RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the management of solid tumours, routine concepts are increasingly being transformed into individualized patient treatment. Endocrine surgery is traditionally characterized by resection strategies that are adapted to phenotype and genotype of the underlying disease. As complication rates in surgery correlate with the extent of resection, continuous efforts are made to identify selection criteria in order to limit the extent of surgery without compromising the oncological outcome. The aim is to design risk-stratified precision endocrine surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search was carried out in PubMed for new and modern strategies and approaches for oncological endocrine surgery. RESULTS: Several developments in surgical technique and technology, molecular pathology, medical therapy, and study data identify the potential to adapt the surgical strategy in all areas of endocrine surgery. CONCLUSION: According to prevalent data, limited extent of resection in thyroid cancer surgery shows a reduction in complication rates while preserving oncological outcome when adequate selection criteria are implemented. New insights and innovative technologies also influence additional areas in oncological endocrine surgery for parathyroid, adrenal, and neuroendocrine neoplasia. However, the broad practice of these new concepts needs to be evaluated with regard to long-term oncological outcome.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) has a rare incidence with better prognosis than nonmucinous adenocarcinoma. We aimed to investigate the prognosis between limited resection and lobectomy for patients with clinical stage IA IMA ≤ 2 cm. METHODS: Data were taken from two cohorts: In Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital (SPH) corhort, we identified 403 patients with clinical stage IA IMA who underwent surgery. In the SEER corhort, 480 patients with stage T1 IMA who after surgery were included. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) for SPH corhort, lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) for the SEER corhort and overall survival (OS) for both corhort were compared between patients undergoing lobectomy and limited resection by Log-rank and Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: In SPH corhort, patients who underwent limited resection had equivalent prognosis than those underwent lobectomy (5-year RFS: 79.3% versus. 82.6%, p = 0.116; 5-year OS: 86.2% versus. 88.3%, p = 0.235). However, patients with IMA > 2 to 3 cm had worse prognosis than those with IMA ≤ 2 cm (5-year RFS: 73.7% versus. 86.1%, p = 0.007). In the analysis of IMA > 2 to 3 cm subgroup, multivariate analysis showed that limited resection was an independent risk factor of RFS (hazard ratio, 2.417; 95% confidence interval, 1.157-5.049; p = 0.019), while OS (p = 0.122) was not significantly different between two groups. For IMA ≤ 2 cm, limited resection was not a risk factor of RFS (p = 0. 953) and OS (p = 0.552). In the SEER corhort, IMA ≤ 2 cm subgroup, limited resection was equivalent prognosis in LCSS (p = 0.703) and OS (p = 0.830). CONCLUSIONS: Limited resection could be a potential surgical option which comparable to lobectomy in patients with clinical stage IA IMA ≤ 2 cm.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUD: The standard resection for early-stage thymoma is total thymectomy and complete tumour excision with or without myasthenia gravis but the optimal surgery mode for patients with early-stage non-myasthenic thymoma is debatable. This study analysed the oncological outcomes for non-myasthenic patients with early-stage thymoma treated by thymectomy or limited resection in the long term. METHODS: Patients who had resections of thymic neoplasms at Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taiwan between December 1997 and March 2013 were recruited, exclusive of those combined clinical evidence of myasthenia gravis were reviewed. A total of 113 patients were retrospectively reviewed with pathologic early stage (Masaoka stage I and II) thymoma who underwent limited resection or extended thymectomy to compare their long-term oncologic and surgical outcomes. RESULTS: The median observation time was 134.1 months [interquartile range (IQR) 90.7-176.1 months]. In our cohort, 52 patients underwent extended thymectomy and 61 patients underwent limited resection. Shorter duration of surgery (p < 0.001) and length of stay (p = 0.006) were demonstrated in limited resection group. Six patients experienced thymoma recurrence, two of which had combined myasthenia gravis development after recurrence. There was no significant difference (p = 0.851) in freedom-from-recurrence, with similar 10-year freedom-from-recurrence rates between the limited resection group (96.2 %) and the thymectomy group (93.2 %). Tumour-related survival was also not significantly different between groups (p = 0.726).result CONCLUSION: Patients with early-stage non-myasthenic thymoma who underwent limited resection without complete excision of the