) in persistent AF (PerAF). Patients who received catheter ablation by contact force-sensing catheter were enrolled in the study. In patients with LsAF, the optimal cutoff duration of AF persistence was evaluated. With use of the threshold, patients with LsAF were divided into 2 groups and compared with PerAF <1 year for arrhythmia-free survival after a 3-month blanking period. RESULTS: The optimal cutoff duration was 2.4 years. Of 458 patients, arrhythmia-free survival rates for LsAF 1-2.4 years were comparable to those of PerAF (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.67-1.52). However, LsAF >2.4 years had a higher recurrence risk than PerAF (HR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.42-3.47). In LsAF >2.4 years, the PVI-plus strategy showed advantages over the PVI-alone strategy (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.14-0.89). However, the interaction effect between LsAF 1-2.4 years and LsAF >2.4 years did not reach statistical significance (P = .116). CONCLUSION: Whereas LsAF 1-2.4 years has similar outcomes to those of PerAF, LsAF >2.4 years was linked to higher arrhythmia recurrence risks. For LsAF >2.4 years, the PVI-plus strategy showed a potential to be superior to the PVI-alone strategy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation generally consists in the isolation of the pulmonary veins ("box-lesion"). Bachmann's bundle is a cardiac structure that may play an important role in the genesis of the atrial fibrillation. Surgical isolation of such bundle has not been reported before. We aim to describe how to perform minimally invasive epicardial pulmonary vein isolation along with the isolation of the Bachmann's bundle. Adding the surgical ablation line of Bachmann's bundle is a feasible, fast, and easy procedure that may be contribute to the reduction of atrial fibrillation relapses.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction Cryoballoon ablation (CB) has proven effective to treatment of patients (pts) with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the isolated efficacy of CB to treat pts with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF) is less know. We analyzed the acute results and the long-term follow-up of our pts suffering LSPAF and initially treated with CB. Methods A cohort of 44 pts, 37 male (84%) mean age (60±10 year) suffering LSPAF were treated with first (CB1): 15pts, and second (CB2): 29 pts, generation CB. Eight pts (18.1%) had structural heart disease. Prior to CB, all pts were previously electrically cardioverted (CV) and sinus node and A-V nodal function evaluated at electrophysiological study (EP) once in sinus rhythm (SR) before antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) load. CB ablation procedure was performed after three months waiting period on AAD following CV/EP drug testing. Result CB procedure was performed in 27 (61.4%) in AF, restoring SR in 8 (18.2%). PV isolation (PVI) was achieved in 95.2%. On follow-up of 30±39 months, 16 pts (40%) had AF recurrence. Second procedure (Redo) was performed in 7 pts. After a single procedure, 24 pts (60%) remain in SR without AAD, after Redo, 29 pts (72.5%), and when AAD added, 31 pts (77.5%) remain in SR. Phrenic nerve palsy (PNP) occurred in 9% of pts (75% with CB2). Conclusion CB technique is safe and useful tool to treat pts with LSPAF with 60% success rate maintaining SR without AAD in a long-term follow-up (30±39 months), up to 72.5% after Redo, and to 77.5% when AAD are added. In the majority of pts maintaining SR (77.5%) CB2 was used in 87% of the cases. Patients without structural heart disease along with those who SR was restored during CB showed the best result.