thymus achieved similar oncologic outcomes during the long-term follow-up and better peri-operative results compared to those who underwent thymectomy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: For patients with stage II and III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), various multi-modality treatments are required. However, depending on the individual conditions of patients, there will be a significant difference in prognosis. Therefore, this study investigated the clinical impact of inadequate treatment (limited surgery and inadequate adjuvant therapy) in patients with NSCLC stage II or III using data from the Korean Association of Lung Cancer Registry (KALC-R) between 2014 and 2016. METHODS: Of the 8,110 new lung cancer cases registered at the Korea Central Cancer Registry in 2014-2016, 721 patients with stage II or III NSCLC were selected and divided into three groups according to differences in cancer treatment methods. In group A, patients underwent standard surgery and completed adjuvant therapy. In group B, patients underwent standard surgery without completing adjuvant therapy. In group C, patients received adjuvant therapy after limited surgery. After performing propensity score matching (PSM) for selected patients, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates of the three groups of patients with stage II and III NSCLC patients were then compared. RESULTS: Of the 721 patients with NSCLC, 239, 437, and 45 belonged to groups A, B, and C, respectively. After 1:3 PS matching for groups B and C, the 5-year survival rate of patients with stage II or III NSCLC were 68.0% and 26.7% for groups B and C, respectively and the DFS rate was 59.1% and 16.2% for groups B and C, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The therapeutic effect of the standard surgery was the best. Although patients received adjuvant therapy, limited resection resulted in a poorer prognosis in compromised patients compared with omitting adjuvant therapy followed by standard surgery. Thus, surgical treatment should be considered in patients who are unable to complete surgical and adjuvant therapy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Although gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are encountered all along the gastrointestinal tract, duodenal GISTs are uncommon and account for <5% of the cases. A 45-year-old woman presented chiefly with anaemia and associated symptoms, whom on further evaluation was found to have a non-metastatic GIST in the distal duodenum sparing the pancreas and major vasculature. Patient was undertaken for segmental duodenectomy with the help of advanced bipolar energy device (tumour occupying D3-D4 with 1 cm proximal margin and 15 cm jejunum) preserving the pancreas and ampulla with end-to-end duodenojejunostomy with an uneventful postoperative course and clear margins on histopathology. Thus, the patient underwent a less morbid procedure with satisfactory oncological outcome and early resumption of activity. This highlights the need to conduct more trials to gather high level evidence in favour of conservative resection and its oncological adequacy and impact on overall survival and recurrence.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many patients with early-stage lung cancer are not candidates for lobectomy because of various factors, with treatment options including sublobar resection or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Limited information exists regarding patient-centered outcomes after these treatments. METHODS: Subjects with stage I-IIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at high risk for lobectomy who underwent treatment with sublobar resection or SBRT were recruited from five medical centers. Quality of life (QOL) was compared with the Short Form 8 (SF-8) for physical and mental health and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) surveys at baseline (pretreatment) and 7 days, 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months after treatment. Propensity score methods were used to control for confounders. RESULTS: Of 337 subjects enrolled before treatment, 63% received SBRT. Among patients undergoing resection, 89% underwent minimally invasive video-assisted thoracic surgery or robot-assisted resection. Adjusted analyses showed that SBRT-treated patients had both higher physical health SF-8 scores (difference in differences [DID], 6.42; p = .0008) and FACT-L scores (DID, 2.47; p = .004) at 7 days posttreatment. Mental health SF-8 scores were not different at 7 days (p = .06). There were no significant differences in QOL at other time points, and all QOL scores returned to baseline by 12 months for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is associated with better QOL immediately posttreatment compared with sublobar resection. However, both treatment groups reported similar QOL at later time points, with a return to baseline QOL. These findings suggest that sublobar resection and SBRT have a similar impact on the QOL of patients with early-stage lung cancer deemed ineligible for lobectomy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Routine preoperative assessment of the tumor marker calcitonin for medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) and the generally improved diagnostics with high-resolution ultrasound, elastography and Doppler function as well as functional imaging, enable the earlier detection of organ-limited, non-metastasized MTC. Thereby, a new treatment option arises for surgical de-escalation in sporadic MTC, moving from routine thyroidectomy with bilateral central lymph node dissection towards unilateral thyroidectomy with ipsilateral central lymph node dissection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A search was carried out in PubMed for surgical approaches and selection of publications with results from limited resection in sporadic MTC. RESULTS: In selected patient cohorts limited resection surgery can achieve adequate oncological results but requires long-term follow-up. DISCUSSION: When sporadic unifocal primary tumors are identified and intraoperative frozen section pathological investigation is consistently employed for assessing the grade of desmoplasia and breach of the tumor capsule, the extent of resection can be intraoperatively adapted. Pivotal prerequisites for this personalized concept include consideration of preoperative clinical criteria and intraoperative surgical assessment in conjunction with the intraoperative frozen section examination in order to achieve an adequate oncological tumor resection and a biochemical cure.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The JCOG0804/WJOG4507L single-arm confirmatory trial indicated a satisfactory 10-year prognosis for patients who underwent limited resection for radiologically less-invasive lung cancer. However, only one prospective trial has reported a 10-year prognosis. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter prospective study coordinated by the National Cancer Center Hospital East and Kanagawa Cancer Center. We analyzed the long-term prognosis of 100 patients who underwent limited resection of a radiologically less-invasive lung cancer in the peripheral lung field. We defined radiologically less-invasive lung cancer as lung adenocarcinoma with a maximum tumor diameter of ≤2 cm, tumor disappearance ratio of ≥0.5 and cN0. The primary endpoint was the 10-year local recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: Our patients, with a median age of 62 years, included 39 males. A total of 58 patients were non-smokers; 87 had undergone wide wedge resection and 9 underwent segmentectomy. A total of four cases were converted to lobectomy because of the presence of poorly differentiated components in the frozen specimen or insufficient margin with segmentectomy. The median follow-up duration was 120.9 months. The 10-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates of patients with lung cancer were both 96.0%. Following the 10-year long-term follow-up, two patients experienced recurrences at resection ends after wedge resection. CONCLUSIONS: Limited resection imparted a satisfactory prognosis for patients with radiologically less-invasive lung cancer, except two cases of local recurrence >5 years after surgery. These findings suggest that patients with this condition who underwent limited resection may require continued follow-up >5 years after surgery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Tumor spread through air spaces (STAS) is now recognized as tumor invasion. However, the association between STAS and procedure-specific outcomes (limited resection and lobectomy) in patients with pathologic stage I lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) is still under investigation. Methods: To investigate whether limited resection predicts poorer survival in such patients, we retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathologic features of a large cohort of 1,566 patients with stage I ADC from 2017 to 2020 and classified them according to STAS status and surgical method. Kaplan-Meier, Cox hazard proportional regression, and propensity score matching (PSM) were adopted for prognostic evaluation. Results: STAS-positive patients had worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in RFS and overall survival (OS) between limited resection and lobectomy, neither for the STAS-negative nor STAS-positive group before matching. After matching, limited resection was found to achieve comparable RFS to lobectomy in STAS-positive patients with pathologic I, IA, or IB stage tumor, (P=0.816, P=0.576, P=0.281, respectively), but worse OS in stage I and stage IB patients (P=0.029, P=0.010, respectively). Furthermore, in multivariable analysis, limited resection was not an independent prognostic factor of RFS or OS. Instead, the high-grade histological subtype was the only independent prognostic factor for RFS (P=0.001). In the subgroup analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) did not improve the outcomes of stage IB STAS-positive patients. Conclusions: Limited resection was associated with worse survival than lobectomy in stage I STAS-positive patients, but not in stage IA STAS-positive patients.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: The indications for limited resection in high-risk patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of the preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in high-risk patients undergoing limited resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: High-risk patients undergoing limited resection for stage I NSCLC in our institution from 2005 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with clinical/pathological Tis/minimally invasive adenocarcinoma and multiple NSCLC were excluded. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Ninety eligible patients were included in this study. Grade ≥2 postoperative complications were significantly more frequent in the low-PNI group (6 cases, 16.6% vs. 7 cases, 12.9%; p=0.03). The rate of death due to other diseases was significantly higher in the low-PNI group than in the high-PNI group (14 cases, 50.0% vs. 11 cases, 25.0%; p=0.002). The multivariate analysis showed that male sex, Brinkman index ≥400, preoperative low PNI and pathological T factor ≥T1c/T2a were independent prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSION: In high-risk patients undergoing limited resection for stage I NSCLC, low PNI was a poor prognostic factor, especially in relation to death from other diseases and lung cancer. The results may support thoracic surgeons in decision-making in relation to the indications for surgery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Mitral valve repair is preferred in patients undergoing surgical treatment for infective endocarditis (IE) of the native mitral valve, however, radical resection of infected tissue and patch-plasty might potentially lead to low or non-durable repair. We aimed to compare a limited-resection and non-patch technique with the classic radical-resection technique. Methods: Eligible candidates were patients with definitive IE of the native mitral valve undergoing surgery between January 2013 and December 2018. Patients were classified according to the surgical strategy into two groups: limited- versus radical-resection strategy. Propensity score matching was used. Endpoints were repair rate, all-cause mortality (30-day and 2-year), re-endocarditis and reoperation at q-year follow-up. Results: After propensity score matching, 90 patients were included. Follow-up was 100% complete. Mitral valve repair rate was 84% in the limited-resection versus 18% in the radical-resection strategy, p < 0.001. The 30-day and 2-year mortality were 20% versus 13% (p = 0.396) and 33% versus 27% (p = 0.490) in the limited-resection versus radical-resection strategy, respectively. The incidence of re-endocarditis during the 2-year follow-up was 4% in the limited-resection strategy versus 9% in the radical-resection strategy, p = 0.677. Three patients in the limited-resection strategy underwent reoperation of the mitral valve, while there were none in the radical-resection strategy (p = 0.242). Conclusions: Although mortality in patients with IE of the native mitral valve remains high, the limited-resection and non-patch surgical strategy is associated with a significantly higher repair rates with comparable 30-day and mid-term mortality, risk of re-endocarditis and re-operation compared to the radical-resection strategy.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sublobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a matter of debate. This study aimed to discuss the feasibility of sublobectomy in patients with pathological-stage IA1-2 confirmed as pathologically invasive but radiologically noninvasive adenocarcinoma. METHODS: From 2011 to 2019, we screened clinical stage IA1-IA2 lung cancer patients who underwent surgery at the Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (GDPH). Inclusion criteria were maximum tumor diameter of 2.0 cm or less, consolidation tumor ratio (CTR) ≤ 0.25, and pathologically confirmed invasive adenocarcinoma. Sublobectomy (segmentectomy and wedge resection) and lobectomy groups were created, and propensity scores were computed. The primary endpoints were lung cancer-specific overall survival (LCSS) and LCS- relapse-free survival (LCS-RFS) after adjusting propensity scores. RESULTS: A total of 1731 patients were screened, and 100 patients were enrolled. The lobectomy group had 51 patients and the limited resection group had 49. No cases relapsed, and two patients died from nontumor causes. For the entire cohort, the 5-year LCSS and 5-year LCS-RFS were 100% in the lobectomy and limited resection groups. When propensity scores matched, there were no differences in LCSS and LCS-RFS between the two groups (LCSS:100%, LCS-RFS 100% in lobectomy and limited resection, respectively). DISCUSSION: Sublobectomy may be curative for pathologically invasive but radiologically noninvasive adenocarcinoma at pathological stage IA1-2.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: A primary duodenal malignant tumor (PDMT) is an extremely uncommon malignancy that originates from a gastrointestinal tract tumor. Currently, there is no unified, effective surgical treatment for PDMTs. In this retrospective study, we sought to analyze and evaluate the surgical procedure for PDMTs including pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and limited resection (LR), expect to inform the management of PDMT. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with PDMT who underwent PD and LR in General Surgery Department of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital from January 2014 to December 2019. The clinical characteristics of the malignant tumors among the different segment of the duodenum were analyzed. We analyzed and compared the efficacy and safety of these two surgical treatments. Through survival result of the patients, we analyzed the survival factors affecting the PDMT. Results: Of the 94 patients, 60 (63.8%) were diagnosed with duodenal adenocarcinomas (DAs), 32 (34.1%) with duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (d-GISTs), and 2 (2.1%) with duodenal lymphomas. Of the duodenal malignancies localized in the descending (D2) segment, 72.6% were DAs, and the initial symptom was jaundice (27.4%). Comparing with D2, d-GISTs were more common in the non-D2 segment (50.0%), and 46.9% of these patients presented with anemia as a primary symptom. PDs (87.1%) were more commonly performed for malignancies localized in the D2 segment, and LRs (59.4%) were more commonly performed for malignancies localized in the non-D2 segment (P<0.05). Conclusions: In this study, we found that PDMT is more likely to occur in the D2 segment than the other segments, and the most common pathological type is DA. Treatment decisions for PD and LR might depend on the tumor type, location, and whether invasion of the pancreas. PD might be the first choice of treatment for PDMTs located in the D2 segment; otherwise, LR would be preferred. Further studies, preferably large randomized clinical trials, are needed to confirm these results.

RESUMEN

Rationale: Approximately a quarter of patients with early stage lung cancer are not medically fit for lobectomy. Limited resection and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) have emerged as alternatives for these patients. Given the equipoise on the effectiveness of the two treatments, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) could have a significant impact on patients' decision-making and treatment outcomes. Objectives: To compare the AE profile between SBRT versus limited resection. Methods: Data were derived from a prospective cohort of patients with stage I-IIA non-small cell lung cancer who were deemed as high-risk for lobectomy recruited from five centers across the United States. Propensity scores and inverse probability weighting were used to compare the rates of 30- and 90-day AEs among patients treated with limited resection versus SBRT. Results: Overall, 65% of 252 patients underwent SBRT. After adjusting for propensity scores, there was no significant difference in developing at least one AE comparing SBRT to limited resection (odds ratio [OR]: 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-1.55 and OR: 1.27; 95% CI: 0.84-1.91 at 30 and 90 days, respectively). SBRT was associated with lower risk of infectious AEs than limited resection at 30 days (OR: 0.05; 95% CI: 0.01-0.39) and 90 days posttreatment (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.17-0.98). Additionally, SBRT was associated with persistently elevated risk of fatigue (OR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.34-4.54 at 30 days and OR: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.52-4.77 at 90 days, respectively), but significantly lower risks of respiratory AEs (OR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.20-0.65 and OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.31-0.86 at 30 and 90 days, respectively). Conclusions: Though equivalent in developing at least one AE, we found that SBRT is associated with less toxicity than limited resection in terms of infectious and respiratory AEs but higher rates of fatigue that persisted up to 3 months posttreatment. This information, combined with data about oncologic effectiveness, can help patients' decision-making regarding these alternative therapies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Radiologically invasive non-small-cell lung cancer, defined as consolidation size to maximum tumour diameter ratio of over 0.5, is associated with pathological invasiveness and worse prognosis. However, there are no real-world, nationwide database studies on limited resections that consider radiological invasiveness. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic validity of limited resection, such as segmentectomy and wedge resection, in cStage IA (TNM 8th edition) radiologically invasive lung cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent complete resection according to the Japanese Joint Committee of Lung Cancer Registry Database. The relationship between surgical procedures and prognosis was examined using stratification by cT factor and radiological invasiveness. RESULTS: Among the 5,692 patients enrolled, lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection were performed in 4,323 (80.0%), 657 (11.5%) and 712 (12.5%) patients, respectively. Multivariable analysis with or without propensity score matching indicated that older age, poor performance status and wedge resection were significantly associated with worse prognosis and that patients who underwent segmentectomy showed an equivalent prognosis to those who underwent lobectomy. Subset analyses revealed that segmentectomy showed an equivalent prognosis to lobectomy in patients with cT1b or less, but not in those with cT1c, especially for non-pure radiological invasive cT1c; 5-year overall survival rates were 91.4% vs 90.4% in cT1b with non-pure radiological invasiveness and 80.0% vs 83.8% in cT1b with pure radiological invasiveness, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Segmentectomy can be an alternative to lobectomy in patients with radiologically invasive lung cancer with cT1b or less but not in those with cT1c.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatoduodenectomy is the standard procedure for duodenal carcinoma of the third or fourth portion. As an alternative option, we developed a novel segmental resection (SR) with partial mesopancreatic and mesojejunal excision (pMME) that enhances radicality. In this report, the surgical technique with video and outcomes are described. METHOD: We performed SR with pMME on seven consecutive patients with third or fourth duodenal carcinoma between 2009 and 2021. We divided the procedure into four sections, including (1) wide Kocher's maneuver, (2) supracolic anterior artery-first approach, (3) dissection of the mesopancreas and mesojejunum, and (4) devascularization of the uncinate process and dissection of duodenum. RESULT: Median operative time was 348 min (range, 222-391 min), and median blood loss was 100 mL (range, 30-580 mL). Major complications of Clavien-Dindo classification grade 3a or more occurred in one patient. All patients achieved R0 resections with 10 mm or more proximal margin. Six cases (85%) were alive without recurrence. CONCLUSION: We developed a radical and safe procedure of SR with pMME as an alternative and less invasive approach for duodenal carcinoma of the third or fourth portion.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Sublobar resection is frequently offered to patients with small, peripheral lung cancers, despite the lack of outcome data from ongoing randomized clinical trials. Sublobar resection may be a particularly attractive surgical strategy for screen-detected lung cancers, which have been suggested to be less biologically aggressive than cancers detected by other means. Using prospective data collected from patients undergoing surgery in the National Lung Screening Trial, we sought to determine whether extent of resection affected survival for patients with screen-detected lung cancer. METHODS: The National Lung Screening Trial database was queried for patients who underwent surgical resection for confirmed lung cancer. Propensity score matching analysis (lobectomy vs sublobar resection) was done (nearest neighbor, 1:1, matching with no replacement, caliper 0.2). Demographics, clinicopathologic and perioperative outcomes, and long-term survival were compared in the entire cohort and in the propensity-matched groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was done to identify factors associated with increased postoperative morbidity or mortality. RESULTS: We identified 1029 patients who underwent resection for lung cancer in the National Lung Screening Trial, including 821 patients (80%) who had lobectomy and 166 patients (16%) who had sublobar resection, predominantly wedge resection (n = 114, 69% of sublobar resection). Patients who underwent sublobar resection were more likely to be female (53% vs 41%, P = .004) and had smaller tumors (1.5 cm vs 2 cm, P < .001). The sublobar resection group had fewer postoperative complications (22% vs 32%, P = .010) and fewer cardiac complications (4% vs 9%, P = .033). For stage I patients undergoing sublobar resection, there was no difference in 5-year overall survival (77% for both groups, P = .89) or cancer-specific survival (83% for both groups, P = .96) compared with patients undergoing lobectomy. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, sublobar resection was the only factor associated with lower postoperative morbidity/mortality (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.98). To compare surgical strategies in balanced patient populations, we propensity matched 127 patients from each group undergoing sublobar resection and lobectomy. There were no differences in demographics or clinical and tumor characteristics among matched groups. There was again no difference in 5-year overall survival (71% vs 65%, P = .40) or cancer-specific survival (75% vs 73%, P = .89) for patients undergoing lobectomy and sublobar resection, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with screen-detected lung cancer, sublobar resection confers survival similar to lobectomy. By decreasing perioperative complications and potentially preserving lung function, sublobar resection may provide distinct advantages in a screened patient cohort.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (D-GISTs) are uncommon mesenchymal tumors and are managed differently to common duodenal epithelial tumors. They may pose surgical challenges due to their unique but complex pancreaticoduodenal location of the gastrointestinal tract near the ampulla of Vater, pancreas, mesenteric blood vessels, biliary and pancreatic ducts. The surgical management of D-GISTs can be performed safely with good oncological outcomes provided an adequate resection margin can be achieved. The current surgical options of resectable primary D-GISTs varies with increasing complexity depending on the location, size and involvement of surrounding structures such as wedge resection with primary closure, segmental resection with small bowel anastomosis or radical pancreaticoduodenectomy. Laparoscopic approaches have been shown to be feasible and safe with good oncological outcomes in experienced hands. The minimally invasive techniques including robotic-assisted approach will likely increase in the future. D-GISTs have a prognosis comparable to gastric and other small bowel GISTs. However, the heterogeneity of different studies and the limited use of systemic tyrosine kinase inhibitor in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings may influence the overall survival of resected D-GISTs. The use of limited resection when condition allows is recommended due to lower surgical morbidity, less postoperative complications and better oncologic outcomes.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: With the advent of high-resolution chest imaging, the number of patients diagnosed with multiple primary lung cancers is increasing. For the treatment of multiple lung cancers, a surgical procedure that preserves pulmonary function while ensuring curability is required. METHODS: The study population included 85 patients with synchronous multiple primary lung cancer who received surgical resection between January 2010 and September 2020. Patients with synchronous lung cancer within the same lobe were excluded, and only patients with ≥2 involved lobes were included. The postoperative pulmonary function was examined at 3-6 months after the surgery. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients had cancers within the ipsilateral lobe, and 18 patients had cancers in bilateral lobes. Seventy-six patients (89.4%) underwent combination surgery with limited resection (e.g., segmentectomy and wedge resection). The preoperative pulmonary functions (mean VC/%VC, mean FEV1 /%FEV1 , and mean %DLCO) were 3.06 L/100.2%, 2.23 L/96.1%, and 117.2%, respectively, and the postoperative pulmonary functions were 2.45 L/81.4%, 1.87 L/81.2%, and 102.6%. In each parameter, the predicted reductions of pulmonary function were almost the same as the predicted values. The 5-year survival rate was 85.0%. The 5-year survival rate according to the most advanced pathological stage was 94.9% for stage I disease, and 62.6% for stage ≥II, which was a significant difference (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment including limited resection, especially segmentectomy and wedge resection, for synchronous multiple primary lung cancer can preserve pulmonary function while ensuring curability.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Standard resection for patients with thymoma is resection of thymoma with total thymectomy (TTx) via median sternotomy. Hence, limited resection for thymoma means a lesser extent of resection of normal thymus compared with a standard procedure, i.e. resection of thymoma with partial thymectomy (PTx). In contrast, minimally invasive resection has been defined as resection of thymoma with TTx via a less-invasive approach. However, to date, few studies have precisely evaluated the differences in surgical and oncological outcomes among these three procedures. This report summarizes the differences among these three procedures with a review of studies (January 2000 to December 2020) focusing on the difference in surgical and oncological outcomes and presents current issues in the surgical management of thymoma. In this report, 16 studies were identified; 5 compared standard resection to limited resection, 9 compared standard resection to minimally invasive resection and 2 compared limited resection to minimally invasive resection. Most studies reported that the surgical and oncological outcomes of limited resection or minimally invasive resection were similar to those of standard resection in patients with early-stage thymoma. However, they did not include a sufficient follow-up period. Both limited resection and minimally invasive resection for early-stage thymoma might be reasonable treatment options. However, they are still promising modes of resection. Further studies with a long follow-up period are needed.

Asunto(s)